臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣司法改革二十年：邁向獨立之路
書刊名：思與言
作者：王金壽
作者(外文)：Wang, Chin-shou
出版日期：2008
卷期：46:2
頁次：頁133-174
主題關鍵詞：司法改革；司法獨立；法官；檢察官；律師；Judicial reform；Judicial independence；Judge；Prosecutor；lawyer
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(22) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:16
  • 共同引用共同引用:67
  • 點閱點閱:86
本文回顧和檢討過去二十年來，台灣司法改革的過程與它的成果和侷限性。我們分別依照改革發起的時間順序來分別討論律師、法官和檢察官的改革。本文指出台灣過去的司法改革，有下列幾個特色：主要改革行動者是年輕的律師與來自司法體系最基層的法官與檢察官、政治人物幾乎不參與這一波司法獨立改革、這些司法體系不同分支的改革者之間很少對話、司法獨立改革已有相當重大的進展、以及司法的民主可問責性此議題幾乎沒有得到任何的關注。
In this paper, we review the historical processes of Taiwan’ judicial reform since democratization and criticize its achievement and limit. We first describe lawyers’, judges’ and prosecutors’ reforms. There are several characteristics in Taiwan’s judicial reforms. The reform participants came from the bottom of the judiciary. Politicians rarely participated in the reform movements. The reform movements of different judicial branches did not have much dialogues and cooperation. Judicial independence has made great progresses. The issue of judiciary’s democratic accountability was ignored.
期刊論文
1.朱朝亮(20070100)。從檢察官天職，回首檢改十年。檢察新論，1，53-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Ferejohn, John(2002)。Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law。Law & Contemporary Problems，65(3)，41-68。  new window
3.Toharia, José J.(1975)。Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian -Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain。Law and Society Review，9(3)，475-496。  new window
4.呂太郎(20001200)。臺灣之審判獨立與司法行政。法官協會雜誌，2(2)，95-106。  延伸查詢new window
5.Stephenson, Matthew C.(2003)。When the Devil Turns…: The Political Foundation of Independent Judicial Review。Journal of Legal Studies，32，59-89。  new window
6.劉恆妏(20020300)。戰後臺灣司法人之研究--以司法官訓練文化為主的觀察。思與言，40(1)，125-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Croley, Steven P.(1995)。The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law。University of Chicago Law Review，62(2)，689-794。  new window
8.呂太郎(19960200)。司法改革運動之回顧與前瞻。律師通訊，197，32-41。  延伸查詢new window
9.王金壽(20060600)。臺灣的司法獨立改革與國民黨侍從主義的崩潰。臺灣政治學刊，10(1)，103-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王金壽(20070900)。獨立的司法、不獨立的法官？--民主化後的司法獨立與民主監督。臺灣社會研究季刊，67，1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Dakolias, Maria(1995)。A Strategy for Judicial Reform: The Experience in Latin America。Virginia Journal of International Law，36(1)，167-231。  new window
12.Dakolias, Maria(2000)。Legal and Judicial Development: The Role of Civil Society in the Reform Process。Fordham International Law Journal，24(6)，26-55。  new window
13.Finkel, Jodi(2004)。Judicial Reform in Argentina in the 1990s: How Electoral Incentives Shape Institutional Change。Latin American Research Review，39(3)，57-80。  new window
14.Finkel, Jodi(2005)。Judicial Reform as Insurance Policy: Mexico in the 1990s。Latin American Politics and Society，47(1)，87-113。  new window
15.王金壽(2012)。台灣司法政治的興起。台灣政治學刊，16(1)，59-117。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hirschl, Ran(2004)。Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Perry, H. W.(1991)。Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United, States Supreme Court。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Merryman, John Henry(1985)。The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America。Stanford University Press。  new window
4.Guarnieri, Carlo、Pederzoli, Patrizia(2002)。The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.司法院史實紀要編輯委員會(1982)。司法院史實紀要。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡蕙寧(1994)。法律企業家林敏生。台北：月旦。  延伸查詢new window
7.Ginsburg, Tom(2003)。Judicial Review in New Democracies。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Kramer, Larry D.(2004)。The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Tushnet, Mark V.(1999)。Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
10.謝長廷(1987)。法治的騙局。久大。  延伸查詢new window
11.Chavez, Rebecca Bill(2004)。The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina。Stanford University Press。  new window
12.Domingo, Pilar、Sieder, Rachel(2001)。The Rule of Law in Latin America: The International Promotion of Judicial Reform。University of London Institute of Latin American Studies。  new window
13.Ramseyer, J. Mark、Rasmusen, Eric(2003)。Measuring Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan。University of Chicago Press。  new window
14.Shapiro, Martin(1981)。Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis。University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.王文玲和蕭白雪(2007)。為官的品格：陳定南還沒完成的志業與自傳。  延伸查詢new window
2.王己由(1994)。法官評鑑地院院長結果出爐 受評十九人總平均不及格 高低分差四倍多。  延伸查詢new window
3.王金壽(2003)。台灣司法獨立的發源地：台中地方法院三○三室。  延伸查詢new window
4.王金壽(2003)。想我屏東地檢的弟兄們。  延伸查詢new window
5.王金壽(2006)。法治作為一種動員策略：台中地院三○三室的故事。  延伸查詢new window
6.田習如(1994)。三○三室是司法改革基地。  延伸查詢new window
7.呂太郎編(1994)。司法改革實錄。  延伸查詢new window
8.沈明倫(2008)。「特別偵察組」實務運作之檢討。  延伸查詢new window
9.呂東熹。剛正不阿的現代包青天--高新武。  延伸查詢new window
10.張升星(2005)。民間司改會十年的回顧與檢討。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳東豪(1994)。「士林的」大送黃金、「台中的」大搞革命。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳瑞仁(2007)。輸掉戰役，贏得戰爭。  延伸查詢new window
13.新新聞(1989)。司法獨立的第一線曙光：論高新武檢察官抗命辦案的意義。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉幸義(1989)。真的需要事前審閱制嗎？。  延伸查詢new window
15.檢改會編著(2008)。正義之箭：檢改會十週年紀念專輯。  延伸查詢new window
16.檢察官改革協會（陳瑞仁編）(1999)。檢察改革實錄。  延伸查詢new window
17.Allan, James(2006)。Judicial Appointments in New Zealand: If it were done when ‘tis done, then ‘twere well it were done openly and directly。  new window
18.Barros, Robert(2002)。Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution。  new window
19.Burbank, Stephen B. and Barry Friedman(2002)。Reconsidering Judicial Independence。  new window
20.Cappelletti, Mauro(1985)。Who Watches the Watchmen?。  new window
21.Cover, Robert M.(1975)。Justice Accused: Antislavery and Judicial Process。  new window
22.Friedrich, C. J.(1950)。Constitutional Government and Democracy。  new window
23.Georgakopoulos, Nicholas A(2000)。Discretion in the Career and Recognition Judiciary。  new window
24.Guarnieri, Carlo(2001)。Judicial Independence in Latin Countries of Western Europe。  new window
25.Hammergren, A. Linn(1998)。The Politics of Justice and Justice Reform in Latin America: The Peruvian Case in Comparative Perspective。  new window
26.Helmke, Gretchen(2005)。Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina。  new window
27.Huang, Yuan-Kuang(2005)。New Generation of Taiwanese Prosecutors。  new window
28.Kuo, Shu-Chin.(2003)。Gender and Discipline in Law。  new window
29.Magalhaes, Pedro C.(1999)。The Politics of Judicial Reform in East Europe。  new window
30.Muller, Ingo(1991)。Hilter's Justice: The Court of the Third Reich。  new window
31.O’Brien, David M. and Yasuo Ohkoshi(2001)。Stifling Judicial Independence from Within。  new window
32.Pederzoli, Patrizia and Carlo Guarnieri(1997)。Italy: A Case of Judicial Democracy?。  new window
33.Prillaman, William C.(2000)。The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule if Law。  new window
34.Resnik, Judith(2005)。Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure。  new window
35.Russell, Peter H.(2001)。Toward a General Theory of Judicial Independence。  new window
36.Seidman, Louis Michael(1988)。Ambivalence and Accountability。  new window
37.Shetreet, Shimon(1985)。Judicial Independence: New Conceptual Dimensions and Contemporary Challenges。  new window
38.Winn, Jane Kaufman and Tang-chi Yeh(1995)。Advocating Democracy: The Role of Lawyer in Taiwan's Political Transformation。  new window
39.Wang, Chin-Shou.(2007)。The Rule of Law and Democracy as Movement Strategy: Explaining Judicial Independence Reform in Taiwan。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳鋕銘(2008)。檢察官改革與檢改團體—檢察官改革協會。正義之劍：檢改會十週年紀念專輯。展聖企業。  延伸查詢new window
2.檢察官改革協會(2008)。十年檢改的里程碑！--法院組織法檢察官制度重大變革修正完成立法。正義之劍：檢改會十週年紀念專輯。展勝企業。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：469（臺灣：463，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1430120 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67238189
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上