The judicial review of administrative adjudication in cases of great public interests, so the case of siting of the Science Park of Mid-Taiwan, is a problem to be reconsidered in Taiwan. As for judicial review of questions of law, the judicial branch in charge has apparently not the specialized knowledge and capability of the final determination about the factfinding, self restraints is necessary, but in case of great public interests, the German model has changed since 1990, a new standards of judicial review is born, it requires the balancing of functional boundary of courts, intensity of the intervention of human rights and all other relevant factors of the case-type is necessary. As for judicial review of questions of law, so it must be taken into account, that judges are real specialist of questions of law, and therefore competent to overrule the legal opinions proposed by the administrative agency, and therefore annul the administrative adjudication. But however, about the question of fact, the stander of review could be somehow lowered, according to the structures and regulations of the policy field in concern. And yet, the German model remains probably an exception of the world. In the siting case, the Taipei Administrative Court, by way of ”abuse of judgement”, took an intensive review of questions of fact and annulled the adjudication, which reflects somehow the changing idea expressed in the new Germen model.