:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:白樂晴的「超克『分斷體制』」論--參照兩韓思想兩岸
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:陳光興 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Kuan-hsing
出版日期:2009
卷期:74
頁次:頁3-47
主題關鍵詞:白樂晴分斷體制超克民族文學第三世界兩韓兩岸關係Paik Nak-chungDivision systemOvercomingNational literatureThird worldTwo KoreasTaiwan and Mainland China
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:146
  • 點閱點閱:56
本文為2008 年台社二十週年會議超克分斷體制組的六篇文章之一,應與其他文章一同閱讀;本文受到的分工在通過白樂晴在兩韓脈絡中發展出來的超克分斷體制論為參照,思考兩岸問題。本文首先根據白樂晴的英文著作及中文翻譯中,追蹤與耙梳他在1970 年代提出民族文學論如何與第三世界的問題意識相結合,到了1980 年代因參與民眾運動與回應馬克思主義的挑戰,逐步形成分斷體制的分析概念,一直到90 年代將分斷體制上升到理論建構。以兩韓經驗為基礎,本文進入兩岸問題思想層次的討論,從相互參照中揭示超克分斷體制的困境與契機,主要核心論點在於,兩岸要能走向和解,必須超脫民族主義的史觀,放在世界史與區域史的視野,才能解釋帝國主義與殖民主義的動力如何在歷史進程中造成今天對峙的格局。因此,超克分斷體制必須發展成長期的知識計畫,一方面對分斷體制本身的歷史形構進行研究,一方面重建史觀,才能打開既有對於統獨問題窄化的認識。
The essay is an integral part of the six papers presented by the “Overcoming ‘division system’” group in the 20th Anniversary Conference of the Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, and therefore should be read along the side of other essays. This specific essay aims at approaching the problematic of Taiwan and Mainland China relation by inter-referencing the experiences of the two Koreas, as articulated in Paik Nak-chung’s theory of overcoming division system. It traces, in his English writing and translations in Chinese, the background in the 1970s for the proposal of a distinctive project of “national literature” and its relation to the Third world; in the 1980s, in his engagement in the People’s Movement and responses to the Marxist challenge, Paik began to develop the concept of “division system”, and then more systematically theorize it in the 1990s. On the basis of Paik’s theory, the essay moves on to unpack the conditions of the Taiwan-mainland relations with reference to the experiences of the two Koreas. It argues that, to move towards reconciliation, we will need to develop a historical worldview, which will overcome the self-centered nationalist historiography on both sides; by bringing global and regional history to the center of analysis, the dynamic history of imperialism and colonialism will be able to offer explanation on the formation of the division itself. Therefore, overcoming the division system needs to be understood as a long term intellectual-political project, to study the historical formation of the division system, on the one hand, and to reconstruct historiography so that the narrowing tendency of existing ways to understand the unification or independence can be overcome.
期刊論文
1.崔末順(20060600)。韓國的現代性經驗與全球化時代的挑戰。當代,108=226,90-107。  延伸查詢new window
2.崔末順(20080300)。韓國民族文學論的建構及其焦點:以白樂晴的民族文學論為中心。臺灣社會研究,69,239-263。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.白永瑞(2008)。東亞論述與近代適應與超克的雙重課題:一個《創作與批評》的視覺。台灣社會研究季刊,71,255-274。  延伸查詢new window
4.白樂晴(2008)。東亞和解的障礙:兩韓問題及其區域性的意涵。台灣社會研究季刊,71,201-213。  延伸查詢new window
5.李旭淵(2008)。〈白樂晴與韓國之民族文學以及分斷體制克服運動〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,69期,229-238。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.柳浚弼(2008)。〈韓國知識界東亞論述現況試探:以《創作與批評》社團的分裂體制論與東亞論述為中心〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,72期,309-324。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.崔末順(2004)。〈光復後韓國文學的發展面貌〉。《當代》,201期,4-21。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳映真(1989)。〈韓國文民眾的反對文化〉。《人間》,44期,8。  延伸查詢new window
9.Kim, Young-hee(2001)。“Doing a literary journal in a divided country: Changbi, its history and projects”。Inter-Asia Cultural Studies,2(3),355-359。  new window
10.Paik, Nak-chung(1993)。The Idea of a Korean National Literature Then and Now。Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique,1(3),553-580。  new window
11.Paik, Nak-chung(1993)。South Korea: Unification and the Democratic Challenge。New Left Review,1(197),67-43。  new window
12.Paik, Nak-chung(1996)。“National and Transnational Claims on Civil Society: A South Korean Contribution,”。Seoul Journal of Korean Studies,vol. 9。  new window
13.Paik, Nak-chung(1996)。“Habermas on National Unification in Germany and Korea,”。New Left Review,1(219),14-21。  new window
14.Paik, Nak-chung(2000)。“Coloniality in Korea and a South Korean Project for Overcoming Modernity”。Interventions,2(1),73-86。  new window
圖書
1.黃皙暎、陳寧寧(2002)。悠悠家園。臺北縣中和市:INK印刻。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃晳暎、金勝一、苗春梅(2006)。客人。上海:上海譯文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳光興(20060000)。去帝國:亞洲作為方法。臺北:行人出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.白樂晴、金正浩、鄭仁甲(1998)。全球化時代的文學與人:分裂體制下韓國的視角。北京:中國文學出版。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃晳暎(1988)。當代世界小說家讀本。台北:光復書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Paik, Nak-chung、Sol Chun-gyu(2005)。The Shaking Division System。Seoul:Changbi Publisher。  new window
圖書論文
1.Paik, Nak-chung(1995)。“The Reunification Movement and Literature,”。South Korea’s Minjung Movement: The Culture and Politics of Dissidence。University of Hawaii Press。  new window
2.Paik, Nak-chung(1998)。“Nations and Literatures in the Age of Globalization,”。The Cultures of Globalization。Duke University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE