:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:心理空間理論與《論語》中的隱喻分析
書刊名:華語文教學研究
作者:吳佩晏張榮興 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Pei-yenChang, Jung-hsing
出版日期:2010
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁97-124
主題關鍵詞:心理空間理論隱喻華語教學論語Mental space theoryMetaphorChinese teachingAnalects
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:56
  • 點閱點閱:169
《論語》中的語句簡短精鍊,卻蘊含豐富的哲理。讀者要從簡短的字句中領會篇章傳達的深奧思想,需要先理解隱喻運作的脈絡。本文以心理空間理論(Fauconnier 1994, 1997;Fauconnier & Turner 2002)為基礎,分析《論語》中隱喻篇章的概念建構過程。本文認為背景知識及上下文語境是影響篇章理解的重要因素。根據心理空間理論,我們建立輸入空間之間的對應關係,尋求兩個輸入空間的共同之處,進而透過背景知識及上下文語境所提供的訊息融合出篇章傳達的真正意涵。本文認為透過篇章意義的建構過程,將有助於對《論語》中隱喻的理解與分析,使華語學習者能更容易掌握篇章意旨,達到有效理解《論語》篇章的目的。
This paper takes the Analects as example to analyze the process of metaphorical meaning constructions, within the framework of Mental Space Theory (Fauconnier, 1994, 1997;Fauconnier & Turner, 2002). Sentences in the Analects are very short but full of philosophy. It has been shown in the paper that background knowledge and contextual meaning will help readers comprehend the implication conveyed by the sentences. To account for how metaphorical meanings are interpreted in the Analects, we set up input spaces and find out the general features shared by the input spaces to figure out the blending meaning from the context and background knowledge. The process of how metaphorical meanings are constructed in this paper will help the readers to comprehend Analects more efficiently.
期刊論文
1.張榮興(2008)。華語篇章中的攝取角度。Journal of Chinese Language Teaching,5(2),47-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張榮興、黃惠華(2006)。從心理空間理論看「最短篇」小說中之隱喻。Journal of Chinese Language Teaching,3(1),117-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Fillmore, Charles J.(1985)。Frames and the Semantics of Understanding。Quaderni di Semantica,6(2),222-254。  new window
4.張榮興、黃惠華(20051000)。心理空間理論與「梁祝十八相送」之隱喻研究。語言暨語言學,6(4),687-705。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.戴浩一(2002)。概念結構與非自主性語法─漢語語法概念系統初探。當代語言學,4(1),1-12。  延伸查詢new window
6.Coulson, Seana、Oakley, Todd(2000)。Blending Basics。Cognitive Linguistics,11(3)/11(4),175-196。  new window
7.Grady, Joseph(2000)。Cognitive Mechanisms of Conceptual Integration。Cognitive Linguistics,11(3)/11(4),335-345。  new window
圖書
1.Turner, Mark(2003)。Literacy and cognition。Reading between the Lines: Perspectives on Foreign Language Literacy。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
2.Fauconnier, Gilles(1997)。Mapping in Thought and Language。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Fauconnier, Gilles、Turner, Mark(2002)。The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
4.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark、Chou, Shizhen(1980)。Metaphors We Live By。University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Fauconnier, Gilles(1985)。Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language。Cambridge:Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
6.周世箴(20030000)。語言學與詩歌詮釋。臺北:晨星。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Saeed, John I.(2003)。Semantics。Blackwell Publishers。  new window
8.王熙元(1981)。論語通釋。臺北市:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.胡壯麟(2004)。認知隱喻學。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Johnson, Mark(1987)。The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason。University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.Lakoff, George P.、Johnson, Mark、周世箴(2006)。我們賴以生存的譬喻。聯經出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.錢穆(1988)。論語新解。東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.南懷瑾(1992)。論語別裁。論語別裁。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Coulson, Seana(2000)。Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction。Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction。Cambridge。  new window
15.Glucksberg, S.、Keysar, Boaz(1993)。How Metaphors Work。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge/New York。  new window
16.Fauconnier, Gilles(1999)。Introduction to Methods and Generalization。Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology。Berlin。  new window
17.Fauconnier, Gilles(2001)。Conceptual Blending and Analogy。The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Sciences。Cambridge, MA。  new window
18.Langacker, Ronald W.(1987)。Functions of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisities。Functions of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisities。Stanford。  new window
19.Mendoza, Francisco J. Ruiz、Peña Cervel, M. Sandra(2005)。Conceptual Interaction, Cognitive Operations, and Projection Spaces。Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction。Berlin。  new window
20.于丹(2008)。于丹《論語》感悟。于丹《論語》感悟。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.李炳南(1989)。論語講要。論語講要。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
22.傅佩榮(2008)。人能弘道:傅佩榮談論語。臺北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
23.楊伯峻(1987)。論語釋注。論語釋注。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.楊義(2006)。論語選評。論語選評。香港。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(西漢)司馬遷(1988)。史記,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE