:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:督導關係中的權力意涵研究--受督者觀點
書刊名:中華輔導與諮商學報
作者:蔡曉雯郭麗安楊明磊 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsai, Hsiao-wenKuo, Li-anYang, Ming-lei
出版日期:2010
卷期:27
頁次:頁39-77
主題關鍵詞:督導關係諮商督導權力Counseling supervisionPower relationshipSupervisory relationship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:527
  • 點閱點閱:104
本研究目的為了解受督者在督導關係中的權力經驗,共訪談三位女性與二位男性受督者。研究結果以「督導關係中的權力意涵」、「負向權力經驗中的督導作為與互動」、「正向權力經驗中的督導作為與互動」、及「權力經驗的新覺察」四部分呈現。結果顯示受督者所知覺的督導權力包括:權力來自於角色任務與位階差距、權力是受督者對權威的投射、權力是遊戲規則的主導權、權力是讓人挫折與受傷的能力、權力是獲得受督者認同的程度、權力是增權的能力、權力是角色與性別的交互作用、權力來自於強勢的分析與詮釋。研究結果也彙整出八種負向權力經驗中的行為與互動,及八種正向權力經驗中的行為與互動,以及七項受訪者對督導權力的新覺察。最後,根據研究結果對督導實務工作與未來研究者提供相關建議。
The study aimed to explore the power experience in counseling supervisory relationship from supervisees' perspectives. We interviewed three female and two male supervisees. The result showed that supervisees perceived powers of their supervisors emanating from the following sources: role and status, supervisees' projections of his/her emotions, supervisors' dominant knowledge of rules, frustration and suffering of the supervisees, the degree of supervisees' identification with supervisors, abilities deriving from supervisors' empowerment, the interaction of role and gender, and supervisors' analyses and interpretation of supervisees' behavior. The findings describe eight types of interaction in both negative and positive aspects of power experience, and seven types of supervisees' novel awareness of power after the interview. Finally, suggestions for supervision practice and further studies were provided.
期刊論文
1.施香如(20000300)。督導者與諮商員在督導過程中的知覺差異研究。中華輔導學報,8,1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Holloway, Elizabeth L.、Wolleat, Patricia L.(1994)。Supervision: The Pragmatics of Empowerment。Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation,5(1),23-43。  new window
3.Murphy, M. J.、Wright, D. W.(2005)。Supervisees' perspectives of power use in supervision。Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,31(3),283-295。  new window
4.許韶玲(20011200)。受督導者於督導過程中的焦慮來源及對焦慮的因應策略之探討。諮商與輔導,192,6-10。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳金燕(20030600)。自我覺察在諮商專業中之意涵:兼論自我覺察督導模式。應用心理研究,18,59-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.連廷嘉、徐西森(20030600)。諮商督導者與實習諮商員督導經驗之分析。應用心理研究,18,89-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.許韶玲(2003)。督導者知覺受督者影響督導過程之因素。應用心理研究,18,113-144。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊明磊(2003)。督導制度的脈絡意義。應用心理研究,19,6-13。  延伸查詢new window
9.Ellis, M. V.,、Douce, L. A.(1994)。Group s upervision of novice clinical supervisors: Eight recurring issues。Journal of Counseling and Development,72 (5),520-525。  new window
10.Garrett, T.(1997)。Trainer-trainee bullying。Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,7(3),227-232。  new window
11.Holloway, E. L., Freund, R. D., Gardner, S. L., Nelson, M. L.,、Walker, B. R.(1989)。Re- lation of power and involvement to theoretical orientation in supervision: An analysis of discourse。Journal of Counseling Psychology,36 (1),88-102。  new window
12.Jacobs, C.(1991)。Violations of the supervisory relationship: An ethical and educational blind spot。Social Work,36(2),130-135。  new window
13.Kottler, J. A.(1991)。Confronting our own hypocrisy: Being a model for our students and clients。Journal of Counseling and Development,70(4),475-476。  new window
研究報告
1.Sumerel, M. B.(1994)。Parallel Process in Supervision (Report no. EDO-CG-94-15)。Washington, DC。  new window
學位論文
1.Markoczy, E.(2004)。Parallel process and supervisees' openness in psychotherapy supervision: A qualitative analysis,CA。  new window
2.黃靚琦(2002)。督導者權力濫用與社會工作者因應行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。靜宜大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡曉雯(2003)。年輕國會助理的權力覺察與行動策略研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.Breaux, D. N. T.(2004)。Development and psychometric utility of the revised supervision relationship survey。  new window
5.Smoot, T. Y.(2001)。Analysis of the power dynamics within consultation supervisory dyads over time。  new window
圖書
1.柯勝文、Dye, T(2000)。權力與社會—社會科學導論(Power & society)。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
2.Borders, L. D.、Brown, L. L.(2005)。The New Handbook of Counseling Supervision。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Inc.。  new window
3.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan, Alain(1977)。Discipline and Punish - The Birth of the Prison。London:Allen Lane:Penguin Press。  new window
4.Wrong, Dennis H.、高湘澤、高全余(1994)。權力:它的形式、基礎和作用。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bernard, J. M.、Goodyear, R. K.(2004)。Fundamentals of clinical supervision。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon:Pearson Education。  new window
6.黃光國(19980000)。知識與行動:中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.王文秀、施香如、沙大荒、Holloway, E. L(1999)。臨床督導工作的理論與實務(Clinical supervision - A systems approach.)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.林葦芸、Lukes, S.(2006)。權力:基進觀點(Power: A radical view)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
9.徐西森、廖鳳池(2002)。諮商督導歷程、功能與任務之分析研究—以系統取向督導模式(SAS)為架構。諮商與心理治療實習和專業監督學術研討會論文集。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
10.孫非、Blau, P. M.(1988)。社會生活中的交換與權力(Exchange & power in social life. )。台北。  延伸查詢new window
11.靳建國、Russell, B.(1989)。論權力(Power. )。台北。  延伸查詢new window
12.蔡麟筆譯、Kakabadse, A.,、Parker, C(1990)。權力政治與組織(Power, politics, and organizations.)。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
13.Copeland, S.(2005)。Counseling supervision in organizations: Professional and ethical dilemmas explored。London。  new window
14.Forsyth, D. R.(1998)。Power。Group dynamics。CA。  new window
15.Porter, N.,、Vasquez, M.(1997)。Covision: Feminist supervision, process, and collabo-ration。Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, re-search, and practice。Washington, DC。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃光國(19880000)。中國人的權力遊戲。中國人的心理。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE