:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:主與客的劃界:剖析司馬庫斯部落觀光發展中存在的真實性
書刊名:戶外遊憩研究
作者:趙芝良 引用關係徐霈馨周碩雄 引用關係
作者(外文):Chao, Chih-liangHsu, Pei-hsinChou, Shou-shiung
出版日期:2010
卷期:23:1
頁次:頁85-107
主題關鍵詞:真實性部落觀光自主性AuthenticityEthnic tourismAutonomy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:210
  • 點閱點閱:56
觀看「他者」一直是主流社會從事觀光活動時的一部份,而「他者」被視為找尋異族情趣中的差異性和興奮性的來源,然而原住民觀光的發展在主流社會觀光客夾帶大量豐沛的資源進入到部落的同時該如何處理與應對?本研究藉由觀光空間與活動符碼的解讀,展示司馬庫斯觀光發展過程中背後所欲呈現之企圖,以及在面對任何可能性的同時如何堅持自己的主張並實踐自身存在的真實性之追求。研究自2006年1月至2009年6月底以民族誌方式進行資料蒐集。得以下結論:司馬庫斯在觀光發展過程中,活動型態與空間型態上的轉變以部落自決為本,來達成存在性真實的實踐與主體性的表達,並拓及未來發展的可能性。研究結果對於台灣原住民部落觀光發展上真實性與自主性有更深一層之理解,研究建議存在性真實之概念可運用於未來相關研究與觀光規劃之中。
In many senses, viewing the ‘other’ has always been a part of the tourist activity of dominant society. The ‘other’ has been seen as a source of potential exotic pleasure brought about by differences and excitement. However, how the indigenous village handles the touristic matters when the ubiquitous tourists pour into the village? This study examines the issue of authenticity in touristic space and activity, how Smangus Village pursuing the concept of existential authenticity through its tourism development and tourism activity. The field survey started in January, 2006 and ended in June, 2009. The data were collected through ethnographic methods. This study shows that Smangus are entitled to evolve in response to change circumstances (space and activity) in their own way, instead of as others expect — claiming and exercising that freedom is the ultimate expression of existential authenticity. The research results will enhance the understanding of autonomy and authenticity matters of the aboriginal villages in Taiwan and suggests how existential authenticity concept can be used in the future research and in tourism planning.
期刊論文
1.MacCannell, D.(1973)。Staged authenticity: The arrangement of social space in tourist settings。American Journal of Sociology,79,589-603。  new window
2.Cohen, E.、Cooper, R. L.(1986)。Language and tourism。Annals of Tourism Research,13(4),533-563。  new window
3.黃翰瑩(2006)。司馬庫斯守望家園。國家公園季刊,9,66-69。  延伸查詢new window
4.Van den Berghe, P. L.、Keyes, C. F.(1984)。Introduction: Tourism and re-createdethnicity。Annals of Tourism research,11(3),343-352。  new window
5.Till, K. E.(1993)。Neo-traditional towns and urban villages: the cultural production of ageography of otherness。Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,11(6),709-732。  new window
6.Maoz, D.(2006)。The mutual gaze。Annals of Tourism Research,33(1),221-239。  new window
7.Hughes, George(1995)。Authenticity in tourism。Annals of Tourism Research,22(4),781-803。  new window
8.Steiner, C. J.、Reisinger, Y.(2006)。Understanding Existential Authenticity。Annals of Tourism Research,33(2),299-318。  new window
9.Wang, Ning(1999)。Rethinking authenticity in Tourism experience。Annals of Tourism Research,26(2),349-370。  new window
10.Reisinger, Y.、Steiner, C. J.(2006)。Reconceptualizing object authenticity。Annals of Tourism Research,33(1),65-86。  new window
11.Cohen, Erik(1979)。A phenomenology of tourist experiences。Sociology: the journal of the British Sociological Association,13(2),179-201。  new window
12.Cohen, Erik(1988)。Authenticity and Commoditization in Tourism。Annals of Tourism Research,15(3),371-386。  new window
13.洪廣冀、林俊強(20040900)。觀光地景、部落與家--從新竹司馬庫斯部落的觀光發展探討文化與共享資源的管理。地理學報,37,51-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Cohen, Erik(1979)。Rethinking the sociology of tourism。Annals of Tourism Research,6(1),18-35。  new window
15.Edensor, T.(2001)。Performing tourism, staging tourism: (Re)producing。Tourist Spaceand Practice,1,59-82。  new window
16.Gordon, R.(1990)。The prospects for anthropological tourism in Bushmanland。Cultural Survival Quarterly,14 (1),6-8。  new window
17.Sweet, J. D.(1989)。Burlesquing the other in Pueblo performance。Annals of Tourism Research,16(1),62-75。  new window
18.Van der Duim, R., Peters, K.,、Wearing, S.(2005)。Planning host and guestinteractions: Moving beyond the empty meeting ground in African encounters。CurrentIssues in Tourism,8(4),286-305。  new window
會議論文
1.紀駿傑(1998)。從觀光原住民到原住民自主的觀光。原住民文化與觀光休閒發展研討會,中華民國戶外遊憩協會(主辦) 。臺北:中華民國戶外遊憩學會:臺灣原住民文教基金會。21-36。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王志弘、Castells, M.(1999)。流動空間中社會意義的重建,空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本。台北巿:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Foucault, M.、王志弘、夏鑄九(1999)。地理學問題,空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本。台北巿:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Rabinow, P.(1984)。Space, Knowledge, and Power。The Foucault Reader。New York:Pantheon Books。  new window
4.Hendry, J.(2000)。The orient strikes back: A global view of cultural display。Oxford::Berg。  new window
5.Katznelson, Ira(1992)。Marxism and the City。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.王志弘、Bourdieu B.(1999)。社會空間與象徵權力,空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本。台北巿:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Giddens, A.、李康、李猛(2007)。社會的構成。臺北:左岸。  延伸查詢new window
8.Tillich, Paul(2000)。The Courage to Be。New Haven:London:Yale University Press。  new window
9.Maslow, Abraham H.(1962)。Toward a Psychology of Being。Princeton, NJ:D. Van Nostrand Co。  new window
10.Castells, Manuel、Sheridan, Alan(1977)。The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach。Cambridge, Mass:London:MIT Press:Edward Arnold。  new window
11.Urry, John(2002)。The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies。Sage Publications。  new window
12.Trilling, L.(1972)。Sincerity and authenticity。Cambridge, MA:London:Harvard University:Oxford University Press。  new window
13.謝世忠(19940000)。山胞觀光:當代山地文化展現的人類學詮釋。臺北:自立晚報社文化出版部。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Cresswell, Tim、徐苔玲、玉志弘(2008)。地方:記憶、想像與認同。群學。  延伸查詢new window
15.Bourdieu, P.、Nice, R.(1989)。Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste。Routledge。  new window
16.Heidegger, M.(1996)。Being and time: A translation of Sein and Zeit。Albany, NY。  new window
17.Kierkegaard, S.、H. V. Hong、E. H. Hong(1983)。Fear and trembling: Repetition。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
18.Sartre, J. P.(2001)。Being and nothingness: An essay in phenomenological ontology。New York:。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃應貴(1995)。導論:空間、力與社會。空間、力與社會。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.謝世忠(2004)。觀光過程與「傳統」論述:原住民的文化意識。族群人類學的宏觀探索:臺灣原住民論集。國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.謝世忠(2004)。傳統與新傳統的現身:當代原住民的工藝體現。族群人類學的宏觀探索:臺灣原住民論集。國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.謝世忠(2004)。族內異觀與類種族主義的族群關係--三種界定台灣漢人主體族群的論述。族群人類學的宏觀探索:臺灣原住民論集。台北:臺大出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE