:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:龜山島生態旅遊遊憩承載量之研究
書刊名:觀光研究學報
作者:馬惠達陳思倫劉瓊如
作者(外文):Ma, Whei-daChen, Szu-lunLiu, Chyong-ru
出版日期:2003
卷期:9:2
頁次:頁123-139
主題關鍵詞:生態旅遊遊憩承載量EcotourismRecreational carrying capacity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:580
  • 點閱點閱:42
本研究旨在建立自然人文生態景觀區遊憩承載量之推估模式,並以龜山島為實證研究對象。本研究所選取之遊憩承載量指標包括實質生態承載量、設施承載量和社會心理承載量等,並採取問卷與現場勘查為主要調查方式。研究結果發現以社會心理承載量而言,遊客認為瞬間之遊客承載量為127人時,屬於感覺適中程度;設施承載量實地估算為150人;在實質生態承載量推估部分,受訪者認為可容許之最大瞬間遊客密度即遊客承載量為174人。最後經由每日容許遊憩承載量分析,顯示週轉率較低,每日之容許遊憩承載量也較低,可減輕遊憩承載量增加之壓力,本研究結果係建立適合自然人文生態景觀區之遊憩承載量推估模式。
The aim of this study was to establish a recreational carrying capacity estimated model for the natural and cultural ecological scenic area of Turtle Island, using Turtle Island itself as the subject of the study. Following a review of the literature, we selected ecological carrying capacity, facilities carrying capacity, and social carrying capacity as indicators for investigation and estimation. Data were collected primarily via questionnaires and on-site investigations. The results indicate that in terms of social carrying capacity, the immediate impression of visitors is that 127 persons is an appropriate amount. On-site estimation puts facilities carrying capacity at 150 persons. In the area of ecological carrying capacity, the immediate impression of visitors is that maximum carrying capacity is 174 persons. Daily recreational carrying capacity analysis indicates that decreasing the turnover of visitors' visitation can alleviate the pressure of increased carrying capacity. The results of the study show that an appropriate estimsted model for the carrying capacity of natural and cultural scenic areas should be established.
Other
1.邱茲容(1978)。景觀規劃中之遊憩承載量的評定。  延伸查詢new window
2.林晏州,吳義隆(1989)。玉山國家公園宿營地點之實質生態遊憩容許量之評定。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.Lime, D. W.、Stankey, G. H.(1971)。Carrying capacity: Maintaining outdoor recreation quality。Recreation Symposium Proceedings,12(14),122-134。  new window
2.Ceballos-Lascurain, H.(1991)。Tourism, ecotourism and protected areas。Park,2(3),31-35。  new window
3.Lapage, W. F.(1963)。Some aspect of forest recreation。Journal of Forestry,61(1),32-36。  new window
4.Shelby, B.、Heberlein, T. A.(1984)。A conceptual framework for carrying capacity determination。Leisure Science,6(4),433-451。  new window
5.林晏州(19880600)。社會心理遊憩容許量之研究。東海學報,29(2),819-848。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鄧振源、曾國雄(19890700)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用。中國統計學報,27(7),13767-13786。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.莊炯文(1984)。遊憩承載量測定方法之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王小璘(1990)。利用數學模式探討遊憩資源之合理經營方法(一)。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋秉明(2001)。台灣發展生態旅遊整體規劃的方向,成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張俊彥(1987)。遊憩規劃中遊客擁擠知覺之分析--以陽明山國家公園為例。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉淑華(1990)。遊憩區與相關交通設施最適公共投資之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.莊金霖(1994)。遊憩區土地使用目標規劃模式之研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳思穎(1995)。交通運輸與遊憩承載整合模式之研究--多目標數學規劃之應用。  延伸查詢new window
7.陽明山國家公園管理處(2000)。陽明山國家公園容許遊憩承載量推估模式之建立。  延伸查詢new window
8.羅紹麟(2000)。生態旅遊與森林遊樂,溪頭。  延伸查詢new window
9.羅志成(1999)。遊憩承載量決定之研究--模糊多目標規劃之應用。  延伸查詢new window
10.Graefe, A. R., R. B. Ditton, J. W. Roggenbuck and R. Schreyer.(1984)。Social Carrying Capacity: An Integration and Synthesis of Twenty Years of Research。  new window
11.Honey, M.(2001)。Ecotourism and Sustainable Development: Who owns Paradise?。  new window
12.Manning, R. E.(1986)。Impacts of Recreation on Riparian Soels and Vegetation。  new window
13.Schreyer, R. & J. W. Roggenbuck(1978)。The Influence of Experience Expectations on Crowding Perceptions and Social-sychological Carrying Capacities。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE