:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網路輔助教學模式對運動技能學習之自我調整策略的影響
書刊名:臺大體育學報
作者:林進隆
作者(外文):Lin, Jin-lung
出版日期:2011
卷期:20
頁次:頁1-15
主題關鍵詞:自我調節學習數位學習模式後設認知策略Self-regulatory learningE-learning support modelMeta-cognition strategies桌球
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:79
  • 點閱點閱:45
本研究旨在探討不同的網路輔助教學模式(直接教學式、探索式、反思式)對大專生桌球運動技能學習之自我調整策略的影響。實驗對象為兩班大一共同必修體育「桌球正拍擊球」單元之103位學生,進行為期六週之實驗教學,以修正之「自我調整策略量表」,調查其自我調整策略使用之差異,並以變異數分析法進行實驗所得資料之統計分析。結果顯示:認知策略方面,反思式與探索式網路輔助教學模式之學習者表現顯著優於直接教學式;後設認知策略方面,反思式網路輔助教學模式則顯著優於直接教學式之學習者;而資源管理策略方面,不同網路輔助教學模式之差異則未達顯著水準。研究結論歸納:網路輔助教學模式對運動技能學習之自我調整策略而言,提供具體反思之楷模比較與知識探索之學習機制,比提供具體引導步驟之教學程序,更有助於提升運動技能學習者自我調節學習之成效。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of differential web-based support model on college students' self-regulatory strategies of motor skills learning. A quasi-experimental design is employed and totally 103 students are randomly assigned as the direct instruction group (DI), knowledge exploring group (KE) and reflective thinking group (RT) for 6 weeks table tennis unit of physical education course. A self-regulatory strategies questionnaire is introduced to evaluating students' cognition, meta-cognition and resources management strategies by revising from "Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)." The results showed that (a) students of the KE and RT group outperformed the DI group on cognition of self-regulatory strategies; (b) students of the RT group outperformed the DI group on meta-cognition of self-regulatory strategies; (c) there are no significantly differences on the students' resources management strategies among these groups. To encourage the effects of web-based support on college students' self-regulatory strategies of motor skills learning, the paper is concluded that providing the visual reflective model and social interaction mechanism seem preferable than knowledge exploring resources.
期刊論文
1.陳偉瑀、王俊明(20070500)。自我調整學習之目標設定與自我監控對大學生運動技能學習表現的影響。臺灣運動心理學報,10,57-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hwang, A.、Arbaugh, J. B.(2006)。Virtual and traditional feedback-seeking behaviors: Underlying competitive attitudes and consequent grade performance。Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education,4(1),1-28。  new window
3.黃素芬(20050500)。自設目標、自我效能及自我監控對桌球自我調整學習的影響。臺灣運動心理學報,6,1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Azevedo, R.、Cromley, J. G.、Seibert, D.(2004)。Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students, ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia?。Contemporary Educational Psychology,29(3),344-370。  new window
5.Rodgers, C. R.(2006)。Attending to student voice: The impact of descriptive feedback on learning and teaching。Curriculum Inquiry,36(2),209-237。  new window
6.蔡英美、王俊明(20080800)。自我調整學習在大學體育教學上的應用。大專體育,97,16-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.葉俊良、卓俊伶、林靜兒、陳重佑(20070300)。自我控制回饋對動作表現、學習及錯誤估計的效應。大專體育學刊,9(1),23-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Pintrich, Paul R.、De Groot, Elisabeth V.(1990)。Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),33-40。  new window
9.Weaver, M. R.(2006)。Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,37(3),379-394。  new window
10.Davis, E. A.(2003)。Prompting middle school science students doe productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts。Journal of the Learning Sciences,12,91-142。  new window
11.Lyke, J. A.、Kelaher-Young, A. J.(2006)。Cognition in context: Students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures and reported cognitive strategy use in the college classroom。Research in Higher Education,47(4),477-490。  new window
12.Magliaro, S. G.、Lockee, B. B.、Burton, J. K.(2005)。Direct instruction revisited: A key model for instructional technology。Educational Technology Research & Development,53(4),41-55。  new window
學位論文
1.劉世雄(2005)。資訊科技融入教學的模式與學生學習因素之研究(博士論文)。屏東師範學院。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇秦玉(2003)。學生自我監控與教師監控對桌球發球表現自我調整的影響(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳美燕(1996)。目標難度、自我效能及自我評價對高爾夫推桿表現的影響暨高爾夫推桿自我效能模式之驗證(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
4.林琮智(1999)。過去表現、目標取向、自我效能、目標設定對國小學童足球挑球表現之影響暨自我調整歷程研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳棨舜(2006)。不同回饋教學法及自我口語提示法對桌球正手殺球教學效果之研究。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Schmidt, Richard A.、Lee, Timothy D.(2005)。Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
2.Schmidt, R. A.、Wrisberg, C. A.(2008)。Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach。Human Kinetics。  new window
3.林生傳(2003)。教育研究法:全方位的統整與分析。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Schunk, D. H.、Zimmerman, B. J.(1994)。Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Zimmerman, B. J.、Schunk, D. H.(2001)。Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.孫春在、林珊如(20070000)。網路合作學習:數位時代的互動學習環境、教學與評量。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.周宏室(2010)。體育課程與教學専業。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.賴慧玲(2002)。教學模式。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.Carver, C. S.、Scheier, M. F.(2007)。Self-regulatory systems: Action and affect。Handbook of motivation science \\ J. Y. Shah ; W. Gardner (eds.)。New York, NY。  new window
10.Gitomer, D. H.、Glaser, R.(1987)。If you don’t know if work on it: Knowledge, self­regulation, and instruction。Aptitude, learning, and instruction \\ R. E. Snow ; M. J. Farr (eds.)。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
11.Gunter, M. A.、Estes, T. H.、Schwab, J.(2003)。Instruction: A models approach。Boston, MA。  new window
12.葉海輝(2008)。任務式體育教學模式的實踐研究。北京。  延伸查詢new window
13.Schunk, D. H.(2007)。Learning theories: An educational perceptive。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
其他
1.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。Knowing, Learning, and Instruction-Essays in honor of R. Glaser。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE