:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民黨的原住民選舉動員:一個社會文化互動途徑的初探分析
書刊名:臺灣原住民族研究季刊
作者:包正豪 引用關係謝顥音 引用關係
作者(外文):Pao, Cheng-haoHsieh, Ivy Haoyin
出版日期:2013
卷期:6:2
頁次:頁83-137
主題關鍵詞:選舉動員原住民社會文化互動途徑Electoral mobilizationIndigenous peopleSocio-cultural approach
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:315
  • 點閱點閱:139
我國選舉制度保障原住民特別席次,其選區劃分係以身分而非戶籍地區分。因此,原住民選民的遷徙,至少就立委選舉層級而言,並不影響其投票權。然而,原住民立委選舉的地理選區仍為全國範圍,就選民分散程度來說,原住民選區遠高過區域選區。在這樣的情形下,過往聚焦於區域選舉而得出的選舉動員相關研究發現,恐未能同樣適用於解釋原住民選舉。不過,社會文化互動理論指出,新遷徙的移民會在建構新身份認同時,會經由雙向定位與歸屬認同的過程中找到新的地位、身分,以及新的「關係模式」,繼而在原生及新社群間建構連結,並相互影響。這種從社會文化互動理論出發的觀點,提供給我們探索現有政治系絡下原住民選舉動員模式的新視角。有鑒於台灣原住民本有強烈之原生社群互動趨勢,在遷移的過程中,不僅大量依靠由原生社群所一起組織而成的新社群提供之社會及人際資源,甚至更進一步利用新社群所建構出之關係與原生社群連接出更緊密之人際資源網絡。因此,本研究擬運用質性研究模式,深度瞭解原住民社群互動的現象,並進一步討論社群互動與人際資源網絡在國民黨原住民選舉動員中所扮演的角色與發展。
In order to guarantee that the indigenous people have the voice out in Taiwan's domestic politics, the seats of the legislators are reserved / dedicated despite the regions they reside. As a result, indigenous people's internal immigration of the does not actually affect their voting rights in different residential areas. Since the indigenous voters are widely distributed and applied to a different electoral system, the existing literatures of electoral mobilization may not be able to provide objective information on the indigenous electoral behaviors. However, according to the social-cultural approach, when the new comers first moved to the new place to construct their identity in the metropolitan, the relational process happened. They interact with people from both the rooted and the new communities as their resources to keep/rebuild their identity/ies, and at the same time seek power in order to position themselves in both communities.The approach provides us a new viewpoint to explore the electoral mobilization among the indigenous groups. The indigenous people in Taiwan tend to keep strong connections with the rooted community. They not only rely on the new comer indigenous groups to get social and human recourses, but also use the new resource to create a two-way interactive model that further helps integrate the resources from both rooted and new communities. This qualitative study thus aims to explore the interactive patterns among the indigenous people and how the patterns play roles in indigenous electoral mobilization of the Kuomintang.
期刊論文
1.劉佩怡(20050800)。臺灣「宗親政治」行程初探--以桃園縣為個案分析。人文學報,29,19-36。  延伸查詢new window
2.Blaka, Gunnhild、Filstad, Catherine.(2007)。How does a newcomer construct indentity? A socio-cultural approach to workplace learning。International Journal of Lifelong Education,26(1),59-73。  new window
3.Calderia, Gregory A.、Patterson, Samuel C.、Markko, Gregory A.(1985)。Mobilization of Voters in Elections。The Journal of Politics,47,490-459。  new window
4.Copeland, Gary W.(1983)。Activating Voters in Congressional Elections。Political Behavior,5,391-340。  new window
5.Eldersveld, Samuel J.(1956)。Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior。American Political Science Review,50,154-165。  new window
6.Fiore, Joan、Becker, Joseph、Coppel, David B.(1983)。Social Network Interaction: A Buffer or a Stress。American Journal of Community Psychology,11(4),423-439。  new window
7.Gerber, Alan S.、Green, Donald P.(2000)。The Effect of Nonpartisan Get-out-the-Vote Drive: An Experimental Study of Leafletting。The Journal of Politics,62,846-857。  new window
8.Gerber, Alan S.、Green, Donald P.(2000)。The Effect of Personal Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment。American Political Science Review,94,653-643。  new window
9.Hartley, David(2009)。Education Policy, Distributed Leadership and Socio-cultural Theory。Educational Review,61(2),139-150。  new window
10.Huckfeldt, Robert、Sprague, John(1992)。Political parties and electoral mobilization: Political structure, social structure, and the party canvass。American Political Science Review,86,405-423。  new window
11.Jackson, Robert A.(1993)。Voter Mobilization in the 1986 Midterm Election。The Journal of Politics,55,1081-1099。  new window
12.Jackson, Robert A.(1997)。The Mobilization of U.S. State Electorate in the 1988 and 1990 Elections。The Journal of Politics,59,520-537。  new window
13.Jackson, Robert A.(2002)。Gubernatorial and Senatorial Campaign Mobilization of Voters。Political Research Quarterly,55,825-844。  new window
14.Macdonald, John S.、Macdonald, Leatrice D.(1964)。Chain Migration Ethnic Neighborhood Formation and Social Networks。The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly,42(1),82-97。  new window
15.Malchow, Hal(199807)。Predicting Voter Turnout: A New Targeting Approach。Campaigns & Elections,44-46。  new window
16.Malchow, Hal(200004)。Predicting Voter Turnout: Applying New Tools。Campaigns & Elections,69-71。  new window
17.Nickerson, David W.(2007)。Quality is Job One: Professional and Volunteer Voter Mobilization Calls。American Journal of Political Science,51,269-282。  new window
18.Nickerson, David W.(2008)。Is Voting Contagious? Evidences from Two Field Experiments。American Political Science Review,102,49-57。  new window
19.Shad, Nasra M.、Menon, Indu(1999)。Chain Migration Through the Social Network: Experience of Labour Migrants in Kuwait。International Migration,37(2),361-382。  new window
20.Shea, Daniel M.(199810)。Successful Get-Out-the-Vote: A Five-Step Process。Campaigns & Elections,48。  new window
21.Sides, John、Karch, Andrew(2008)。Messages that Mobilize? Issue Publics and the Content of Campaign Advertising。The Journal of Politics,70,466-476。  new window
22.Smith, Mark A.(2001)。The Contingent Effects of Ballot Initiatives and Candidate Races on Turnout。American Journal of Political Science,45,700-706。  new window
23.Wielhouwer, Peter M.、Lockerbie, Brad(1994)。Party Contacting and Political Participation, 1952-90。American Journal of Political Science,38,211-229。  new window
24.陳介英(19960300)。選舉與「地方化」社會--臺灣選舉活動中的社會內涵。思與言,34(1),169-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Huckfeldt, Robert R.、Sprague, John(1987)。Network in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information。American Political Science Review,81(4),1197-1216。  new window
26.Fereday, Jennifer、Muir-Cochrane, Eimear(2006)。Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development。International Journal of Qualitative Methods,5(1),80-92。  new window
27.徐火炎(19941200)。認知動員、選舉動員類型與選民的投票行為:第二屆國民大會代表選舉的分析。社會科學論叢,42,101-147。  延伸查詢new window
28.傅恆德(19941100)。政治文化與投票行為:民國七十八年立委和八十年國大代表選舉。選舉研究,1(2),27-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Jackson, Robert A.(1996)。A Reassessment of Voter Mobilization。Political Research Quarterly,49(2),331-349。  new window
30.Luo, Yadong、Park, Seung H.(2001)。Guanxi and Organizational Dynamics: Organizational Networking in Chinese Firms。Strategic Management Journal,22(5),455-477。  new window
31.包正豪(20111100)。原住民政治版圖的持續與變遷:1992-2008立委選舉的總體資料分析。選舉研究,18(2),87-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.吳重禮、鄭文智、崔曉倩(20061200)。交叉網絡與政治參與:2001年縣市長與立法委員選舉的實證研究。人文及社會科學集刊,18(4),599-638。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.張卿卿(20020500)。競選媒體使用對選民競選議題知識與政治效能感的影響--以兩千年總統大選為例。選舉研究,9(1),1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Morrison, Elizabeth W.(2002)。Newcomers' relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization。Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1149-1160。  new window
35.張佑宗、趙珮如(20060600)。社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇。臺灣民主季刊,3(2),1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.陳家聲、戴士嫻(20071200)。創業家社會網絡行為之質性研究。創業管理研究,2(4),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.黃秀端(19950500)。一九九四年省市長選舉選民參與競選活動之分析。選舉研究,2(1),51-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.盛杏湲(20020500)。統獨議題與臺灣選民的投票行為:一九九〇年代的分析。選舉研究,9(1),41-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.黃毅志(19981000)。社會階層、社會網絡與心理幸福。臺灣社會學刊,21,171-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.蔡佳泓(19951100)。社會網路位置類型分析--以七十八年臺北市南區立委選舉為例。選舉研究,2(2),171-203。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Fawcett, James. T.(1989)。Networks, Linkages, and Migration Systems。International Migration Review,23(3),671-680。  new window
42.林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(20050600)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(2),122-136。  延伸查詢new window
43.陳義彥、蔡孟熹(19971200)。新世代選民的政黨取向與投票抉擇--首屆民選總統的分析。政治學報,29,63-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.陳義彥(19961200)。不同族群政治文化的世代分析。政治學報,27,83-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.Leighley, Jan E.、Nagler, Jonathan(1992)。Individual and Systemic Influences on Turnout: Who Votes? 1984。The Journal of Politics,54(3),718-740。  new window
46.Gherardi, S.、Nicolini, D.(2002)。Learning the Trade: A Culture of Safety in Practice。Organization,9,191-223。  new window
47.Turner, Daniel W. III(2010)。Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators。The Qualitative Report,15(3),754-760。  new window
研究報告
1.包正豪(2011)。台灣政黨的持續與變遷:組織程度 (計畫編號:99-2410-H-032-026-MY3)。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.章英華、林季平(2008)。臺北縣原住民族就業及生活狀況調查報告。臺北:臺北縣政府原住民族行政局。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王重義(2008)。我國兩大政黨陣營選舉策略、組織動員與配票方式之比較研究-以第五屆立法委員台北市第一選區選舉為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳振宇(1998)。候選人競選策略之研究--1997年新竹縣長選舉之分析(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳政聞(2004)。候選人競選策略與選舉動員之研究---2002年高雄市長選舉謝長廷個案分析(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.湯晏甄(2007)。社會網絡與投票行為:2004年立法委員選舉的實證分析(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊舒偉(2010)。新竹縣客家族群選舉動員變遷之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.葉明琦(2009)。臺灣原住民菁英政治參與之研究--以宜蘭縣大同鄉為例(碩士論文)。佛光大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝育真(2009)。閩客族群選舉動員之比較-以苗栗縣為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hsieh, Ivy H.(2008)。Literacy practices of working-class new Chinese immigrant families(博士論文)。University of Florida,Gainesville, FL。  new window
9.江肇國(2004)。金錢與選舉動員(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.海樹兒.犮剌拉菲(2007)。原住民參選立法委員之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.王金壽(1994)。國民黨候選人選舉機器的建立與運作(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.何信安(2002)。原住民部落政治參與研究--以泰武鄉為例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Michael, M.(1996)。Constructing identities: The social, the nonhuman and change。London, England:Sage。  new window
2.Green, Donald P.、Gerber, Alan(2004)。Get Out The Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout。Washington:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
3.Jackson, Robert A.(2011)。Mobilization: Getting the Electorate to the Polls。New Directions in Campaigns and Elections。NY:Routledge。  new window
4.Wertsch, James V.(1995)。The need for sociocultural research。Sociocultural Studies of Mind。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Coffey, A.、Atkinson,P.(1996)。Making sense of qualitative data。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
6.行政院原住民族委員會(2011)。99年原住民經濟狀況調查。台北:行政院原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Hatch, J. Amos(2002)。Doing Qualitative research in education settings。State University of New York Press。  new window
8.Monroe, Alan D.(1975)。Public Opinion in America。New York:Dodd, Mead and Company。  new window
9.Rosenstone, Steven J.、Hansen, John Mark(1993)。Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America。Longman。  new window
10.Krueger, Richard A.、Casey, Mary A.(2000)。Focus Groups: A Practical Guide For Applied Research。Sage。  new window
11.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Verba, Sidney、Schlozman, Kay Lehman、Brady, Henry E.(1995)。Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics。Harvard University Press。  new window
13.Wolfinger, Raymond E.、Rosenstone, Steven J.(1980)。Who Votes?。New Haven, Connecticut:Yale University Press。  new window
14.Verba, Sidney、Nie, Norman H.(1972)。Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
15.Strauss, Anselm、Corbin, Juliet(1998)。Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounder Theory。Sage。  new window
16.Kvale, Steinar(1996)。Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing。Sage。  new window
單篇論文
1.Murphy, P.,Sharp, G.,Whitelegg, F.(2006)。Girls' experience of physics: A problem of identification and marginalization?,The Open University。  new window
其他
1.國立政治大學選舉研究中心(2011)。歷屆公職人員選舉資料,http://esc.nccu.edu.tw/modules/tinyd2/index.php?id=2, 20110713。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院原住民族委員會(2011)。原住民人口數統計資料,http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docDetail.html?CID=940F9579765AC6A0&DID=0C3331F0EBD318C2ED65D7F6AF842A773, 20111213。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.謝高橋、張清富(1997)。城鄉連結--遷移人口的特性與適應。臺灣的都市社會。臺北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE