:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇
書刊名:臺灣民主季刊
作者:張佑宗 引用關係趙珮如
作者(外文):Chang Yu-tzungChau, Peiru
出版日期:2006
卷期:3:2
頁次:頁1-38
主題關鍵詞:社會脈絡個人網絡2004年立委選舉投票抉擇Social contextIndividual networkVote choiceThe 2004 legislative elections in Taiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(18) 博士論文(5) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:18
  • 共同引用共同引用:464
  • 點閱點閱:55
本文研究結果發現,在控制選民政黨認同的條件下,認同泛藍陣營的選民,如個人與家庭其他人的政治立場不一樣,比起那些家庭內成員的政治立場一樣,或是家庭內成員的政治立場都不一樣的人,最後把票投給泛藍陣營的比率最低(69.6%)。在家庭成員的壓力下,他們也沒把票投給泛綠陣營,而是有部份的人選擇不去投票(26.1%)。認同泛綠陣營的選民,如個人與家庭其他人的政治立場不一致,比起那些家庭內成員的政治立場一致,或是家庭內成員的政治立場都不一致的人,最後把票投給泛綠陣營的比率也是最低(47.1%)。在家庭成員的壓力下,他們也沒把票投給泛藍陣營,而是有高達47.1%的人選擇不去投票。透過Logistic 迴歸模型的分析,政黨認同仍是影響選民投票抉擇最重要的因素,不管是泛藍或泛綠的認同者,居住在其支持陣營較弱勢的地區,最後投給其所認同陣營的比率高於同樣認同其陣營,但居住在其陣營得票率較高的村里。在控制地理區域下,政黨認同仍是影響選民投票抉擇最重要的因素,居住在北部的選民,教育程度越高,越支持泛藍陣營;年紀越低,越支持泛綠陣營。
Using a sociological research approach, we find that, controlling for party identification, those identifying with the pan-blue camp whose political position differed from those of all their family members voted for the pan-blue camp less (69.6%) than either those whose position was the same as all of their family members or those whose position agreed with those of some family members but not with others. Under pressure from their families, many of these voters did not necessarily vote for the pan-green camp, but instead decided not to vote (26.1%). Likewise, those identifying with the pan-green camp whose political position differed from those of all their family members also voted for the pan-green camp less (47.1%) than either those whose position was the same as all of their family members or those whose position agreed with those of some family members but not others. A high percentage of these voters (47.1%) also decided not to vote, under pressure from their families. Using logistic regression find that party-identification was the most important factor influencing voter choice, and independence/unification position was the second most important. Interestingly, regardless of whether identifying with the pan-blue or pan-green camp, voters living in districts in which support for their camp is weak tend to vote for their own camp more often than those living in districts in which support for their camp is strong.
期刊論文
1.蔡明惠(20041200)。澎湖馬公地區外省籍榮民投票取向之探析。臺灣民主,1(4),139-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.彭芸(20021100)。2001年臺灣選民的媒介行為與政治信任。選舉研究,9(2),1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.徐永明(2001)。政治版圖:兩個選舉行為研究途徑的對話。中國地方自治,51(11),4-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.郭及天、王嵩音(20011100)。總統參選人夫人媒介形象呈現之初探--以連方瑀,吳淑珍,陳萬水為例。選舉研究,8(2),65-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Curtice, John(2002)。The State of Election Studies: Mid-life Crisis or New Youth?。Electoral Studies,21(2),161-168。  new window
6.Erikson, R. S.(2002)。National Election Studies and Macro Analysis。Electoral Studies,21(2),269-281。  new window
7.Finifter, Ada W.(1974)。The Friendship Group as a Protective Environment for Political Deviants。American Political Science Review,68(2),607-625。  new window
8.Huckfeldt, Robert、Plutzer, Eric、Sprague, John(1993)。Alternative Contexts of Political Behavior: Churches, Neighborhoods, and Individuals。The Journal of Politics,55(2),365-381。  new window
9.Huckfeldt, Robert、Levine, Jeffery、Morgan, William、Sprague, John(1998)。Election Campaigns, Social Communication, and the Accessibility of Perceived Discussant Preference。Political Behavior,20(4),263-294。  new window
10.Huckfeldt, Robert、Sprague, John(1987)。Network in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information。American Political Science Review,81(4),1197-1216。  new window
11.Huckfeldt, Robert、Beck, Paul Allem、Dalton, Ruessell J.、Levine, Jeffery、Morgan, William(1998)。Ambiguity, Distorted Message, and Nested Environment Effects on Political Communication。The Journal of Politics,60(4),996-1030。  new window
12.Johnston, Richard、Brady, Henry E.(2002)。The Rolling Cross-section Design。Electoral Studies,21(2),283-295。  new window
13.Prahl, Ralph(1988)。Social Network and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass。American Journal of Sociology,94(3),502-534。  new window
14.Rahn, Wendy M.、Aldrich, John H.、Borgida, Eugene(1994)。Individual and Cotextual Variation in Political Candidate Appraisal。American Political Science Review,88(1),193-199。  new window
15.Shanon, Benny(1990)。What is Context?。Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour,20(2),157-166。  new window
16.Stoker, Laura、Bowers, Jake(2002)。Designing Multi-level Studies: Sampling Voters and Electoral Contexts。Electoral Studies,21(2),235-267。  new window
17.盛治仁(20000700)。統獨不再對決--從2000年總統選舉看臺灣新社會分歧的興起及影響。理論與政策,14(2)=54,119-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.黃秀端(20051200)。候選人形象、候選人情感溫度計、與總統選民投票行為。臺灣民主季刊,2(4),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Mutz, Diana Carole(2002)。The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation。American Journal of Political Science,46(4),838-855。  new window
20.Beck, Paul Allem、Dalton, Ruessell J.、Freene, Steven、Huckfeldt, Robert(2002)。The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organization Influences on Presidential Choice。American Political Science Review,96(1),57-73。  new window
21.徐永明(20001200)。「南方政治」的形成﹖--臺灣政黨支持的地域差別,1994-2000。國立中山大學社會科學季刊,2(4),167-196。  延伸查詢new window
22.孫秀蕙(19961100)。選民的傳播形態對政治行為的影響:以1996年總統大選為例。選舉研究,3(2),71-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.張卿卿(20020500)。競選媒體使用對選民競選議題知識與政治效能感的影響--以兩千年總統大選為例。選舉研究,9(1),1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Johnson, Martin、Shively, W. Phillips、Stein, Robert M.(2002)。Contextual Data and the Study of Elections and Voting Behavior: Connecting Individuals to Environments。Electoral Studies,21(2),219-233。  new window
25.陳文俊(19951100)。統獨議題與選民的投票行為--民國八十三年省市長選舉之分析。選舉研究,2(2),99-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.陳陸輝(20001100)。臺灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷。選舉研究,7(2),109-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Marsh, M.(2002)。Electoral Context。Electoral Studies,21(2),207-217。  new window
28.徐火炎(20041100)。臺灣結、中國結與臺灣心、中國情:臺灣選舉中的符號政治。選舉研究,11(2),1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.吳乃德(19931100)。國家認同和政黨支持--臺灣政黨競爭的社會基礎。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,74,33-61。  延伸查詢new window
30.翁秀琪、孫秀蕙(19941100)。選民的媒介使用行為及其政治知識、政黨偏好與投票行為之間的關聯--兼論臺灣媒體壟斷對政治認知與行為之影響。選舉研究,1(2),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.孫秀蕙(19950500)。比較臺灣省選民傳統媒體與新媒體的使用對政治行為的影響--以民國83年臺灣省長選舉為例。選舉研究,2(1),93-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.鄭夙芬、陳陸輝、劉嘉薇(20050600)。2004年總統選舉中的候選人因素。臺灣民主季刊,2(2),31-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.劉義周(19940500)。臺灣選民政黨形象的世代差異。選舉研究,1(1),53-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.黃秀端(19950500)。一九九四年省市長選舉選民參與競選活動之分析。選舉研究,2(1),51-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.盛杏湲(20020500)。統獨議題與臺灣選民的投票行為:一九九〇年代的分析。選舉研究,9(1),41-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.傅明穎(19981200)。北市選民的候選人評價與投票決定。臺灣政治學刊,3,195-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.吳重禮、譚寅寅、李世宏(20030600)。賦權理論與選民投票行為:以2001年縣市長與第五屆立法委員選舉為例。臺灣政治學刊,7(1),91-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.徐火炎(19911100)。政黨認同與投票抉擇:臺灣地區選民的政黨印象、偏好與黨派投票行為之分析。人文及社會科學集刊,4(1),1-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.彭芸(20000500)。2000年總統大選的媒介使用、選舉參與及投票對象。選舉研究,7(1),21-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.黃秀端(19960500)。決定勝負的關鍵:候選人特質與能力在總統選舉中的重要性。選舉研究,3(1),103-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.梁世武(19941100)。一九九四年臺北市長選舉之預測:「候選人形象指標」預測模式之驗證。選舉研究,1(2),97-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.徐火炎(19960700)。臺灣選民的國家認同與黨派投票行為:一九九一至一九九三年間的實證研究結果。臺灣政治學刊,1,85-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.徐火炎(20010900)。一九九八年二屆臺北市長選舉選民投票行為之分析:選民的黨派抉擇與分裂投票。東吳政治學報,13,77-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.洪永泰(2000)。政治版圖重組:2000年總統選舉的選後評估。2000年選舉研究學術研討會。臺北:國立政治大學選舉研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.劉義周(2005)。2002年至2004年選舉與民主化調查三年期研究計畫:民國 93 年立法委員選舉大型面訪案 (計畫編號:NSC 93-2420-H-004-005-SSS)。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bartels, Larry M.(1988)。Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Berger, Josef(1960)。Discoverers of the New World。New York:American Heritage。  new window
3.Berry, William D.、Lewis-Beck, Michael S.(1986)。New Tools for Social Scientists: Advances and Applications in Research Methods。Beverly Hills:Sage Publications。  new window
4.Flanagan, Scott C.(1991)。The Japanese Voter。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
5.Lazarsfeld, Paul F.、Berelson, Bernard、Gaudet, Hazel(1968)。The People Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
6.Popkin, Samuel L.(1991)。The Reasoning Voter。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Westlye, Mark C.(1991)。Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
8.Monroe, Alan D.(1975)。Public Opinion in America。New York:Dodd, Mead and Company。  new window
9.Berelson, Bernard R.、Lazarsfeld, Paul F.、McPhee, William N.(1954)。Voting。University of Chicago Press。  new window
10.蔡勇美、郭文雄(1984)。都市社會學。臺北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。New York:John Wiley and Sons, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Key, V. O., Jr.、Munger, F.(1959)。Social Determinism and Electoral Decision: The Case of Indiana。American Voting Behavior。Glencoe, IL:Free Press。  new window
2.McPhee, William(1963)。A Theory of Informal Social Influence。Formal Theories of Mass Behavior。New York:Free Pree of Glencoe。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE