:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:數位學習媒體與戰術作業對國小五年級學生創造力之影響
書刊名:體育學報
作者:洪祥偉 引用關係陳五洲 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Shiang-weiChen, Wu-chou
出版日期:2014
卷期:47:2
頁次:頁303-317
主題關鍵詞:創造力資訊科技融入教學羽球比賽認知基模工作記憶CreativityIntegrating information technologies into instructionBadminton gameCognitive schemaWorking memory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:110
  • 點閱點閱:38
目的:透過羽球戰術教學在不同數位學習媒體與戰術作業的創思策略下,探究對國小五年級學生創造思考能力與創造性傾向之影響。方法:採用準實驗研究法經立意取樣挑選臺北市某國小五年級四個班級學生共112人。將四班隨機分配至兩種數位學習媒體(3D/影片(V))×兩種戰術作業(創造(C)/模仿比賽(I)),共四組(3DC, 3DI, VC, VI),進行每週一次,共四週教學,實驗前後以威廉斯創造力評量組合測驗進行評估,資料以相依樣本t考驗及單因子變異數分析進行分析(α = .05)。結果:一、組內比較:3DC與VC在流暢力、開放性、獨創力、精密力、標題有顯著提升。二、組間比較:變通力3DI比VI有顯著效果;精密力VI比3DI、VC有顯著效果;標題VI比VC有顯著效果。三、在創造性傾向方面,各組間皆無顯著差異。結論:結合創思策略(變異法與重組法)的數位學習媒體能提升學生流暢力、開放性、獨創力、精密力、標題表現;四組在流暢力、開放性、獨創力的培養上有相同的成效;模仿比賽寫作與使用CSTB創作比賽在精密力效果一樣好;因情意刺激不足造成創造性傾向能力未能提升。
Purpose: This study investigated the effects of different creative thinking teaching strategies on improving students’ divergent thinking and feeling through badminton tactics instruction. Methods: Through purposive sampling, four classes (n = 112) from an elementary school in Northern Taiwan were assigned to one of the four groups (3DC, 3DI, VC, VI); the e-learning media group: 3D and Video (V) and the tactical assignment group: Creative (C) and Imitation (I). Each group received one of the four treatments once a week for four weeks. "Test of Divergent Thinking" and "Test of Divergent Feeling" were used to collect data. Paired-sample t test and one-way ANOVA were applied to analyze the data (α = .05). Results: 1. Within-group comparison: 3DC and VC had significant improvement on dimensions of fluency, openness, originality, elaboration, and title. 2. Between-group comparison: 3DI was significantly higher than VI in flexibility; VI was significantly higher than 3DI and VC in elaboration; VI was significantly higher than VC in title. 3. In terms of creative tendency there was no significant difference in the within-group and between-group. Conclusion: Creative thinking teaching strategies (examples of change, organized random search) combines with the e-learning media increasing student’s fluency, openness, originality, elaboration, and title; the four groups had equal effect in the cultivation of fluency, openness and originality; writing imitation game and creating games through CSTB had equal effect in elaboration. The divergent feeling dimensions were not affected due to inadequate stimulus in affection situation of.
Other
1.Amabile, Teresa M.(1982)。The Social Psychology of Creativity,Springer-Verlag。  new window
期刊論文
1.Smith, D.、Holmes, P.(2004)。The effect of imagery modality on golf putting performance。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,26(3),385-395。  new window
2.紀世清、彭俊秀、姚漢禱(20100600)。羽球單打比賽戰術類型研究之效度與信度。休閒運動健康評論,1(2),33-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.van Gog, Tamara、Ericsson, K. Anders、Rikers, Remy M. J. P.、Paas, F.(2005)。Instructional design for advanced learners: Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice。Educational Technology Research and Development,53(3),73-81。  new window
4.王育文、黃美瑤、林雅博(20111000)。國小學童學業、健康體適能與體育課同儕互動之相關性研究。臺灣運動教育學報,5(2),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Chandler, P.、Sweller, J.(1996)。Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program。Applied Cognitive Psychology,10(2),151-170。  new window
6.吳高讚(20070500)。排球運動員攻擊動作視覺偵察影片之信效度分析。臺灣運動心理學報,10,87-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.周建智、鄭家惠(20101200)。在體育課中發展學生運動競賽的決策能力模式。中華體育季刊,24(4)=95,138-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.洪祥偉、陳五洲(20050900)。從資訊融入教學觀點探討中小學體育教師應具備的資訊素養。國立體育學院論叢,16(2),333-345。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃筱卉、李朝信、李俊杰(20100800)。探索教育融入體育課對國中生創造性思考傾向之影響。運動知識學報,7,93-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Sternberg, R. J.、Lubart, T. I.(1991)。An investment theory of creativity and indevelopment。Human Development,34,1-31。  new window
11.李明俊、李政吉、林益偉、周建智(20091200)。在多媒體輔助教學之情境學童體育課學習動機與班級氣氛。北體學報,18,46-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Massetti, B.(1996)。An Empirical Examination of the Value of Creativity Support Systems on Idea Generation。MIS Quarterly,20(1),83-97。  new window
13.張振成(19970600)。實施創造思考教學--以培養富有創意的學生。中等教育,48(3),68-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.邱玉菁(2004)。數位學習之學習成果的再思考。教育資料與圖書館學,41(4),561-581。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.蕭顯勝、洪琬諦、伍建學(20090400)。以網路遊戲實施科技創造力教學之研究。藝術學報,84,93-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.徐新逸、廖珮如(20040900)。數位學習知識類型與訊息設計之探討。教育研究,125,5-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Holt, Nicholas L.、Strean, William B.、Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia(2002)。Expanding the Teaching Games for Understanding Model: New avenues for future research and practice。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,21(2),162-176。  new window
18.王睿千、林靜萍(20090900)。創造思考教學模組對體育師資生創造力的影響。大專體育學刊,11(3),39-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Abernethy, Bruce、Wood, Joanne M.、Parks, Sheri(1999)。Can the anticipatory skills of experts be learned by novices?。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports,70(3),313-319。  new window
20.藍孝勤、王炫智、陳五洲(2010)。多媒體輔助教學對大專生八式太極拳學習效果之影響。體育學報,43(3),109-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.凃金堂(20110900)。運用「範例(worked-out example)」在國小數學問題解決的教學實驗研究。教育心理學報,43(1),25-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Scott, G. M.、Leritz, L. E.、Mumford, M. D.(2004)。The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review。Creativity Research Journal,16(4),361-388。  new window
23.Edmondson, A. C.(2002)。The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective。Organization Science,13(2),128-146。  new window
24.郝光中、林保源(20090400)。籃球多媒體輔助教學系統之開發。大專體育,101,146-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.黃美瑤、楊宗文、周建智(20090800)。以電腦影音多媒體介入體育課教學後對學生體育課學習動機之影響。休閒研究,1(2),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Brown, John Seely、Collins, Allan、Duguid, Paul(1989)。Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning。Educational Researcher,18(1),32-42。  new window
27.Jonassen, D. H.(1997)。Instructional Design Models for Well-structured and Ill-structured Problem-solving Learning Outcomes。Educational Technology Research & Development,45(1),65-94。  new window
28.黃美瑤、薛名淳、張琬渝、黃筱卉(20120300)。同儕互動回饋策略提高學生創造力與學習動機。大專體育學刊,14(1),13-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.謝依婷、周建智、黃美瑤(20090700)。專題導向學習對大學生創造力之研究。北體學報,17,84-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Cohen, Wesley M.、Levinthal, Daniel A.(1990)。Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning an Innovation。Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1),128-152。  new window
31.Chou, C.、Tsai, C. C.、Tsai, H. F.(2001)。Developing a Networked VRML Learning System for Health Science Education in Taiwan。International Journal of Educational Development,21(4),293-303。  new window
32.Collins, B.(1995)。Anticipating the impact of multimedia in education: Lessons form the literature。Computers in Adult Education and Training,2(2),136-149。  new window
33.Cassidy, A.、Paul, E.(2000)。The use of digital video pitch simulators for training expert baseball batters to improve their abilities to setect optical anticipatory pitch information。Dissertation Abstracts International,60,43-62。  new window
34.王文宜、闕月清、周建智(2010)。創思教學對不同身體動覺能力學生創造力之影響。運動研究,19(2),42-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.黃志成(2003)。球類教學新趨勢理解式教學。臺灣運動教育學會九十二年度年會暨學術論文發表會。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chen, W. C.、Chu, F. C.、Hung, S. W.(200808)。A prototype of creativity support tool on badminton。The 1st International Pre-Olympic Conference。Nanjing, China。163-167。  new window
3.洪祥偉、陳五洲、李德仁(201212)。網路羽球戰術系統在創造力教學課程實施之研究。臺灣教育傳播暨科技學會--2012國際學術研討會。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.周建智、黃璧惠、黃美瑤、藍美玉(2003)。創意教師vs.創造力學童「擴散式之體育教學策略對學童之腦力激盪與獨立思考能力的影響:以探索式運動遊戲教育課程介入為例」 (計畫編號:0910200044)。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳明雄(1999)。創造思考教學方案對高職機械修護科實用技能班學生學習成效之影響 (計畫編號:NSC 88-2519-S-003-011)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2009)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.程漢傑、姚裕強(1995)。中學生讀寫技巧。臺北市:萬卷樓。  延伸查詢new window
3.Finn, K.(1993)。Marking creativity happen: An introduction to the solution machine。Bedford, New York:The Gemini Group。  new window
4.Robbin, A.(1990)。Idea Fisher-An introduction。Irvine, CA:Fisher Idea Systems。  new window
5.Williams, F. E.(1980)。The Creativity assessment packet。Chesterfield, MO:Psychologists and Educators Inc.。  new window
6.葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學:過去、現在與未來。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Williams, F. E.(1972)。Encouraging creative potential。Educational Technology Publications。  new window
8.Griffin, L. L.、Mitchell, S. A.、Oslin, J. L.(1997)。Teaching sport concepts and skills:A tactical games approach。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
9.Butler, J.、Griffin, L.、Lombardo, B.、Nastasi, R.(2003)。Teaching Games for Understanding in physical education and sport: An international perspective。Reston, Virginia:National Association of Sport and Physical Education。  new window
10.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
11.Jonassen, D. H.(2000)。Computers as mindtools for school: Engaging critical thinking。Prentice-Hall。  new window
12.Hayes, J. R.(1989)。The complete problem solver。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
13.教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
14.Williams, Frank E.(1970)。Classroom ideas for encouraging thinking and feeling。Buffalo, New York:D. O. K. Publishers, Inc.。  new window
15.張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.Kirk, Roger E.(1995)。Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
18.Williams, F. E.、林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗:指導手冊。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Resnick, M.、Myers, B.、Nakakoji, K.、Shneiderman, B.、Pausch, R.、Selker, T.、Eisenberg, M.(2005)。Design principles for tools to support creative thinking。Creativity Support Tools。  new window
2.Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1986)。The curriculum model。Rethinking games teaching。University of Technology。  new window
3.Collins, M. A.、Amabile, T. M.(1999)。Motivation and creativity。Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Kaput, J. J.(1987)。Representation systems and mathematics。Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE