臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：整合社工處遇與修復式司法協助家暴成人保護個案之實務經驗省思--以臺南市女權會為例
書刊名：臺灣社會工作學刊
作者：李易蓁 引用關係／楊巧鈴
作者(外文)：Lee, I-chen／Yang, Qiao-ling
出版日期：2014
卷期：13
頁次：頁69+71-99
主題關鍵詞：社會工作；修復式司法；家庭暴力；成人保護；Social work；Restorative justice；Domestic violence；Adult protection
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:42
  • 點閱點閱:54
傳統上多將家暴被害人與施暴者分開處遇，但親密暴力涉及糾葛情感，關係不易切割。而即使法入家門，期待藉由司法嚇阻暴力，卻似乎亦未能十足保障被害人安全。其次，Bowker（1983）已論證受虐婦女可與施暴者在維繫關係的情況下成功終止暴力（引自Davis, 1998）。故如何協助打造非暴力互動關係，而非一昧隔絕，方是終止暴力的關鍵要素。有鑑於此，修復式司法是否為另類解決模式在近年有不少討論。台南市女權會基於在提供保護性服務過程中，看到一定比例的家暴被害人仍期待與施暴者修復關係或仍有一定生活交集。乃在2011、2012年嘗試結合社工處遇及修復式司法，跨專業共同協助具刑事訴訟困擾之成人保護個案。只是，修復式司法是否適用於家暴事件，仍有爭論；跨專業合作不免需要磨合、實驗性方案的挑戰，被害人困境是否能確實化解更是需關注之焦點。筆者有幸分別擔任此方案之外聘督導與專案社工，並均有多年服務家暴被害人之實務經驗，僅以本文統整服務期間所見、所聞、所思，並與相關文獻對話。期待能藉此拋磚引玉，激發更多人思考結合社工處遇與修復式法之可行性，進而開發嶄新服務模式。
In a traditional manner, the victims and abusers of the domestic violence are treated separately. However, complex emotions are often involved in the intimate violence so that it is difficult to detach victims and abusers' relationships. Even the legal actions had been taken; it still cannot provide fully protection for the victims of domestic violence. According to Bowker(1983), he verified that the violence could be terminated successfully while the battered women and abusers keep maintaining their relations. Therefore, how to help victims and abusers to create a non-violence interactive relationship instead of isolation is the key to terminate the occurrence of the domestic violence. In view of this, applying the restorative justice could be an alternative solution which has been brought up to attention recently. During the process of providing protective services, the Tainan Women's Right Association found out that a certain percentage of victims of domestic violence are willing to restore relationship or keep their interactions with the abusers. Therefore, an integrated social work and restorative justice treatment were implemented to help those adult victims between the year of 2011 and 2012. However, there are some arguments while applying restorative justice on the cases of the domestic violence. For example, during the process of this service, some conflicts among professions are the challenges that to be deal with. Also, whether the project could help those victims relief from their difficulties or not is still an issue to be concern. The researcher has been worked for abused women with practical experience many years and also acted as a supervisor of this project. By reviewing and discussing the implications and limitations of this project, the suggestions are provided for the future practices and also could inspire more people reflect on feasibilities for integrating social work and restorative justice treatment.
期刊論文
1.王增勇(20061000)。社工與家庭暴力的相遇：性別關係的複製場域。性別平等教育季刊，37，8-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃翠紋(20030600)。婚姻暴力受虐婦女接受鄉鎮市區調解委員會調解滿意度影響因素之分析。犯罪學期刊，6(1)，67-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳祖輝(20040900)。淺談社區司法的理念與實踐：復歸式正義的取向。社區發展季刊，107，445-457。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.潘雅惠、陳建宏(20091022)。修復式司法運用於家庭暴力事件之探討。司法周刊，1463，2-3。  延伸查詢new window
5.Phyllis, Baker(1997)。And I went back: Battered women's negotiation of choice。Journal of Contemporary Ethnography，26(1)，55-74。  new window
6.Juliet, Behrens(2005)。Meeting the needs of victims of domestic violence with family law issue: the dangers and possibilities in restorative justice。International Journal of law in Context，1(3)，215-235。  new window
7.Michele, Bograd、Mederos, Fernando(1999)。Battering and couples therapy: Universal screening and selection of treatment modality。Journal of Marital and Family Therapy，25(3)，291-312。  new window
8.Aziz, Sagifta(2010)。Should restorative justice be use for case of domestic violence。Internation Journal of Restorative Justice，6(1)，1-48。  new window
9.Corinna, Seith(2001)。Security matters: Domestic violence and public social services。Violence against Women，7(7)，799-820。  new window
10.J, Stubbs(2007)。Beyond apology? Domestic violence and critical questions for restorative justice。Criminology and criminal justice，7(2)，149-180。  new window
11.Barbara Oberhofer, Dane、Barbara, L. Simon(1991)。Resident guests :social workers in host settings。Social work，36(3)，208-213。  new window
12.van Wormer, K.(2009)。Restorative justice as social justice for victims of gendered violence: A standpoint feminist perspective。Social Work，54(2)，107-116。  new window
13.沈慶鴻(20091200)。弱勢社工服務弱勢案主？！婚暴防治社會工作者實務困境之研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊，13(2)，87-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.高鳳仙(20070300)。諮商與調解在家庭暴力事件之法律界限。應用心理研究，33，1-7。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.張錦麗(2007)。從家庭暴力防治新法與家庭暴力防治實務中看受暴婦女困境。2007年臺灣防暴聯盟九十六年度婦幼安全溫馨家園系列活動。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.台南市女權會(2011)。台南市女性權益促進會一百年度「修復式司法」試行方案成果報告。台南市女權會。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃蘭媖、許春金(2014)。修復式司法試行方案成效評估暨案件評估指標之研究期末報告。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.莊凱琦(2008)。伴侶關係中的安全與自主：以留在施暴者身邊的受暴婦女為主體的服務反思(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃翠紋(2001)。婚姻暴力調解措施之研究(博士論文)。中央警察大學，桃園。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.郭貴蘭(2007)。苗栗縣客家籍受虐婦女復元之初探--優勢觀點團體工作之運用(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳婷蕙(1997)。婚姻暴力中受虐婦女對脫離受虐關係的因應行為之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Davies, J.、Lyon, E.、Monti-Catania, D.(1998)。Safety planning with battered women: Complex Lives/Difficult choices。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
2.Mark, Tisdall、Sam, Farmer、Margaret, Robinson、Arthur, Wells、Ken, McMaster(2007)。Review of the Use of Restorative Justice in Family Violence Cases in the Rotorua District。Wellington：Ministry of Justice, New Zealand。  new window
3.Dutton, Donald G.(2006)。Rethinking domestic violence。UBC Press。  new window
4.Mills, L. G.、黃煜文(2004)。錯的是我們不是我：家暴的動力關係。臺北：商周。  延伸查詢new window
5.李增祿(1995)。社會工作概論。臺北：巨流。  延伸查詢new window
6.成蒂(2004)。終結婚姻暴力：加害人處遇與諮商。臺北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.法務部(2010)。法務部推動復式司法試行方案」實施計畫，http://www.scc.moj,gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=300486&CtNode=33671&mp=013， 2014/07/01。  延伸查詢new window
2.United Nations(2006)。Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes Criminal Justice Handbook Series，http://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/06-56290_Ebook.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃翠紋(2006)。修復式正義理念在婚姻暴力調解上的應用。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集。法務部編印。  延伸查詢new window
2.Braithwaite, John(2003)。Principless of restorative justice。Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice : competing or reconcilable paradigms?。Oxford：Hart Publishing。  new window
3.Eglash, Albert(1977)。Beyond restitutionrcreative restitution。Restitution in Criminal Justice。MA：D. C. Health and Company。  new window
4.Martha R, Mahoney(1994)。Victimization or oppression? Women's lives, violence, andagency。The Public Nature of Private Violence: The Discovery of Domestic Abuse。NY：Routledge。  new window
5.M, Shamai(1996)。Couple therapy with battered women and abusive men: Does it have a future?。Future interventions with battered women and their families。CA：Sage Publications。  new window
6.Stubbs, J.(2002)。Domestic violence and women's safety: Feminist challenges to restorative justice。Restorative Justice and Family Violence。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：664（臺灣：660，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67499799
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上