:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會工作者的去權及增強權能督導策略之研究:以婚暴社工督導為例
書刊名:社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者:沈慶鴻 引用關係
作者(外文):Shen, Ching-hung
出版日期:2015
卷期:19:1
頁次:頁139-185
主題關鍵詞:去權平行過程婚姻暴力增強權能督導DisempowermentEmpowermentMarital violenceParallel processSupervisor/supervision
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:310
  • 點閱點閱:117
本研究的目的在了解婚暴社工之去權特徵,並收集社工督導為社工增強權能的督導策略。由於督導者和受督導社工是一配對關係,研究者於是透過24位中高權能社工的推薦,邀請曾經增強其權能之督導者參與本研究,並以個別訪談法收集14位來自不同婚暴機構之社工督導的督導經驗。研究者歸納受訪督導的觀察發現,由婚暴社工呈現的8項去權特徵顯示,社工的去權已影響其個人的生理、情緒和工作效率,干擾其人際互動、網絡連結,破壞其對組織的認同及暴力防治工作的投入意願;為了改善社工的去權現象,受訪督導使用了遍及個人、人際和組織三層次、共8種的增強權能策略,由這些策略可看出督導者在為社工增強權能時,不僅能善用自己的優勢,也能充分連結同儕、內/外聘督導和組織資源。最後,研究者還針對社工之去權現象進行討論,並為落實增強權能之督導策略提供建議。
The purposes of this research is to explore disempowered characteristics of social workers for marital violence, and to collect the strategies for empowering the disempowered social workers through supervision. Since supervisors and supervised social workers are a dyadic relationship, through the recommendation of 24 social workers with "mild to high level" and "highly empowered", the researcher invited supervisors who had ever empowered them in the way of dyad to participate in this research. Accordingly, the opinions of 14 participants were collected by interviewing individually from several institutes of marital violence. The results show 8 disempowered characteristics of social workers comes from the observation of participants, which have negatively impacted social workers in physiology, emotion, and work efficiency, interfered with their interpersonal interaction, and destroyed their identity of organization and their willingness to participate in violence prevention. Therefore, in order to change disempowered characteristics, the interviewed participants had used 8 types of empowerment strategies, which included individual, interpersonal and organization dimensions. The supervisors not only could use their advantage, but also could sufficiently coordinate with resources from co-workers, inside (or outside) supervisors, and organizations. Finally, the phenomenon of disempowerment on social workers reviewed, and suggestions on implementing supervising strategies of empowerment were proposed for social work supervisors.
期刊論文
1.Chadiha, L. A.、Adams, P.、Biegel, D. E.、Auslander, W.、Gutierrez, L.(2004)。Empowering African American women informal caregivers: A literature synthesis and practice strategies。Social Work,49(1),97-108。  new window
2.Shulman, L.(2005)。The clinical supervisor-practitioner working alliance: a parallel process。The Clinical Supervisor,24(1/2),23-47。  new window
3.王增勇(20061000)。社工與家庭暴力的相遇:性別關係的複製場域。性別平等教育季刊,37,8-11。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭瑞隆(20041200)。家庭暴力社工員專業服務困境與改進措施之研究。犯罪學期刊,7(2),129-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭麗珍(20061000)。家暴社工的處境與問題。性別平等教育季刊,37,12-18。  延伸查詢new window
6.汪淑媛、蘇怡如(20100700)。社工督導功能期待與實踐落差研究--比較督導與被督者之觀點:以公部門家暴防治社工為例。臺灣社會工作學刊,9,41+43-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Laufrr, H.(2003)。Long-experience social workers and supervision: Perception and implication。The Clinical Supervisor,22(2),153-171。  new window
8.Collins-Camargo, C.、Kelly, M. J.(2006)。Supervisor as informal mentors: Promoting professional development in public child welfare。The Clinical Supervisor,25(1/2),127-146。  new window
9.Johnson, D. M.、Zlotnick, C.(2009)。HOPE for battered women with PTSD in domestic violence shelters。Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,40(3),234-341。  new window
10.Lee, E.、Esaki, N.、Kim, J.、Greene, R.、Kirkland, K.、Mitchell-Herzfeld, S.(2013)。Organizational climate and burnout among home visitors: Testing mediating effects of empowerment。Children and Youth Services Review,35,594-602。  new window
11.Turner, L. M.、Shera, W.(2005)。Empowerment of human service workers: Beyond intra-organizational strategies。Administration in Social Work,29(3),79-94。  new window
12.Wright, C. V.、Perez, S.、Johnson, S. D.(2010)。The mediating role of empowerment for African American women experiencing intimate partner violence。Psychology Trauma,2(4),266-272。  new window
13.Lee, J.、Weaver, C.、Hrostowski, S.(2011)。Psychological empowerment and child welfare worker outcomes: a path analysis。Child & Youth Care Forum,40(6),479-497。  new window
14.蔡曉雯、郭麗安、楊明磊(20100300)。督導關係中的權力意涵研究--受督者觀點。中華輔導與諮商學報,27,39-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.沈慶鴻、賴乃榕(20130600)。從「社工」到「督導」:新手社工督導角色轉換之研究--以婚暴防治為例。中華心理衛生學刊,26(2),215-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Boudrias, J. S.、Brunet, L.、Morin, A. J. S.、Savoie, A.、Plunier, P.、Cacciatore, G.(2010)。Empowering Employees: The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Climate and Justice。Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science,42(4),201-211。  new window
17.Boudrias, J. S.、Morin, A. J. S.、Brodeur, M. M.(2012)。Role of Psychological Empowerment in the Reduction of Burnout in Canadian Healthcare Workers。Nursing and Health Sciences,14(1),8-17。  new window
18.Dill, K.(2007)。Impact of Stressors on Front-Line Child Welfare Supervisors。The Clinical Supervisor,26(1/2),177-193。  new window
19.Itzhaky, H.、Dekel, R.(2005)。Helping Victims of Terrorism: What Makes Social Work Effective?。Social Work,50(4),335-343。  new window
20.Nelson, G.、Lord, J.、Ochocka, J.(2001)。Empowerment and Mental Health in Community: Narratives of Psychiatric Consumers/ Survivors。Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology,11(2),125-142。  new window
21.Porter, N.(1994)。Empowering Supervisees to Empower Others: A Culturally Responsive Supervision Model。Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,16(1),43-56。  new window
22.Salzberger, R. P.(1979)。Casework and a Client's Right to Self-Determination。Social Work,24(5),398-400。  new window
23.Bradbury-Jones, C.、Irvine, F.、Sambrook, S.(2010)。Empowerment of Nursing Students in Clinical Practice: Spheres of Influence。Journal of Advanced Nursing,66(9),2061-2070。  new window
24.Cousins, C.(2004)。Becoming a social work supervisor: A significant role transition。Australian Social Work,57(2),175-185。  new window
25.Pearson, Quinn M.(2000)。Opportunities and Challenges in the Supervisory Relationship: Implications for Counselor Supervision。Journal of Mental Health Counseling,22(4),283-294。  new window
26.Williams, A. B.(1997)。On Parallel Process in Social Work Supervision。Clinical Social Work Journal,25(4),425-435。  new window
27.Yip, Kam-Shing(2004)。The Empowerment Model: A Critical Reflection of Empowerment in Chinese Culture。Social Work,49(3),478-487。  new window
28.Everett, J. E.、Homstead, K.、Drisko, J.(2007)。Frontline worker perceptions of the empowerment process in community-based agencies。Social Work,52(2),161-170。  new window
29.宋麗玉(20081200)。增強權能策略與方法:臺灣本土經驗之探索。社會政策與社會工作學刊,12(2),123-194。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.沈慶鴻(20091200)。弱勢社工服務弱勢案主?!婚暴防治社會工作者實務困境之研究。社會政策與社會工作學刊,13(2),87-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.李開敏、陳淑芬(20061200)。受暴婦女的充權:社工復原力訓練及督導之整合模式。應用心理研究,32,183-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.宋麗玉(20061200)。增強權能量表之發展與驗證。社會政策與社會工作學刊,10(2),49-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.汪淑媛(20080600)。論臺灣社工教育對社會工作職業風險之忽視。臺大社會工作學刊,17,1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.汪淑媛(20060600)。家暴婦女庇護中心工作者情緒張力與因應策略。社會政策與社會工作學刊,10(1),189-226。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.趙善如(19990500)。「增強力量」觀點之社會工作實務要素與處遇策略。臺大社會工作學刊,1,231+233-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.呂學榮(2007)。臺灣公部門社工知覺之督導功能、充權感受、與工作滿足感相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.高淑雲(2004)。家庭暴力防治社會工作者工作壓力與因應之探討(碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃明玉(2008)。工作困境與督導制度之研究:以兒童保護社工員為例(碩士論文)。靜宜大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱琇琳(2005)。專業助人者之替代性受創與因應策略--以公部門家防社工為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.顏玉如(2005)。社會工作人員對優點個案管理模式之態度與執行現況深討-以婚姻暴力處遇為例(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃源協(2008)。社會工作管理。臺北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李增祿(2004)。社會工作概論。臺北:巨流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Payne, Malcolm(1997)。Modern Social Work Theory。London, England:Macmillan Press。  new window
4.Bernard, J. M.、Goodyear, R.(2009)。Fundamentals of clinical Supervision。Boston, MA:New Jersey:Allyn & Bacon:Pearson。  new window
其他
1.內政部(2008)。中央對直轄市、縣(市)政府執行社會福利積效考核評鑑報告,http://soef.moi.gov.tw/29/assessment.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.鄭麗珍(2003)。增強權能理論與倡導。社會工作理論--處遇模式與案例分析。臺北:洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE