:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:有參與就有審議嗎?臺北市參與式預算審議討論過程之評估
書刊名:公共行政學報
作者:方凱弘陳揚中李慈瑄
作者(外文):Fang, Kai-hungChen, Yang-chungLi, Tzu-hsuan
出版日期:2021
卷期:61
頁次:頁41-78
主題關鍵詞:審議式民主審議品質審議評估參與式預算公民參與Deliberative democracyQuality of deliberationEvaluation of deliberationParticipatory budgetingCitizen participation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:115
  • 點閱點閱:1
期刊論文
1.Barnes, Mariam(2005)。The Same Old Process? Older People, Participation, and Deliberation。Ageing and Society,25(2),245-259。  new window
2.杜文苓(20070600)。審議民主與社會運動:民間團體籌辦新竹科學園區宜蘭基地公民會議的啟發。公共行政學報,23,67-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Fung, A.(2006)。Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance。Public Administration Review,66(Suppl. 1),66-75。  new window
4.林國明(20131200)。多元的公民審議如何可能?--程序主義與公民社會觀點。臺灣民主季刊,10(4),137-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林國明(20140600)。審議的不平等:臺灣公民會議的言說互動。臺灣社會學,27,1-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.范雲(20100300)。說故事與民主討論--一個公民社會內部族群對話論壇的分析。臺灣民主季刊,7(1),65-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.葉欣怡、陳東升、林國明、林祐聖(20161200)。參與式預算在社區--文化部推展公民審議及參與式預算實驗計畫。國土及公共治理,4(4),29-40。  延伸查詢new window
8.蘇彩足(20170400)。公部門推動參與式預算之經驗與省思。文官制度季刊,9(2),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳東升(20060300)。審議民主的限制--臺灣公民會議的經驗。臺灣民主季刊,3(1),77-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林祐聖(20100600)。從歧見到共識--公共審議中的網絡平衡。臺灣民主季刊,7(2),177-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Burkhalter, Stephanie、Gastil, J.、Kelshaw, T.(2002)。A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups。Communication Theory,12(4),398-422。  new window
12.Ryfe, David M.(2005)。Does Deliberative Democracy Work?。Annual Review of Political Science,8(1),49-71。  new window
13.林國明(20160600)。審議造就積極公民?公民審議、社會資本與政治參與。人文及社會科學集刊,28(2),133-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.林祐聖、陳東升(20180600)。當社區營造遇到參與式預算:兩個社區的比較研究。臺灣社會學,35,109-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.林國明(20160600)。公民社會與公共審議:一般公民和社團活躍份子的審議傾向。臺灣社會學刊,59,139-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Wan, Poe Yu-ze(2018)。Outsourcing Participatory Democracy: Critical Reflections on the Participatory Budgeting Experiences in Taiwan。Journal of Public Deliberation,14(1),1-20。  new window
17.林祐聖、葉欣怡(20180300)。弱勢者在公民參與中的美麗與哀愁:以三峽身心障礙者就業促進參與式預算試辦計畫為例。社區發展季刊,161,187-197。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Yeh, Hsin-yi、Lin, Kuo-ming(2019)。Distributing Money to Commemoration: Collective Memories, Sense of Place, and Participatory Budgeting。Journal of Public Deliberation,15(1)。  new window
19.郭瑞坤、謝政勳、吳偉寧(20180600)。參與式預算提案類型與操作模式之經驗--以高雄市105年度參與式預算推動計畫為例。城市發展,24,114-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.傅凱若(20191200)。民主創新與公共價值創造的實踐--以臺灣都會區參與式預算為例。臺灣民主季刊,16(4),93-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.林育瑾(20160600)。以韓非思想反思審議式民主的困境與可能。國家發展研究,15(2),91-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.范玫芳、張簡妙琳(20210600)。從審議系統觀點探討臺灣邵族傳統領域治理與公民行動。臺灣民主季刊,18(2),37-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳文學(20181000)。地方政府推動公民參與的行動反思:以文化部補助公所推展社區型參與式預算為例。人事行政,205,10-20。  延伸查詢new window
24.傅凱若、張婷瑄(20201200)。當公民參與遇上專案管理:以臺北市參與式預算的專案管理為例。行政暨政策學報,71,43-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.藍世聰、許敏娟、曾丰彥、林德芳(20181000)。參與式預算制度之執行成效--以臺北市推動成果為例。政府審計季刊,39(1)=153,13-23。  延伸查詢new window
26.Carcasson, M.、Sprain, L.(2016)。Beyond problem solving: reconceptualizing the work of public deliberation as deliberative inquiry。Communication Theory,26(1),41-63。  new window
27.De Vries, R.、Stanczyk, A. E.、Ryan, K. A.、Kim, S. Y. H.(2011)。A framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: Enhancing deliberation as a tool for Bioethics。Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,6(3),3-17。  new window
28.De Vries, R.、Stanczyk, A.、Wall, I. F.、Uhlmann, R.、Damschroder, L. J.、Kim, S. Y.(2010)。Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: A case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research。Social Science & Medicine,70(12),1896-1903。  new window
29.Goold, S. D.、Neblo, M. A.、Kim, S. Y.、Vries, R. D.、Rowe, Gene、Muhlberger, P.(2012)。What is good public deliberation。Hastings Center Report,42(2),24-26。  new window
30.Hustedde, R. J.(1996)。An evaluation of the national issues forum methodology for stimulating deliberation in rural Kentucky。Journal of the Community Development Society,27(2),197-210。  new window
31.King, C. S.、Feltey, K. M.、O'Neill Susel, B.(1998)。The question of participation: toward authentic public participation in public administration。Public Administration Review,58(4),317-326。  new window
32.Knobloch, K. R.、Gastil, J.、Reedy, J.、Walsh, K. C.(2013)。Did they deliberate? applying an evaluative model of democratic deliberation to the Oregon citizens' initiative review。Journal of Applied Communication Research,41(2),105-125。  new window
33.Monnoyer-Smith, L.、Wojcik, S.(2012)。Technology and the quality of public deliberation: A comparison between on and offline participation。International Journal of Electronic Governance,5(1),24-49。  new window
34.Sanders, Lynn. M.(1997)。Against Deliberation。Political Theory,25(3),347-376。  new window
35.Thompson, Dennis F.(2008)。Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science。Annual Review of Political Science,11(1),497-520。  new window
36.Steenbergen, Macro R.、Bächtiger, André、Spörndli, Markus、Steiner, Jürg(2003)。Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index。Comparative European Politics,1(1),21-48。  new window
研究報告
1.蘇彩足、孫煒、蔡馨芳(2015)。政府實施參與式預算之可行性評估 (計畫編號:NDC-DSD-103-020-005)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fan, Mei-fang(2020)。Deliberative Democracy in Taiwan: A Deliberative Systems Perspective。Routledge。  new window
圖書論文
1.方凱弘、陳揚中(2018)。預算治理:省思台北市參與式預算之民主與預算意涵。地方治理的問題與對策:理論與實務分析。致知學術。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gastil, J.、Knobloch, K.、Kelly, M.(2012)。Evaluating deliberative public events and projects。Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Giugni, M.、Nai, A.(2013)。Quality of deliberation: A multilevel analysis。Meeting democracy: Power and deliberation in global justice movements。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE