:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不轉不行?從一個平凡小學教室之「翻轉教室」經驗省思科技翻轉教育的意義
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:蔡瑞君
作者(外文):Tsai, Jui-chun
出版日期:2016
卷期:261
頁次:頁82-99
主題關鍵詞:科技應用課程與教學翻轉教育翻轉教室Technology useCurriculum and instructionFlipping educationFlipped classroom
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:26
科技日新月異,對課程與教學產生影響。近年來,「翻轉教室」模式鼓勵學生課前觀看影片預習、課程中討論的作法,得到世界各地許多人的認可並投入其中。在多數相關研究均宣稱多數學生於此模式中獲益之際,卻忽略說明其課程實施過程中可能之困境或問題。本研究藉由一個位於都市中的平凡教室進行一學期的「翻轉教室」教學,透過班級教師與學生的觀點,了解在一個平凡不過的教室中實踐「翻轉教室」的實際情形。 研究結果發現,本次研究場域的情境脈絡導致「翻轉教室」模式的推行未獲得多數學生與家長的支持,教學影片無法成功地吸引學生持續投入學習,而學生亦不喜歡此上課模式。教師一開始雖有心投入融入科技之教學創新活動,但最後轉而對科技融入採取保留態度。本研究建議,「翻轉教室」模式之實施需重視學生所處之社會脈絡,且不可過度浪漫化學生皆能自主投入運用平臺自學的情形。進入數位時代後,科技應用固然為教師必備之能力,但「何時」以及「如何」運用科技於教學中,將更考驗教師的專業。
With advancement in technology, various forms of education methodologies emerge and make impact on curriculum and instruction. In recent years, the “Flipped Classroom” model, which encourages students to view short lecture videos before the class and participate in class discussions, has gained great popularity around the world. Although a number of studies claimed that most students benefit from the pedagogical model, they failed to explain the problems associated with the model or difficulties encountered in its implementation. In this context, the current study aims to understand the actual “Flipped Classroom” experiences in an ordinary primary school classroom from perspectives of teachers and students. Results revealed that the students and parents did not support the new pedagogical model due to the specific living context they were in. The lecture videos failed to attract the students in learning by themselves. The students disliked the pedagogical model. Although the teacher was passionate in the beginning on using new technology to improvise her teaching, later she turned to integrate technology use in education with reservation. Research suggested that implementation of “Flipped Classroom” model should take students’ living context into account. Besides, we should not overly expected that all students can be self-directed learners through the use of this model. In this digital age, although the ability of integrating technology in teaching has become a requirement for a teacher, ‘when’ and ‘how’ to use the technology appropriately have become major challenges to the teachers.
期刊論文
1.Ertmer, P. A.、Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T.、Sadik, O.、Sendurur, E.、Sendurur, P.(2012)。Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship。Computers & Education,59(2),423-435。  new window
2.Capdeferro, N.、Romero, M.(2012)。Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences?。International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,13(2),26-44。  new window
3.Carceller, C.、Dawson, S.、Lockyer, L.(2013)。Improving academic outcomes: Does participating in online discussion forums payoff?。International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning,5(2),117-132。  new window
4.Chen, F.、Sager, J.(2011)。Effects of tablet PC use in the classroom on teaching and learning process。Journal of Learning in Higher Education,7(2),55-67。  new window
5.Correia, A.(2008)。Team confl ict in ICT-rich environments: Roles of technologies in conflict management。British Journal of Educational Technology,39(1),18-35。  new window
6.Mayrath, M. C.、Traphagan, T.、Jarmon, L.、Trivedi, A.、Resta, P.(2010)。Teaching with virtual worlds: Factors to consider for instructional use of second life。Journal of Educational Computing Research,43(4),403-444。  new window
7.Miranda, H. P.、Russell, M.(2012)。Understanding factors associated with teacher-directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A structural equation modeling approach。British Journal of Educational Technology,43,652-666。  new window
8.Nielsen, K. L.、Hansen, G.、Stav, J. B.(2013)。Teaching with student response systems (SRS): Teachercentric aspects that can negatively affect students' experience of using SRS。Research in Learning Technology,21。  new window
9.Norton, P.、Hathaway, D.(2008)。On its way to k-12 classrooms, web 2.0 goes to graduate school。Computers in the Schools,25(3/4),163-180。  new window
10.Orton-Johnson, K.(2009)。'I've stuck to the path I'm afraid': Exploring student non-use of blended learning。British Journal of Educational Technology,40(5),837-847。  new window
11.Scherer, R.、Siddiq, F.、Teo, T.(2015)。Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning。Computers & Education,88,202-214。  new window
12.Stöckelová, T.、Virtová, T.(2015)。A tool for learning or a tool for cheating? The many-sided effects of a participatory student website in mass higher education。British Journal of Educational Technology,46(3),597-607。  new window
13.Sun, D.、Chee-Kit, L.、Wenting, X.(2014)。Collaborative inquiry with a web-based science learning environment: When teachers enact it differently。Journal of Educational Technology & Society,17(4),390-403。  new window
14.Wu, P. L.、Wu, H. J.、Huang, S. H.、Chang, M. Y.、Yang, P. S.(2012)。Wiki as an instructional tool: A case study of students' learning diffi culties。International Journal of Learning,18(7),141-152。  new window
15.蔡瑞君(20140600)。數位時代「翻轉教室」的意義與批判性議題。教育研究與發展期刊,10(2),115-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Petko, D.(2012)。Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers' constructivist orientations。Computers & Education,58(4),1351-1359。  new window
17.Pinar, William F.(1978)。The reconceptualization of curriculum studies。Journal of Curriculum Studies,10(3),205-214。  new window
圖書
1.Fulton, K.(1997)。The skills students needs for technological fluency。Santa Monica, CA:Milken Family Foundation。  new window
2.Pinar, William F.、Reynolds, William M.、Slattery, Patrick、Taubman, Peter M.(1995)。Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses。Peter Lang。  new window
3.Tanner, Daniel、Tanner, Laurel(1990)。History of the school curriculum。Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
4.Carr, Wilfred、Kemmis, Stephen(1986)。Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research。Falmer Press。  new window
5.Bergmann, Jonathan、Sams, Aaron(2012)。Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day。International Society for Technology in Education。  new window
6.Denzin, Norman K.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(1994)。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
其他
1.張益勤(2014)。翻轉教師 決心讓教室不一樣,http://www.parenting.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5056542。  延伸查詢new window
2.Tucker, B.(2012)。The flipped classroom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning,http://educationnext.org/files/ednext_20121_BTucker.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.何琦瑜(2013)。滑世代的希望與難題。翻轉教育:未來的學校、未來的學習、未來的孩子。臺北市:親子天下。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE