:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:都市更新資訊透明度與報酬之關連
書刊名:住宅學報
作者:陳奉瑤 引用關係沈文才梁仁旭
作者(外文):Chen, Fong-yaoShen, Wen-thairLiang, Jen-hsu
出版日期:2016
卷期:25:1
頁次:頁77-97
主題關鍵詞:都市更新資訊透明度實施者報酬分析層級程序法資訊不對稱Urban regenerationTransparencyImplementer's returnAHPInformation asymmetry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:7
在都市更新推動過程中,實施者較地主掌握更多資訊,形成資訊不對稱,影響談判協商成功的機率。本文透過文獻回顧、深度訪談及分析層級程序法,建構都市更新資訊透明度評估指標及權重;並設定都市更新財務模型,推估個案實施者之報酬率,藉以探討都市更新資訊透明度與實施者報酬的關聯性。實證結果顯示,提升資訊透明度對實施者報酬有所助益,本文並就委託實施或自組更新會階段、擬訂概要階段、擬訂事業計畫階段以及執行階段,分別提出應揭露之都市更新透明度的關鍵因素,可作為強制揭露資訊之參考,增加實施者與地主、相關權利人間、融資者等之信任,以加速都市更新推動。
In the urban regeneration, an implementer grasps more information compared with a landowner because of low information-transparency. Such information asymmetry renders negotiation processes difficult, and consequently, the landowner does not trust the implementer and other landowners. To address this situation, we review related literature and use interviews and the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) to obtain transparency-assessment indicators and their associated weights. Moreover, we apply a questionnaire to examine the transparency in urban regeneration cases in Taipei City. In addition, we establish a financial model to estimate an implementer’s return rate. The results show that the higher the information transparency is, the higher the implementer’s return rate becomes. Finally, we suggest the transparency items required for each step of urban regeneration.
期刊論文
1.廖坤榮(20041200)。臺灣金融管制政策的困境:代理人途徑個案分析。中山人文社會科學期刊,12(2)=27,51-86。  延伸查詢new window
2.Diamond, D. W.(1985)。Optimal release of information by firms。Journal of Finance,40(4),1071-1094。  new window
3.邊泰明、黃泳涵(20130300)。信任與都市更新參與意願之研究。都市與計劃,40(1),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.楊松齡、卓輝華(20110500)。從產權分離探討都市更新之激勵機制。臺灣土地研究,14(1),1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.彭建文、馮靖博、丁玟甄(20111200)。待更新不動產之實質選擇權價值分析。住宅學報,20(2),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.邊泰明(20100900)。都市更新--困境與信任。經濟前瞻,131,97-102。  延伸查詢new window
7.Lundholm, R. J.、Myers, L. A.(2002)。Bringing the future forward: The effect of disclosure on the returns-earnings relation。Journal of Accounting Research,40(3),809-839。  new window
8.李桐豪、廖志峰(20110600)。不動產指數衍生性商品發展概況與回顧:臺灣房價指數衍生性商品發展與挑戰。住宅學報,20(1),85-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Adair, A.、Hutchison, N.、Burgess, J.、Roulac, S.(2005)。The Appraisal of Urban Regeneration Land: A Contemporary Perspective Allowing for Uncertainty。Journal of Property Investment and Finance,23(3),213-233。  new window
10.Capozza, D. R.、Seguin, P.(1999)。Focus, Transparency and Value: The REIT Evidence。Real Estate Economics,27,587-619。  new window
11.劉啟群(19990300)。我國銀行年報自願性揭露與銀行特質關聯性研究。中山管理評論,7(1),57-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Fama, E. F.、Laffer, A. B.(1971)。Information and capital markets。Journal of Business,44(3),289-298。  new window
13.李春長(20020200)。房屋仲介市場與經紀人職業倫理。住宅學報,11(1),35-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Healy, Paul M.、Palepu, Krishna G.(2001)。Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature。Journal of Accounting and Economics,31(1-3),405-440。  new window
15.Diamond, Douglas W.、Verrecchia, Robert E.(1991)。Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital。The Journal of Finance,46(4),1325-1359。  new window
學位論文
1.曾玉琦(2009)。資訊揭露評鑑系統之效益分析:股票報酬及經濟附加價值(博士論文)。國立成功大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.麥怡安(2009)。我國都市更新權利變換制度之研究--以實施者與土地權利人間權益分配問題為中心(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林育全(2007)。建構整合代理機制推動民間參與都市更新事業之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE