:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:謝靈運仕隱對立觀對其山水詩的影響
書刊名:正修通識教育學報
作者:林童照 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Tung-chao
出版日期:2016
卷期:13
頁次:頁35-54
主題關鍵詞:謝靈運仕隱山水詩Xie Ling-YunOfficial-hermitLandscape poetry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:57
  • 點閱點閱:22
謝靈運為劉宋時代山水詩的奠定詩人,其模山範水的方式,一改玄言詩之粗陳山水,而以逼真化的寫實方式為之,並且其所偏好描摹者,乃深山大壑之景物。本文以謝氏之生平及性格為進路,解釋其山水詩中之景物呈顯此種特徵之因,認為:謝氏因不得志於朝廷,於是強調仕隱對立的觀念,此使「跡」之所在具有顯現價值高下的作用,於是其遊之「跡」在與「道」並生之山林,便反襯出朝廷之失德。而對於「跡」的重視,其人真實在山林之中的身影,便必須有以突出,這可為謝詩以逼真化的書寫方式描摹山水,提出一項解釋。並且,在「跡」意識的籠罩下,謝靈運所隱、所遊之「跡」,甚且到達人所未至之絕境,這在謝詩中也就具有了獨特的象徵意義,象徵著謝靈運是人所未能至的「第一人」。「第一人」而未能有與其相稱的位遇,其貶斥、對抗朝廷之意自也寓於其中。
Xie Ling-Yun was the founder of landscape poetry. He changed the roughly-writing pattern of landscape of metaphysic poetry into the realism pattern. Besides the descriptive quality of his landscape poetry, the landscape that locate far from one could reach was his favorite also. This paper discusses the formation of Xie's landscape poetry by examining his biography and character to understand the reason that shaping the features of his landscape poetry. According to his biography, Xie's ambition of polity was defeated by the emperor so he emphasized the conception of official-hermit confrontation to show the emperor was not legitimate. His practice, based on the traditional conception of 'Tao', had to happen in real traveling and sightseeing in the landscape to make believe. For achieved this aim, thus the descriptive quality of his landscape poetry was demanded. Furthermore, reaching the places that no one had ever been could show the symbolic meaning that he was the 'first man'. Since the 'first man' could not get the official position what he should get, the mistake was made by the emperor without doubt.
期刊論文
1.張節末(20101200)。謝靈運山水詩的成因及其美學分析。漢學研究,28(4)=63,41-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王國瓔(2007)。中國山水詩研究。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.沈約、楊家駱(1975)。宋書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝靈運、顧紹柏(2004)。謝靈運集校注。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.嚴可均、陳延嘉(1997)。全上古三代秦漢三國六朝文。石家莊:河北教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.房玄齡、楊家駱(1976)。晉書。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.李延壽、楊家駱(1994)。南史。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.詹福瑞(1995)。走向世俗--南朝詩歌思潮。天津:百花文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.傅剛(2000)。《昭明文選》研究。中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.哈羅德.布魯姆、徐文博(2006)。影響的焦慮--一種詩歌理論。南京:江蘇教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉勰、周振甫(1984)。文心雕龍注釋。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.逯欽立(1988)。先秦漢魏晉南北朝詩。木鐸出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳昌明(2005)。沈迷與超越 : 六朝文學之感官辯證。臺北:里仁。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.劉義慶、劉孝標、余嘉錫、周祖謨(1984)。世說新語箋疏。華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王瑤(1986)。玄言‧山水‧田園--論東晉詩。中古文學風貌。台北:長安。  延伸查詢new window
2.林文月(1996)。從游仙詩到山水詩。山水與古典。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.林文月(1996)。陶謝詩中孤獨感探析。山水與古典。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳怡良(2006)。陶謝兩家理趣詩之比較。田園詩派宗師:陶淵明探新。台北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.塚本信也、宋紅(2001)。謝靈運的「山居賦」與山水詩。日韓謝靈運研究譯文集。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Knechtges, David R.(2009)。中國中古文人的山嶽觀--以謝靈運〈山居賦〉為主的討論。遊觀--作為身體技藝的中古文學與宗教。台北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.林文月(1996)。鮑照與謝靈運的山水詩。山水與古典。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭毓瑜(2009)。身體行動與地理種類--謝靈運〈山居賦〉與晉宋時期的「山川」、「山水」論述。遊觀--作為身體技藝的中古文學與宗教。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。  延伸查詢new window
9.林文月(1996)。中國山水詩的特質。山水與古典。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
10.李豐楙(2000)。嚴肅與遊戲:六朝詩人的兩種精神面向。世變與創化:漢唐、唐宋轉換期之文藝現象。中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE