:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:林朝棟與清季臺灣樟腦業之復興
書刊名:臺灣史研究
作者:黃富三 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Fu-san
出版日期:2016
卷期:23:2
頁次:頁1-64
主題關鍵詞:林朝棟劉銘傳開山撫番樟腦業中路撫墾局棟軍盈豐號葛竹軒裕豐號陳汝舟腦館公泰洋行福裕源Lin Chao-tungLiu Ming-chuanMountain-opening and Barbarian-pacificationCamphor industryPacification and settlement bureau of central TaiwanTung ArmyYing-Feng CompanyGe Zhu-xuanYu-Feng CompanyChen Ru-zhouCamphor houseButler & Co.Fu-Yu-Yuan Company
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:280
  • 點閱點閱:59
臺灣樟腦在咸豐8-10年(1858-1860)開港後出口日益興盛,同治9年(1870) 到達高峰後逐步衰退,至光緒11年(1885)幾近於零,樟腦王國為日本取代。隔年(1886),臺灣巡撫劉銘傳推動開山撫番政策,道員林朝棟力贊,且建議樟 腦專賣,從而主導中路撫墾事務,促成臺灣樟腦業之復興。關於林朝棟與樟腦業的關係,以往作品因缺乏一手史料僅能輾轉抄襲,甚至以訛傳訛。本文運用筆者新發掘之「霧峰林家文書」,結合相關史料,重建重 要史實,分四方面論述:林朝棟在開山撫番期與公泰洋行合作之背景、樟腦自 由買賣期雙方合作之始末、自營產銷,以及對清季臺灣腦業發展的貢獻。所獲 結論如下。第一,不少作品稱林朝棟擁有樟腦專賣權,此說不正確,事實是:他在樟 腦專賣時期(1886-1890)管理中路撫墾局,並率領棟軍,維持產銷秩序;而光緒17年(1891)開放自由買賣後,則投資中路樟腦業,並與外商合作出口樟腦。第二,林朝棟與公泰洋行之合作有二大因素。一是世界樟腦之需求與德國 化學工業之勃興,樟腦乃重要原料之一,故求之於世界最大產地的臺灣;二是 林朝棟在開山撫番政策上扮演要角,甚至投資樟腦業,外商必須透過他方能取 得大量而穩定的供應量。第三,林朝棟與公泰洋行之合作,以往作品語焉不詳,本文確認其時間為 樟腦開放自由買賣後之光緒17-19 年(1891-1893)間,前後共三年。然而,光緒20年(1894)其轄下部分腦商可能另外訂約,由公泰出口;而光緒16 年(1890)專賣期林朝棟是否已私自與公泰合作?此有待確認。此外,雙方合作終止之原因,一般說法是林朝棟片面要求漲價,實際上是公泰洋行認為香港腦價會下跌而要求減價,而光緒20 年確實下跌。第四,林朝棟與公泰洋行合作終止後,創設「福裕源」商號(光緒20年5月-21年3月)自營產銷,並與其他洋行合作,如瑞記洋行。此進一步反映林家 經營樟腦業之全貌。 第五,林朝棟在清季臺灣腦業發展的評價,近年來負面多於正面,本文予以釐清,歸納出三點:(1)開山撫番政策確為臺灣樟腦業振衰起敝之關鍵因素;(2)內山產腦區之擴張與棟軍之駐防有關;(3)臺灣樟腦業復興之主力來自中 路產銷之大增。因臺灣樟腦出口在同治9 年達到高峰後即走下坡,至光緒11年陷於谷底,僅有399磅;但開山撫番後,自光緒12年(1886)即快速回升,至光緒19年年出口量達5,321,463 磅,超越日本、奪回世界樟腦王國之寶座。因此林朝棟雖非清季臺灣樟腦業的壟斷者,但無疑是促成產業復興的主要功臣。
With Taiwan opening ports to foreign trade in 1858-1860, the export of Formosan camphor increased gradually, peaked in 1870, but declined and sank almost into oblivion by 1885. As a result, Japan surpassed Taiwan in being the chief producer and exporter of camphor. Situation changed when Liu Ming-chuan, the then governor of Taiwan, launched his campaign of "opening up the mountains and pacifying the aborigines" in 1886. Lin Chao-tung not only implemented Liu’s policy but also recommended monopolization of camphor production and marketing. Through his work at the Pacification and Settlement Bureau in central Taiwan, Lin contributed to revive the camphor industry. Current literature on the relationship between Lin Chao-tung and the camphor industry lacked first-hand accounts and often contained erroneous information borrowed indiscriminately or rumors from unreliable sources. This article, with reference to the recently discovered "Lin’s Archives of Wufeng" and existing documents, attempts to explore and reconstruct the related significant historical facts. The exploration focuses on four main aspects: the background of the joint venture between Lin and Butler & Co., the evolution of their collaboration during the free-trade period, camphor production and marketing under Lin, and Lin’s contribution to the development of camphor industry. The findings are as follows. Firstly, some previous studies claimed that Lin owned the monopoly of camphor, which was quite misleading and should be corrected. During the Monopoly Period (1886-1890), Lin played a leading role in maintaining the state-monopolized camphor production and marketing in order through his post in the Pacification and Settlement Bureau in central Taiwan and his military force, Tung Army. After the camphor was open to free trade in 1891, Lin startrws investing in the industry and collaborated with foreign companies in camphor export. Secondly, two factors contributed to the joint venture between Lin and Butler & Co. in camphor trade. One was the soar in global demand of Formosan camphor, especially with the rise of chemical industries in Germany. The other was Lin’s important role in the campaign of “opening up the mountains and pacifying the aborigines” and his own investment in camphor industry. His support was indispensable to foreign merchants who sought to obtain a substantial and steady supply of camphor. Thirdly, the joint venture between Lin and Butler & Co. is now confirmed to be of three years lasting from 1891 to 1893. However, whether there was any unauthorized business dealing between them in 1890 or whether some camphor merchants under Lin continued cooperating with Butler & Co. need to be further examined. Contrary to what has been said in present works, the real reason why they terminated their collaboration was the request from Butler & Co. for price reduction. Fourthly, with Butler & Co. out of the picture, Lin made his own investment in camphor production and marketing. He established Fu-Yu-Yuan Company in 1894 and cooperated with other foreign companies in camphor export. Finally, prevailing appraisal of Lin’s role in camphor industry of Taiwan tended to be negative. While most previous works depicted that Lin monopolized the camphor industry, this article highlights his contributions toward the revival of camphor industry after it hit rock bottom in 1885. On the one hand, Lin’s implementation of the "opening up the mountains and pacifying the aborigines" policy was the turning point. On the other hand, the stationing of Tung Army in the mountain areas maintained order and fostered the production of camphor. Eventually, soar in camphor production revived the camphor industry and by 1893 Taiwan regained the status from Japan as the leading global producer and exporter of camphor.
期刊論文
1.李佩蓁(20130600)。依附抑合作?清末臺灣南部口岸買辦商人的雙重角色(1860~1895)。臺灣史研究,20(2),31-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林文凱(20140600)。晚清臺灣開山撫番事業新探--兼論十九世紀臺灣史的延續與轉型。漢學研究,32(2)=77,139-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.卓克華(20021000)。清代士林潘家之發展兼及北臺仕紳交往之網絡關係。北縣文化,74,82-112。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃奇列(1953)。關西鎮文獻採訪錄。新竹文獻會通訊,5,5-34。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡懋棠(19800600)。簡介清季臺灣樟腦業概況。臺灣風物,30(2),74-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Myers, W. W.、林滿紅(19770600)。清末南部臺灣的蔗糖業。臺灣文獻,28(2),137-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃富三(19950600)。板橋林本源家與清代北臺山區的發展。臺灣史研究,2(1),5-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃富三(20010900)。清季臺灣外患、新政與霧峰林家--林家之際遇與紳權性格之轉變。故宮學術季刊,19(1),21-37+297-298。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡懋棠(19800600)。鹿港綠香居主人(蔡明正)自述--菜耕紀事。臺灣風物,30(2),83-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭喜夫(19760300)。蔡青筠年譜。臺灣文獻,26(4)/27(1),318-328。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李佩蓁(2015)。“Who is the Real Master?”:1895 年前後淡水口岸瑞記洋行的經營與轉折。「戰爭與臺灣社會」學術研討會,中央研究院臺灣史研究所、國立臺灣歷史博物館(主辦) (會議日期: 8 月15-16 日)。臺南:國立臺灣歷史博物館。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃富三(2009)。臺灣總督府樟腦專賣政策與霧峰林家。臺灣殖民地史學術研討會,中國社會科學院臺灣史研究中心(主辦) (會議日期: 8月20-25日)。大連:中國社會科學院臺灣史研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃頌文(2012)。清季臺灣開港前後英商杜德與寶順洋行的崛起(1850-1870)(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張麗芬(1995)。日本統治下的臺灣樟腦業(1895-1919)(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
3.林欣宜(1998)。樟腦產業下的地方社會與國家--以南庄地區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.朱壽朋、臺灣銀行經濟研究室(1969)。光緒朝東華續錄選輯。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
2.戴寶村(2009)。世界第一.臺灣樟腦。臺北:國立臺灣博物館。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺灣銀行經濟研究室(1969)。劉銘傳撫臺前後檔案。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺灣總督府史料編纂委員會、松下芳三郎(1924)。臺灣樟腦專賣志。臺北:臺灣總督府史料編纂委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.李鴻章、吳汝綸(1962)。李文忠公全集。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃富三、林滿紅、翁佳音(1997)。清末臺灣海關歷年資料(II):1882-1895。臺北:中央研究院臺灣史研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃富三、林正慧、吳俊瑩、何鳳嬌(2014)。霧峰林家文書集:棟軍相關收支單。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃富三、何鳳嬌、林正慧、吳俊瑩(2015)。霧峰林家文書集:田業租谷。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊秉煌、臺灣省南投農田水利會(2008)。南投農田水利會志。臺灣省南投農田水利會。  延伸查詢new window
10.蕭富隆、林啟三(1995)。日據時期竹山郡轄內概況。南投縣立文化中心。  延伸查詢new window
11.Davidson, J. W.(1903)。The Island of Formosa, Past and Present。New York:London:MacMillan & Co.。  new window
12.Milward, Alan S.、Saul, S. B.(1977)。The Development of the Economies of Continental Europe, 1850-1914。London:George Allen & Unwin。  new window
13.林資修、林培英(1992)。南強詩集。臺北:龍文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.波越重之(1985)。新竹廳志。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃富三、何鳳嬌、林正慧、吳俊瑩(2013)。霧峰林家文書集:墾務、腦務、林務。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃富三、何鳳嬌、林正慧、吳俊瑩(2014)。霧峰林家文書集:棟軍等相關信函。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
17.臺灣銀行經濟研究室(1961)。臺灣私法商事編。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
18.劉銘傳、馬昌華、翁飛(1997)。劉銘傳文集。合肥:黃山書社。  延伸查詢new window
19.鄭喜夫(1979)。林朝棟傳。臺中:臺灣省文獻會。  延伸查詢new window
20.鄭喜夫、潘敬尉(1980)。臺灣地理及歷史.卷九官師志:第一冊文職表。臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
21.薛仲三、歐陽頤(1977)。兩千年中西曆對照表。臺北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.Meskill, Johanna Menzel(1979)。A Chinese Pioneer Family: The Lins of Wu-feng Taiwan, 1729-1895。Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press。  new window
23.臺灣銀行經濟研究室(1962)。臺灣通志。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
24.林獻堂、林幼春(1971)。臺灣霧峰林氏族譜。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
25.王世慶、陳漢光、王詩琅、黃富三、陳俐甫(1991)。霧峰林家之調查與研究。臺北:林本源中華文化教育基金會。  延伸查詢new window
26.許雪姬(2004)。臺灣歷史辭典。臺北:行政院文化建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
27.Otnes, Harold M.(1999)。One Thousand Westerners in Taiwan, to 1945: A Biographical and Bibliographical dictionary。臺北:中央研究院臺灣史研究所。  new window
28.洪敏麟(1980)。臺灣舊地名之沿革。臺灣省文獻會。  延伸查詢new window
29.黃富三(1987)。霧峰林家的興起:從渡海拓荒到封疆大吏(1729-1864)。臺北:自立晚報社文化出版部。  延伸查詢new window
30.臺灣銀行經濟研究室(1963)。臺灣私法物權編。臺北:臺灣銀行。  延伸查詢new window
31.胡傳(1960)。臺灣日記與稟啟。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
32.劉銘傳(1958)。劉壯肅公奏議。臺北市:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
33.林滿紅(19970000)。茶、糖、樟腦業與臺灣之社會經濟變遷:1860-1895。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.周憲文(1980)。臺灣經濟史。臺北市:臺灣開明書店。  延伸查詢new window
35.倪贊元(1959)。雲林縣采訪冊。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
36.連橫(1962)。臺灣通史。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
37.黃紹恆(20100000)。臺灣經濟史中的臺灣總督府:施政權限、經濟學與史料。臺北:曹永和文教基金會:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.淡新檔案(17329.27)。,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺灣總督府公文類纂(8-1、536-10)。,南投。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳文添(2011)。談臺灣總督府早期購買土地實例,http://w3.th.gov.tw/www/epaper/view2.php?ID=81&AID=1117, 2015/08/23。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.包贌。臺灣人的臺灣史。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃富三(20120000)。臺灣農商連體經濟的興起與蛻變(1630-1895)。比較視野下的臺灣商業傳統。臺北:中央研究院臺灣史研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE