:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:災難治政:2014年高雄石化氣爆後的尺度政治與不均地理發展
書刊名:政治學報
作者:王文誠 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Wen-cheng
出版日期:2016
卷期:61
頁次:頁87-113
主題關鍵詞:尺度政治尺度移轉不均地理發展高雄氣爆災難政治Politics of scaleScale shiftUneven geographical DevelopmentKaohsiung gas explosionDisaster politics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:56
  • 點閱點閱:27
2014 年7 月31 日深夜,高雄市發生嚴重的地下石化管線氣爆事件,面對諸多批評,為什 麼「這一爆」非但不像陳菊市長自己所說的「政治生涯結束」,反而在發生如此重大意外災難 後,弔詭地成就她個人民意支持度的高峰?為了回答這個問題,本文試圖從災難政治學出發, 就尺度政治的「施為」及不均地理發展之「結構」視角,建構一個「結構化歷程」的分析架構。 研究發現,地方政府運用尺度移轉、尺度跳躍、及再尺度化等「尺度政治」策略動員的災難政治, 成功地築起防火牆,避免掉政治責難,進而在政治地位上「鞏固現況」。再者,尺度政治所支 持之社會背景,即臺灣經濟發展中「重南輕北」的不均地理發展結構,令地方政府在災難政治 中得以強化權力。結論指出,不均地理發展是這次氣爆災難中,各級政府面對臺灣發展更需要 重視的課題。
On July 31, 2014, a series of serve gas explosions occurred at the center of Kaohsiung city. Despite public rebukes for the city government’s poor performance of disaster management, the support to Mayor Chen, contrary to her own catastrophic expectation, remained strong. This study attempts to analyze the phenomenon from perspectives of disaster politics. A framework of structuration in which power is illustrated as an outcome of the interaction between the “agency” of politics of scale and the social “structure” of uneven geographic development is introduced. It is concluded that strategies of scale shifting, jumping and rescaling in politics of scale adopted by the city government to mobilize disaster politics have successfully built a firewall to avoid political culpability, and thus retained the political position of “accelerated status.” Furthermore, Taiwan’s “north-south divide” on uneven geographical development might have constituted a structural social background to enhance the power of local government in disaster politics. This explosion disaster seems to suggest that “uneven geographical development” would be a more salient issue for the government to tackle for further economic development.
期刊論文
1.MacLeod, G.、Jones, M.(2007)。Territorial, scalar, networked, connected: In what sense a 'regional world'?。Regional Studies,41(9),1177-1191。  new window
2.石之瑜(2009)。史上最強台獨現身--陳菊信手拈來皆武器。海峽評論,226,50-54。  延伸查詢new window
3.林倖妃(2013)。陳菊 台灣花媽的新高雄夢。天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳宏昱(20070800)。形象「建構」?「見構」形象!?--解讀高雄市長陳菊之政治意識型態。藝術欣賞,3(4),71-78。  延伸查詢new window
5.Adams, Patricia C.(1996)。Protest and the Scale Politics of Telecommunications。Political Geography,15(5),419-441。  new window
6.Brenner, N.(2009)。Open Questions on State Rescaling。Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,2(1),123-139。  new window
7.Brenner, N.(2004)。Urban Governance and the Production of New Spaces in Western Europe, 1960-2000。Review of International Political Economy,11(3),447-488。  new window
8.Brenner, N.(2000)。The Urban Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of Scale。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,24(2),361-378。  new window
9.Drury, A. C.、Olson, R. S.(1998)。Disasters and Political Unrest: An Empirical Investigation。Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,6(3),153-161。  new window
10.Gaillard, Jean-Christophe、Clavé, Elsa、Kelman, Ilan(2008)。Wave of Peace? Tsunami Disaster Diplomacy in Aceh, Indonesia。Geoforum,39(1),511-526。  new window
11.Gawronski, V. T.、Olson, R. S.(2013)。Disasters as Crisis Triggers for Critical Junctures? The 1976 Guatemala Case。Latin American Politics and Society,55(2),133-149。  new window
12.Katz, C.(2001)。On the Grounds of Globalization: A Topography for Feminist Political Engagement。Signs,26(4),1213-1234。  new window
13.Mamadouh, V.、Kramsch, O.、Van der Velde, M.(2004)。Articulating Local and Global Scales。Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie,95(5),455-466。  new window
14.Ker-Lindsay, James(2000)。Greek-Turkish Rapprochement: The Impact of Disaster Diplomacy?。Cambridge Review of International Affairs,14(1),215-232。  new window
15.Massey, D.(1979)。In What Sense a Regional Problem?。Regional Studies,13(2),233-243。  new window
16.McCarthy, J.(2005)。Devolution in the Woods: Community Forestry as Hybrid Neoliberalism。Environment and Planning A,37(6),995-1014。  new window
17.Morgan, K.(2007)。The Polycentric State: New Spaces of Empowerment and Engagement?。Regional Studies,41(9),1237-1251。  new window
18.Olson, R. S.(2000)。Toward a Politics of Disaster: Losses, Values, Agendas, and Blame。International Jounal of Mass Emergencies Disasters,18(2),265-287。  new window
19.Olson, R. S.、Gawronski, V. T.(2003)。Disasters as Critical Junctures? Managua, Nicaragua 1972 and Mexico City 1985。International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters,21(1),5-35。  new window
20.Pelling, M.、Dill, K.(2010)。Disaster Politics: Tipping Points for Change in the Adaptation of Sociopolitical Regimes。Progress in Human Geography,34(1),21-37。  new window
21.Swyngedouw, E.(2000)。Authoritarian Governance, Power, and the Politics of Rescaling。Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,18(1),63-76。  new window
22.Smith, Neil(1992)。Contours of a Spatialized Politics: Homeless Vehicles and the Production of Geographical Scale。Social Text,33,54-81。  new window
23.Wickramasinghe, A.(2005)。Tsunami: Building the Nation through Reciprocity while Reconstructing the Affected Areas in Sri Lanka。Local Environment,10(5),543-549。  new window
24.王文誠(20110300)。反身性的社區營造:實踐性的地理學想像。都市與計劃,38(1),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Raco, Mike(2003)。Governmentality, subject-building, and the discourses and practices of devolution in the UK。Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,28(1),75-95。  new window
26.Brown, J. Christopher、Purcell, Mark(2005)。There's Nothing Inherent about Scale: Political Ecology, the Local Trap, and the Politics of Development in the Brazilian Amazon。Geoforum,36(5),607-624。  new window
圖書
1.Jones, E. C.、Murphy, A. D.(2009)。The Political Economy of Hazards and Disasters。Lanham:AltaMira Press。  new window
2.蕭新煌(1987)。我們只有一個台灣:反污染、生態保育與環境運動。臺北:圓神。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brenner, N.(2003)。State/Space: A Reader。Malden, MA:Blackwell。  new window
4.Castells, M.(2000)。The Rise of the Network Society。Blackwell。  new window
5.Chandler, Alfred Dupont Jr.(1977)。The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business。Cambridge, MA:Belknap Press。  new window
6.Klein, N.(2007)。The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism。New York:Henry Holt。  new window
7.Doreen, Massey(1984)。Spatial Division of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production。Macmillan。  new window
8.Massey, D.、Allen, J.、Sarre, P.(1999)。Human Geography Today。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
9.Myrdal, G.(1957)。Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions。London:Gerald Duckworth。  new window
10.Piketty, T.、Goldhammer, A.(2014)。Capital in the Twenty-First Century。Cambridge, MA:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
11.Scott, J.(2001)。Power。Malden, MA:Polity Press。  new window
12.Sylves, R.(2015)。Disaster Policy and Politics: Emergency Management and Homeland Security。Washington, DC:CQ Press。  new window
13.Harvey, David(2003)。The New Imperialism。Oxford University Press。  new window
14.Giddens, Anthony(1984)。The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration。University of California Press。  new window
15.Harvey, David(2005)。Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development。Franz Steiner Verlag。  new window
其他
1.方家敏(20140806)。學者認應追究陳菊 氣爆事件責任。  延伸查詢new window
2.今日新聞政治中心(2014)。楊秋興緊追陳菊氣爆有無按摩:妳在怕什麼?,http://www.nownews.com/n/2014/10/01/1437107。  延伸查詢new window
3.三立民調中心(2014)。高雄氣爆 中央與地方誰危機處理能力好?,http://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=34733。  延伸查詢new window
4.(20140807)。陳菊今為市府橫向連繫不足道歉。  延伸查詢new window
5.石秀華,周昭平,涂建豐(20141130)。菊囊括99萬票 全台最多打造安全城市「誰敢忽視高雄人」。  延伸查詢new window
6.王鼎鈞(2014)。高雄災後最新民調:陳菊57%、楊秋興19%,http://www.nownews.com/n/2014/08/13/1368584。  延伸查詢new window
7.王英傑(20140805)。沈春華哽咽批政府重北輕南。  延伸查詢new window
8.王正寧(20140807)。早知埋管 市府團隊說謊。  延伸查詢new window
9.石秀華,楊適吾(2014)。高雄災區石化管線 陳菊: 永不回填,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20140805/446561/。  延伸查詢new window
10.吳江泉,呂素麗(20140830)。陳菊:這一爆難道是我政治生涯結束?。  延伸查詢new window
11.吳江泉,李義,劉宥廷(20140901)。災區路茫茫 善款發得亂糟糟。  延伸查詢new window
12.吳秉鍇,吳父鄉(20140806)。高雄災區石化管線 全面停用。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳秉鍇,胡宗鳳(20140808)。高市府認錯四首長請辭 死亡箱涵由市府發包。  延伸查詢new window
14.李義(20140808)。收規費還不知情?議長:市府白賊。  延伸查詢new window
15.李欣芳(20140824)。高雄爭取中油南遷 不排除二次江菊會。  延伸查詢new window
16.吳門鍵(20140808)。公文證明早知管線 陳菊道歉。  延伸查詢new window
17.吳秉鍇,胡宗鳳(20140808)。市長陳菊道歉副市長吳宏謀、水利局長、工務局長、捷運局長負政治責任。  延伸查詢new window
18.胡宗鳳(20140831)。陳菊憂氣爆使政治生涯結束 楊秋興諷冷血。  延伸查詢new window
19.林宏聰,曹明正(20140808)。橫向聯繫大錯 早知有榮化管線 幽靈箱涵惹禍 高市府81(1992)年施作 陳菊道歉 副市長、3局長辭職。  延伸查詢new window
20.林宏聰,曹明正(20140808)。早知榮化埋管 陳菊:非常對不起。  延伸查詢new window
21.東森新聞(2014)。陳菊要求檢討管線配置 總統允諾檢討,http://www.ettoday.net/news/20140801/。  延伸查詢new window
22.曾韋禎,李欣芳,王榮祥(20140806)。代位求償逾百億 政院:高市府負責。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳乃綾,謝梅芬,劉星君(20140807)。前年會議紀錄 輕軌工程協商管線 李長榮化工曾派員……榮化這條管線 高市早知道。  延伸查詢new window
24.許素惠(20140805)。財團企業稅繳中央 蘇治芬:地方有責 但扛不起。  延伸查詢new window
25.胡宗鳳,謝梅芬(20140808)。高市府終認錯……陳菊道歉 四官員求去。  延伸查詢new window
26.蔡佩芳(20140806)。高市府1頁公文討19億 政院錯愕。  延伸查詢new window
27.歐陽良盈,謝梅芬(20140808)。真相終出土…… 要命的箱涵 高市工務局蓋的。  延伸查詢new window
28.楊濡嘉(20150731)。氣爆周年 陳菊哽咽:「要讓高雄翻轉」。  延伸查詢new window
29.華視新聞(2014)。氣爆市府無罪 家屬: 死者陰間抗議,http://news.cts.com.tw/cts/society/201412/201412181559882.html。  延伸查詢new window
30.(20140802)。延宕的三小時:高雄救災的專業死角。  延伸查詢new window
31.(20140903)。慚愧呀!這個政府。  延伸查詢new window
32.(20140804)。下水道箱涵掛管線違法 檢展追查。  延伸查詢new window
33.謝梅芬,簡淳琪(20140902)。氣爆滿月 高雄災戶掛布條:謝謝台積電。  延伸查詢new window
34.賴義中(20140807)。氣爆引羞辱 張家祝、杜紫軍雙辭。  延伸查詢new window
35.嚴思祺(2014)。台灣高雄氣爆:石化管線剪不斷 理還亂,http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/china/2014/08/140804_taiwan_kaohsiung_blast_pipelines。  延伸查詢new window
36.證券基金會(2010)。上市公司紡織類股基本資料表,http://www.sfi.org.tw/。  延伸查詢new window
37.顏瑞田,彭暄貽(20141219)。高雄氣爆 李謀偉等12人遭起訴。  延伸查詢new window
38.顏瑞田(20140808)。早知有榮化管線 陳菊道歉 4首長請辭。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Latour, B.(2005)。From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik--Or How to Make Things Public。Making Things Public--Atmospheres of Democracy。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Swyngedouw, E.(2004)。Scaled Geographies: Nature, Place, and the Politics of Scale。Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method。Malden, MA:Blackwell。  new window
3.李丁讚(20040000)。導論--市民社會與公共領域在台灣的發展。公共領域在台灣:困境與契機。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE