:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣未婚男女單身化:2025年男女年齡層擇偶機會估計
書刊名:國家與社會
作者:張榮富 引用關係唐曉霞彭于庭
出版日期:2019
卷期:21
頁次:頁1-50
主題關鍵詞:擇偶機會晚婚未婚不婚可婚指標Marriage opportunityDelayed marriageUnmarriedNo-marriageAvailability index
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:68
  • 點閱點閱:6
本文運用台灣人口資料,在假設「結婚利得及結婚意願」沒有下降的情况下,計算及推估2012年與2025年可婚指標(availability index),以比較兩年度男女的逐歲「絕對性擇偶機會」的升降。研究結果發現:(1)2025年未婚男性可婚指標在27至34歲高於2012年,但在39歲以後則明顯低於2012年。(2)2025年未婚女性可婚指標的最高雙峰仍停留在27與30歲,但是27歲以後可婚指標大多低於2012年。承上述兩點,近期年輕男女的未婚率的上升,縱使個人的原意只是推遲「正式考慮」婚姻擇偶年齡(想晚婚而非不婚),但將使更多男女發生「擇偶錯時」的情况(女性比男性嚴重),而在未來陷入比2012年「更劣勢」的婚姻市場中擇偶,使得男女結婚的困難度皆提提高。總結上述,近期年輕男女未婚率的上升,將不只導致未來男女的晚婚,而晚婚將進一步導致未來男女「不婚率」(40或50歲未婚率)的上升。台灣有婚姻意願但無法成婚的未婚男女將日漸增加,「未婚男女單身化」已是趨勢。另外,由於30歳以後女性未婚率的漸漸增加,這可能抵消政府獎勵已婚者多生的生育政策,台灣少子化現象在未來不易緩解。
This paper explored if the recent increase in the rate of unmarried young people will only result in a delay in marriage or also increase the number of elder single people in the near future. Taiwan's availability index (Veevers, 1988) of 2012 and 2025 was calculated and estimated under the limitations of matching factors and the willingness to get married were kept unchanged, in order to assess the availability of men and women for marriage in the two years. The results show that in 2025, marriage opportunities are lower for both men and women as compared to 2012. Both men and women will be facing a higher proportion of "the predicament of mistimed mate selection." Compared with 2012, the highest and second highest ages of the female availability index in 2025 stay the same. Accounting for the late marriage trend, the marriage age (or the mate selection age) in 2025 will more than the one in 2012. Therefore, women in 2025 might still seek a match, even when they have passed the highest age of the availability index, and are facing "the predicament of mistimed mate selection." The male availability index after 34 years old in 2025 is slightly lower than the one in 2012. Overall, the results means that men and women will both face a more difficulty in matching. Hence, recent increase in the rate of unmarried young people in Taiwan will more likely to increase no-marriage of elder in the near feature.
期刊論文
1.Dolton, P. J.(1982)。The Arrange Game: An Assignment Problem with Indivisibilities。Theory and Decision,14,373-389。  new window
2.Bennett, Elaine(1988)。Consistent Bargaining Conjectures in Marriage and Matching。Journal of Economic Theory,45,392-407。  new window
3.張榮富、唐玉蟬(20091200)。逐歲分析男女年齡對擇偶年齡偏好的影響。淡江人文社會學刊,40,115-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Veevers, J.(1988)。The 'Real' Marriage Squeeze: Mate Selection, Mortality and the Marriage Gradient。Sociological Perspectives,31,169-189。  new window
5.Pawlowski, Boguslaw、Koziel, Slawomir(2002)。The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates。Evolution and Human Behavior,23(2),139-149。  new window
6.張榮富、蔡滋紋(20150300)。「學歷擠壓」困境:擇偶網站資料的分析。人文及社會科學集刊,27(1),205-263。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張榮富、蔡滋紋(20150300)。「學歷擠壓」困境:擇偶網站資料的分析--回應。人文及社會科學集刊,27(1),277-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Thornton, A.、Axinn, W. G.、Teachman, J. D.(1995)。The Influence of School Enrollment and Accumulation on Cohabitation and Marriage in Early Adulthood。American Sociological Review,60(5),762-774。  new window
9.South, S. J.、Lloyd, K. M.(1992)。Marriage Opportunities and Family Formation: Further Implications of Imbalanced sex ratios。Journal of Marriage and the Family,54(2),440-451。  new window
10.Lampard, R.(1993)。Availability of Marriage Partners in England and Wales: A Comparison of Three Measures。Journal of Biosocial Science,25(3),333-350。  new window
11.Samuelson, Paul A.(1948)。Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference。Economica,15(60),243-253。  new window
12.Raymo, J. M.(2003)。Premarital Living Arrangement and the Transition to First Marriage in Japan。Journal of Marriage and Family,65,302-315。  new window
13.Bloom, David E.、Bennett, Neil G.(1990)。Modeling American Marriage Patterns。Journal of the American Statistical Association,85,1009-1017。  new window
14.張榮富、張宗文(20120400)。騎驢找馬與劈腿:以「多對多」連續性搜尋模型分析兩種擇偶模式的配對成功率。調查研究,27,81-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Schoen, R.、Kluegel, J. R.(1988)。The widening gap in black and white marriage rates: The impact of population composition and differential marriage propensities。American Sociological Review,53(6),895-907。  new window
16.Kenrick, Douglas T.、Keefe, Richard C.(1992)。Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies。Behavioral and Brain Sciences,15(1),75-133。  new window
17.Gale, David、Shapley, Lloyd(1962)。College Admissions and Stability of Marriage。American Mathematical Monthly,69(1),9-15。  new window
18.駱明慶(20060300)。教育成就的性別差異與國際通婚。經濟論文叢刊,34(1),79-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張榮富(20130900)。北高兩市與全臺男女各年齡層擇偶機會的差異--兼論男性外婚與女性不婚。城市學學刊,4(2),27-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.張榮富、陳玫瑜(20120300)。年齡被接受度的性別差異--以年齡偏好的雙向配對擇偶模式評估。經濟論文叢刊,40(1),119-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.張榮富(20060900)。年齡對擇偶年齡與身高偏好門檻的影響。中華心理學刊,48(3),275-289。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade(1997)。Women's Employment and the Gain to Marriage: The Specialization and Trading Model。Annual Review of Sociology,23,431-453。  new window
23.張榮富、范慧美、許淑娟、王杏玫、韓秀妮(20150600)。臺灣未婚男女擇偶機會的近期變化及城鄉差異。社會與區域發展學報,4(2),67-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Goldman, Noren、Westoff, Charles F.、Hammerslough, Charles(1984)。Demography of the Marriage Market in the United States。Population Index,50(1),5-25。  new window
25.張榮富、吳杭彌(20170900)。異性的或自己的年齡偏好何者更影響擇偶機會?--擇偶網站都會區男女的模擬配對分析。城市學學刊,8(2),1-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.楊靜利、李大正、陳寬政(20061200)。臺灣傳統婚配空間的變化與婚姻行為之變遷。人口學刊,33,1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade(1988)。A Theory of Marriage Timing。American Journal of Sociology,94(3),563-591。  new window
28.Ferguson, Thomas S.(1989)。Who Solved the Secretary Problem?。Statistical Science,4,282-296。  new window
會議論文
1.楊文山、張祐慈、范維君(2010)。台灣女性初婚年齡變遷的社會學初探。「2010年臺灣人口學會年會暨人口變遷與社會發展」學術研討會,國立臺灣大學 (會議日期: 2010年4月29-30日)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.樓玉梅、范瑟珍(2010)。我國人口變動趨勢之影響分析及政策探討。臺北市:行政院經濟建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fraboni, R.、Billari, F. C.(2001)。Measure and Dynamics of Marriage Squeezes: From Baby Boom to Baby Bust in Italy。  new window
3.Ni Bhrolcháin, Maire、Sigle-Rushton, Wendy(2004)。Gender Contrasts in Partner Supply: Marriage Market Estimates and Their Implications。Southampton, GB:Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute。  new window
4.中華民國國家發展委員會(2012)。中華民國2012年至2060年人口推計。  延伸查詢new window
5.Brüderl, J.、Diekmann, A.(1997)。Education and Marriage: A Comparative Study。Institute of Sociology, University of Munich。  new window
6.Casson, M.(1995)。Partner Selection in International Joint Ventures: Economic Mode! and Social Metaphors。Department of Economics, University of Reading。  new window
學位論文
1.Chang, J. F.(1997)。A Simulation Matching Approach for Mate Selection(碩士論文)。University of Reading。  new window
圖書
1.Mosteller, F. R.(1965)。Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions。Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley。  new window
2.Becker, Gary Stanley(1981)。A Treatise on the Family。Harvard University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Todd, P. M.(1997)。Searching for the Next Best Mate。Simulating Social Phenomena。Springer-Verlag。  new window
2.楊文山(2006)。臺灣地區的婚姻擠壓。挑戰與回應。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Glick, P. C.、Beresford, J. C.、Heer, D. M.(1963)。Family formation and family composition: Trends and prospects。Sourcebook in marriage and the family。Boston:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
4.Trivers, R.(1972)。Parental investment and sexual selection。Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871-1971。Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE