:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:調節生育與人口遷移對台灣人口結構之影響
作者:劉一龍 引用關係
作者(外文):Yi-long Liu
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:社會福利所
指導教授:王德睦
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:第三次人口轉型替換性移民超低生育率調節生育國際移民replacement migrationThird demographic transitioninternational migrationfertility adjustmentlowest-low fertility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:55
台灣的TFR在2003年已達「超低水準(lowest-low fertility)」,2006年更下滑至千分之1115,引發後續人口快速老化的疑慮。儘管Bongaarts and Feeney(1998)認為TFR容易因生育步調影響而被低估,在去除生育的時間效果後,TFR調整值仍保持在千分之1400至1500間,故台灣女性的生育率依舊維持極低水準。低生育率的主要影響是人口結構老化、勞動人力不足及青壯年人口負擔加重等。早於20年前,珨F慶與陳寬政(1988)便建議利用「調節生育」和「國際移民」來因應人口問題。提高生育政策目的為促使家庭發揮弁遄A生育率回升是政策執行成奶U的產物,由於提高生育政策的內容十分豐富,故需付出高額經濟支出,同時,其他國家經驗證實生育率甚難回到人口「替換水準」之上,故United Nations(2000)主張以「替換性移民(Replacement migration)」來解決青壯人口負擔與勞動人力短缺的問題。晚近,台灣的人口政策綱領目標也從過去的「計劃生育」轉變成「維持人口合理成長」,2006年規劃的「人口政策白皮書」更將「生育」和「遷移」議題視為重要內涵,然而,目前尚未有研究連結二者探討日後人口組成發展,本文即是希望透過兼顧調節生育和各類人口遷移之效果,計算台灣人口在維持「潛在支持比(potential support ratio, PSR)」為3的前提下,各種生育和婚姻移民假設需要額外引進多少經濟勞動人力。
本文依照生育和婚姻移民差異設定四種假設,分別為TFR維持現狀(比較組);TFR在10年內由目前的千分之1115上升至千分之1600(調節生育政策的影響);考慮婚姻移民的數量和生育差異(婚姻遷移的影響);兼顧調節生育政策與人口遷移效果。結果發現,未來人口總數都呈現先增後減,人口規模縮減已成定局;若能提高生育水準,2050年時,可以將老年人口比例降至30﹪以下,婚姻移民對降低人口老化的效果較不顯著。若以PSR趨勢觀察,各類假設的工作人口負擔沉重,工作人口內的中高齡者(45-64歲)比例亦逐年增加,預告更沉重的負擔來臨。將PSR維持在3,時間越晚所需的人口數量越多,預計自2030年開始便需陸續引進勞動人力以填補工作人口短缺問題。雖然,大量人口移入未造成「第三次人口轉型(third demographic transition)」,但在生育率持續低迷、依賴國際移民解決工作人口負擔的前提下,人口轉變趨勢將朝此發展。最後,根據United Nations(2000)估計,眾多低生育率國家日後也仰賴移入大量人力以為國家發展,預測未來人口政策目標將由當前的「維持人口合理成長」,調整為「吸引其他國家勞動人口移入」。
In 2003, Taiwan’s TFR had already reached the lowest-low fertility, and it even declined to 1115‰ in 2006, which caused the misgivings of fast aging population in the future. Although Bongaarts and Feeney (1998) think that TFR would be easily underestimated because of the influence of fertility pace, after eliminating timing effects of fertility, the adjusted TFR is still between 1400‰ and 1500‰; thus, the fertility rate of female in Taiwan is still very low. The main influences of low fertility rate are aging population structure, insufficient labor force, and heavier burden for the young population. Tu and Chen (1988) had proposed the use of fertility adjustment and international migration to manage population problem 20 years ago. The purpose of enhancing fertility policy is to urge family to develop its function, thus the rise of fertility rate is the success of policy implementation. Since the content of policy of enhancing fertility is abundant, thus great amount of economic expenditures is needed; in the meanwhile, other countries verify that it is quite difficult for fertility rate to get back to and be above population replacement level, so United Nations (2000) stood for replacement migration to solve the problems of young population’s burden and shortage of labor force. Recently, the essential goal of Taiwan’s population policy has also changed from the previous “family planning” to “maintenance of reasonable population growth”. “White paper for population policy” that was planned in 2006 even considered “fertility” and “migration” as important contents. However, none of the studies has connected “fertility” and “migration” together to discuss the composition and development of population in the future; this thesis hopes to calculate how many economical labor force is needed to be recommended additionally with regard to the assumptions of fertility and marriage migration through looking after the effects of both fertility adjustment and population migration under the prerequisite of maintaining Taiwan population’s potential support ratio (PSR) as 3.
This thesis sets up four kinds of assumptions according to the differences of fertility and marriage migration, which are maintaining the status quo of TFR (control group), TFR increases from current 1115‰ to 1600‰ within 10 years (influence of fertility adjustment policy), considering marriage migration quantity and fertility difference (influence of marriage migration), and giving consideration to the effects of both fertility adjustment policy and population migration respectively. The result finds out the total population in the future shows the phenomenon of increase first and decrease after, the reduction of population scope is a foregone conclusion. If it is possible to rise the fertility level, the ratio of aged population could be reduced to less than 30% by 2050; while the effect of marriage migration towards lowering aging population is relatively insignificant. If observing from the PSR trend, the burdens of work population in each kind of assumptions are heavy, the ratio of people with moderate to advanced age (45- 64 years old) among the work population also increases year by year, which predicting the coming of heavier burden. In order to maintain PSR at the level of 3, the later the time, the required population would be more and more, estimating that it is necessary to introduce labor force continuously so as to fill in the shortage of work population since 2030. Although the immigration of large number of population would not cause third demographic transition, the trend of population change would develop towards this transition under the prerequisite of continuously low fertility rate and depending on international migration to solve the burden of work population. Finally, according to the estimation from United Nations (2000), numerous countries with low fertility rates will be dependent on immigrating a large number of labor power to develop for the countries in the future, predicting that the goal of population policy in the future would be changed from the present “maintenance of reasonable population growth” to “attracting the labor force from other countries”.
參考書目
內政部入出國及移民署︰http://www.immigration.gov.tw/aspcode/searchMenu.asp,2008年6月。
內政部警政署︰http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/np?ctNode=11358&mp=1,2008年6月。
行政院經濟建設委員會︰http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0000124,2008年6月。
中文
王宏仁與張書銘(2003)商品化的跨國婚姻市場:以台越婚姻仲介業運作為例,台灣社會學刊,6:177-221。
王德睦與劉一龍(2008)台灣總生育率再分析-ACF法的運用,人口學刊,36:37-66。
王錫美(2005)台灣地區有偶率與婚姻移民對生育率之影響,國立台北大學統計學系碩士論文。
余清祥與藍銘偉(2003)台灣地區生育率模型之研究,人口學刊,27:105-131。
李雅儒(2004)英、法、德三國移民政策之比較,東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。
沈倖如與王宏仁(2003)融入或逃避?「越南新娘」的在地反抗策略,頁249-284,收錄於蕭新煌主編,台灣與東南亞:南向政策與越南新娘,台北:中央研究院亞太研究中心。
辛炳隆(2005)由「入出國及移民法」之修正看外籍專業人士的引進,就業安全,4(1)︰73-79。
胡夢鯨(2006)「人口結構變遷與教育政策之研究」工作進度計協調會議簡報,教育部教研會專案研究報告-「我國人口結構變遷與教育政策之整合型研究」。
夏曉鵑(2000)資本國際化下的國際婚姻,台灣社會研究季刊,39:45-92。new window
(2002)流離尋岸-資本國際化下的「外籍新娘」現象,台北:唐山。
(2006)新移民運動的形成—差異政治、主體化與社會性運動,台灣社會研究季刊,61:1-70。
徐聖堯與楊靜利(2004)國小教師之需求量與供給量推估:民國92-102年度,教育與社會研究,9:99-118.
財團法人臺灣智庫(2004)人口組成變遷與未來人口政策方向,行政院內政部委託研究報告。
珨F慶、陳寬政與陳昭榮(1992)台灣地區老年殘障率之研究,人口學刊,15:17-30。
珨F慶與陳寬政(1988)調節生育與國際移民:未來台灣人口變遷的兩個關鍵問題,人文及社會科學集刊,1(1):77-98。
張維安與王德睦(1983)社會流動與選擇性婚姻,中國社會學刊,72:191-214。
莫藜藜與賴佩玲(2004)台灣社會「少子化」與外籍配偶子女的問題初探,社區發展季刊,105:55-65。
陳小紅(2000)婚配移民:台灣海峽兩岸聯姻之研究,亞洲研究,34:35-68。new window
陳肇男、孫得雄與李棟明(2003)台灣的人口奇蹟:家庭計畫政策成弗晰翩A台北:聯經。
陳寬政、王德睦與陳文玲(1986)台灣地區人口變遷的原因與結果,人口學刊,9:1-25。new window
陳寬政、陳昭榮與珨F慶(1993)老年殘障與醫療費用,頁179-197,收錄於王國羽主編,社會安全問題之探討,嘉義:中正大學社會福利研究所。
陸慧玲(1999)「包容」與「排斥」?英、德移民政策之研究,國立政治大學外交學系碩士論文。
傅以蒨(2003)法國與歐洲共同移民政策,國立政治大學外交學系碩士論文。
曾嬿芬(2006)誰能打開國界之門:台灣移民政策的階級主義,台灣社會研究季刊,61:73-108。
黃詩雯(2001)亞太地區技術性移民政策之比較研究,東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。
楊靜利、李大正與陳寬政(2006)台灣傳統婚配空間的變化與傳統婚姻行為之變遷,人口學刊,33:1-32。new window
廖正宏(1988)人口遷移,台北:巨流。
劉一龍、李大正、王德睦(2008)調整生育步調對臺灣總生育率的影響,台灣社會福利學刊,6(2):25-60。new window
劉一龍、陳寬政與楊靜利(2003)鼓勵生育與所得稅免稅額調整,台灣社會福利學刊,2(2):53-78。new window
劉一龍與王德睦(2005)台灣地區總生育率的分析:完成生育率與生育步調之變化,人口學刊,30:97-123。
潘淑雯(2003)我國外籍勞工政策制定過程-政策網絡的分析,國立中正大學勞工學系碩士論文。
潘淑滿(2004)從婚姻移民現象剖析公民權的實踐與限制,社區發展季刊,105:30-43。new window
蔡宏進(1998)港澳地區及大陸移入台灣人口之研究,人口學刊,19:81-92。new window
蔡明璋(1996)台灣的貧窮:下層階級的結構分析,台北:巨流。
蔡淑玲(1994)台灣之婚姻配對模式,人文及社會科學集刊,6(2):335-71。
蔡雅玉(2000)台越跨國婚姻現象之初探,國立成奶j學政治經濟學系碩士論文。
藍科正(2005)我國引進外國專業人員之管理機制,就業安全,4(2)︰8-13。
英文
Ahlburg, D.A. and J.W. Vaupel. 1993. " Immigration and the Dependency Burden."International Population Conference Montreal 1993(4):61-71.
Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. London:Sage.
Becker, G.S. 1960. "An economic analysis of fertility." Pp.209-231 in Demographic and economic change in developed countries, Princeton:Princeton University Press.
Bongaarts, J. 1999. "The fertility impact of changes in the timing of childbearing in the developing world." Population studies 53:277-89.
2000. "Fertility and Reproductive Preference in Post-Transitional Societies." Population and Development Review 27:260-281.
2002. "The End of the Fertility Transition in the Developed World." Population and Development Review 28(3):419-443.
Bongaarts, J. and G. Feeney. 1998. "On the quantum and tempo of fertility." Population and development review 24(2):271-91.
Bulatao, R. and J. Gasterline. 2001. Global Fertility Transition. New York:Population Council.
Caldwell, J. 2005. "Demographers’ involvement in twentieth-century population policy:Continuity or discontinuity?" Population Research and Policy Review 24:359-385.
Coleman, D. 2006. "Immigation and ethnic change in low-fertility countries:A third demographic transition." Population and Development Review 32(3):401-446.
D’addio A.C. and d’Ercole M. Mira. 2005. Trends and Determinants of fertility rates in OECD countries:The Role of Policies. OECD social, employment and migration working papers.
Day, J.C. 1992. "Population Projections of the United States, by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin:1992 to 2050." Pp25-1092 in Current Population Reports, edited by U.S. Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC:U.S. GPO.
Easterlin, R.A. 1978. "The Economics and sociology of fertility:a synthesis." in Historical studies of changing fertility, edited by C. Tilly. Princeton:Princeton university press.
Espenshade, T.J. 1986. "Population dynamics with immigration and low fertility." Pp248-261 in Below-Replacement fertility in Industrial Societies:Causes, Consequences, Policies, edited by Kingsley Davis Mikhail S. Bernstam and Rita Ricardo-Campbell. New York:Population Council.
1994. "Can Immigration slow U.S. Population Aging?"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13(4):759-68.
Frassmann, H. and R. Münz. 1994. European Migration in the Late Twentith Century:History Patterns, Actual Trends, and Social Implications. England:Edward Elgar Press.
Freedman, R. 1967. "Application of the behavioral sciences to family planning programs." Studies in Family Planning 23:5-9.
Goodkind, D.M. 1993. "New Zodiacal Influences on Chinese Family Formation: Taiwan, 1976." Demography 30(2):127-142.
Gilbert, N. and P. Terrell. 1998. Social Welfare Policy. Allyn and Bacon.
Henry, L. 1977. "Concepts actuels et résultats empiriques sur la fécondité naturelle." Pp17-28 in Natural Fertility, edited by H.Leridon and J. Menken. Liège:Ordina Editions.
Hoffman, L.W. and M.L. Hoffman. 1973. "The value of children to parents." Pp17-76 in Psychological Perspectives on Population, edited by J.T. Fawcett. New York:Basic Books.
Holzmann, R. 1987. "Aging and Social Security Costs." European Journal of Population 3:411-37.
Jonsson, S.H. and M.S. Rendall. 2004. "The Fertility Contribution of Mexican Immigration to the United States." Demography 41(1):129-150.
Keely, C.B. and B.N. Tran. 1989. "Remittances from Labor Migration:Evalutions, Performance and Implications." International Labor Review 23:500-25.
Kohler, H.P., F.C. Billari and J.A. Ortega. 2002. "Variance effects in Bongaarts-Feeney formula ." Demography 38(1):1-16.
2002. "The Emergence of Lowest-Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s." Population and development review 28(4):641-80.
Lesthaeghe, R. 2001. "Postponement and recuperation:recent fertility trends and forecasts in six western European countries." Paper presented at IUSSP Seminar on International Perspectives on Low Fertility:Trends, Theories and Policies, Tokyo, 21-23 March 2001.
Lesthaeghe, R. and P. Willems. 1999. "Is Low fertility a temporary phenomenon in the European Union?" Population and development review 25(2):211-28.
Liefbroer, A. and M. Corijn. 1999. "Who, what, and when? Specifying the impact of education attainment and labor force participation on family formation." European Journal of Population 15(1):45-75.
Lindstrom, D.P. and S.G. Saucedo. 2002. "The Short- and Long-Term Effects of U.S. Migration Experience on Mexican Women’s Fertility." Social Force 80(4):1341-1368.
Lutz, W. 2000. "Low fertility and population policy in Europe. "Pp54-82 in Low Fertility and Policy Response to Issues of Aging and Welfare, edited by Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs and United Nations Population Fund. Seoul.
Lutz, W., B.C. O’Neill, and S. Scherbov. 2003. "Europe’s Population at a Turning Point." Science 299(28):1991-92.
Lutz, W. and V. Skirbekk. 2005. "Policies addressing the tempo effect in low fertility countries." Population and Development Review 31(4):699-720.
McDonald, P. 2000a. "Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility." Journal of Population research 17(1):1-16.
2000b. "Gender equity in theories of fertility transition." Population and Development Review 26(3):427-439.
2002. "Sustaining fertility through public policy:The range of options." Population 57(3):417-446.
2006. "Low fertility and the state: the efficacy of policy." Population and Development Review 32(3):485-510.
McDonald, P. and R. Kippen. 2001. "Low Fertility and Liberal Democracy in Western Europe Labor supply prospects in 16 development countries, 2000-2050." Population and Development Review 27(1):1-32.
McIntosh C.A. 1981. "Low Fertility and Liberal Democracy in Western Europe." Population Development Review 7(2):181-207.
McNicoll, G. 2001. "Government and Fertility in Transitional and Post-Transitional Societies." Population and Development Review 27:129-159.
OECD. 2000. Reforms for an Ageing Society. OECD.
Philipov, D. and H.P. Kohler. 2001. "Tempo Effects in Fertility Decline in the Eastern Europe:Evidence From Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungry, Poland, and Russia." European Journal of Population 17(1):37-60.
Phoenix A. and C. Owen. 2000. "From miscegenation to hybridity:mixed relationship and mixed parentage in prolife."Pp72-95 in Hybridity and its Discontents, edited by A. Brah and A. E. Coombes. London:Routledge.
Rindfuss, R.R. and K.L. Brewster. 1994. "Childrearing and Fertility." Population and Development Review 22:258-89.
Ryder, N.B. 1964. "The process of demographic." Demography 1:74-82.
1983. "Cohort and Period Measures of Changing Fertility." Pp.737-56 in Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, edited by R.A. Bulatao, R.D. Lee, P.E. Hollerbach and J. Bongaarts. New York:Academiv Press.
Schoen, R. 2004. "Timing Effects and the Interpretation of Period Fertility." Demography 41(4):801-19.
Shaw, C. 1988. "Latest estimates of ethnic minority populations." Populations Trends 51:5-8.
Shirbekk, V. 2005. "Population Ageing Negatively Affects Productivity." Pp.5-6 in Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2005 .
Sleebos, J. 2003. Low fertility rates in OECD countries:Facts and Policy Responses. OECD social, employment and migration working papers.
Smallwood, S. 2002. "The Effect of changes un timing of childbearing on measuring fertility in England and Wales." Population Trends 19:36-45.
Sobotka, T. 2003. "Postponement of childbearing and future fertility recuperation in Europe." Presentation on the conference The Second Demoraphic transition in Europe in Spain Belgium, 19-24 June 2003.
2004. "Is Lowest-Low Fertility in Europe Explained by the Postponement of Childbearing." Population and development review 30(2):195-220.
Stelzer, I.M. 2001. "Immigration Policy for and Age of Mass Movement." Policy 17(4):1-10.
Stone, D.A. 1997. Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Boston:Scott, Foresman and Company.
Sun, T.H., H.S. Lin and R. Freedman.1978. "Trends in fertility, family size preferences, and family planning practice, Taiwan:1965-1976." Studies in Family Planning 9:54-69.
Sykes, B. 1999. "The Molecular genetics of European ancestry." Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B 354(1379):131-138.
Ulrich R.E. 1998. "Grau oder bunt?Zuwanderungen und Deutschlands Bevölkerung im Jahre 2030."Pp.17-27 in Migration und Gesundheit:Zustandsbeschreibungen und Zukunftsmodelle, edited by Matthias David, Theda Borde and Heribert Kentenich. Germany:Mabuse.
United Nations. 2000. Replacement Migration. Population Division:Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nation Secretariat.
Van De Kaa D.J. 1987. Europe’s Second Demographic Transition. Population Bulletin 42(1)Washington:The Population Reference Bureau.
1996. "Anchored Narratives:the story and finding of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility." Population Studies 50(3):389-432.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE