:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:日常生活、文化資產與地方發展:以「臺東縱谷文化生活圈整合計畫--縱谷山海關」為例
書刊名:東台灣研究
作者:方鈞瑋
作者(外文):Fang, Chun-wei
出版日期:2020
卷期:27
頁次:頁67-92
主題關鍵詞:文化資產地方發展文化生活圈地方文化館文化治理Cultural heritageLocal developmentCultural living communityLocal cultural museumsCultural governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:137
  • 點閱點閱:3
本文以「台東縱谷文化生活圈整合計畫—縱谷山海關」為例,探討當代原住民地方社會在國家政策的推動下,注入以「文化」為基礎的社會發展動能,以地方文化館做為多重跨域及連結的推動單位。這種兼具觀光發展與文化傳承的文化觀念,在實踐的過程中,清楚呈現地方社會的發展是處在經濟發展與文化保存的辯證之中。在臺灣,進行區域性文化資產的跨域與連結,成為國家文化生活圈政策之核心目標,尤其對那些位處地理邊陲及文化多樣性的地區。透過國家文化政策的制訂並與地方發展計畫結合,地方社群發現他們不能自外於這樣的發展,而必須主動參與。2017年,臺東縣海端鄉布農族文化館、關山鎮農會米國學校農村文物故事館與新元昌紅茶產業文化館共同提出「台東縱谷文化生活圈整合計畫—縱谷山海關」,並成功獲得文化部「博物館與地方文化館發展計畫」的補助。該計畫獨特之處在於提出以新武呂溪為源頭之「台東縱谷文化生活圈」,試圖透過與產業結合的特色遊程,傳遞縱谷區域特有的文化生活集體形象,促進多元文化的相互認識與理解,進而創造一個更具規模與多元的區域合作發展。藉由檢視這個計畫的形成與執行過程,本文指出,從地方的角度來看,「文化資產」觀念是在國家政策制訂與執行過程中被形塑出來的,這樣的文化資產觀念從一開始就與國家及地方的發展意理緊密結合。透過國家以「文化資產」為基礎的政策主導,一方面為地方社會帶進新的社會發展量能;另一方面,地方社會的文化資產其實是國家社造資源投入及文化資產保存運用論述下形成的一種特殊範疇,並與觀光直接連動。在這個的過程中,地方社會的日常生活被理解成文化、產業與在地生活三個面向。這三個面向之間相互銜接、移動與轉換的過程,也成為原住民地方社會回應大社會發展的重要機制。
By examining the Cultural Living Community Integrating Plan in Taitung Valley - Shanhaikuan, this paper aims to investigate the contemporary Indigenous Community that has been infused into culture-oriented social developing mechanism through the promotion from state policy, and that has been making local cultural museums become the thrusting units of multiple field-crossing and connecting. Bringing into practice about this cultural concept of combining tourism development and cultural transmission, which could illustrate clearly that the development of local community is situated in the dialectic of economic development and cultural preservation. In Taiwan, to carry out field-crossing and connecting of regional cultural heritage has become a core goal of the state policy over developing cultural living communities, especially aiming for those peripheral regions with a variety of cultures. On account of the setting up of national policy of culture, also getting combined with local development projects, local communities in Taitung Rift Valley got aware that they should not get excluded from the developing trend, and they would participate in it actively instead. In the year of 2017, the Bunun Cultural Museum of Haiduan Township, the Rural Cultural and Historic Story Museum of Rice School of Guanshan Township Farmers' Association and the Xinyuanchang Black Tea Cultural and Industrial Museum jointly proposed this 'Cultural Living Community Integrating Plan in Taitung Rift Valley - Shanhaikuan', and successfully got the grant from the Ministry of Culture. The characteristics of this plan is to propose the Sinwulyu River originated Cultural Living Communities of Taitung Rift Valley, seeking to send out unique collective image of cultural living in the rift area by way of designing distinctive tour and industrial visiting programs, also will promote mutual recognizing and understanding among various cultures in the region and could even result in bigger scale and more various culture featured collaboration of communities. Through investigating the process of the formation and execution of this plan, this paper argues that viewing from the perspective of local community, the concept of cultural heritage was constructed from the process of policy making and executing, this kind of understanding of cultural heritage is closely connected with the national and local development from the very beginning. By means of the guidance from national policy which focused on valuing cultural heritage, could bring new developing energy into local societies on one hand, also on the other hand could form a special category of cultural heritage through the bestowing of national community building resources and the discussing of preservation and application for cultural heritage, which links directly to tourism as well. During the whole process, daily life of the local community would be understood as having culture, industry and local living three dimensions. The operation of these three dimensions connecting, shifting and transferring one another will become the important mechanism which works for the responding to the grand social development from the Indigenous Community.
期刊論文
1.古宜靈(20051200)。文化政策與文化產業的反省。立德學報,3(1),109-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王本壯(2008)。社區總體營造的回顧與展望。府際關係研究通訊,3,18-21。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳文德(20140600)。文化產業與部落發展:以卑南族普悠瑪(南王)與卡地布(知本)為例。考古人類學刊,80,103-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.MacDonald, S.(2006)。Undesirable heritage: Historical consciousness and Fascist material culture in Nuremberg。International Journal of Heritage Studies,12(1),9-28。  new window
5.黃勝雄(19990600)。族群分布對臺灣地域空間發展的影響。土地經濟年刊,10,151-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Green, M.、Mercer, C.、Mitlin, D.、Kothari, U.(2012)。Saving, Spending and Future Making: Time, Discipline and Money in Development。Environment and Planning A,44(7),1641-1656。  new window
7.王振寰、錢永祥(19950800)。邁向新國家?民粹威權主義的形成與民主問題。臺灣社會研究季刊,20,17-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳其南(1996)。地方文化與區域發展。地方文化與區域發展研討會。臺北:行政院文建會。(主)1-(主)8。  延伸查詢new window
2.辛晚教(1996)。文化生活圈與文化展演設施規劃理念。地方文化與區域發展研討會。臺北:行政院文建會。93-110。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃勝雄、古宜靈(1995)。文化生活圈與文化展演設施規劃之初步研究。第八屆建築研究成果發表會。台北:中華民國建築學會。87-92。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.馬田(2012)。部落策展人的地方館省思:以海端鄉布農族文物館為例(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳怡方(2011)。Rush-weaving in Taiwan: Perceptions of the Environment and the Process of Becoming Heritage(博士論文)。University of Edinburgh。  new window
3.王慧玲(2017)。論原住民族文化館之活化歷程與省思(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林慧如(2008)。地方博物館政策研究--以英國地區文藝復興計畫為例(碩士論文)。國立臺南藝術大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Crewe, Emma、Harrison, Elizebeth(1998)。Whose Development? An Ethnography of Aid。Zed Books。  new window
2.Harrison, Rodney(2013)。Heritage: Critical Approaches。Routledge。  new window
3.Hewison, Robert(1987)。The Heritage Industry: Britain in a Climate of Decline。Methuen Publishing。  new window
4.Lowenthal, David(1985)。The Past is a Foreign Country。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Lowenthal, David(1998)。The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.胡家瑜(2011)。非物質文化遺產與臺灣原住民儀式--對於遺產政治和文化傳承的一些反思。非物質文化遺產與東亞地方社會。香港:香港科技大學華南研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.王甫昌(2008)。由若隱若現到大鳴大放:臺灣社會學中族群研究的崛起。群學爭鳴:臺灣社會學發展史,1945-2005。臺北:群學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李莎莉(2005)。活化原住民文物館:整合地方造景、造產與造人資源。學習型部落理論與實踐。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.李廣均(2008)。籍貫制度、四大族群與多元文化:國家認同下之爭下的人群分類。跨戒:流動與堅持的臺灣社會。臺北:群學出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Basu, Paul、Modest, Wayne(2014)。Museums, Heritage and International Development: A Critical Converstion。Museums, Heritage and International Development。Routledge。  new window
6.Palmer, R.(2009)。[Council of Europe, Heritage and Beyond] Preface。Council of Europe, Heritage and Beyond。Strasbourg:Council of Europe Publishing。  new window
7.Thomas, Northcote(1906)。Editor's Preface。The Natives of British Central Africa。London:Archibald Constable。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE