:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:權力菁英流動與威權體制「轉型」--從「新制度論」的觀點反省一個認識論的問題
書刊名:東海學報
作者:楊開雲劉子琦
作者(外文):Yang, Kai-yunLiu, Dsih-chi
出版日期:1998
卷期:39:5(社會科學學院)
頁次:頁139-165
主題關鍵詞:權力菁英社會流動威權體制新制度論
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(4) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:716
  • 點閱點閱:56
     在這一篇論文裡,我們主要的目的,是藉著「新制度論」的理論觀點,透過舉證 一部份權力菁英流動過程的經驗資料,指出近年來學界有關台灣政治「轉型」論述的部份誤 謬。我們在文中強調,所謂「轉型」應該指的是一種「體質」與「體制」均和前此不同的制 度的形成過程;而不應只是就原有制度進行修補。另一方面,我們也指出歐美學者使用的「民 主過渡」有其政治文化脈絡的意義,但如用來分析台灣的情況則帶有強烈的「目的論」式的 價值意涵。我們辯稱,「過渡」的結果不必然是某個單一的特定目標(民主)、而是多元且不 確定的。本地學者們將「過渡」和「轉型」作無區別地使用,一種原因可能是出於不留心, 而另一種則是有意以此夾帶其他非學術性價值的目的。果真如此,那是學術研究者應引以為 戒的錯誤示範。
     Is Taiwan "transformed" into liberal democracy already or it is still in continuity of authoritarian practice? In this paper we argue that, in contrast to those students who claim Taiwan has moved to the former stage already, although Taiwan regime is indeed experiencing social change in many respects, yet it is too early to claim that it has been 'transformed' into liberal democracy already. We argue that, based on theoretical insights of New-institutionalism, there have been extraordinary changes in 'formality' indeed. However, there seems hardly any change with power elite's mobility, manipulation of political symbols and ritual practice in everyday life by the state, as well as the understanding of present status of Taiwan regime in lay person's daily life under President Lee Deng-hui's rule. In other words, it is in continuity of authoritarian rule in 'practice'. We also argue that scholars in Taiwan mistakenly use 'transition' to represent 'transformation'. There is strong 'teleological' implication in scholars who argue that the result of "transition" in Taiwan must be liberal democracy. We believe the result of 'transition' is an open-ended question. Taiwan is in transition to somewhere unknown yet, liberal democracy is not necessarily to be the only destination.
期刊論文
1.Brachet-Marquez, Viviane(1997)。Democratic Transition and Consolidation in Latin America: Steps Toward a New Theory of Democratization。Current Sociology,45(1),15-54。  new window
2.Nee, Victor(1991)。Social Inequality in reforming State Socialism。American Sociological Review,56,267-282。  new window
3.Szelényi, Iván、Szelényi, Szonja(1995)。Circulation or Reproduction of Elites during the Postcommunist Transformation of Eastern Europe。Theory and Society,24(5),615-638。  new window
4.Walder, Andrew G.(1995)。Career Mobility and Communist Political Order。American Sociological Review,60(3),309-328。  new window
5.王振寰(1993)。台灣的政治轉型與新政商關係的形成。台灣社會研究季刊,14,123-163。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃德福(19900300)。選舉、地方派系與政治轉型:七十八年底三項公職人員選舉之省思。中山社會科學季刊,5(1),84-96。  延伸查詢new window
7.朱雲漢、靳菱菱(19921200)。臺灣政權轉型期政商關係的再結盟。中山社會科學季刊,7(4),58-78。  延伸查詢new window
8.Moe, Terry M.(1984)。The New Economics of Organization。American Journal of Political Science,28(4),739-777。  new window
9.王振寰、錢永祥(19950800)。邁向新國家?民粹威權主義的形成與民主問題。臺灣社會研究季刊,20,17-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王振寰(19890300)。臺灣的政治轉型與反對運動。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(1),71-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Granovetter, Mark S.(1985)。Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness。American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510。  new window
12.Moe, Terry M.(1991)。Politics and the Theory of Organization。The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,7(3),106-129。  new window
13.Nee, Victor(1989)。The Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism。American Sociological Review,54,663-681。  new window
會議論文
1.Chu, Yun-han(1996)。From Party-State to Dominant One-Party regime: The Transformation of KMT and Taiwan's Democratization。The 1996 Annual Meeting of the Taiwanese Political Science Association,(會議日期: 1996/12/14-12/15)。Taipei。  new window
圖書
1.Domhoff, William(1983)。Who rules America Now?。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall Inc。  new window
2.行政院新聞局(1994)。寧靜革命。臺北:行政院新聞局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Deyo, Frederic C.(1988)。Beneath the Miracle: Labor Subordination in the New Asian Industrialism。Berkeley。  new window
4.Feher, F.、Heller, A.、Markus, G.(1983)。Dictatorship Over Needs: an Analysis of Soviet Societies。Oxford。  new window
5.Haggard, Stephan、Kaufman, Robert R.(1995)。The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
6.O'Donnell, Guillermo A.、Schmitter, P. C.(1986)。Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusion About Uncertain Democratives。Baltimore。  new window
7.丁遠超(1995)。存在與希望:側寫李登輝的政治智慧。臺北:遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.周玉蔻(19930101)。李登輝的一千天:1988-1992。臺北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
9.何洛(1996)。李登輝全紀錄1923-1996:李登輝先生與台灣的政治發展軌跡。生活智庫出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.若林正丈、松永正義、廖兆陽(1988)。中日會診臺灣:轉型期的政治。臺北市:故鄉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.于尚白(1987)。國民黨領導階層分析。台北市:台灣文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.沈野(1994)。都是李登輝惹的禍。台北縣新店市:獨家。  延伸查詢new window
13.林倖一(1991)。對政治人物之諍:臺灣25年來政治社會變遷之實錄。台北市:自立晚報。  延伸查詢new window
14.周玉蔻(1994)。李登輝:一九九三。台北市:周玉蔻。  延伸查詢new window
15.Chou, Yang sun、Nathan, Andrew J.(1987)。Democratizing transition in Taiwan。Baltimore:School of Law, University of Maryland。  new window
16.Domhoff, William(1978)。Who Really Rules: New Haven and Community Power Reexamined。New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Books。  new window
17.Hankiss, Elemer(1990)。East European Alternatives: Are There Any?。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
18.Kovacs, Janos Matyas、Tardos, Marton(1992)。Reform and Transformation in Eastern Europe--Soviet-type economics on the threshhold of change。New York:London:Routledge。  new window
19.黃嘉樹(1994)。國民黨在台灣(1945-1988)。台北:大秦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.蕭新煌、臺灣研究基金會(1989)。壟斷與剝削--威權主義的政治經濟分析。臺北:臺灣研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
21.蘇子琴(1992)。權與錢:透視台灣政商關係。台北:新新聞文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.Aberbach, Joel D.、Dollar, David、Sokoloff, Kenneth L.(1994)。The Role of The State in Taiwan's Development。New York:M.E. Sharpe。  new window
23.Domhoff, G. William(1990)。The Power Elite and the State。New York:Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
24.Domhoff, G. W.(1967)。Who Rules America?。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
25.Ethier, Diane(1990)。Democratic Transition and Consolidation in Southern Europe, Latin America and Southeast Asia。London:Macmilland。  new window
26.Feldman, Harvey、Kau, Michael Y. M.、Kim, Ilpyong J.(1988)。Taiwan in a Time of Transition。N. Y.:Paragon House。  new window
27.Jessop, B.(1990)。State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place。Cambridge:Polity。  new window
28.Kornai, Janos(1990)。The Road to a Free Economy: Shifting from a Socialist System, the Example of Hungary。New York:W.W. Norton & Company。  new window
29.Mann, M.(1986)。The sources of social power, vol.1: A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760。Cambridge University Press。  new window
30.Staniszkis, Jadwiga(1991)。The Dynamics of Breakthrough in Eastern Europe。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
31.White, Gordon(1988)。Developmental State in East Asia。New York:St. Martin。  new window
32.Winckler, Edwin A.、Greenhalgh, Susan(1988)。Contending approaches to the political economy of Taiwan。Studies of the East Asian Institute, Columbia University。  new window
33.Wu, Yu-Shan(1994)。Comparative Economic Transformations--Mainland China, Hungary, the Soviet Union, and Taiwan。Stanford, California:Stanford University Press。  new window
34.若林正丈(1989)。轉型期的台灣--「脫內戰化」的政治。臺北:故鄉出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
35.Powell, Walter W.、Dimaggio, Paul J.(1991)。The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis。Chicago:London:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
36.Kornai, János(1992)。The Socialist System: the Political Economy of Communism。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
37.張茂桂(1990)。社會運動與政治轉化。臺北:國家政策研究資料中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Granovetter, Mark S.、Swedberg, Richard(1992)。The sociology of economic life。Westview Press。  new window
39.陳明通(1995)。派系政治與臺灣政治變遷。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
40.Deyo, Frederic C.(1987)。The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism。Cornell University Press。  new window
41.Fukuyama, Francis Yoshihiro(1992)。The End of History and the Last Man。Free Press。  new window
42.Mills, Charles Wright(1956)。The Power Elite。Oxford University Press。  new window
43.Williamson, Oliver E.(1985)。The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms Markets, Relational Contracting。Macmillan, Ltd:Free Press。  new window
44.王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣?轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.Linz, Juan José、Stepan, Alfred C.(1996)。Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe。The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
46.North, Douglas C.(1990)。Institutions, Institutional Change And Eccnomic Performance。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.劉子琦,楊開雲(1998)。黨國威權體制轉型問題。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Jessop, Bob(1994)。Post-Fordism and the State。Post-Fordism: A Reader。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
2.Bertramsen, Rene B.(1991)。From the Capitalist State to the Political Economy。State, Economy and Society。London:Unwin Hyman。  new window
3.Haggard, Stephan、Cheng, T. J.(1987)。State and Foreign in the East Asia NICS。The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism。Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press。  new window
4.Hall, Stuart(1988)。Authoritarian Populism。Thatcherism: A Tale of Two Nations。Cambridge:Polity。  new window
5.Wolf, Eric R.(1977)。Kinship, Friendship, and Patron-Client Relations in Complex Societies。Friends, Followers, and Factions。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
6.楊開雲、劉子琦(1997)。不確定中的巨變? --香港社會制度的轉型與斷裂。香港:文明的延續與斷裂?。台北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Domhoff, William(1986)。The Power Elite and the Growth Machine: A Challenge to Pluralists and Marxists Alike。Community Power。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
8.Evans, Peter(1987)。Class, State and Dependence in East Asia: Lessons for Latin Americanists。The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism。Ithaca, NY:Cornell U. Press。  new window
9.Evans, Peter B.(1992)。The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy, and Structural Change。The Politics of Economic Adjustment。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
10.Gereffi, Gary(1990)。Big business and the state。Manufacturing miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Jepperson, Ronald L.(1991)。Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalization。The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis。Chicago, Illinois:University of Chicago Press。  new window
12.Kaufman, R.(1977)。Corporatism, Clientelism, and Partisan Conflict。Corporatism and Authoritarianism in Latin America。Pittsburgh:Pittsburgh University Press。  new window
13.Stark, David(1997)。Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism。Restructuring Networks in Post-Socialism。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
14.Szalai, Erzsebet(1990)。The New Elite。Economy and Power。Budapest:Aula Kiado。  new window
15.Szelenyi, Ivan、Manchin, Robert(1986)。Social Policy Under State Socialism: Market Redistribution and Social Inequalities in East European Socialist Societies。Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy。White Plains, NY:M.E. Sharpe。  new window
16.Tie, Hung-mao(1992)。Transformation of an Authoritarian Parth State: Taiwan's Development Experience。Political Change in Taiwan。Boulder, Colo:Lynne Rienner。  new window
17.Scott, James C.(1977)。Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia。Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism。University of California Press。  new window
18.Skocpol, Theda(1985)。Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research。Bringing the State Back In。Cambridge University Press。  new window
19.Gold, Thomas B.(1988)。Entrepreneurs, Multinationals, and the State。Contending Approaches to the Political Economy of Taiwan。Armonk, New York:M. E. Sharpe, Inc.。  new window
20.Friedland, Roger、Alford, Robert R.(1991)。Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions。The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis。University of Chicago Press。  new window
21.Amsden, Alice H.(1985)。The State and Taiwan's Economic Development。Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE