During the 1960s, when many studies were concerned about unepual facts in society, social scientists enthusiastically aspired to be both scientific and politically radical. Pluralism was considered a term of absue. An emphasis on multiple subjectivities resulting from the critique of the singular and unitary identity has led to a preoccupation with weak theories of social constructivism that failed to locate agencies in the larger social totality of advanced capitalist flows. So, used as a goal, a concept, an attitude, a strategy and a value, multiculturalism has become an alibi for an establishment theory and has emerged as the eye of a social storm swirling. Multicaltural education must be linked t social structural adjustment, complete with an emphasis on rebuilding social justice and incrcasing asset development among minority groups. Although many Western countries have faced numerous questions about immigration, various movements of racial and gender awareness and carried out mutlicultural education for dozens of years, the dominant culture still presents itself as a distinctly white social order. At the same time, multiple models and practices of multicultural education have, by now, been multiply defined and critiqued from multiple political orientations. Thus, it will face a variety of challenges to practice multicultural eduction. This essay focuses on the importance og multicultural education, debates some questions about value conflict of identity and equal opportunity and attempts to point out the solution. By introducing the distinctive shape of British multicultural education and the practical experience of Peer early educational Partnership, I hope to find some practical ways to improve Taiwan's multicultural edcation.