:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國立法院全國不分區委員制度之研究
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:吳東野
作者(外文):Wu, Tung-yeh
出版日期:1999
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁143-174
主題關鍵詞:全國不分區名單比例代表制半比例代表制首先跨越門檻者當選單記非讓渡投票法選區規模At large systemList PRSemi-PRFirst past the postSingle non-transferable voteDistrict magnitude
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:138
  • 點閱點閱:60
     臺灣政治民主化的過程中,抉擇選舉方式向來是國會改革最重要的動力之一。自 從民國 80 年立法院及國民大會選舉設定全國不分區議席以來,即不斷呈現出許多問題,社 會輿論及各政黨呼籲改革現行選舉方法之聲浪高漲。本文主要是在檢視我國立法院不分區制 度運作上的一些問題,同時針對未來的選舉方法改革,提供新的思考面向。鑒於我國立院的 不分區議席根本上屬比例代表選舉制,因此本文擬從全球國家採行比例代表選舉方法的相關 技術問題與實施經驗,例如選區規模、政黨得票門檻、議席分配方式或政黨提名名單等,藉 以分析立法院全國不分區制度對議事運作及政黨生態所造成的影響。
     The choice of electoral system is one of the most important parliamentary reforms for Taiwan's democracy. The at large system ofthe Legislative Yuan (Li-fa-yuan) and the National Assembly (Kuomin-ta-hui) since 1992 is found to have numerous deficiencies, both for the nation and for individual political parties, that there is a growingpressure to have the system reformed. In this paper, the author will examine what's wrong with the implementation of the at large system in the Legislative Yuan, what problems the system has caused, and the proposals for reform and the difficulties encountered. Because the consequences of different PR systems for parliamentaryrepresentation are not merely influenced by the "type" of PR system used but also by a number of other technical-related issues concerning the design of the PR system, the author will detail the important impact of the at large system for the parliamentary representation of political parties in the Legislative Yuan. In addition, relevant technical issues such as district magnitude, the thresholds, apparentement, or closed lists) are examined.
期刊論文
1.傅恆德(19990100)。第四屆立法委員選舉後的省思:立法改革芻議。政策月刊,42,13-15。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bomsdorf, Eckart(1987)。Ein neues Verfahren zur Umsetzung von Wählerstimmen in Mandate。Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen,2,221-228。  new window
3.江大樹(19990100)。「單一選區制」的政治影響評估。政策月刊,42,2-4。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃錦堂(19990100)。立法委員選舉制度改革建議。政策月刊,42,5-7。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳東野(19960500)。「單一選區兩票制」選舉方法之探討--德國、日本、俄羅斯選舉之實例比較。選舉研究,3(1),69-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.趙永茂(19890900)。地方派系與選舉之關係:一個概念架構的分析。中山社會科學季刊,4(3),58-70。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃德福(19900300)。選舉、地方派系與政治轉型:七十八年底三項公職人員選舉之省思。中山社會科學季刊,5(1),84-96。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳世敏(1986)。台灣選舉文化之世俗化。投票行為與選舉行為研討會。台北:中國政治學會。67-100。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Reynolds, Andrew、Reilly, Ben(1997)。The IDEA Handbook of Electoral System Design。Stockholm:IDEA。  new window
2.Epstein, Leon D.(1986)。Political Parties in the American。Madison:The University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
3.何思因(1993)。英美日提名制度與黨紀。台北:理論與政策雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Nohlen, Dieter(1986)。Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem。Opladen:Leverkusen:Leske+Budrich。  new window
5.(199409)。公職人員選舉罷免法及其施行細則關係條文對照表。台北:台北市選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.Lijphart, Arend(1968)。The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands。University of California Press。  new window
7.Arter, David(1987)。Politics and Policy-Making in Finland。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
8.Wu, Jaushieh Joseph(1995)。Taiwan's Democratization: Forces Behind the New Momentum。New York:Hong Kong:Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Crotty, William、Jackson, John S. III(1985)。Presidential Primaries and Nominations。Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Press。  new window
10.王業立(1996)。我國選舉制度的政治影響。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Dummett, Michael A. E.(1997)。Principles of Electoral Reform。Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Riker, William H.(1982)。Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and Theory of Social Choice。San Francisco:W. H. Freeman。  new window
13.Mackie, Thomas T.、Rose, Richard(1991)。The International Almanac of Electoral History。Washington, D. C.:Congressional Quarterly。  new window
14.謝復生(1992)。政黨比例代表制。臺北市:理論與政策雜誌社。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(19981207)。解讀大選結果,展望朝野政黨消長。  延伸查詢new window
2.Elkit, Jorgen,Reynolds, Andrew。Jorden: Electoral System Design in the Arab World,http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/es/esy-jo.htm。  new window
3.沈富雄(19990106)。單選區兩票制:日德模式朝野拔河。  延伸查詢new window
4.沈富雄(19990106)。實踐一選區兩票制此其時矣。  延伸查詢new window
5.沈富雄(19990107)。單一選區兩票制不可行。  延伸查詢new window
6.The Law of the Republic of Armenia on the election on the Deputies to the National Assembly,http://www.arminco.com/homepages/ifes/deplawl.htm。  new window
7.Reynolds, A.,Reilly, B.。List PR-Advantages,http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/es/esf02a.htm。  new window
8.The Electoral Websites' Parliaments around the world,http://www.agora.stm.it/elections/parlemen.htm。  new window
9.Reynolds, A.,Reilly, B.。Jordan: Electoral System Design in the Arab World,http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/es/esf02b.htm。  new window
10.Sparrow, Andrew(19981119)。List case clearly not open and shut。  new window
11.Jones, George(19981119)。Lords defeat Government for fifth time。  new window
12.Reynolds, A.,Reilly, B.。List-PR disadventages,http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/es/esf02b.htm。  new window
13.Reilly, Ben。Sri Lanka: Changes to Accommodate Diversity,http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/es/esy-lk.htm。  new window
14.(19981201)。趙少康:提名黑金立委才是垃圾。  延伸查詢new window
15.Reynolds, A.,Reilly, B.。Threshold,http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/es/esg01.htm。  new window
16.(19981202)。國、民兩黨不分區立委人選彭明敏痛批。  延伸查詢new window
17.(19980307)。自立早報。  延伸查詢new window
18.中央選舉委員會。立法委員全國不分區各政黨分配當選名額計算表,http://www.elect87.gov.tw/015.htm。  延伸查詢new window
19.Roberts, Nigel。New Zealand: A Westminster Democracy Switches to PR,http://www.aceproject.org/main/english/es/esy-nz.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chen, Ming-Tong(1996)。Local Factions and Elections in Taiwan's Democratization。Taiwan's Electoral Politics arts Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave。Armonk, NY:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE