臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：工業設計專案學習的評量項目意涵及意涵說明：教師觀點
書刊名：藝術教育研究
作者：陳淳迪／黃佳音／翁註重 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Chun-di／Huang, Chia-yin／Wong, Ju-jong
出版日期：2012
卷期：23
頁次：頁71-103
主題關鍵詞：工業設計專案學習；學習評量；設計教育；Industrial design project learning；Learning assessment；Design education
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:108
  • 點閱點閱:49
工業設計實務學習評量趨向於採用多元評量方式，然而目前相關研究主要著眼於評量項目種類上的探討，較少觸及評量項目的內涵以及如何向學生說明這些評量項目等實際執行面上的議題。本研究訪談九位產品設計相關學系教師，以文本分析方式歸納出被最多受訪教師所提到的前五項設計專案學習評量項目，包含創意、造形美感、完整性、發表能力、以及表現能力，並探討這些評量項目的意涵以及如何向學生解釋這些意涵的方法。分析結果顯示在設計專案的學習評量中，教師除了在評量內容上沒有標準答案，對於學生表現良莠與否的差異性似乎無法在事前明確的加以定義，對於特定的評量項目也不易在事前向學生清楚說明表現好壞的差異為何。本研究從教師、教學以及學科特性探討可能的原因，並提出以互為主體性的實踐促進教師群與學生甚至其他的專業者在價值、知識以及思想上的對話與理解，以獲得更佳的學習成效。
This study argues that the assessment methods proposed from the current studies concerning with design practical learning assessment are less practical due to inappropriate research approaches. Instead, this research work addresses the contents of assessment criteria and the way to explain these criteria in terms of interviewing 9 design teachers, and applying the text analysis to the transcriptions of the interviewees' utterance. Having categorized the most popular 5 criteria (creativity, beauty of form, integrity, presentation skill, and performance) employed by the interviewees, the results of the analysis showed that there is neither standard nor consistent meaning to each criterion amongst these interviewees. Moreover, it is virtually impossible to precisely clarify what the good or bad learning performance is prior to the commencement of the design project. Facing on the nature of the subjectivity in design, this paper proposes the practice of inter-subjectivity to enhance the dialogue between the teachers and the students and then to become a co-learning group looking for the better performance.
期刊論文
1.魯俊賢、陳美英、吳毓瑩(20051200)。過程技能能力要項藉由能力指標聚焦並轉化成實作評量設計之行動研究。當代教育研究，13(4)，95-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳志衍、楊裕富、楊紹裘(20060300)。設計教學歷程之評量指標建構初探--以中臺灣設計科系為例。建築學報，55，1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Green, L. N.、Bonollo, E.(2004)。The importance of design methods to student industrial designers。Global Journal of Engineering Education，8(2)，175-181。  new window
4.楊敏英、游萬來、陳斐娟(20050600)。探討工業設計系學生面臨的困擾及生涯輔導需求對設計教育的意涵。設計學報，10(2)，57-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Lewis, W. P.、Bonollo, E.(2002)。An analysis of professional skills in design: Implications for education and research。Design Studies，23(4)，385-406。  new window
6.Yang, Ming-Ying、Chen, Fei-Chuan、You, Manlai L.(2005)。Competencies and qualifications for industrial design jobs: implications for design practice, education, and student career guidance。Design Studies，26(2)，155-189。  new window
7.Topping, K. J.、Ehly, S. E.(2001)。Peer-assisted learning。Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation，12(2)，113-132。  new window
8.Linn, Robert L.、Baker, Eva L.、Dunbar, Stephen B.(1991)。Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria。Educational Researcher，20(8)，15-21。  new window
9.Ammer, J. J.(1998)。Peer evaluation model for enhancing writing performance of students with learning disabilities。Reading & Writing Quarterly，14(3)，263-276。  new window
10.Stiggins, R. J.(1987)。Design and development of performance assessments。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice，6(3)，33-42。  new window
11.Findeli, Alain(2001)。Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion。Design Issues，17(1)，5-17。  new window
12.彭森明(20061200)。學習成就評量的多元功能及其相應研究設計。教育研究與發展期刊，2(4)，21-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.楊深坑(19960300)。理性的冒險、生命的行動及主體性的失落與拯救--人類圖像的歷史變遷與教育改革之展望。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，37，19-38。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bayazit, Nigan(2004)。Investigating design: A review of forty years of design research。Design Issues，20(1)，16-29。  new window
15.嚴貞、孫志誠(20080400)。設計類師生對實作評量的認知與評量規準之研究。科技學刊. 人文社會類，17(1)，41-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Goodrich Andrade, Heidi(2000)。Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning。Educational Leadership，57(5)，13-18。  new window
17.林家旭(2008)。以德飛法建構服裝設計作品評量表之建構。華岡紡織期刊，15(4)，323-332。  延伸查詢new window
18.翁註重(2003)。久被遺忘的誘騙原型：從「商品美學批判：資本主義社會中的表象、慾望及廣告」反思現代設計。城市與設計學報，13(14)，411-429。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.潘文福(2010)。建構互為上體性的教室觀察指標：詮釋的觀點。教育資料與研究，96，95-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.蕭錫錡、鄭文俊(2001)。工業設計教育之發展方向。技術及職業教育雙月刊，61，51-56。  延伸查詢new window
21.Blandford, A. E.(1993)。Applying the WON to WOMBAT: Evaluation of a tool to support learning about design evaluation。Design Studies，14(3)，228-246。  new window
22.Buckanan, R.(2001)。The problem of character in design education: Liberal arts and professional specialization。International Journal of Technology and Design Education，11(1)，13-26。  new window
23.Gluck, J.、Ernst, R.、Unger, F.(2002)。How creatives define creativity: Definitions reflect different types of creativity?。Creativity Research Journal，14(1)，55-67。  new window
24.Lee, N.(2009)。Project methods as the vehicle for learning in undergraduate design education: A typology。Design Studies，30(5)，541-560。  new window
25.Matusov, E.(2001)。Intersubjectivity as a way of informing teaching design for a community of learners classroom。Teaching and Teacher Education，17(4)，383-402。  new window
26.Oxman, R.(2003)。Think-maps: Teaching design thinking in design education。Design Studies，25(1)，63-91。  new window
27.Parkes, J.(2000)。The interaction of assessment format and examinee’s perceptions of control。Educational Research，42(2)，175-182。  new window
28.Zerull, D. S.(1990)。Evaluation in arts education: Building and using an effective assessment strategy。Designs for Arts in Education，92(1)，19-24。  new window
會議論文
1.Yeh, W. D.(200310)。The demand and the evaluation of the industrial design profession from the industries。The 6th Asian Design Conference, Integration of Knowledge, Kansei, and Industrial power，(會議日期: 2003/10/14-17)。Tsukuba。  new window
2.Cheng, W. J.(2000)。A Taiwanese perspective: Factors involving the transition period in the new millennium and the design education in Taiwan。USA。141-148。  new window
3.Wagner, I.(2000)。Persuasive artefacts in architectural design and planning。London, UK。379-389。  new window
研究報告
1.Saunders-Smits, G.、Melkert, J.(2011)。Innovative grading for design exercise: A case study from aerospace engineering。Delft, Northland。  new window
學位論文
1.胡薏菡(2005)。遠距工業設計實務教學與評量之研究(碩士論文)。長庚大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Crossley, Nick(1996)。Intersubjectivity-the Fabric of Social Becoming。London：Sage Publications。  new window
2.Flick, Uwe(2009)。An Introduction to Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
3.Glaser, B. G.、Strauss, A. L.(1967)。Grounded Theory。New York：Aldine。  new window
4.Freire, Paulo(1970)。Pedagogy of the Oppressed。New York：Seabury Press。  new window
5.Patton, Michael Quinn(2002)。Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods。Sage。  new window
6.林曼麗(20000000)。臺灣視覺藝術教育研究。臺北：雄獅。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Nonaka, Ikujiro、Takeuchi, Hirotaka(1995)。The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation。Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Dewey, John(1938)。Logic: The Theory of Inquiry。Henry Holt and Company。  new window
9.郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量。精華。  延伸查詢new window
10.Lindemann, U.、Assmann, G.、Stetter, R.(1999)。The development of a mountain-bike frame: A case-study about the use of models in mechanical design。Visual and spatial reasoning in design \\ J. Gero ; B. Tversky (eds.)。Sydney, Australia。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：523（臺灣：517，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1908780 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67716706
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上