臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：工業技術研究院技術創新管理之研究
作者：羅達賢
作者(外文)：Lo, Ta-Hsien
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：科技管理所
指導教授：袁建中
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2003
主題關鍵詞：研發機構；工業技術研究院；技術創新；技術創新管理；經營政策；創業精神；人才培育；研發成果落實；Research institute；Industrial Technology Research Institute；technological innovation；technology innovation management；operation policy；entrepreneurial spirit；nurture of potential employee；implementation of R & D result
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:47
台灣四十年來經濟發展從勞力密集輕工業到高科技產業的持續成長及產業結構轉變，以應用研究導向為主的研發機構提供了產業轉型的技術來源，其中經由立法通過的財團法人工業技術研究院（簡稱工研院），更扮演一個相當重要的推手角色，也是政府發展產業的一項重要政策工具。
工研院成立至今，配合政府發展工業技術的目標，帶動新興產業發展，並積極提升產業技術水準，使台灣的產業結構逐步從勞力密集轉型成為技術與資本密集。目前工研院已是世界上在技術創新管理方面極具特色且對國家產業發展有重要貢獻的國家級研發機構，也是開發中國家為發展其科技產業的主要模仿對象。因此，工研院在技術創新管理方面之作法成為各界想一窺究竟的課題。
本論文探討台灣經濟發展過程中，工研院如何於不同的經濟發展階段環境中，在技術發展與應用方面所採取的創新管理做法。本研究採深入訪談方式，經由對工研院運作相當熟稔之工研院各研究單位及企業界高階決策主管進行深入訪談，構建工研院技術創新管理之架構及界定組織創新運作流程中可管理的關鍵因素。並從組織經營政策、組織發展策略、人才培育與運用以及研發成果落實等影響技術創新的重要因素，深入探討工研院之實務作法並分析其特色以作為後續相關研究之參考，同時並以工研院執行經濟部委託之IC科技專案計畫，從引進國外技術、創造獨特的組織文化和運作機制，到形成台灣整體產業效益之創新模式，作為驗証所提架構及其中主要因素之實証研究。
Taiwan’s continuous economic growth during the last forty years has ushered in a new industrial structure. Predominately, this shift from labor-intensive light industries to high-tech industries has been brought about by applied research oriented research institutes, who have supplied the technological skills necessary to reshape industry. The Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) is one such institute. It has acted as both an important enabler of industrial development and a vehicle for the Taiwanese government to precipitate progress in industry.
From its’ early stages, ITRI worked in accordance with government policy to develop industrial technology. ITRI efforts also helped to stimulate the newly formed technological industry within Taiwan. These farsighted actions have led to national economic prosperity while providing a backbone for the maturation of Taiwanese industry. As Taiwan continues to stay ahead of the curve, refining this structure, just as industry underwent a change from a labor-intensive structure to a technological and capital-intensive one, involves lateral thinking and a pooling of resources. This is precisely what ITRI has done. ITRI is a national research institute that has always employed methods to bridge the public and private sectors. In turn, ITRI serves to promote technological innovation worldwide. Along with ITRI’s significant contributions to the development of industry in Taiwan, it sets a standard for other developing nations that are striving to improve their own technological industries. These achievements have brought ITRI worldwide acclaim; furthermore, the methods ITRI has used to foster technology innovation have become sought-after information in a market eager for know-how.
This study examines the innovative management and methodology used to spark the development of applied technologies which ITRI, as a technologically-oriented research institute, has employed. These actions, performed in concert with government policy, may be the cornerstone of Taiwan’s ability to elevate its’ own industrial standards. In-depth interviews with various research institutes and corporate executives who are familiar with the way ITRI operates were also used within this study. The study serves to both examine the most effective methods for ITRI to advance technological innovation, and to pinpoint the key factors within the daily operational procedure. ITRI’s real time methods were put under the microscope, an analysis of ITRI’s attributes was conducted, and various factors were assessed for their ability to impact ITRI’s ability to innovate. In particular, the management policy, development strategy, efforts to nurture nascent industry, utilization of human resources, and the application of R&D results were scrutinized by examining both ITRI’s infrastructure and the implementation of its’ unique vision. This information may serve as a reference for subsequent related studies. This study also used the IC Technology Project - commissioned to ITRI by the MOEA - as a case study. ITRI’s ability to act as a gateway of technology has affected its unique organizational culture and operating mechanisms; this study measures how the culture has formed an innovative model that benefits Taiwan industrial as a whole.
1. 工研院（民82），工業技術研究院經營政策，工業技術研究院。
2. 工研院（民82），工業技術研究院評估報告，工業技術研究院。
3. 工研院（民82），工業技術研究院二十年紀要，工業技術研究院。
4. 工研院（民86），工業技術研究院經營政策，工業技術研究院。
5. 工研院（民92），工業技術研究院經營政策，工業技術研究院。
6. 工研院企劃處（民92），研究機構與科技產業發展，工研院企劃處。
7. 王弓，許瓊文，涂敏芬，蕭筑云，陳玉玲（民92），「新竹科技聚落之過去、現在與未來」，工研院第一屆科技聚落發展研討會論文集，新竹：工研院。
8. 史欽泰（民83），工研院簡報，工研院。
9. 史欽泰（民89），工研院發展方向，工研院。
10. 朱博湧（民92），「工研院效益評估模式與實證，產業科技與工研院」，工研院。
11. 何畏，易家詳等譯（民90），經濟發展理論，台北：貓頭鷹。
12. 吳思華（民91），「從製造台灣到知識台灣」，創新─哈佛商業評論精選24，台北：天下文化。
13. 吳豐祥，黃怡芳，洪李竹（民87），「工業技術研究院案例研究計畫個案研究（一）－產研合作創新個案－三芳化工超細纖維」，工研院。
14. 李田樹，李芳齡譯（民89），啟動革命，台北：天下文化。
15. 李田樹譯（民90），杜拉克精選：管理篇，台北：天下文化。
16. 李明軒，邱如美合譯（民85），國家競爭優勢，台北：天下文化。
17. 林燦螢(民91)，「發現勇氣─組織文化與領導風格」。
18. 徐進鈺（民88），「流動的鑲崁：新竹科學工業園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展」，台灣社會研究季刊，第35期，頁75-118。new window
19. 袁建中，羅達賢(民92)，「技術落實策略，產業科技與工研院」，工研院。
20. 許振明，劉完淳（民91），「金融成長在經濟成長中的角色─台灣與韓國的實證研究」，國家政策研究基金會。
21. 陳朝福（民92），「組織轉型研究-新科學典範的創造性演化觀點」，台大商研所。new window
22. 國防部人力司（民88），研究所畢業役男志願服務國防工業訓儲為預備軍（士）官實施規定，國防部人力司。
23. 劉瑞華（民92），「工研院對台灣產業發展的貢獻，產業科技與工研院」，工研院。
24. 潘東傑，李田樹，蕭羨一，譚天合譯（民90），新經濟時代管理大師觀點，台北：天下文化。
25. 蕭富峰，李田樹譯（民84），創新與創業精神，Innovation and Entrepreneurship，台北，麥田。
26. 應小端譯（民91），「迎戰劇變」，創新─哈佛商業評論精選24，台北：天下文化。
27. 羅達賢（民90），RCA技術引進專案研究訪談稿彙總，工研院。
28. 羅達賢，劉世南（民92），「研發機構之組織創新，產業科技與工研院」，工研院。
29. Amabile, T. M. and Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987), Creativity in the R & D laboratory, Technical Report, No. 30, Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
30. Amabile, T. M. (1996), Creativity in Context: Update to The Social Psychology of Creativity, Oxford: Westview Press, Inc.
31. Amabile, T. M. and Conti, R. (1999), “Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 630-640.
32. Ansoff, H. I. (1965), Corporate Strategy: an Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion, New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, New York: Addision-Wesley.
34. Arnold, E., Rush, H., Bessant, J., and Hobday, M. (1998), “Strategic Planning in Research and Technology Institutes”, R&D Management, 28(2), 89-100.
35. Bass, B. M. (1985), Leadership and performance beyond expectations, New York: Free Press.
36. Betz, F.（1998）, Managing Technological Innovation — Competitive Advantage from Change, New York: Wiley-Interscience.
37. Borton L. （2000）, “Vietnam Airlines'' CEO Dao Manh Nhuong on strategic leadership”, The Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 16-19.
38. Brockhaus, R. H. (1980), “Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs”, Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509-520.
39. Burns, J. M. (1978), Leadership, New York: Harper & Row.
40. Carland, W. B. (1989), “Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(4), 47-56.
41. Chiesa, V（2001）, R&D Strategy and Organisation, London: Imperial College Press.
42. Conger, J. A. and Kanungo, R. (1987), “Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings”, Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637-647.
43. Csiksentmihalyi, M. (1996), Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, New York: Harper Collins.
44. Deal, T. E. and Kennedy, A. A. (1982), Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Perseus, 1－4.
45. Drucker, Peter F., Management: Tasks, Responsibility, Practices, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers,Inc.,1985.
46. Dodgeson, M. (1993), “Ogranizational Learning: a Review of Some Literature”, Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394.
47. Edson, C. H. (1986), “Our past and present: Historical inquiry in education”, The Journal of Thought, 21(2), 13-27.
48. Gort, M. (1962), Diversification and Integration in American Industry, Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Granstrand, O. (1994), Economics of Technology, Netherlands: North-Holland.
50. Hill, W. L. and Hansen, S. (1991), “A Longitudinal Study of the Cause and Consequences of Changes in Diversification in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry 1977-1986”, Strategic Management Journal, 12（3）, 187-199.
51. ITRI (1993), ITRI Assessment Report, ITRI, 1-6.
52. Janis, I. L. and Mann, L. (1977), Decision Making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment, New York: Free Press.
53. Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. (1982), Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Kristof, A. L. (1996), “Person-Organization Fit: An Integrative Review of It’s Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications”, Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
55. Lee, M., Son, B., and Om, K. (1996), “Evaluation of national R & D projects in Korea”, Research Policy, 25(5), 805-818.
56. Maanen, J. and Barley, S.（1983）, Cultural Organization: Fragments of a Theory, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas Texas.
57. Mansfield, E. (1995), Innovation, Technology and the Economy: The Selected Essays of Edwin Mansfield, Volume II, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
58. Mathews, J. A. (1995), “High-Technology Industrialisation in East Asia: The Case of the Semiconductor Indusry in Taiwan and Korea”, Contemporary Economic Issues Series, No. 4, Taipei: Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
59. McClelland, D. C. (1961), The Achieving Society, New York: The Free Press.
60. Mintzberg, H. (1979), The Structuring of Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
61. Mintzberg, H. (1989), Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations, The Free Press.
62. Ouchi W. (1981), Theory Z Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 41－42.
63. Porter, M. E. (1998), “Clusters and The New Economic of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.
64. Porter, M. E. (2000), “Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy”, Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-34.
65. Probert, D. Canz, L. Platts, K. (2001) “Technology Transfer and Succession Planning: The Relevance of Make-or-Buy Analysis”, PICMET, Technology in the knowledge era, 439-452.
66. Porter, M. E. and Stern, S. (2001), “Innovation: Location Matters”, Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 28-36.
67. Saxenian, A. and Saxenian, A. L. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
68. Schein, E. H.（1983）, The Role of the Founder in Creating Organizational Culture, Organizational Dynamics, vol.12.
69. Schein, E. H. (1985), Organizational culture and leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70. Schein, E. H.（1989）, “Reassessing The Divine Rights Of Managers” Sloan Management Review, 30(2), 63-68.
71. Stata, R. (1989), “Organizational Learning: The Key to Management Innovation”, Sloan Management Review, 30(3), 63-73.
72. Steers, R. M. and Porter, L. W. (1991), Motivation and Work Behavior, 5th Edition, Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
73. Sternberg, R. J., and O’Hara, L. A. (1999), “Creativity and intelligence, In R. J. Sternberg”, Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251-272.
74. Thomke, S. (2001). “Enlightened experimentation: The new imperative for innovation”, Harvard Business Review, 79(2), 67-75.
75. Tichy, N. W. and Devanna, M. A. (1991), The Transformational Leader, 2nd Edition, New York: Wiley.
76. Tushman, M. L. and O’Reilly, C. A. (1996), Winning Through Innovation—A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：378（臺灣：370，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2042760 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67854082
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上