:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣地區長期照護機構老人醫療利用之研究-長期照護與全民健康保險臨界服務之界定
作者:林四海
作者(外文):Szu-Hai Lin
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:社會福利所
指導教授:鄭文輝
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2006
主題關鍵詞:長期照護全民健康保險長期照護機構臨界服務long-term careNational Health Insurancelong-term care institutionsborderline medical care services
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:50
醫藥的進步、經濟水準的提升及生活形態的改變,使得國民平均餘命延長。1971年台灣地區65歲以上人口佔總人口數2.9%,至1993年底已達7%,步入世界衛生組織所謂的「高齡化社會」。2006年更達到9.9%,老化指數也達53.34%,預估2016年將達到13%。在短短的二十三年間,老年人口成長了約2倍,其成長速度之快,在先進國家中僅次於日本。由於我國高齡化進展快速,造成沉重的老年經濟照顧、醫療照護及其他社會負擔,未來面臨長期照護老人的多重需求、醫療照護、長期照護與全民健康保險的銜接,必須予以正視。
本研究旨在探討台灣地區長期照護機構老人與全國老人在健保醫療給付中門診、住院之相關就診疾病別、醫療服務費用之醫療利用差異,及影響長期照護機構老人之全民健保利用程度差異重要因素,藉此釐清有那些疾病或醫療行為是屬於長期照護機構老人較常見的,並製作長期照護機構老人與全國老人常見急慢性疾病別臨界服務光譜,以利瞭解長期照護與全民健康保險的臨界服務,提供訂定有關長期照護政策時必要的參考。
實證分析資料採取台灣長期照護專業協會對各類長期照護服務機構之分類方式,調查各類長期照護機構及榮民醫院護理之家2002年入住之12,460人老人資料,以回溯其至1999年的醫療利用。另為瞭解長期照護老人疾病的長期趨勢,再蒐集機構中2003年23,775人及2004年15,342人的基本老人資料,總共51,577人之機構老人資料,經身分證檢查及除錯後鍵檔,以中央健康保險局保險對象就醫之門診及住院醫療費用清單明細檔做為資料來源,擷取其醫療利用情形;並分析2004年全民健康保險醫療統計年報中65歲以上保險對象之全國老人統計資料,進行統計分析,以資比較長期照護機構老人與全國老人醫療利用之差異。除以上實證資料之分析方法,本研究輔以焦點團體專家座談方式,界定得知1999~2004年長期照護老人及全國老人所發生最常見的急慢性疾病類別,進而製作出本研究之疾病臨界服務光譜。
本研究重要發現有:一、長期照護機構老人於門診所花費的醫療費用皆比全國老人來得高,長期照護機構老人於住院所花費的醫療費用亦比全國老人來得高。二、就長期照護機構老人及全國老人醫療利用疾病類別醫療費用佔總醫療費用大於0.5%之分佈情形觀之,急性疾病類別有8類,而慢性疾病則有32類,其中慢性肝病及肝硬化、結核病、肝及肝內膽管惡性腫瘤等3類疾病,各在全國老人慢性病的排序前30項,但在長照老人慢性病的排序則為30項之後。三、針對長期照護機構老人及全國老人醫療利用門診及住院部分以罹病率為考量,而醫療總費用則以占率為考量,經假設作法做為篩選之基礎,得知1999~2004年全國老人及長期照護老人所發生最常見的疾病,進而製作出以疾病平均門診總件次、平均住院總人次及平均醫療總費用之臨界服務光譜6種。
依據上述主要發現之意涵,本研究建議一、衛生福利行政主管機關因長期照護機構老人所花費的醫療費用高,部分負擔自負額多,對此一族群宜建立補助制度。二、長期照護與社會福利之臨界服務所需大量弁鄐w養照護人力,藉由志工或其他非營利組織提供協助,宜早日規劃長期照護服務輸送制度。三、老人健康照護的相關研究應將醫療照護的完整分析結合弁鄔宒晙d資料合併分析討論。四、 本研究已創制我國長期照護體系與全民健康保險之臨界服務,藉此明白顯現長期照護機構老人與全國老人之急性、亞急性、慢性疾病與長期照護之醫療照護臨界服務範圍,未來之研究可陸續進行以疾病別為單元之臨界服務分析研究,以界定長期照護與醫療照護體系之銜接。
目前全民健康保險資源的主要耗用者為65歲以上之老年族群,而長期照護機構老人所花費的醫療費用亦比全國老人來得高,在健保財政嚴重匱乏之際,老人健康照護體系宜再探討不要使用花費高、無療效的過渡醫療化,而是給於有尊嚴與生活品質的老人弁鄐A當醫療,本研究礙於資料之限制,僅初探醫療利用情況,無法討論弁鄐暋D。
Advancement in medical sciences, improvement in economic conditions and changes in lifestyles, all have contributed to the prolongation of life expectancy. In 1971 in the Taiwan Area, the population above the age of 65 years accounted for 2.9% of the total population; the percentage reached 7% at the end of 1993, meeting the criteria of the “aged society” defined by the World Health Organization. This percentage reached 9.9% in 2006, and the aging index was already as high as 53.34%. It is estimated that the elderly would account for 13% of the total population by the year 2017. In the last 23 years, the elderly population has grown by 2 times. This rapid growth rate of the elderly population is next only to Japan in all developed countries. This rapid process of population aging has brought about heavy burdens in the financial and medical care of the elderly, and also other social burdens. The multiple needs in the coming future for the medical care, long-term care and their linkage with the National Health Insurance for the elderly under long-term care should be faced.
The purpose of the present study is to investigate preliminarily, as reflected by the medical payment data of the National Health Insurance, the differences between the elderly under long-term institution care and the elderly of the general population in the diseases seen at outpatient clinics and under hospital care, their differences in the utilization of medical care services as shown by the medical costs, and also the main factors that affect the utilization of the National Health Insurance by the elderly under long-term institution care. Through this process, it is expected to understand what diseases or medical behaviors are common to the elderly under long-term care, and thus to develop a common acute/chronic disease-specific spectrum of borderline medical care services for the elderly under long-term institution care and the elderly of the general population to help understand what the borderline medical care services are for the two elderly groups for the reference in the formulation of policies relevant to long-term care.
Data for analysis are taken from the categorization of the various long-term care institutions developed by the ROC Long-Term Care Association. Information for the 12,460 elderly cared at various long-term care institutions and nursing homes of the veterans’ hospitals in 2002 was collected; their utilization of medical care services was traced back to 1999. In addition, to understand the long-term trend of diseases of the elderly under long-term care, basic information of the 23,775 elderly in 2003 and 15,342 in 2004, totaling 51,577, cared in institutions was collected. The information was verified by ID card and keyed in computers. Medical costs for outpatient care and hospital care of those covered by the National Health Insurance were used as the sources of information. Their utilization of medical care services was retrieved. Data of the elderly 65 and above in the general population covered by the National Health Insurance in the 2004 National Health Insurance statistical report was further analyzed to compare the differences in the utilization of medical care services by the elderly under long-term care and the elderly of the general population. In addition to the analyses mentioned above, a focal group discussion method was also used. Through this process, the most common acute and chronic diseases of the elderly under long-term care and the elderly of the general population for 1999-2004 were identified, and a spectrum for the borderline medical care services of diseases has been developed.
The study showed that, 1) the medical costs for outpatient care of the elderly under long-term care were higher than those of the elderly of the general population; their medical costs for inpatient care were also higher; 2) by diseases of the elderly under long-term care and the elderly of the general population, eight were acute diseases, and 32 were chronic diseases; of them, three diseases, chronic liver diseases, cirrhosis of liver, tuberculosis, malignant neoplasms of liver and intrahepatic bile duct, were, in the elderly of the general population group, ranked within the leading 30 chronic diseases; they were listed beyond the 30 leading diseases for the elderly under institution care; 3) by morbidity in outpatient and inpatient care and medical costs as percent of total medical costs, and through the use of hypothetical method as a basis for screening, diseases common to the general elderly and the elderly under long-term care for 1999-2004 were identified. A spectrum for the borderline medical care services by the average number of outpatient visits per disease, the average person-times of hospital care, and the average medical costs was developed.
By these findings, the present study recommends that, 1) the competent health and welfare authorities should, by the fact that the medical costs and co-payments borne by the elderly under long-term institution care are high, develop a subsidy system for this elderly group; 2) currently, the large manpower required for the borderline medical care services for long-term care and social welfare has been provided by volunteers or other non-profit making organizations, a long-term care delivery systems should be established earlier; 3) research related to the healthcare of the elderly should integrate analysis of medical care with studies of functional surveys. At present, the largest consumers of the National Health Insurance resources are the elderly above 65; and the medical costs of the elderly under long-term institution care are higher than those of the elderly of the general population. At a time the National Health Insurance is facing financial difficulties, the use of high-cost, low-effective transitional medical care in the health care system of the elderly should be considered with care. Instead, perhaps adequate medical care of dignity and high quality of life should be provided. This study, for limitation of data, made only a preliminary investigation of the utilization of medical care services by the elderly, further studies are needed to address to issues related to functions.
中文部分
1.王正、鄭文輝:「社會福利制度之發展及對經濟之影響-國際比較」,1995。
2.王增勇:加拿大長期照護的發展經驗,社區發展季刊,92:270-288,2000。new window
3.內政部統計資訊服務網:台閩地區老人狀況調查報告,2003。http://www.moi.gov.tw/w3/stat/home.asp。
4.江東亮:醫療保健政策—台灣經驗,台北,巨流出版社,1999。
5.行政院衛生署:長期照護納入全民健保給付可行性評估報告,1996。
6.行政院主計處 http://www.dgbasey.gov.tw,2000。
7.行政院經濟建設委員會,”中華民國台灣地區民國95年至140年人口推計”簡報,2006。
8.行政院經濟建設委員會,「建構長期照顧服務網十年計畫」,2006.04.26。
9.吳肖琪、張淑卿、陳惠姿、沈秀卿、陳坤皇、李世代、黃源協、蔡誾誾、廖本堡:台閩地區失能老人機構照護供需資源分佈現況-先趨性研究,長期照護,2003;6(2):12-25。
10.吳凱勳:健康保險概論,台北:三民書局,五版,1992年8月,頁92-94。
11.吳凱勳:日本介護保險制度及財務規劃,台北,長期照護財務問題各國經驗及台灣前景研討會,國家衛生研究院,1999。
12.吳淑瓊:從健康服務的供需探討我國老人健康照護問題,經社法制論叢1994;14:85-100。
13.吳淑瓊、江東亮「台灣地區長期照護問題與對策」,中華衛誌,1995;14(3):246-255。new window
14.吳淑瓊、呂寶靜、盧瑞芬:配合我國社會福利制度之長期照護政策研究,行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究計畫,1998。
15.吳淑瓊:實驗社區身心弁鉬棆牧怐熒蚥U負擔:實驗介入前,建構長期照護體系先導計劃「挑踐與躍升—打造新世紀長期照護體系」研討會,政治大學公企暨公教中心,87-97,2002。new window
16.吳淑瓊:如何建構完整之照顧服務體系,內政部社會司網站,http://volnet.moi.gov.tw/sowf,2002。
17.李偉立:醫院附設和獨立型護理之家老人特質與健康狀況之比較,高雄醫學大學健康科學院公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,2000。
18.阮玉梅等:長期照護,國立空中大學用書,1999。
19.杜敏世、林麗嬋、陳素春、蔡誾誾:健全台灣長期照護體系,衛生報導,2003;115;10-18。
20.沈茂庭:DOH:With Respect to Old Age:Long-Term Care- Rights and esponsibilities,1999。
21.周世珍,我國長期照顧之展望,運動科技與人生通識講座, 224-247, 2006.07。
22.周麗芳:德國長期照護保險制度,台北,長期照護財務問題各國經驗及台灣前景研討會,國家衛生研究院,1999。
23.周麗芳、林佳慧:台灣地區老年長期照護費用推估,保險實務與制度,2003;2(1);59-81。
24.屈蓮:長期照護新論,台北,大揚出版社,2001。
25.林志鴻:照護需要風險制度化滿足之社會經濟效果- 以德國長期照護保險為例。國家衛生研究院論壇長期照護委員會,匿名外審專書。2004;第一章。
26.林昭宏、李建宏、黃茂雄、劉景寬、林永哲:影響腦中風患者使用長期照護機構的因素,物理治療,2000;25(4);192-199。
27.林耀盛、吳英璋:慢性病的個人控制觀:自主與依賴之間,應用心理研究,第3期;1999秋;105-128頁。new window
28.邱黎明:接受長期照護老人對照護服務需求與滿意度之探討,國防醫學院公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,2000。
29.柯木興:社會保險,台北,三民書局,修訂版,2001年8月,241-242。
30.范涵惠:長期照護機構老人健康狀況、生活適應及生活滿意度相關性之探討。中國醫藥學院醫學研究所碩士論文,2002。
31.高森永、王運昌、鍾明惠、張吉祥、白惠婷、邱黎明、邱宛瑜、王素滿:社區老人與慢性病患對長期照護需求之探討,行政院衛生署八十八年度委辦業務計畫。
32.孫得雄、齊力、孫美玲:人口老化與老年照護,中華民或人口學會叢書,1997。
33.國家衛生研究院:長期照護財務制度規劃研討會大會手冊,台北,國家衛生研究院論壇長期照護委員會,2003。
34.張立央G不同型態長期照護機構成本效益-效果之比較研究,高雄醫學大學健康科學院公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,1997。
35.張席熒、謝清麟譯:美國老年人失能情形與弁?#64008;使之最近趨勢:系統性文獻回顧。台北巿職能治療師公會網站,http://taot.org.tw/,2002。
36.張景永:慢性病人醫療資源耗用之研究:以腦中風病人為例,國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文,2001。
37.陳俊全:台灣地區老年健康狀況與醫療費用之長期推估。國立中正大學社會福利研究所博士論文,1997。
38.陳楚杰、張睿詒、林壽惠、吳玲娟:以連續直接觀察法估計護理之家各類住民照護成本—以某醫院附設護理之家為例,醫護科技學刊,5(1),1-11。
39.陳楚杰、林壽惠、張睿詒、吳玲娟:護理之家住民照護活動項目及成本之初探,醫護科技學刊,4(3),239-249。new window
40.曾昭蓉:居家式與機構式照護病人型態及照護費用之比較研究,高雄醫學大學健康 科學院公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,1998。
41.葉莉莉、田玫、溫敏杰、陳惠姿:社區發展季刊,2000;29;359-369。
42.葉淑娟:長期照護財務制度之探討。長期照護,2003;6(2);1-10。
43.蔡素玲:「醫療網長期照護規劃與老人保護」,福利社會雙月刊,1997;23-25。
44.鄭文輝、鄭清霞、林志鴻、陳正芬、吳淑瓊(2003),長期照護費用估算之研究。內政部委託研究。
45.鄭文輝、林志鴻、陳惠姿、張宏哲、鄭清霞、朱僑麗(2004)。推動長期照護可行性之研究。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究。
46.盧成皆、黃靜宜、史麗珠:從住院費用以統計模式探討中風病人轉診至長期照護機構之臨界日—某醫學中心為例,中華衛誌,1997;16(6);488-497。new window
47.賴慧貞、徐弘正:長期醫療照護系統復健費用分析:以某綜合醫院腦中風患者為例,中華復健醫誌,1999;27(3);135-144。
48.謝美娥:老人長期照護的相關議論題,台北,桂冠,1993:55-72。new window
49.顏啟華:機構式照護的醫學倫理觀,台灣老人醫學會會訊,2003;52;11-15。

英文部分
1.Aday, L. A., and Shortell, S. 1988. Indicators and predicators of health service utilization. Introduction to Health Service, 3:51-81.
2.Agricultural Policies Markets and Trade in OECD countries: Monitoring and Evaluation 1996, Paris.
3.Andersen, R. A. 1968. A behavioral model of families’ use of health services. Research Series No. 23, Center for health administration studies, Chicago:university of Chicago press.
4.Andersen, R. M. 1995. Revisiting the behavior model and access to medical care:Dose it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1):1-10.
5.Andersen, R. M., and Aday, L. A. 1995. Revisiting the behavior model and access to medical care:Dose it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36:1-10.
6.Benjamin,A.E.1996“Trends among Younger Persons with Disability or Chronic Disease”, in R. H. Binstock, L. E. Cluff and O. V. Mering(eds.), The Future of Long-Term Care,75-95, Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.Binstock,Divorce/Child Cust. & Support. Author: Per Curiam. Judge: Hon. Maurice R. Hunke, 1998; 27:524-576.
8.Bordy SJ., Masciocchi C.:Data for long-term care planning by health systems agencies. Am J Public Health 1980; 70: 1194-8.
9.Bordy, S. J.:“Planning for the long-term support & care system:The array of service to be considered.” Philadelphia:Health Service Council. Kane, Rosalie A. Kane Robert L.:Long-Term Care: principles, programs, and policies. N. Y. Springer Pub. Co. 987; 6-7.
10.Cefalu, C.A., Heuser, M.:Adult day care for the demented elderly. American Family Physician., 1993; 47, 723-724.
11.Evashwick CJ:The Continuum of Long-term Care: Innovative Models. London: Sage Publications, 1991: 17-18.
12.Garner, J. D. and S. O. Mercer:“Meeting the Needs of the Elderly: Home Health Care or Institutional ization?”, Health and Social Work, 7(Aug), 1982; 183-191.
13.Graham, H.:“Caring:A Labour of Love” In J. Finch & D. Groves(eds.)A Labor of Love:Women, Work, and Caring, London: Routeledge & Kegan Paul, 1983; 13-30.
14.Huttman, E.D:Social Service for the Elderly, New York: The Free Press. 1985.
15.Kane, Rosalie A. /Kane, Robert L. /Ladd, Richard C:The Heart of Long-Term Care. Oxford:Oxford University Press. 1998; 3-60.
16.Koff:Long-Term Care: An Approach to Serving the Frail Elderly. London: Little Brown & Company. 1982.
17.Lee Y., Choi K.,:Functional disability of older persons in long-term carefacilities in Korea. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2002; 34(1): 93-106.
18.Liu K., Black KJ.,:Hospital-Based and Freestanding Skilled Nursing Facilities: Any Cause for Differential Medicare Payments? Inquiry. 2003; 40(1): 94-104.
19.Schneider, Ulrike:“Germany’s Social Long-Term Care Insurance: Design, Implementation and Evaluation. ”International Social Security Review, 1999; Vol. 52: 31-74.
20.Schulte:“Social Long-Term Care Insurance in Germany.”1998.
21.Shaughnessy PW., Kramer AM., Schlenker RE., Polesovsky MB.:Nursing home case-mix differences between Medicare and non-Medicare and between hospital-based and freestanding patients. Inquiry. 1985; 22(2): 162-177.
22.Tester, Susan:“Comparative Approaches to Long-Term Care for Adults.” in Jochen Clasen(eds.), Comparative Social Policy: Concepts, Theories and Method, Blackwell, 1998; 136-158.
23.Thomas, C.:“De-Constructing Concepts of Care”Sociology, 1993; 27(4): 649-669.
24.Weissert W.:Community-base Long-term Care: A Prospective Budgeting Strategy for Achieving Cost Effectiveness. Quality and Cost Containment in Care of the Elderly. NY, Springer Publishing Co, 1991: 175-189.

網路部分
1.http://hcfa.gov/stats/nhe-oact/tablcs/t9.htm 2000/6/21。
2.http//www.statisk-bund.de/basis/c/solci/solcitab8.htm 2000/6/20。
3.http://www.bmgesundheit.de/themen/pflege/zahlen/tabs/ent.htm,
1999/11/10。
4.http://www.cepd.gov.tw/business/business_sec3.jsp?businessID=54&parentLinkID=8&linkid=91.
5.http://vol.moi.gov.tw/sowf3w/20/04_5.htm,2000;中國時報,1999
6.http://vol.moi.gov.tw,2000.
7.http://www.tokushima.med.or.jp/awagun/kaigo/tanka2.htm,德島縣阿波市醫師會1999/3/12。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE