:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:虛擬社群成員互動過程之研究:個人認知與社會影響之整合觀點
作者:吳壽進 引用關係
作者(外文):Sou-Chin Wu
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
指導教授:方文昌
黃恆獎
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:識別匿名性外在自我覺察社群認同群體規範社群投入Identifiable anonymityPublic self-awarenessCommunity identificationGroup normsCommunity engagement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:49
過去研究缺乏驗證匿名性對社會規範的矛盾效果,同時也忽略了外在自我覺察與社群認同在匿名性效果過程中的可能中介角色。本研究重新定義匿名為「識別匿名性」,用此概念來討論個人認知與社會影響過程,根據「去個人化理論」與「去個人化的社會認定模式」(SIDE),分析兩個不同模式在虛擬社群環境的匿名角色,進而整合出其相互影響關係與解釋路徑。研究採兩階段設計,透過質性調查三個熱門社群,包括MMC車友會(MMC on-line club)、巴哈姆特(gamer.com)與愛情公寓網站(i-part.com),以確定概念定義與研究變數之間的路徑關係。其次,採用問卷調查收集虛擬社群樣本,最終有效問卷共347份,並藉由PLS方法進行量表效度與假說檢定。研究結果顯示,本研究之結構模型具有高度的解釋與預測能力。其中,識別匿名性在虛擬社群互動的個人認知途徑上,對外在自我覺察具有負向的影響關係;外在自我覺察與社群認同,分別在個人認知與社會影響路徑上,具有中介效果。結果並建議,欲提高群體規範一致性的路徑有二:(a).降低識別匿名性(即提高會員彼此辨識的程度),來提高外在自我覺察,進而提高社群成員對群體規範一致性認知。(b). 或藉由外在自我覺察的增加,來提升社群認同,進而形成群體規範的一致性。最後,當外在自我覺察與社群認同增強,會正向影響群體規範一致性,且有助於最終社群投入的結果。
Previous studies rarely examine the anonymity effects of social norms from a mutually conflicting perspective. Moreover, most studies neglect the mediating effect of public self-awareness and community identification in the relationship between anonymity and its results, especially in a virtual community context. This study redefines anonymity as “identifiable anonymity,” and discusses this concept from the perspective of cognitive factors and social influence. This study develops an integrated perspective model for the process of member interaction, and analyzes two different models, Deindividuation Theory and the Social Identity model of Deindividuation Effects (SIDE), to determine the role of anonymity in a virtual community. According to the research design, this study first conducted a qualitative study involved of three popular virtual communities: the MMC on-line club, gamer.com, and i-part.com. This initial study helped ascertain the path relationships between related variables. This study then performed the scale validation and hypotheses test with data from the members of several virtual communities in Taiwan. A total of 347 members completed the questionnaire. The data was analyzed with the Partial Least Squares (PLS) method. The present study confirms the theoretical applicability and predictability of the integrated model (with mediating effects) compared to other rival models. Results also indicated that identifiable anonymity was negatively associated with public self-awareness, as expected. A comparison of the mediating model and non-mediating models revealed that public self-awareness and community identification exerted a significant mediating effect on the paths of individual cognition and its social influence. Furthermore, the results suggested the following paths: (a). Members with low identifiable anonymity recognize more public self-awareness, and therefore, are more likely to conform to group norms. (b). When communicators have higher public self-awareness, the higher their level of community identification, the more consistently they follow the norms of their group. As a result, the higher their level of group identification and norms, the more community engagement and cooperative behaviors they exhibit.
一、中文部份
徐瑋伶,鄭伯壎(2002),「組織認同:理論與本質之初步探索與分析」,中山管理評論,10卷1期:頁45-64。new window
張秀華,曾中蓮,周惠文(2007),「網路匿名性及人格特質分組對群體討論發言廣度之影響」,資訊管理學報,14卷3期:頁 1-17。new window
巫喜瑞,陳皇曄(2007),「網路交易消費者道德決策研究—道德強度、道德哲學與匿名性之影響」,管理學報,24 卷5期:頁531-550。new window
駱少康(2005),視覺匿名性與預期未來互動對線上自我揭露之影響,國立台北大學企業管理學系未出版之博士論文。new window
簡恆信(1998),虛擬社群匿名行為模式研究-以網際網路電子布告欄為例,東吳大學社會研究所未出版之碩士論文。

二、英文部份
Adrianson, L. (2001). Gender and computer-mediated communication: group processes in problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 71–94.
Adrianson, L. & Hjelmquist, E. (1999). Group processes in solving two problems: Face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Behaviour and Information Technology, 17, 179-198.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211.
Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M. & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69 (3), 19–34.
Alon, A., Brunel, F. B. & Schneier Siegal, W. L. (2004). Ritual behavior and community life cycle: Exploring the social psychological roles of net rituals in the development of online consumption communities, In C. Haugvedt, K. Machleit, and R. Yalch (Eds.), Online consumer psychology: Understanding how to interact with consumers in the virtual world. Hillsdale, NJ7 Erlbaum.
Amine, A. & Sitz, L. (2004), How Does a Brand Community Emerge? Some implications for marketing research, Marketing: Where Science Meets Practice, Esomar Conference, Warsaw.
Andersen, T. J. (2005). The performance effect of computer-mediated communication and decentralized strategic decision making. Journal of Business Research, 58 (8), 1059–1067.
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411-423.
Anderson, K., Harwood, J. & Hummert, M. L. (2005). Age- stereotypes in context: The importance of the grandparent-grandchild relationship in intergenerational communication. Human Communication Research, 31, 268–294.
Armstrong, J. S. & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396-402.
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. M. (2001). Social psychology (4th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16 (2), 2–21.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 16 (1): 74-94.
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (3): 421-458.
Bergami, M. & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Soial Pschology, 39 (4), 555-77.
Bettenhausen, K. & Murnighan, J. K. (1985). The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30 (3), 350-372.
Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H. & Glynn, M. A. (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59 (4), 46-57.
Bhattacharya, C. B. & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76-88.
Brown, R. (1988). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Bugental, D. E., Tannenbaum, R. & Bobele, H. K. (1968). Self-concealment and self-disclosure in two group context. California Management Review, 11 (2), 23-29.
Buss, A. H. (2001). Psychological dimensions for the self. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306-307.
Carlson, B. D., Suter, T. A. & Brown, T. J. (2008). Social versus psychological brand community: The role of psychological sense of brand community. Journal of Business Research, 61, 284–291.
Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Themes and issues in the self-regulation of behavior, In R. Wyer (Ed.), Perspectives on behavioral self-regulation, 1–105. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L. & Newsted, P. R. (1996). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, Ohio.
Chin, W. W. (1998), Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
Chiou, J. S. & Cheng, C. (2003). Should a company have message boards on its web sites. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(3), 50-61.
Cialdini, R. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55 (February), 591–621.
Coffey, B. & Woolworth, S. (2004). Destroy the scum, and then neuter their families: The web forum as a vehicle for community discourse. The Social Science Journal, 41, 1-14.
Cova, B. & Cova, V. (2002). The Tribalization of Society and Its Impact on the Conduct of Marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 36 (5–6), 595–620.
Craig, D. L. & Zimring, C. (2000). Supporting collaborative design groups as design communities. Design Studies, 21(2), 187-204.
Deutsch, M. & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P. & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263.
Diener, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members, In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence, 209-242. Hillsdale, NJ: Edbaum.
Douglas, K. M. & McGarty, C. (2001). Indentifiablity and self-presentation: Computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 399-416.
Duval, S. & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press.
Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P. & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group, and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2–3), 371–389.
Etzioni, A. (1996). The responsive community: A communitarian perspective. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 1– 11.
Fenigstein, A. & Levine, M. P. (1984). Self-attention, concept activation, and the causal self. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 231-245.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F. & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.
Fletcher, G. J. O., Danilovis, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D. & Reeder, G. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual difference measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 875-884.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structure equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
Freestone, O. & Mitchell, V. W. (2004). Generation Y attitudes towards E-ethics and internet-related misbehaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 121-128.
Hagel, J. & Armstrong, A. (1997). Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Paolini, S. & Voci, A. (2005). Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes towards older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 393–406.
Henry, K. B., Arrow, H. & Carini, B. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558-581.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing, In R. R. Sinkovics, P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Volume 20 of the book series: Advances in International Marketing, 277 – 319.
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J. & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theory: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(4), 255-269.
Ickes, W. J., Wicklund, R. A. & Ferris, C. B. (1973). Objective self awareness and self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 202-219.
Jang, H. Y., Olfman, L., Ko, I. S., Koh, J. & Kim, K. (2008). The influence of on-line brand community characteristics on community commitment and brand loyalty. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12(3), 57 – 80.
Jessup, L. M. & D. A. Tansik, (1991). Decision making in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support System. Decision Sciences, 22(2), 266-279.
Johnson, D. (2000). Anonymity and the internet. The Futurist, 34(4), 12.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, F. P. (1997). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (6th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192.
Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K. K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V. & Wassenaar, A. (2000). A Cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects, MIS Quarterly, 24 (2), 299-325.
Kemmelmeier, M. (2001). Private self-consciousness as a moderator of the relationship between value orientations and attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141 (1), 61-74.
Kerr, D. S. & Murthy, U. S. (2004). Divergent and convergent idea generation in teams: A comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 381–399.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123–1134.
Kiesler, S. & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123.
Knippenberg, D. & Schie, E. C. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
Langfred, C. W. (1998). Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance. Small Group Research, 29 (1), 124-143.
Lea, M. & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
Lea, M., Spears, R. & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 526-537.
Lee, E. J. & Nass, C. (2002). Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication: When interacting via computers differs from interacting with computers. Human communication Research, 28 (3), 349-381.
Lee, F. S. L., Vogel, D. & Limayem, M. (2003). Virtual community informatics: A review and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5 (1), 47-61.
Lin, C. H. & Wu, P. H. (2006). The effect of variety on consumer preferences: Role of need for cognition and recommended alternatives. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(7), 865-786.
Loch, K. D. & Conger, S. (1996). Evaluation ethical decision making and computer use. Communications of the ACM, 39 (7), 74-83.
Maclaran, P. & Catterall, M. (2002). Researching the social Web: Marketing information from virtual communities. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 20 (6), 319 – 326.
Mael, F. A. & Ashforth, B. E. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Mael, F. A. & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.new window
Marx, G. (1999). What’s in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. The Information Society, 15, 99-112.
Matheson, K. & Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behaviour, 4(3), 221-233.
McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W. & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38-55.
McMillan, D. W. & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14 (1), 6–23.
McWilliam, G. (2000). Building stronger brands through online communities. Sloan Management Review, 41 (3), 43-54.
Moral-Toranzo, F., Canto-Ortiz, J. & Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2007). Anonimity effects in computer-mediated communication in the case of minority influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 223, 1660-1674.
Muniz, Jr. A. M. & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412-432.
Muniz, Jr. A. M. & Schau, H. J. (2005). Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 737 – 747.
Neumann, P. G. (1996). Risks of anonymity. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 162.
Nissenbaum, H. (1999). The meaning of anonymity in an information age. Information Society, 15(2), 141-144.
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Oliver, C. (1995). Privacy, anonymity and accountability. Computers & Security, 14, 489-490.
Pissarra, J. & Jesuino, J. C. (2005). Idea generation through computer-mediated communication: The effect of anonymity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20 (3), 275-291.
Plant, R. W. & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally controlling styles. Journal of Personality, 53 (3), 435-449.
Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4), 531-544.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Postmes, T. & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.
Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, Special Issue: (Mis) communicating across boundaries, 25, 689–715.
Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 341– 371.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K. & de Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243–1254.
Qian, H. & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1428–1451.
Rao, R. J. & Rohatgi, P. (2000). Can pseudonymity really guarantee privacy? In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Security Symposium, Denver, Colorado.
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R. & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Strobe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, 161-198. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. NY: Addison-Wesley.
Rice, R. E. & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworld, simulations, and games. Educational technology research and development, 442, 43-48.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358-384.
Roy, S., Sivakumar, K. & Wilkinson, I. F. (2004). Innovation generation in supply chain relationships: A conceptual model and research propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (1), 61-79.
Shaffer, D. R., Smith, J. E. & Tomarelli, M. M. (1982). Self-monitoring as a determinant of self-disclosure reciprocity during the acquaintance process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 163-175.
Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley.
Silke, A. (2003). Deindividuation, anonymity and violence: Findings from Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 493-499.
Sloan, P. A., Berman, M. E., Zeigler–Hill, V., Greer, T. F. & Mae, L. (2006). Group norms and self–aggressive behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25 (10), 1107-1121.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537.
Spears, R., Lea, M. & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 121–134.
Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: The case of electronic mail. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
Stafford, T. F. & Gonier, D. (2004). What Americans like about being online. Communication of the ACM, 47, 107-113.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93.
Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation, In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology intergoup relations, 77-98. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An intergrative theory of intergroup conflict, In W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33-47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior, In S. Worchel and L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Taylor, S.E., Peplau, L.A. & Sears, D.O. (2003). Social psychology (11th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the internet. London: Sage.
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior, In E. J. Lawler(Ed), Advances in group processes, theory and research, Vol. 2, 77-122.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
Vorauer, J. D. & Ross, M. (1999). Self-awareness and feeling transparent: Failing to suppress one’s self. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 415-440.
Wallace, K. A. (1999). Anonymity. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(1), 23-35.
Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342–369.
Walther, J. B. & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50-88.
Weber, A. L. (1992). Social Psychology. New York: Harpercollins.
Weingart, L. R., Bennett, R. J. & Brett, J. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 504-517.
Wold, H. (1982). Systems under indirect observation using PLS, In C. Fornell (Ed.), A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, 325-347. New York: Praeger.
Yao, Z. M. & Flanagin, A. J. (2006). A self-awareness approach to computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 518-544.
Yun, H. (2006). The creation and validation of a perceived anonymity based on the social information processing model and its nomological network test in an online social support community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.new window
Zimbardo, P. G. (1970). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos, In W. J. Arnold and D. Levine (Eds.), 1969 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 237-307. Lincoln, NE: University Of Nebraska Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE