:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小數學教師科技學科教學知識與社會網絡的延展與再思-以重構教學部落格為例
作者:王玉蘭
作者(外文):Yu-Lan Wang
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:趙美聲博士
王如哲博士
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:科技學科教學知識互動式電子白板部落格TPACKInteractive WhiteboardTeaching Blog
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:23
本研究旨在探討國小教師使用互動式電子白板實施數學教學,並透過建構教學部落格,對其科技學科教學知識產生的影響與改變。本研究採用混合研究法之鑲嵌式設計,實施互動式電子白板於29名國小四年級學生的數學教學中,歷經為期二年的研究歷程,蒐集的質、量化資料包含:同儕觀察與自我檢核表、部落格對話、教學省思札記、學生數學日記、社會網絡分析矩陣等,並獲致下述的主要結論:
(一)國小數學教師的科技學科教學知識﹝TPACK﹞的樣態繁複,其改變主要呈現在科技學科知識﹝TCK﹞與科技教學知識﹝TPK﹞兩個面向。
(二)本研究因教學部落格所形成的社會網絡,行動者具同質性、網絡成兩端發訊且整體網絡關係偏弱,有5位行動者位處結構洞、中心性相對較高,且形成四個次團體。14位行動者擔任中間人的角色,且扮演具有不同意涵的五種角色類型。
(三)國小數學教師的科技學科教學知識歷經四階段並依層級進行螺旋性發展。
(四)科技學科教學知識與社會網絡的螺旋性牽引使國小數學教師的科技學科教學知識與核心價值產生質變。
根據上述結論,本研究據以提出有關專業成長、電子白板輔助教學實施、建構部落格與後續研究的相關建議。
The purpose of this study is to examine the impacts of using the InteractiveWhiteboard into math instruction and building teaching blog to extend and reflect the teacher’s TPACK.This study is conducted via embeded design of mixed method. The Mathematics teacher used the Interactive Whiteboard into math instruction for 29 fourth graders in an elementary school. This study was carried out over 2 years and data was gathered via various methods like observation checklists, peer teachers’ blog dialogues, teacher self-reflection notes, students’ diaries and social network analysis matrixes etc.
According to the data analysis and discussion, the main conclusions were synthesized as follows:
1.The TPACK of the elementary school Mathematics teachewas complex and had been mianly influenced by TPK and TCK.
2.The social network consructed by teaching blog was consis of sixty actors. and the actors’ background was homogenous.The social network displayed a weak-structure, exploded outward and emerged 4 subgroups. Five actors were located in structure holes and their centrality exponents were much higher. Fourteen actors played the role of middlemen and had different five kinds of role meaning.
3.The TPACK of the elementary school Mathematics teacher had experienced 4 stages and developped spirally.
4.The TPACK and the social network had been influeced spirally and generated real changes of the TPACK.
Acording to conclusions, suggestions about professional devolpment, intergrating Interactive Whiteboard into math instruction, blog construction and futher research
were proposed as follows.
中文部分
王良輝(2004)。博客文化及其教育應用。遠程教育,1,7-9。new window
方興東、張笑容(2005)。我們把Web2.0叫做互聯網2.0。網路傳播,10,22-35。2010年11月12日,取自http://media.people.com.cn/
BIG5/22114/46419/46429/3758158.html46429/3758158.html
呂宗晉(2007)。教學知識社群發展之行動研究。輔仁大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
宋文理(譯)(2001)。J. Bruner著。教育的文化-文化心理學的觀點。台北市:遠流。
宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),97-130。new window
林克寰(2004)。你不能不知道的BLOG WEB LOG ── Blog 是甚麼碗糕啊?
2010年10月9日,取自http://www.ebao.us/portal/showcontent.asp?INDEX=2368
林炳憲(2009)。以社會網絡分析部落格行為。明新科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹縣。
林祖強(2011)。職前生物教師資訊科技融入學科教學知識(TPCK)發展之研究。國立臺灣師範大學生命科學研究所博士碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
柯玟岑(2008)。感動自己與認識世界的一扇窗-教師運用部落格分享實踐知識之個案研究。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台
北市。
何家源(2010)。高中地理老師GIS研習參與情形之社會網絡研究。國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
沈容卉(2007)。部落格在學校之應用。國立台南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
吳承翰(2006)。教師資訊科技訓練教材之發展─以「部落格軟體LifeType」為例。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
吳榮宗(2010)。國小教師建置電子化教學檔案對教師專業發展意義之探究-以彰化縣為例。東海大學教育研究所碩士碩士論文,未出版,臺中縣。
吳慧如(2009)。學習社群內知識分享對學習成效的影響-以個案教學法為例。元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
李柏玲(2011)。實施創意教學在生活領域發展國小教師科技學科教學知識之個案研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
徐珮淇(2010)。台南縣國小教師使用教學部落格之調查研究。國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士論文,未出版,臺南縣。
陶瀅如(2007)。國小實習教師教育實習部落格的自我呈現、學習社群文化及其影響之研究。國立中山大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
許麗玲(2008)。網路學習社群創新擴散模式建構之研究。高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄市。new window
教育部(1993)。國民小學課程標準。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2007)。教育部資訊融入教學 ICT 計畫。2012年2月16日取自
http://blog.jges.tc.edu.tw/lifetype12/index.php?op=ViewArticle&;articleId=591&;blogId=62
陳宜旻(2011)。TPCK發展歷程之研究:以IWB融入 國小國語科教學為例。
國立東華大學課程設計與潛能開發學系碩士論文,未出版,台東縣。
陳昌霖(2011)。以跨層次的觀點探討高職教師採用教學部落格之影響因素。new window
國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系博士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
陳惠邦(2006,12月)。互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考。載於「全球華人資訊教育創新論壇」研討會論文集,宜蘭縣。
陳凱銘(2002)。由社會網絡觀點探討社群模式的線上學習。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
梁亦銘(2003)。人格特質及科技接受度對線上學習社群內社會鑲嵌網絡的影響。淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,4,87-120。new window
張順評(2008)。以社會網絡分析法探討虛擬社群之反應結構。國立屏東商業技術學院資訊管理系碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。new window
張湄鈴(2010)。發展一份量表評估國小自然科教師的科技學科教學知識。
中原大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
張靜雯(2009)。國中小教師部落格使用者呈現教學歷程檔案之接受度及影響因素之研究。國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
黃馨誼(2008)。當教師遇上部落格-小武老師部落格自我揭露之歷程研究。
國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
葉明政(2006)。走近教師網路社群:一位國小老師的部落格網誌之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
楊承勳(2008)。教學知識社群推廣之行動研究。輔仁大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
齊若蘭(譯)(1995)。P. M. Senge著。第五項修煉實踐篇-思考、演練與超越。台北市:天下遠見。
網奕資訊(2007)。互動式電子白板。2012年3月16日取自http:// www. habook.com.tw/
歐義平(2010)。創意教學分享網絡之研究。亞洲大學國際企業學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,苗栗縣。
劉江釗(2004)。部落格之社會網絡與自我呈現初探。國立中山大學資訊管理
學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
劉芷源(2010)。運用教師社群發展國小數學教師TPCK之行動研究。中原大
學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
劉依婷(2006)。線上表演:部落格作者網絡關係對網路書寫的影響。元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
劉宗旻(2009)。中等學校教師採用教學部落格因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
劉軍(2009)。整體網分析講義。上海市:格致。
劉淑芳(2007)。弱聯繫對大學教師教學創新行為影響之研究:認知風格的調節效果。國立中正大學高齡者教育所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
劉崇武(2007)。台灣地區部落格發展與使用之探討。網路社會學通訊期刊,62。2010年10月16日,取自http://society.nhu.edu.tw/e-j/62/62-06.htm
鍾桂民(2007)。應用社會網絡分析於研究生知識社群之研究。輔仁大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
鍾 靜(1999)。落實國小數學新課程之意圖與學校本位的進修活動。課程與教學季刊,2(1),15-35。new window
鍾 靜(2000)。學生學習為中心的數學教學特質分析研究Ⅱ。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC 89-2511-S-152-029)。台北市:國立台北教育大學數學暨資訊教育學系。
蔡斌傑(2008)。運用社會網絡分析探討部落格意見領袖地位之信任與互動關係。開南大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
蔡麗婷(2007)。資訊組長知識獲得和友誼網路之分析。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
維基百科(Wikipedia, 2008)。2010年10月25日,取自http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blog&;variant=zh-tw
鄭尹茹(2002)。探索線上學習與課堂學習互動網絡差異與相互影響。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
鄭國威(2005)。Blog, Research, and Beyond。國立中正大學傳播所網路社會學通訊期刊,45,22-23 。
賴南宏(2005)。九年一貫課程自然與生活科技領域之科技核心概念研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
賴國賓(2004)。愛上Blog。師友月刊,443,78-81。
謝志偉、王慧玉(譯)(2010)。Creswell, J. W., &; Plano Clark , V. L.著。混合方法研究導論。台北市:心理。
謝麗媛(2011)。國小數學教師使用萬用揭示板發展TPACK之行動研究。中
原大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
藝立協(2003)。Blog—部落格線上出版、網路日誌實作。台北市:上奇科技。
蘇漢哲(2008)。部落格卷宗在教師專業發展的應用。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。

外文部分
Angeli, C., &; Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the Conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in
technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPCK).Computers &; education 52, 154-168.
Ball, B. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard, Micromath, 19(1), 4–7.new window
Barger, J. (1991). Weblog Resources FAQ. Retrieved October 12, 2010, from http://www.robotwisdom.com/weblog/
Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518-539.
Brass, D. J. (1995). A social networks perspective on human resource management. Research in personnel and human resource management, 13, 39-79.
Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital. In Nan Lin , Karen Cook, &; Ronald Burt,(Eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research (pp. 31-56). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Cantre, P., Young, S., &; Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(3), 178-190.
Carter, A. (2002). Using interactive whiteboards with deaf children. Retrieved Febrary 11, 2012, from http://www.bgfl.
org/bgfl/activities/intranet/teacher/ict/whiteboards/
index.htm
Carr, A., Jonassen, D., Lizinger, M. E., &; Marra, R. M. (1998). Good ideas to foment educational revolution: The role of systematic change in advancing situated learning, constructivism, and feminist pedagogy. Education
Technology, 38(1), 5-15.new window
Cox, S., &; Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an Elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrend, 53(5), 60-69.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines: the Classroom Use of Technology since 1920, Teachers College, Columbia University Press, New York.
Damcott, D., Landato, J., Marsh, C. &; Rainey, W. (2000). Report on the use of the smart board interactive whiteboard in physical science. Retrieved October 18, 2011, from http://www.smarterkids.org/research/paper3.asp.
Degenne, A., &; Forse, M. (1999). Introducing social network. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Elloit, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Flap, H., &; Volker, B. (2001). Goal specific social capital and job satisfaction effects of different types of networks on instrumental and social aspects of work. Social
Networks, 23, 297-320.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Network, 1(3), 215-239.new window
Glover, D. &; Miller, D. (2003). Players in the Management of Change: introducing interactive whiteboards into schools. Management in Education, 17(1), 20-23.new window
Granovertter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In L. Marsden (Ed.), Social Structures and Network Analysis (pp. 105-130).
Gerard, F. et al. (1999) Using SMART Board in foreign language classrooms. Paper presented at SITE 99: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education.
Hanneman, R. A. (1998). Introduction to Social Network. Retrieved October 26, 2010, from http://wizard.ucr.edu/
~rhannema/networks/nettext.pdf
Hanneman, R. A., &; Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to Social Network Method.Retrieved November 2, 2010, from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~ hanneman /nettext/
Hansen, M. T. (1998). Combining network centrality and related knowledge: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit firms . Harvard Business, Boston.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., &; Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 41(4), 393-416.
Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library and Information Science Research, 18, 323-342.
HKEDB(2008). Consultation Document on the Third Strategy on Information. Technology in Education -- Right Technology at the Right Time for the Right Task. Retrieved December 28, 2011, from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx nodeid=
6140&;langno=1new window
Hofer, M., &; Swan, K. O. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A case study of a middle school digital documentary project. Journal of research on technology in education, 41(2), 179-200.
Hou, H.T., Chang, K. E., &; Sung, Y. T. (2010). What kinds of knowledge do teachers share on blogs? A quantitative content analysis of teachers' knowledge sharing on blogs. British Journal of Educational Technolog, 41(6), 963-967.
Hourihan, M. (2002). What we're doing when we blog.
Retrieved November12, 2010, from http://www.oreillynet.com/
pub/a/javascript/2002/06/13/megnut.html.
Ibarra, H., &; Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 277-303.
Ibarra, H., &; Herminia, R. (1995). Race, Opportunity and Diversity of Social Circles in Managerial Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-701.
Jamerson, J. (2002). Helping all children learn: action research project. Retrieved November 26, 2011, from http://www.smarterkids.org/research/paper15.asp.
Jang, S. J., &; Tsai, M. F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards.Computers &; Education, 59 (2), 327-338.
Johnson, M. P., &; Milardo, R. M. (1984). Network
Interference in Pair Relationships: A Social Psychological Recasting of Slater's Theory of Social Regression. Journal of Marringe and the Family, 46, 893-99.
Kennewell, S. (2004). Researching the Influence of
Interactive Presentation Tools on Teacher Pedagogy. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association
Annual Cinference, Manchester, UK.
Kilduff, M., &; Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage Publications.
Koehler, M. J., &; Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. The
educational computing research, 32(2), 131-152.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., &; Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, and technoledge. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740-762.
Koehler, M. J., &; Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology ( Eds.), The
handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S.; &; Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of
Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 26, 563-573.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in networks and organizations. In N. Nitin &; G. E. Robert (Eds.), Networks and Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Businesss School Press.
Luehmann, A. L., &; Tinelli, L. (2008). Teacher professional identity development with social networking technologies: Learning reform through blogging. Educational Media International, 45(4), 323-333.
Luehmann, M. (2008). Using blogging in support of teacher professional identity development:A case study. The
journal of the learning science, 17, 287-337.
Marlow, J. (2004). Audience, structure and authority in the weblog community. Paperpresented at the International Communication. Association Conference, May 27-June 1, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved November 12, 2010, from http://web.media.mit.edu/~cameron/cv/pubs/04-01.pdfnew window
Mishra, P., &; Koehler, M. J. (2003).Not “what”but “how”: Becoming design-wise about educational technology. In Y. Zhao (Ed.), What teacher should know about technology: Perspectives and practice (pp.99-122). Greeneich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Mishra, P., &; Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological
pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record,108(6), 1017-1054.
Mitchell, J. C. (1969). Social networks and urban situations. Manchester University Press.
Mitchell, J. C. (1973). Networks, norms, and institutions. In M. J. Boissevain &; J. C. Mitchell. (Eds.), Network analysis: Studies in Human Interaction (pp.15-36).
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teacher to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology
pedagogical content knowledge. Teacher and Teacher education, 21, 509-523.
Niess, M. L., Suharwoto, G., Lee, K., &; Sadri, P. (2006, April ). Guiding Inservice Mathematics Teachers in Developing TPCK. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.
Niess, M. L., Sadri, P., &; Lee, K. (2007). Dynamic spreadsheets as learning technology tools: Developing teachers’ technology pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
Niess, M. L. (2008). Knowledge needed for teaching with technologies – Call it TPACK. AMTE Connections, 17(2), 9-10.
Niess, M. L., &; Ronau, R. N. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK Standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 10.new window
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research &; evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Palonen, T., &; Lehtinen, E. (2001). Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Fisnnish case. Higher Education, 42, 493-513.
Rodrigues, S. (2003). Experiences from the partnership in primary science project: Teacher professional development invoving ICT and science pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education Iternational, 14(2), 2-11.
Scheffler, I. (1990). Computers at school? In V. H. Howard (Ed.), Varieties of thinking: Essays from Harvard’s philosophy of education (pp. 93-109). London: Routledge.
Schmidt, D. A., Bara, E., &; Thompson A. (2009).
Technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
Shea, P.; &; Hayes, S. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. Internet &; Higher Education, 13, 10-21.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.new window
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., &; Miller, J. (2005). Interactive Whiteboard: boon or bandwagon? A Critical Review of the Literature .Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
Walker, D. (2002). White enlightening. Times Educational Supplement, pp.19.
Tashakkori &; C. Teddlie (Eds.).(1998). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavior research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wasserman, S., &; Faust. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wasserman, S., &; Galaskiewicz, J. (1994). Advances in Social Network Analysis:Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage Publications, Inc.
Wells, L. (2006). Blog it: an innonative way to improve literacy. Reading Today, 24(1), 40.new window
Zhao, Y. (Ed.). (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE