一、中文部分
王保進（譯）（2002）。H. R. Kells著。大學自我評鑑（Self-study processes : a guide for postsecondary and similar service-oriented institutions and programs）。新北市：正中。
李允傑、丘昌泰（2009）。政策執行與評估。臺北市：元照。
宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。混合方法在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55(4)，97-130。
吳明清（1991）。教育研究：基本觀念與方法之分析。臺北市：五南。
吳芝儀、廖梅花（譯）（2001）。A. Strauss & J. Corbin著。紮根理論研究方法（Basics of qualitative research）。嘉義市：濤石文化。
吳芝儀、李奉儒（譯）（1995）。M. Q. Patton著。質性評鑑與研究（Qualitative evaluation and research methods）。臺北縣：桂冠。
吳淑娟（譯）（2004）。信度與效度。載於黃光雄總校定，教育研究法規劃與評鑑（原作者：J. R. Fraenkel & N. E. Wallen）。高雄市：麗文。（原著出版年：2003）。
林曉雲（2015，9月25日）綠營五縣市拒絕教部統合視導。自由時報。取自由時報。http//news,ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/918482。
林葦芸（譯）（2006）。S. Lukes著。權力：基進的觀點（Power : A radical view）。臺北市：商周。
卓意屏（2006）。臺北市國民小學效務自我評鑑（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學國民教育研究所，臺北市。
許籐繼 (1995）。臺北市國民小學自我評鑑之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所，臺北市。
連世傑（2004）。臺北市國民小學效務自我評鑑之個案研究（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所，臺北市。
郭昭佑（2000）。學校本位評鑑。臺北市：五南。
郭昭佑（2005）。學校自我評鑑可行性探究。教育政策論壇，8(1)，159-184。
郭昭佑（2007）。教育評鑑研究：原罪與解放。臺北市：五南。
許添明、劉智豪（2008）。從國小校務評鑑論教育品質與管理之問題與對策。教育資料與研究雙月刊。81，153-178。
國際教育訊息電子報(2017年5月16日)。英國中小學的自我評鑑做為校務評鑑的一環【部落格文字資料】。取自http://fepaper. Naer.edu.tw/print?edm-no=125&content-no=6264
黃政傑（1987）。課程評鑑。臺北市：師大書苑。
黃嘉雄（2012）。影響小學對課程與教學評鑑發現利用之因素研究。課程與教學季刊，15(3)，1-26。
黃柏叡（譯）（2003）。研究倫理。載於黃光雄總校定，教育研究法規劃與評鑑（原作者：J. R. Fraenkel & N. E. Wallen）。高雄市：麗文。（原著出版年：2003）。
曾淑惠（2006）。高職學校評鑑阻礙之研究。教育政策論壇，9(3)，73-98。
彭玉宜（2004）。桃園縣國民小學校務自我評鑑之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學進修部學校行政進修班，新竹市。
楊振昌（2005）。一所國民小學實施校務自我評鑑實務之研究（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所，臺北市。
潘慧玲（2004）。邁向下一代的教育評鑑：回顧與前瞻。載於國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心主編，教育評鑑：回顧與展望學術研討會（頁11-23）。臺北市：臺灣師範大學教育研究中心。
鄭淑惠（2015）。國民中小學校務經營中的自我評鑑現況研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊，17，67-78。
劉北成、楊遠嬰（譯）（1992）。規訓與懲罰：監獄的誕生（原作者：M. Foucault）。臺北市：桂冠。（原著出版年：1990）
關鍵評論（2015年9月24日）。得獎教師：政府的善意缺乏對基層的了解，反而是拖垮教育的元兇【部落格文字資料】。取自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/25286
盧增緒（1995）。論教育評鑑觀念之形成。載於中國教育學會主編，教育評鑑（頁3-60）。臺北市：師大書苑。
謝文全（2003）。教育行政學。臺北市：高等教育
翻轉教育2.0(2015年9月23日)。104年全國SUPER教師獎，高中職組全國首獎莊福泰老師的得獎感言【部落格文字資料】。取自https://sites.google.com/a/dlsh.tc.edu.tw/flipall/home/xue-si- da-shi-shi-xin-de-fen- xiang/104nianquanguosuperjiaoshijianggaozhongzhizuquanguoshoujiangzhuangfutailaoshidedejiangganyan


二、西文部分
Adems, J. E. (1994). Implementing program equity: Raising the Stakes for educational policy and practice. Educational Policy, 8(4), 518-534.
Alkin, M. & Coyle, K. (1988). Thoughts on evaluation misutilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 14(3) , 331-340.
Alkin, M.C. & Taut, S.M.(2003). Unbundling evaluation use. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 1-12.
Arrowsmith, R. (2001). A right performance :The performing school. London, U.K. : Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2001). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy. In D. Gleeson & C. Husbands.(Eds.), The performing school: Managing teaching and learning in a performance culture(pp.210-216). London, U.K.: Routledge Falmer.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teachers’ soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Educational Policy. 18(2), 215-228.
Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes a law. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Baughman, S., Boyd. H.H. & Franz, N. K.(2012). Evaluation and program planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35, 329-336.
Bauman, R. (1996). From pilgrim to tourist-or a short history of identity . In S. Hall, & P. DuGay, (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp.18-36). London, U.K.: Sage .
Brighouse, T. & Woods, D. (1999). How to improve your school？. London, U.K.: Routledge.
Caldwell, B. & Spinks, J.M. (1992), Leading the self-managing school. London, U.K.: Falmer Press.
Castells, M. (2001). Information technology and global capitalism. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens (Eds.), On the edge living with global capitalism. London, U.K. : Vintage.
Carlyle, D. & Woods, P. (2002). Emotions of teacher stress. London, U.K. : Cromwell Press.
Chapman, C. (2008). Towards a framework for school-to-school networking in challenging circumstances. Educational Research, 50(4), 403-420.
Chapman, C. & Sammons, P. (2013). School self-evaluation for school improvement：What works and why？Retrieved from : https://www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com/~/media/EDT/Reports/Research/2013/r-school-self-evaluation-2013.pdf
Christie, C. A. & Alkin, M. C. (1999). Further reflections on evaluation misutilization. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 1-10.
Church, C.& Rogers, M.M. (2006). Designing for results: Integrating monitoring and evaluation in conflict transformation programs. Washington, DC: Search for Common Ground. File: ///c: Users/user/Downloads/manualpart1.pdf
Coe, R. & Visscher, A. J. (2002). Drawing up the balance sheet for school performance feedback systems. In A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds) School improvement through performance feedback. Lisse, Netherlands : Swets & Zeitlinger B. V.
Coe, R. & Visscher, A. J. (2002). School improvement through performance feedback. Rotterdam, Netherlands : Swets & Zeitlinger.
Cohen, D., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education(5th Ed.). London, U.K. : Routledge.
Cousins, J. B. & Leithwood, K.A.(1986). Current empirical research on evaluation utilization. Review of Educational Research, 56, 331-364.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches(2nd ed). Thousand Oaks,CA : Sage.
Creswell, J.W. (2004). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches( 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London, U.K. : SAGE.
Crowie, M. , Taylor, D. & Croxford, L. (2007). Tough, intelligent accountability in Scottish secondary schools and the role of Standard Tables and Charts: A critical appraisal. Scottish Educational Review. 39(1), 29-50.
Demetriou, D. & Kyriakides, L. (2012). The impact of school self-evaluation upon student achievement: a group randomization study. Oxford Review of Education, 38(2),149-170.
Department of Education and Science.(2016). Looking at our school 2016: A quality frame work for primary school. Dublin, Ireland : DES.
Department of Education and Science.(2016). School self-evaluation guidelines 2016-2020(primary). Dublin, Ireland : DES
Devos, G. (1998). Conditions and caveats for self-evaluation. The case of secondary schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 421493).
Devos, G. & Verhoeven, J. C. (2003). School self-evaluation－conditions and caveats: The case of secondary schools. Educational Management and Administration. 31(4), 403-420.
Earley, P. (1996). School imorovement and Ofsted insoection: the research evidence. In P. Earley, B. Fidler & J. Ouston(Eds), Improvement through inspection？Complementary approaches to school development(pp.11-22). London, U.K. : David Fulton.
Fetterman, D. M. (2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation .Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage..
Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. & Tymms, P. (2002). Technical and ethical issues in in dicator systems: Doing things right and doing wrong things. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 10(6), 1-25.
Flick, U. (2007). Designing qualitative research. London, U.K. : Sage.
Fleischer, D.F. & Christie, C. A.(2009). Evaluation use : Results from a survey of U.S. American evaluation association members. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(2), 158-175.
Foucault, M. (1979). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp.87-104). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.) (1992). Teacher development and educational change. London, England : Falmer.
Gallagher, M. (2010). Are schools panoptic? Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4),262-272.
Gerth, H.H. & Mills, C.W.(Eds.)(1991). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London, England : Routledge.
Gray, J. & Wilcox, B. (1995). Good school and bad school: Evaluating performance and encouraging improvement. Buckingham, England : Open University Press.
Gray, J., Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., Wilcox, B., Farrell, S., & Jesson, D. (1999). Improving schools: Performance and potential. Buckingham, England : Open University Press.
Greene, J. C. , Caracelli,V.J. & Graham, W.F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11,255-274.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA：Sage.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, Changing time: teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern world. London, England : Cassell.
Hargreaves, A. (Ed)(1998). International handbook of educational change. Dordrecht, Netherlands : Kluwer.
Hall, C. & Noyes, A. (2009). School self-evaluation and its impact on teachers’ work in England. Research Papers in Education, 24(3),311-334.
Harris, A. (2000). Effective leadership and departmental improvement. Westminster Studies in Education. 23, 81-90.
Harris, A. (2002). School improvement: What’s in it for schools？New York, NY : Routledge Falmer.
Hesse-Biber, S.N. & Leavy, P. (2011). Practice of qualitative research(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hennink,M., Nutter,I. & Bailey, A. (2011).Qualitative research methods. London, England : Sage.
Henry, G.T, & Mark, M.M. (2003). Beyond use: Understanding evaluation’s influence on attitudes and actions. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 293-314.
Hofman, R.H., Dijkstra,N. Hofman, W.H.A. (2009). School self-evaluation and student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,20(1),47-68.
Hopkins, D. (2001). School improvement for real. London, England : Routedge Falmer.
Hoy,C., Bayne-Jardine, C., & Wood, W. (2000). Improving quality in education. London, England : Falmer Press.
Hulley, W. & Dier, L. (2005). Harbours of hope: The planning for school and student success process. Bloomington, IA: National Educational Service.
Israel, M. & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for scientists: Between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. London, England : Sage.
Janssens, F.J.G. & van Amelsvoort, G (2008). School self-evaluations and school inspections in Europe: An exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34, 15-23.
Johnson, R. B. (1995). Qualitative research in education. SRATE Journal, 4(1), 3-7.
Johnson, B. & Turner, L.A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In Tashakkori , A. & Teddlie, C.(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research(pp.297-320). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Johnson, K., Greenseid, L.O., King, J.A., Lawrenz, F. & Volkov, B.(2009), Research on evaluation use: A review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 377-410.
Kemper, E. A., Stringfield, S. & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research(pp273-319). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage..
Kirkhart, K.E.(2000). Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence. New Dikection Evaluation, 88, 5-21.
Kyriakides, L. & Campbell, R.J. (2003). Teacher evaluation in Cyprus：Some conceptual and methodological issue arising from teacher and school effectiveness research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 21-40.
Kyriakides, L. & Campbell, R.J. (2004). School self-evaluation and school improvement: a critique of values and procedures. Studies in Educational Evaluation,30,23-36.
Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R.J. & Christofidou, E. (2002). Generating criteria for measuring teachereffectiveness through a self-evaluation approach: A complementary way of measuring teacher effectiveness. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(3), 291-325.
Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B., Antonniou, P. & Demetriou, D. (2010). A systhesis of studies searching for school factors: Implications for theory and research. British Educational Research Journal, 36(5), 807-830.
Leung, C. K. L. (2005). Accountability versus school development: Self-evaluation in an international school in Hong Kong. International Studies in Educational Administration, 33(1), 2-14.
Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide tosensitive research methods. London, England : Sage.
Leviton, L.C. & Huges,E.F.X.(1981). Research on the utilization of evaluations: A reiew and synthesis. Evaluation Review, 5, 525-548.
MacBeath, J. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves: The case for school self-evaluation. London, England : Routledge Falmer.
MacBeath, J. (2000). Self-evaluation in European schools: A story of change. UK: Taylor.
MachBeath, J. (2004). Democratic learning: The challenge to school effectiveness. New York, NY : Routledge Falmer.
MacBeath, J. (2005). Self-evaluation: Background, principles and key learning. Nottingham, England : NCSL.
MacBeath, J. (2006). School inspection and self-evaluation：Working with the new relationship. London, England：Routledge..
MacBeath, J. (2008). Leading learning in the self-evaluating school, School Leadership and Management, 28(4), 385-399.
MacBeath, J. & McGlynn, A. (2002). Self-evaluation: What’s in it for school?. London, England : Routledge Falmer.
MacBeath, J. Schratz, M., Meuret, D. & Jakobsen, L. (2000). Self-evaluation in European schools: A story of change. UK: Routledge Falme.
MacGilchrist, B. (2004). The intelligent school. London, England : Sage.
Maxcy, S.J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In Tashakkori , A. & Teddlie, C.(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research(pp.51-90). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
Madeus, G. , Scriven, M., & Stuffledeam, D. (1983). Evaluation models. Lancaster, England : Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Marsh, D. & Odden, A. R. (1991). Implementation of the California mathematics and science curriculum frameworks. In Odden, A. R.(Ed.), Education policy implementation(pp219-240). Albany: State University of New York.
Marzano, R.J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McNamara, G. & O’Hara, J. (2005). Internal review and self-evaluation- The chosen route to school improvement in Ireland？Studies in educational Evaluation, 31, 267-282.
McNamara, G. & O’Hara, J. (2008). The importance of the concept of self-evaluation in the changing landscape of education policy. Studies in Educational Evaluation,34,173-179.
McNamara, Gerry, O’Hara, J., Lisi , P.L. & Davidsdottir, S. (2011). Operationalizing self-evaluation in schools : experiences from Ireland and Iceland. Irish Educational Studies, 30(1),63-82.
Meijer, P.C., Verloop, N. & Beijaard, D. (2001). Similarities and differences in teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 171-184.
Mertens, D. M. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation,20(1), 1-14.
Mertens, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods and politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie(Eds.). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp.135-164). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage
Meuret, D. & Morlaix, S. (2003). Conditions of success of a school’s self-evaluation: Some lessons of a European experience. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 14(1), 53-71.
Mortimore, P. (1998). The road to improvement: Reflections on school effectiveness. Lisse, Netherlands : Swets & Zeitlinger.
Moss, P. (1994). Sure start. Journal of Education Policy, 19, 631-634.
Narciss, S., Koerndle, H. & Dresel, M. (2011). Self-evaluation accuracy and satisfaction with performance: are there affective costs or benefits positive self-evaluation bias? . International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 230-240.
Nevo, D. (1995). School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement. Oxford, England :Pergamon.
Nevo, D. (2001). School evaluation: internal or external？Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27(2), 95-106.
Nevo, D. (2002). Dialogue evaluation : combining internal and external evaluation, In D. Novo. (Ed.). School-based evaluation:An international perspective（pp3-16）. Oxford, England : Elsevier Science.
Olssen, M., Codd, C. & O’Neill, A.(2004). Education policy, globalization, citizenship and democracy. London, England : Sage Publications.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. & Johnson,R.B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp351-384). Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE.
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Utilization-focused evaluation in Africa. Paper presented at the Inaugural Conference of the African Evaluation Association, Nairobi, Kenya. Retrieved from http://preval.org/documentos/00552.pdf
Patton, M.Q.(2008). Utilization focused evaluation(4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
Pedder, D. & MacBeach, J. (2008). Organisational learning, approaches to school leadership and management: Teacher’s values and perceptions of practice. School Effective and School Improvement. 19(2), 207-224.
Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanism and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2),147-161.
Plowright, D. (2007). Self-evaluation and Ofsted inspection. Educational Management administration & Leadership,35(3),373-393.
Plowright, D. (2008). Using self-evaluation for inspection: how well prepared are primary school headteachers?. School Leadership & Management. 28(2),101-126.
Popkewitz, T. S. & Brennan, M. (1998). Restructuring of social and political theory in education: Foucault and a social epistemology of school practices. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.) Foucault’s challenge : Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp.3-35). NewYork, NY : Teachers College Press.
Preskill, H. & Caracelli, V.(1997). Current and developing conceptions of use TIG survey results. Evaluation Practice, 18, 209-225.
Preskill, H., Zuckerman, B. & Matthews, B.(2003). An exploratory study of process use: Findings and implications for future research. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 423-442.
Rea, J. & Weiner, G. (1998). Cultures of blame and redemption when empowerment becomes control: Practitioners’ views of the effectiveness schools movement. In R.Slee, G. Weine & S. Tomlinson (Eds.), School effectiveness for whom？Challenges to the school effective and school improvement movement（pp21-31）. London, England : Falmer Press.
Rosenholtz, S.J. (1989). Workplace conditions that affect teacher quality and commitment: Implications for teacher induction programs. The Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 421-439.
Russel, N. & Willinsky, J. (1997). Fourth generation educational evaluation: The impact of a post-modern paradigm on school based evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 3(3),187-199.
Ryan, T. G. & Telfer, L. (2011). A review of school self-assessment processes: Ontario and beyond. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 3(3), 171-191.
Sabatier, P. & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8（4）, 538-559.
Scheerens, J. (2002). School self-evaluation: Origins, definition, approaches, methods and implementation. In David Nevo(ed.). School-Based Evaluation: An Internstional Perspective（pp35-69）. Amsterdam, Netherlands : Oxford.
Scheerens, J. (2004). The evaluation culture. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30(2), 105-124.
Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, England : Elsevier Science Ltd.
Schildkamp, K., Visscher, A., & Luyten, H. (2009). The effects of the use of a school self-evaluation instrument. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(1), 69-88.
Schildkamp ,K., Vanhoof, J. Petegem,P.V. & Visscher, A. (2012). The use of school self-evaluation results in the Netherlands and Flanders. British Educational Research Journal, 38(1),125-152.,
Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London, England : Temple Smith.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (3 rd Ed.). Boston, MC : Allyn Bason.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2000). The life world of leardership . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Spring, J. (2004). How educational ideologies are shaping global society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stromquist, N. P. (2002). Education in a globalized world: The connectivity of economic power, technology, and knowledge. Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield.
Swanson, A.D. (1992). Educational restructuring: international perspectives. Journal of Education Policy, 7(2),135-137.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quanitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research：From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie(Eds.). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp.671-702). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage
Teddlie, C & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international Handbook of school effectiveness research. London, England : Falmer Press.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In Tashakkori , A. & Teddlie, C.(Eds.). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research(pp.3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori,A. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 12-28.
Vanhoof,J. & Ven Petegem, P. (2007). Matching internal and external evaluation in an era of accountability and school development: lessons from a flemish perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation,33,101-119.
Vanhoof, J. & Ven Petegem, P. (2011). Designing and evaluating the process of school self-evaluations. Improving Schools,14(2),200-212.
Vanhoof, J., Ven Petegem, P. & De Maeyer, S. (2009). Attitudes towards school self-evaluation. Studies in Educational Evalution,35,21-28.
Van Meter, D. S. & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptional framework. Administration and Society, 6(4), 445-488.
Van Petegem, P. (2005). Shaping school policy: School effectiveness research as a source of inspiration for school self-evaluation. Leuven, Belgium : Acco.
Visscher, A. J. & Coe, R. (2003). School performance feedback systems: conceptualization, analysis and reflection. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 321-350.
Watling, R., Arlow, M. (2002). Wishful thinking: Lessons from the internal and external evaluations of an innovatory education project in northern Ireland. Evaluation & Research in Education, 16(3), 166-181.
Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Häkkinen, K. & Hämäläinen, S. (1998). External inspections or school self-evaluation？ A comparative analysis of policy and practice in primary schools in England. British Educational Research Journal, 24(5), 539-566.
Weiler, H. N. (1993). Control verus Legitimation. In Hannaway & M. Carnoy(Eds.), Decentralization and school improvement (pp.55-83). San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
Weiss, C. H., Murphy-Graham, E. & Birkland, S.(2005). An alternate route to policy influence: How evaluation after DARE. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 12-30.
Wong, M.N.C. & Li, H. (2010). From external inspection to self-evaluation: a study of quality assurance in Hong Kong kindergartens. Early education and Development,21(2),205-233.
Wrigley, T. (2007, July 1). Book Review [Review of the book School inspection and self-evaluation: working with the new relationship, by J. MacBeach ]. Improving Schools, 10(2), 199-200.