:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生課外學習成果及其影響因素之研究–從校務研究策略觀點探析
作者:陳明國
作者(外文):Chen, Ming-Kuo
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:公民教育與活動領導學系
指導教授:張雪梅
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:校務研究校園經驗核心能力課外學習成果學務方案Institutional ResearchCampus ExperiencesCore CompetenceCo-curricular Learning OutcomeStudent Affairs Program
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:10
本研究係以校務研究的策略觀點,探究學生課外學習成果及其影響因素,以正視大學生課外學習成果的重要性;其中課外學習成果係以課外學習核心能力的具備程度加以衡量,並以個人背景變項、校園經驗以及學務方案/活動品質作為影響因素進行探究。本研究係以獲得「教育部補助大學提升校務專業管理能力計畫」經費補助之四間私立綜合型大學的二至四年級學生為調查對象,有效樣本共計1,033人,研究結果發現:
一、大學生自評其課外學習核心能力的具備程度接近理想;對於校園經驗的知覺與投入程度感到尚可;對於學務方案/活動品質,亦即符合評量標準的程度則是感到尚可。
二、個人背景變項對各研究構面差異分析的數據顯示當學生沒有重修、有工讀經驗、在校內工讀、有社團參與、較高的社團職務、社團投入時間較長以及來自高家庭社經背景,其校園經驗相對較好。低年級以及參與社團的學生對於學務方案/活動品質有較高的知覺。此外沒有重修、有工讀經驗、有社團參與、社團投入時間較長以及來自高家庭社經背景的學生,對於課外學習核心能力具備程度的自評結果相對較為理想。
三、研究結果顯示本研究校園經驗、學務方案/活動品質對於課外學習核心能力均具有解釋力且呈現正向的相關性,其中校園經驗對於課外學習核心能力具備程度的關聯性相較其他因素更為重要。
四、針對本研究的量化結果所進行質性訪談中發現,各校受訪的校務研究人員及學務人員對於校園經驗或是學務方案/活動品質雖然都認為是課外學習核心能力重要影響因素,但幾乎都未曾思考這些因素對於課外學習成果所產生的影響。對於校務研究之功能與看法,發現二者並不一致,校務研究人員對於校務研究的功能有較為清楚的概念,但目前研究範疇大都侷限於課堂內的學習成果;而學務人員則對與業務推動有關的議題有清楚的概念,但卻未思考將相關的調查納入校務研究的範疇,這凸顯目前校務研究的功能並未完整的推展到各個業務單位。
五、各校學務人員對本研究在學務方案/活動品質採用美國高等教育標準促進評議會」(Council for the Advancement of standards in Higher Education, CAS的評量指標均認為是相當合適與重要的評量指標,且有助於引導學生對於學務方案/活動的認識,惟受訪的學務人員均表示部分的評量指標的問項並不適合用來對所有學生的調查,因此如能慎選受訪對象,將能有效反映方案的品質。
The purpose of the study is to explore the results of college student’s extracurricular activities and its relevant factors based on strategic perspective of institutional research. The aim is to show the importance of extracurricular activity learning. Co-curricular learning outcome is analyzed by core competence; along with relevant factors including personal background, campus experience and student affairs programs/activities. Several phenomena were presented in the analyzed data:
First, self-assessment of college students based on extracurricular activity core competence scored nearly excellent. As for consciousness and efforts put on campus experience, it is scored as average. It is scored average too on the quality of student affairs programs/activities.
Second, gap analysis of personal backgrounds in various research aspects shows: students who do not retake courses, who have part-time working experience or are student workers in campus, who participate, take higher positions, spend more time in clubs, who come from a high socioeconomic status background, have a relatively better campus experience. Freshman students and who participate in clubs have a higher consciousness on the quality of student affairs programs/activities. In addition, students who do not retake courses, who have part-time working experience, who participate and spend more time in clubs, and who come from a high socioeconomic status background, scored higher on self-assessment based on extracurricular activity core competence.
Third, the result of this research indicates that campus experience and the quality of student affairs programs/activities are both explanatory and positively related to the core competence of extracurricular learning. The correlation with campus experience is more significant than other factors.
Fourth, according to the quantitative results of the qualitative interview of this study, institutional researchers and student affairs staffs considered the quality of student affairs programs/activities as an important relevant factor, which may influence the core competence of extracurricular learning. However, nearly none of them deliberate the impact of those factors caused. As for the functions and perspectives on institutional research, the two are not consistent. Institutional researchers acquire a clearer conception on the purpose of institutional research. However, most of the research scope is limited to the learning outcomes in the classroom only. On the other hand, student affairs staffs are more familiar with business-promotion-related issues, while they never consider including the relevant surveys in institutional research. This highlights the fact that the functions of institutional research have not been fully rolled out to each of business units.
Fifth, this research method adapting the CAS (Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education) is highly agreed by student affairs staffs. The result serves as a suitable and important evaluation index and it helps guiding students’ knowledge on student affairs programs/activities. The interviewed student affairs staffs expressed that some of the questions on the evaluation measures are not suitable for all students. Therefore, a more careful selection of respondents should be reflected effectively on the quality of the program
中文部分

丁芳敏、潘正德、楊慶麟(2008)。大學生全人教育目標知覺、校園參與經驗及學習成果之相關研究-以中原大學為例。通識教育學刊,1,97-124
方國定(2017)。YunTech 校務研究中心的設立與支持校務治理架構。載於「校務研究實務觀摩會」會議手冊(頁2-26)。雲林縣:國立雲林科技大學。
王秀槐(2011)。學習成果導向的課程設計與評量:理念與實例。教育研究月刊,207,53-60。
王保進(2010a)。導入品質保證內涵與重視學生學習成效之大學校務評鑑。評鑑雙月刊,24,54-58。
王保進(2010b)。建立學生學習成效評估機制之大學校務評鑑。評鑑雙月刊,26,56-58。
王保進(2016)。建立確保學生學習成效品質文化之校務研究機制。評鑑雙月刊,60,13-17。
王麗雲(2012)。大專校院校務研究與資料庫應用。載於吳清山等著,我國高等教育評鑑發展與實務(121–149頁)。臺北市:財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會。
王麗雲(2013)。大學自辦外部評鑑的作法與展望。評鑑雙月刊,44,30-33。
王麗雲(2014)。透過校務研究進行自我評鑑與自我改進,評鑑雙月刊,47,19-23。
江文龍(2017)。淺析臺灣大學生就業能力—以臺灣就業網調查 2015 年企業最愛新鮮人為例。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(4),91-94。
江東亮(2016)。迎接校務研究時代的來臨。評鑑雙月刊,60,7-9。
池俊吉(2013)。認可與校務研究:傳統角色與新思維。評鑑雙月刊,46,40。
何希慧(2015)。大學建立校務研究體制之建議:以學習成效評估及提升機制為例。評鑑雙月刊,57,38-41。
何希慧、王淑芳(2009)。建構學生學習能力指標:以東吳大學結合學生e-portfolio為例。評鑑雙月刊,19,12-18。
吳京玲(2011)。建構大學生核心能力架構之研究:分析學術界與產業界的觀點。通識教育學刊,7,9-38。
吳明隆(2009)。SPSS操作與應用-問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南
吳玥玲(2005)。大學僑生校園經驗與學習成就之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,臺北市。
吳清山(2010)。高等教育評鑑議題研究。台北市:高等教育。
吳聰能、蕭玉真(2016)。以校務研究進行自我創新轉型—以弘光科技大學為例。載於楊國賜、胡茹萍主編,大學創新轉型發展(頁206-231)。臺北市:高等教育。
呂威廉(2008)。美國大學生學習成果評鑑模式分析。評鑑雙月刊,15,17-19。
宋曜廷、潘佩瑜(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),97-130。
李立旻(2016)。促進學務人員專業發展-105年大專校院學務人員專業增能研習營。學生事務與輔導,55(2),84-87。
李育齊(2014)。大學生校園經驗與批判思考能力關係之研究—以北部某國立大學為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,臺北市。
李育齊、劉若蘭(2016)。投入社區的翻轉學習:大學生參與服務學習融入聯課活動之實施品質、學生投入及學習成果模式研究。課程與教學,19(4),61-91
李佩玲(2015)。大學生校園課外學習經驗與真誠領導的關係。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(7),111-116。
李坤崇(2010)。大學核心能力與能力指標之建置。教育研究月刊,190,107-122。
李政翰(2015a)。我國大學評鑑制度改革方向之探討。評鑑雙月刊,53,14-17。
李政翰(2015b)。我國推動大學校務研究之策略。評鑑雙月刊,57,915。
李麗君(2014)。我國大學推動學習成果本位評量的現況與挑戰。高教評鑑與發展,8(1),4171。
周川(2003)。校務研究的性質與特徵。載於程星、周川主編,院校研究與美國高效管理(頁3-6)。長沙市:湖南人民出版社。
周昭和、黃毅英(2000)。從課外活動「持分」看教育產品指標化的權力展現。 香港:中文大學教育學院及香港教育研究所。
周祝瑛(2012)。在大學法第五條約束下的大學評鑑,誰獲益。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(8),7-10。
周素足、吳建隆、劉杏元(2014)。第一哩路的期待與實踐:技職校院新生入學期待與校園經驗探討。學生事務與輔導,53(3),51-65。
林世昌,周愛倫、陳信文(2014)。清大學習評鑑中心-行政服務與校務研究結合的新體制。評鑑雙月刊,48,頁32–35。
林劭仁(2016)。認可制度的進化與評鑑中心的轉型。評鑑雙月刊,64,22-24。
林劭仁(2017)。如何準備校務評鑑–第二週期評鑑主軸與執行原則。評鑑雙月刊,66,7-8。
林義男(1983)。大學師生非正式互動與學生學習成果的關係。台灣教育學院輔導學院輔導學報,6,125-148。
林義男(1988)。大學生的學習參與及學習成果—參與理論的驗證性研究。高雄:復文。
林義男(1990)。大學生的學習參與學習型態與學習成過的關係。國立彰化師範大學輔導學報,13,79-128。
林生傳(2005)。教育社會學。台北:巨流圖書有限公司。
林靜慧、陳俊宏(2017)。校務研究與內部品質保證。評鑑雙月刊,65,9-12。
社團法人台灣評鑑協會(2014)。103-108學年度科技校院綜合評鑑項目效標【技專校院評鑑資訊網】。2017年3月15日,擷取自 http://tve-eval.twaea.org.tw/index.html。
邱世寬(2016)。創業警覺能力、學習投入與機會辨識能力關係之研究-以從車庫到金庫–看見臺灣企業生命力磨課師課程為例。高等教育研究紀要,5,1-18。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市:五南。
姜怡君(2015)。校園經驗、學校認同與續讀意願相關性之探究:以臺灣雙北地區私立大學大一學生為例。學生事務與輔導,54(3),35-54。
洪慈欣(2017年2月8日)。教育部大刀砍訪視評鑑 大學系所評鑑今年起全面停辦。聯合新聞網。2017年3月20日,擷取自https://udn.com/news/story/9/2272284。
徐聯恩、林明吟(2005)。成果導向教育(OBE)的教育改革及其在美國實踐的經驗。教育政策論壇,8(2),55–74
秦夢群、陳遵行(2012)。臺灣高等教育評鑑制度與實施之分析研究。教育資料與研究,106,105-142。
翁慧圓、陳心怡、林秉賢、唐宜楨(2016)。方案設計與評估。臺北市:洪葉。
財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(2010)。100年度校務評鑑實施計畫【第一週期校務評鑑】。2017年3月15日,擷取自http://www.heeact.edu.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=1370&CtUnit=843&BaseDSD=7&mp=2。
財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(2011)。「基本素養」與「核心能力」不同嗎?2017年3月1日,擷取自http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2011/11/01/5047.aspx。
財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(2016)。105年度教育部大專校院統合視導實施計畫【大專校院統合視導】。2017年3月15日,擷取自http://www.heeact.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15788&ctNode=2073&mp=2。
財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(2016)。106年度校務評鑑實施計畫【第二週期校務評鑑】。2017年3月15日,擷取自http://www.heeact.edu.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=2126&CtUnit=1297&BaseDSD=7&mp=2。
國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系、中華學生事務學會、中華學生社團教育學會、中國輔導學會、公民與道德教育學會、台灣高等教育學會(2006)。臺灣高等教育與學生事務國際學術研討會宣言。載於「2006臺灣高等教育與學生事務國際學術研討會」會議手冊(頁656–667)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
張英陣(2002)。方案設計與評估。南投:内政部社福研習中心。
張家宜(2000)。大學校院學生滿意度之實証研究。淡江人文社會學刊,6,1-27。
張雪梅(1996)。學生發展:學生事務工作的理論與實踐。臺北市:張老師。
張雪梅(1999)。大學教育對學生的衝擊:我國大學生校園經驗與學習成果之實證研究。臺北市:張老師。
張雪梅(2003)。介入或放手--大學生參與課外活動的問題與輔導對策。載於林至善(主編),學生事務與社團輔導第四輯(頁350-366)。台北:東吳大學。
張雪梅(2005a)。大學學生事務的行政與實務。載於陳伯璋、蓋浙生主編,新世紀高等教育政策與行政(頁472-476)。臺北市:高等教育。
張雪梅(2005b)。大專院校學生事務工作評鑑指標建構之研究。教育部。
張雪梅(2015)。大學生學習成果評量研究。教授休假研究,未出版,臺北市。
張雪梅(2015)。我國大學品德教育與公民參與政策方案實施成效研究。學生事務與輔導,54(2),頁50–67
張雪梅、黃玉(2005)。大專院校學生事務工作評鑑指標建構之研究結案報告。臺北市:教育部。
張雪梅、劉若蘭、陳新霖、葉昌智、盧欣怡、李育齊(2010)。學生成功學習宣言。載於「2010 臺灣『高等教育與學生事務』國際學術研討會」論文集(頁391-400)。台北市:國立台灣師範大學。
張凱婷(2011)。大學生家庭背景、入學特質、校園經驗與學習成果之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,臺北市。
張新仁、張淑美、魏慧美、丘愛鈴(2006)。大專校院推動生命教育現況及特色之調查研究。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,21,1-24。
張鈿富(2012)。大學生學習投入理論與評量實務之探討。高教評鑑,中文特刊,41-62。
教育部(2012)。教育部認定大學校院自我評鑑機制及結果審查作業原則。檢索日期(2017年4月20日),取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawQuery.aspx。
教育部(2014)。103年度私立大專校院學生事務與輔導工作暨經費執行成效訪視總結報告。臺北市:教育部
教育部(2015)。教育部補助大學提升校務專業管理能力計畫審查作業要點。2017年4月20日,擷取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/NewsContent.aspx?id=3467。
教育部(2016)。各級學校基本資料。2017年8月1日,擷取自http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=96B1633791CBD94E
教育部(2017)。高等教育深耕計畫。臺北市:教育部。
教育部訓育委員會(1980)。大專課外活動工作手冊。台北:教育部。
教育部訓育委員會(2000)。推動校園社團發展方案。訓育研究,39(1),頁61-62。
教育部訓育委員會(2004)。高等教育學生事務工作發展願景目標與策略規劃報告。臺北市:教育部訓育委員會。
教育部學生事務及特殊教育司(2017)。業務職掌【學生事務科】。2017年4月15日,擷取自http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2800/News_Content.aspx?n=948E2595995D4CBA&sms=8B90AADA10E1FA12&s=547EE28845FC251F。
梁朝雲(2009)。學習環境對大學生課外活動學習與領導力的影響。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫(編號NSC99-2410-H155-025),未出版。
梁朝雲(2010)。以學務願景為本的課外學習能力指標之建立-以元智大學為例。學生事務,49(2),頁17-43。
陳金貴(2001)。學生涉入理論運用在學生事務的探討。載於何進財等著,學生事務與社團輔導(頁81-98),臺北市:東吳大學。
陳昭雄、費吳琛、張立安、傅木龍、何進財(2003)。私立大專校院訓輔工作成效影響因素之研究。弘光學報,41,19-24。
陳淑瓊(2007,11月)。大學生居住類型、重要課外校園經驗與心理社會發展之比較研究—以公立大學大三學生為例。台灣高等教育研究電子報,15。2017年4月13日,擷取自http://info.cher.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/epaperi/topics/nindex.php?t_id=23
陳舜田(2014)。談科技校院認可制評鑑指標。評鑑雙月刊,51,5-10。
陳舜芬(2007)。台灣地區高等教育學府大學部學生教育成果之研究研究成果報告(精簡版)。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫(編號NSC 94-2413-H-007-002),未出版。
陳舜芬、張傳琳(2003)。松竹楊梅四校大學生校園經驗與學習成果之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號NSC91-2413-H-007-003),未出版。
陳新霖(2014)。高等教育學務人員專業能力指標建構與實證調查研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,臺北市。
陳瑞瑞、牛秀平(2005)。社團活動與大學生社會化的關係研究。石家莊學院學 報,7(6),85-89。
傅木龍(2000)。校園學生社團活動之發展與輔導。訓育研究,39(1),16-24。
傅遠智(2016)。校務研究與大學校務評鑑。評鑑雙月刊,60,18-21。
彭森明(2010a)。大學生學習成果評量。臺北市:高等教育
彭森明(2010b)。大學校院如何推展學生學習成果評量。評鑑雙月刊,24,28-34。
彭森明(2013)。高等教育校務研究的理念與應用。臺北市:高等教育。
黃世雄(2007)。技職院校大一新生校園經驗與學校生活適應調查之研究—以智理技術學院為例。載於琳至善主編,學生事務與社團輔導第六輯(頁20-45)。臺北市:東吳大學。
黃玉(1996)。大學學生事務的角色與功能。公民訓育學報,5,167-192。
黃玉(2000)。大學學生事務的理論基礎—台灣大學生心理社會發展之研究。公民訓育學報,9,161-200。
黃玉(2005)。大學學生事務的理論與應用。載於陳伯璋、蓋浙生主編:新世紀高等教育政策與行政(頁395-470),臺北市:高等教育。
黃政傑、李隆盛(1996)。國民小學教育評鑑之研究。臺北市:國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心。
黃淑玲(2010)。學其所做、做其所學:以CHEA 傑出校院學生學習成效執行獎為例。評鑑雙月刊,25,36-39。
黃淑玲(2013)。關鍵時刻的校務研究與評鑑新貌。評鑑雙月刊,45,39-43
黃淑玲(2016)。高教新疆界、評鑑新扉頁:析論挑戰與未來想像。評鑑雙月刊,63,14-20。
楊武勳(2014)。日本大學發展「校務研究」作為教學改善之探討。評鑑雙月刊,47,37-42。
楊極東(1976)。我國大學院校學生課外活動現況調查研究。臺北市:正中
楊瑩(2011)。以學生學習成效為評量重點的歐盟高等教育品質保證政策。評鑑雙月刊,30,27-34。
葉昌智(2014)。大學生課外學習經驗與其畢業後生活適應關係之研究─以某大學校友為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,臺北市。
葉紹國(2006)。大學生的校園生活及其對學生發展的意義。高等教育電子報,2。2017年5月31日,擷取自https://www.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/epaperi/topics/nindex2.php?no=3Association of
葉紹國、何英奇、陳舜芬(2007)。大一學生的校園參與經驗與收穫自評-以淡江、清華、師大三校為例。師大學報,52(3),91-114。
詹盛如(2017)。大學生學習評量政策:大學該有的角色。評鑑雙月刊,68,30 - 33。
詹鴻敏(2007)。國立大學學生事務工作自我評鑑之現況與問題-後設評鑑觀點(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,臺北市。
廖俞晴(2008)。淡江大學學生課外活動學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學教育科技學系,新北市。
劉若蘭(2005)。大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習模式之建構與驗證–以北部某多元族群技術學院學生為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,臺北市。
劉若蘭(2007)。多元背景技職新生課業準備、歸屬感與心理社會發展之研究。長庚科技學刊,7,頁159-175。
劉若蘭(2008a,4月)。大學生對教育的期待、校園經驗、學習成果與學校滿意度之關係。高教研究電子報,20。2017年5月15日,擷取自http://www.cher.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/epaper/
劉若蘭(2008b)。大學生個人因素、校園經驗與多元能力之關係研究-以台灣高等教育資料庫大三學生為例。長庚科技學刊,9,119-134。
劉若蘭、林大森(2011)。影響大學生畢業流向因素之研究。當代教育研究季刊,19(1),101-144
劉若蘭、黃玉(2006)。大專原住民族及漢族學生多元族群校園經驗與學習發展之研究。教育研究集刊,52(1),93-128。
劉若蘭、楊昌裕(2009)。不同身分背景大學生校園經驗與學習成果滿意度之關係模式研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,26(2),1-21。
劉若蘭、楊昌裕(2013)。影響大學生能力發展相關因素研究。公民訓育學報,22,1-21。
劉若蘭、蔡昕璋、李育齊(2016)。一所公立大學經濟弱勢學生學習與校園經驗及輔導資源研究。學生事務與輔導,55(3),9-29。
劉孟奇(2016)。以校務研究為校務決策之本。評鑑雙月刊,60,10-12。
劉杏元、劉麗美、陳海焦、盧瑞華(2016)。定向輔導對新生校園經驗影響之研究。學生事務與輔導,55(2),20-39。
潘正德(1996)。大一新生人格特質、生活適應與學業成績的關係暨相關性之研究。中原學報,24(2),35-51。
蔡志賢(2012)。高等教育課外學習核心能力極其評量指標建構研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,臺北市。
鍾志明(2015)。校務研究與教務評比中心的整合應用—美國大學為例。評鑑雙月刊,57,頁23-27。
蘇錦麗(1997)。高等教育評鑑:理論與實際。臺北市:五南。
蘇錦麗(2009a)。大學校院學生學習成果評估相關內涵分析。評鑑雙月刊,21,58-62。
蘇錦麗(2009b)。美國WASC 採行的「學生學習成果本位評估模式」。評鑑雙月刊,22,37-41。

西文部分

ACPA. (1994). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.
ACPA. (1996). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from: http://www.myacpa.org (Original work published in 1994).
ACPA & NASPA. (2004). Learning reconsidered: A Campus-wide focus on the student. Washington, DC: author.
Academic Leader. (2006). Learning communities link courses, bring academic and student affairs together. Academic Leader, 22(5), 7-8.
Aitbach, P. G., & Kelly, D.H. (1985). Higher education in international perspective. London: Mansell.
Alford, H., & Aharonian, A. (2011). What is institutional research? Retrieved March 5, 2017 from http://www.rupp.edu.kh/news/kiyo/hash2014rupp_3_addition__ir_by_alford.pdf
Angelo, T. A. (1995). Improving classroom assessment to improve learning. Assessment Update, 7(6), 1-2.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 371-372.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A develop mental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence: A critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York, NY: America Council on Education/ Macmillan.
Astin, A. W. (1991). The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York, NY: American Council on Education/ MacMillan.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood cliffs, Upper Asddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Banta, T. W., & Kuh, G. D. (1998). A missing link in assessment: Collaboration between academic and student affairs professionals. Change 30(2), 40-46.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Self–authorship as the common goal of 21st-century education In M. B. Baxter Magolda & M. P. King (Eds.), Learning partnerships: Theory and models of practice to educate for self-authorship (pp.1-35). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Bok. D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges:A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Christenson, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). Commentary: The centrality of the learning context for students’ academic enabler skills. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 378-393.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). (2017). Understanding Survey Results. Retrieved May 17, 2017, from: http://www.ccsse.org/survey/reports/2017/understanding.cfm
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self-processes in development: Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology: 23, pp.43-77. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Corson, J. J. (1975). The Governance of Colleges and Universities: Modernizing structures and processes. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS). (2008). Learning and Development Outcomes. Retrieved March 5, 2017 from: http://www.cas.edu/learningoutcomes
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS). (2009). Campus Activities standards and guidelines:Self-assessment guide. Washington, DC:Author.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS). (2014). Campus Activities standards and guidelines:Self-assessment guide. Washington, DC:Author.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS). (2014). General Standards. Retrieved March 5, 2017 from: http://standards.cas.edu/getpdf.cfm?PDF=E868395C-F784-2293-129ED7842334B22A.
College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ), (2017). Retrieved May 17, 2017, from: http://cseq.indiana.edu/cseq_generalinfo.cfm.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Duggan, M., & Angela, Carlson-Bancroft, A. (2016, May). How Emerson college Increased Participation Rates in Course Evaluations and NSSE. Poster session presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Eagan, K., Figueroa, T., Hurtado, S., Cobian, K., & White-Lewis, D. (2016, May). College experiences that influence post-baccalaureate STEM pathways. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans
Eurydice European Unit. (2002). Key Competencies: A developing concept in general compulsory education. Brussels: author
Ewell, P. T. (1987). Establishing a campus-based assessment program. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Student outcomes assessment: What institutions stand to gain. New Directions for higher Education, 59(XV). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ewell, P. T. (2009, November). Assessment, Accountability, and Improvement: Revisiting the Tension. (NILOA Occasional Paper No.1). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Fredricks, J. A., Phyllis, B., & Parks, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
Gerstner, J. J., & Finney, S. J. (2013). Measuring the Implementation Fidelity of Student Affairs Programs: A Critical Component of the Outcomes Assessment Cycle. Research & practice assessment, 8, 15-28.
Green, A. S., Jones, E., & Aloi, S. (2008). An Exploration of High-quality Student Affairs Learning Outcomes Assessment Practices. NASPA Journal, 45(1), 133-157.
Greene, T. G., Marti, C. N., & McClenney, K. (2008). The effort-outcome gap: differences for African American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academic achievement. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 513-539.
Gururaj, S. (2016, May). Challenges of assessing impacts of community engagement. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Gilbert, B., & Pistilli, M. (2016, May). Assessing co-curricular student learning outcomes. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Harvey, Lee. (2001) Defining and measuring employability. Quality in Higher Education, 7(2), 97-109
Hines, R., & MacFarlane, C. (2016, May). The Relationship between general Education, Student Engagement, and Success. Poster session presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Howard, R. D., McLaughlin, G. W., Knight, W. E., & Associates. (2012). The handbook of institutional research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Huba, M. J., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Hurtado, S., BrckaLorenz, A., & Clark, J. (2016, May). Gender identity and sexual orientation: Survey Challenges and Lessons Learned. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Karen, K. (1999). Collaboration: Student Affairs and Academic Affairs Working Together To Promote Student Learning. ERIC Digest. Retrieved March 10, 2017, from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED432940.
Kellogg, A., & Niskode, A. S. (2008). Student affairs and higher education policy issues related to multiracial students. New Directions for Student Services, 123, 93-102.
Kettner, P. M., Moroney, R. M., & Martin, L. L. (2013). Designing and managing programs: An Effectiveness-Based Approach (4ed). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
King, P. M., & Baxter Magolda, M. (1996). A developmental perspective on leaning. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 163-173.
Knowles, A.S. (1978). The international encyclopedia of high education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environment for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 135-148.
Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning. Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10-66.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24-32.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5-20.
Kuh, G.D., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E.J., & Associates. (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G.D., & Banta, T.W. (2000). Faculty-student affairs collaboration on assessment: Lessons from the field. About Campus, 4(6), 4-11.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Knefelkamp, L. L. (1991). The seamless curriculum. CIC Deans Institute: Is this good for our students? Washington, DC: Council for Independent Colleges.
Kuk, L. & Banning, J. H. (2009). Designing student affairs organizational structures: Perceptions of senior student affairs officers. NASPA Journal, 46(1), 94-117.
Kim, E., & Seo, E. H. (2015). The Effect of Educational Experiences on Student Learning Outcomes in General Education. New Educational Review, 39(1), 167-176.
Ko, J. W., Park, S., Yu, H. S., Kim, S. J., & Kim, D. M. (2016). The Structural Relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes in Korea. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.), 25(1), 147-157
Lindquist, B. S. (1999). A profile of institutional researchers from AIR national membership surveys. New Directions for Institutional Research, 104, 41-50.
Li, Y. (2016). Assessing Student Learning Outcomes at the Program Level. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans
Maasen, P., & Sharma, R. (1991). What is institutional research? Journal of Institutional Research, 1(1), 1–4.
Maassen, P. A. M. (1986). Institutional research and organizational adaptation. Higher education policy studies, 18.
Mallory, S. L., & Clement, L. M. (2009). Accountability. In G. S. McClellan & J. Stringer (Eds.), The Handbook of student affairs administration (pp. 105–119.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Marsh, C. J., (2007). A critical analysis of the use of formative assessment in schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6(1), 25-29.
McEwen, M. K. (1996). The nature and uses of theory. In S. R. Komives, D. B. Jr. Woodard, & Associates. (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (3rd ed., pp. 147-163). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McEwen, M. K. (2003). The nature and uses of theory. In S. R. Komives, D. B. Jr. Woodard, & Associates. (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (4th ed., pp. 153-178). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miller, T. K. (Ed.). (2003). The book of professional standards for higher education 2003(3rd ed. major revision). Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.
Miller, T. E., Bender, B. E., Schub, J. H. (2005). Promoting reasonable expectations: Aligning student and institutional views of the college experience. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mikulec, E., & McKinney, K. (2014). Perceived learning outcomes from participation in one type of registered student organization: Equestrian sport clubs. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(3), 93 - 109.
Monroe, W. (1952). Encyclopedia of educational research. New York, NY:The MacMillan Company
Markle, R., Jankowski, N., Russell, J., Blaich, C., Fulcher, K., & Wise, K. (2016). Next-level learning outcomes assessment: Varying perspectives, common goals. presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Newmann, F., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. pp 11-39. New York: Teachers College Press.
Nelson, K. A. (2010). Leadership development in student affairs graduate preparatory programs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
NSSE. (2017). NSSE Findings. Retrieved May 17, 2017, from: http://nsse.indiana.edu/html/findings.cfm
O’ Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33-84.
Pace, C. R. (1980). Measuring the Quality of Student Effort. Current Issues in Higher Education,10-16.
Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college students’ experience: An account of the development and use of the college student experiences questionnaire. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California Press.
Pascarella, E. T. (1985). Racial differences in factors associated with bachelor’s degree completion: A nine-year follow up. Research in Higher Education, 23(4), 351-373.
Pascarella, E. (2001). Using student self-reported gains to estimate college impact: A cautionary tale. Journal of College Student Development, 42(5), 488­492.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass。
Peterson, M. W. (1985). Institutional research: an evolutionary perspective. New Directions for Institutional Research, 12(2).
Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., McCormick, A. C., Ethington, C. A., & Smart, J. C. (2011). If and when money matters: the relationships among educational expenditures, student engagement and students’ learning outcomes. Research in Higher Education. 52(1), 81-106
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257-267.
Rogers, G. (2002). Program outcomes and performance criteria. Retrieved July 5, 2017, from: http://www.abet.org/_TrainingCD/data/references /assessment%20Links/Goals_revised_Blooms.pdf.
Rogers, G. (2008). Assessment tips with Gloria Rogers, Ph. D. Community Matters, 1-3. Retrieved July 5, 2017, from http://www.abet.org/% 20Document-UPDATE/Newsletters/08-03-CM.pdf
Saupe, J. L. (1990). The functional of institutional research (2nd ed.). Tallahassee, FL: Association for institutional research.
Saupe, J. L., & Montgomery, J. R. (1970). The nature and role of institutional research: Memo to a college or university (ED049672). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research.
Saupe, J.L. (1981). The functions of institutional research. Tallahassee: AIR.
Sayson, H. W., & Alvarado, A. R. (2016, May). Examining Individual and Campus-Level Engagement with diversity curriculum. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Sayson, H. W., Shapiro, C., & Levis-Fitzgerald, M. (2016, May). Examining faculty Satisfaction and Students’ Academic Outcomes. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Schuh, J. H., UpCraft, M. L., & Associates. (2001). Assessment practice in student affairs: An applications manual. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schuh, R.H., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2010). The Role of Student Affairs in Student Learning Assessment. (NILOA Occasional Paper No.7). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Assessing student learning responsibly: From history to an audacious proposal. Change, 26-33.
Sheehan, B.S. (1980). Telematics and the decision support intermediary. In P. Jedamus, & M.W. Peterson, (Eds.) Improving academic management - a handbook of planning and institutional research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spady, W. (1994). Choosing Outcomes of Significance. Educational Leadership 51(5), 18-23.
Student development theory chart. (2007). August 1, 2017, retrieved from: http://studentaffairs.webs.com/collegeimpact.htm.
Suskie, L. (2004). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Bolton, MA: Anker Pub.
Terenzini, P. T., Springer, L., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1995). Influences affecting the development of students’ critical thinking skills. Research in Higher Education, 36(1), 23-39.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student Attrition (2nd. edition). Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Troutman, D., Chellman, C., & Siegert, C. E. (2016, May). Calculating post-collegiate earnings: FL, NY, & TX. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Thompson, S. (2016, May). Assessing student co-curricular involvement using rubrics and focus groups. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Upcraft, M. L., & Schuh, J. (1996). Assessment in student affairs: A guide for practitioners.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Volkwein, F. (2015). Teaching and learning in IR courses: Myths vs. reality. Paper presented at the Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, denver, CO.
Wang, R., Zilvinskis, J., & Ribera, A. (2016, May). Involving online students in high-impact practices. Poster session presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Watson, L. W. (1996). A collaborative approach to student learning: A model for administrators in higher education. Planning and Changing: An Educational Leadership and Policy Journal, 27(3/4), 165-179.
Weidman, J. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 5 (pp. 289-322). New York: Agathon.
Wolf, R. A. (2009). Future directions for American higher education accreditation. In T. W. Bigalke & D. E. Neubauer (Eds.), Public good and quality in higher education in Asia Pacific. New York: Palgrave, MacMillan Press.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 high school survey of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2010). Charting the path form engagement to achievement: A report on the 2009 high school survey of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
Yuhas, B., & BrckaLorenz, A., Laird, T. N. (2016, May). Graduate student surveys: Assessment landscape, challenges, and solutions. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
Zilvinskis, J., & McCormick, A. (2016, May). Working for pay and high-impact practice participation. Presented at the annual forum of the Air, New Orleans.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE