:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:越南大學生學習投入及其關聯因素之研究
作者:陳仲才
作者(外文):Trong-Tai Tran
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:教育政策與行政學系
指導教授:張鈿富
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:學習投入學習發展高等教育越南student engegementlearnig developmenthigher educationVietnam
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 歷年統計:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:91
研究者通過自編的「大學生學習狀況調查問卷」進行問卷調查以蒐集資料,藉由分析資料來探討越南高等教育學生學習投入情形。研究內容包含比較學生背景互異之情況下學習投入狀況以及可能產生的影響。本研究嘗試從模式的建立來探索影響學習結果以及影響學習滿意的有關因素並提出解釋。研究顯示越南高等教育學生學習投入的狀況,可以透過此一研究設計來解釋。最後本研究對越南高等教育學習投入的問題提出改善建議。
The study is based on questionnaire survey "Student Engagement Questionnaire" designed by the researcher. Through data collection and interpretion, this study explores current student engagement in Vietnamese higher education. This study compared the condition of student engagement and its iimpact by using students’ different backgrounds. The factors impact on student engagement in Vietnamese higher education were analyszed. Researcher tries to explore the factors that might affect the learning outcomes and learning satisfaction, and then provide fit models for explanations. This sudy reveals that the student engagement of Vietnamese higher education can be interpreted by this research design. Finally, this study proposes some suggestions for iproving student engagment issues in Vietnamese higher educaton institutions.
壹、中文部分
方來壇、時勘與張風華(2008)。中文版學習投入量表的信效度研究。中國臨床心理學雜誌,16(6),618-620。
王士祿(1992)。簡論越南現代教育的形成與發展。東南亞,4,35-46。
王保進(2009)。掌握系所評鑑的重點-系所評鑑之精神與認可要素。評鑑雙月刊,21,9-13。
周子敬(2008)。台灣地區大專院校學生課程投入量表之探討。智慧科技與應用統計學報,6(2),173-188。
林淑惠與黃韞臻(2012)。「大學生學習投入量表」之發展。測驗學刊,59(3),373-396。
林志忠(2006)。越南高等教育歷史發展之探究。「高等教育發展與人流通:各國經驗分析與比較」國際學術研討會,南投縣。
張鈿富(2012)。大學生學習投入理論與評量實務之探討。高教評鑑中文特刊,March 2012,41-62。new window
張鈿富、林松柏與周文菁(2012)。台灣高中學生學習投入影響因素之研究。教育資料集刊,54,23-57。new window
陳琼琼(2009)。大學生參與度評價:高教質量評估的新視角—美國「全國學生參與度調查」的解析。高教發展與評估,25(1),24-30。new window
陳舜芬(2004)。松竹楊梅四校大學生校園投入經驗與學習成果之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告(編號:NSC91-2413-H-007-003)。
彭森明(2008a)。以學生評鑑確保大學生優良素質:美國策略。教育研究與發展期刊,4(3),1-20。new window
彭森明(2008b)。將學生學習成果納入大學評鑑指標項目之必要性與可行性。評鑑雙月刊,15,9-14。
彭森明(2010)。美國公立研究型大學學生學習成效評估計畫之實施。取自http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/images/epaper_heeact_edu_tw/2010_0901_No27/PD4 F_27/27_5-4_14-17.pdf
臺灣高等教育整合資料庫(2013)。臺灣高等教育師生問卷調查。取自https://www.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?cat=6
劉若蘭(2005)。大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習模式之建構與驗證:以北部某多元族群技術學院為例。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。new window
劉若蘭(2009)。大學教育品質與學生學習發展之因果模式研究。教育政策論壇,12 (3),99-124。new window
裴明賢(1997)。80年代以來的越南高等教育改革。比較教育研究,18,(3),
48-52.


貳、英文部分
Angell, L. R. (2009). Construct validity of the community college survey of student engagement (CCSSE). Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 564-570.
Ann, M. L. C., Wendell, H. P., & Michelle, R. (2004). Gender differences in learning constructs, shifts in learning constructs, and their relationship to course achievement in a structured inquiry, yearlong college physics course for life science majors. School Science and Mathematics, 104, 288-300.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369-386.
Arteche, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Ackerman, P., & Furnham, A. (2009).Typical intellectual engagement as a byproduct of openness, learning approaches, and self-assessed intelligence. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 29, 357-367.
Australian Council for Educational Research. (2013)
http://www.acer.edu.au
Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bok, D. (2007). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brennan, J., Edmunds, R., Houston, M., Jary, D., Lebeau, Y., Osborne, M., et al. (2010). Improving what is learned at university. London: Routledge.
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47, 1-32.
Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 13(8), 1-7.
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development. New York: Sage.
Dickenson, P. A. (2009). Goal orientation of Latino English language the relationship between students’ engagement, achievement and teachers’ instructional practices in mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles,CA.
Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children’s risk for school problems contribute to children’s behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36, 413-432.
Duong, D. N.(1978). Education in Vietnam under the French domination: 1862-1945. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
Elliott, J. G., Hufton, N. R., Willis, W., & Ilyushin, L. (2005). Motivation, engagement and educational performance: International perspectives on the contexts for learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fredricks, J. A., Phyllis, B., & Parks, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
Gayles, J. G., & Hu, S. (2009). The influence of student engagement and sport participation on college outcomes among Division I student athletes. Journal of
Higher Education, 80, 315-333.
Greene, T. G., Marti, C. N., & McClenney, K. (2008). The effort-outcome gap: Differences for African American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and achievement. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 513-539.
Hair, J., Black, B. Babin, B., Anderson, R. and Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 184-192.
Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2009). Beyond sameness, with engagement and outcomes for all: An introduction. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 1-15). New York: Routledge.
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, pp. 9-34.
Hu, S., Kuh, G. D., & Li, S. (2008). The effects of engagement in inquiry oriented activities on student learning and personal development. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 71-81.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Kaiser, J., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 73-84.
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10-17, 66.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24-32.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5-20.
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 540-563.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
LaNasa, S. M., Olson, E., & Alleman, N. (2007). The impact of on-campus student growth on first-year student engagement and success. Research in Higher Education, 48, 941-966.
Le, D. P. (2006). The role of non-public institutions in higher education development of Vietnam. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Faculty of the Graduate School on Education Hiroshima University.
Marti, C. N. (2009). Dimensions of student engagement in American community colleges: Using the community college student report in research and practice. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 1-24.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2014a). Engagement indicators. Retrieved from http://nsse.iub.edu/html/engagementIndicators.cfm
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2014b). Survey instrument. Retrieved from http://nsse.iub.edu/html/survey_instruments.cfm
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2014c). NSSE topical modules. Retrieved from http://nsse.iub.edu/html/modules.cfm
Ngô Đoàn Đại. (2006). Higher Education Eccreditation – Situation in Vietnam and the United States’ and Japan’s Experience. Retrieved July 1, 2007, from http://100years.vnu.edu.vn:8080/BTDHQGHN/Vietnamese/C1794/2006/05/N8051new window
Oliver, D.E.& Nguyễn, P.T.T., & Nguyễn, K.D. (2003). Higher Education Accreditation
in Vietnam: Lessons From Accreditation in the U.S. American Education Research
Association Annual Meeting (2-34), Chicago.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1999). Classifying educational programmers: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris, France: Author.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Retrieved from http://www. oecd.org/dataoecd/0/47/42025182.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Gender gaps in educational performance Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/data/gender-equality-in-education/gender-gaps-in-educational-performance_data-00730-en
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pham, M. H. (1995). The educational system of Vietnam, In David Sloper & Le Thac Can (Eds.), Higher Education in Vietnam—Change and Response (p.41-61). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 46, 185-209.
Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). First- and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 276-300.
Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., Kuh, G. D., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter? Research in Higher Education, 47, 847-872.
Porter, S. R. (2006). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 47, 521-558.
QS. (2015). QS University Rankings: Asia 2015. Retrieved from http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/asian-university-rankings/2015#sorting=rank+region=+country=+faculty=+stars=false+search=
Ryan, J. F. (2005). Institutional expenditures and student engagement: A role for financial resources in enhancing student learning and development? Research in Higher Education, 46, 235-249.
Schuetz, P. (2008). A theory-driven model of community college student engagement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 32, 305-324.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
Thiessen, V., & Blasius, J. (2008). Mathematics achievement and mathematics learning strategies: Cognitive competencies and construct differentiation. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 362-371.
Trần Kiên. (2002). Education in Vietnam: Current State and Issue. Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers.
Trow, M. (1973). The expansion and transformation of higher education. New York: General Learning Press.
Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153-184.
Veiga, F. H. (2012). Proposal to the PISA of a new scale of Students’ engagement in school. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1224-1231.
Walker, C. O., & Greene, B. A. (2009). The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 463-472.
Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
Williams, T., Williams, K., Kastberg, D., & Jocelyn, L. (2005). Achievement and affect in OECD nations. Oxford Review of Education, 31, 517-545.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2010). Charting the path form engagement to achievement: A report on the 2009 high school survey of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
Yeung, A. S., Kuppan, L., Kadir, M. S., &Foong, S. K. (2010). Boys' and girls' self-beliefs, engagement, and aspirations in physics. International Journal of Learning, 17(10), 397-417.
Zhao, C. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115-138.

參、越文部分
Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo(n.d.). Cơ quan Bộ. http://www.moet.gov.vn/?page=8.2&loai_bphan=1new window
Lê hoàng vũ. Đảm bảo chất lượng giáo dục đại học ở Việt Nam, thực trạng và giải pháp. Ban ISO – Trường ĐH Công nghiệp thực phẩm Tp.HCM.
Lưu Tiến Dũng, Phạm Văn Hà & Cao Hoàng Nam. (2015). Chất lượng giáo dục và đào tạo đại học khối ngành kinh tế - kinh doanh ở Việt Nam dưới góc nhìn doanh nghiệp. Enhancing Student Competencies in current context, Hanoi, Volume: 1.new window
Nguyễn Anh Tuấn. (2010). Triết học với việc xây dựng triết lý giáo dục trong đào tạo nguồn nhân lực của Việt Nam hiện nay. Trường Đại học Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn – ĐHQGHN.
Nguyễn Cảnh Toàn. (2012). Giáo dục đại học Việt Nam thế kỷ XXI cơ hội và thách thức. Trường Đại học Khoa học Xã hội & Nhân văn - ĐHQGHN
Nguyễn Kim Hồng. (2011). “Đổi mới căn bản, toàn diện nền giáo dục Việt Nam” nhìn từ góc độ trường học. Tạp chí KHOA HỌC ĐHSP TPHCM.
Nguyễn Quang Giao. (2009). Đảm bảo chất lượng giáo dục và kinh nghiệm của một số trường đại học trên thế giới. Tạp chí Khoa học Công nghệ Đại học Đà Nẵng, số 4(33).2009.
Nguyễn Thị Phương Hoa. (2006). Giáo dục Việt Nam từ cách nhìn hệ thống. Tạp chí Tạp chí Khoa học, số 6.
Nguyễn Văn Hiệp, Phạm Văn Thịnh. (2013). Những chặng đường phát triển của giáo dục Việt Nam trong lĩnh vực đào tạo sau đại học. Journal of Thu Dau Mot University, No 4 (11) – 2013.
Quy định tạm thời về kiểm định chất lượng trường đại học. (2004). http://thuvienphapluat.vn/archive/Quyet-dinh-38-2004-QD-BGDDT-kiem-dinh-chat-luong-truong-dai-hoc-vb20735.aspx
Phạm Đỗ Nhật Tiến. (2013). Bài toán chất lượng giáo dục trong xây dựng xã hội học tập ở Việt Nam. Mục lục và tóm tắt Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục, số 98.
Phạm Xuân Thanh. (2005). Kiểm định chất lượng giáo dục đại học. Đăng ở Tạp chí Giáo dục, số 115, tháng 6/2005.
Trần Hồng Phong. (2014). Hành trình đi tìm triết lý giáo dục Việt Nam hiện đại. Kỷ yếu hội nghị khoa học 2014.
Thủ tướng Chính phủ. (2012). Chiến lược Phát triển giáo dục 2011 – 2020. Ban hành kèm theo Quyết định số 711/QĐ-TTg ngày 13 tháng 6 năm 2012 của Thủ tướng Chính phủ.
Tổng kết nghiên cứu về phương hướng cải cách đại học ở Việt Nam. (2015). http://hocthenao.vn/2015/06/11/phuong-huong-cai-cach-dai-hoc-o-viet-nam-doi-thoai-giao-duc/
Tổng cục Thống kê. (2013). University and college education. http://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=474&idmid=3&ItemID=15322
Tổng cục Thống kê. (2012). Điều tra mức sống hộ gia đình.
http://www.gso.gov.vn/default.aspx?tabid=417&idmid=4&ItemID=13886
Wikipedia tiếng Việt (2015). Danh sách trường đại học và cao đẳng tại Hà Nội. https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danh_s%C3%A1ch_tr%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Dng_%C4%91%E1%BA%A1i_h%E1%BB%8Dc_v%C3%A0_cao_%C4%91%E1%BA%B3ng_t%E1%BA%A1i_H%C3%A0_N%E1%BB%99i
Wikipedia tiếng Việt (2015). Danh sách trường đại học tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danh_s%C3%A1ch_tr%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Dng_%C4%91%E1%BA%A1i_h%E1%BB%8Dc_t%E1%BA%A1i_Th%C3%A0nh_ph%E1%BB%91_H%E1%BB%93_Ch%C3%AD_Minh

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 學習障礙大學生自我決策能力與學習投入之關係研究--以科技大學為例
2. 高中生知覺教師支持對其投入學習歷程檔案的影響:以焦慮及自我效能為中介變項
3. 大學勞作教育和校外實習課程爭議之省思--從大學教育內涵與學生之受教權和勞動權保障說起
4. 運用BOPPPS教學模式於通識古典文學課程提升大學生學習成就與投入之研究
5. 結合擴增實境與虛擬實境遺傳學學習系統對國中學生在遺傳學概念理解、學習投入程度及探究能力的影響
6. 國中及高中數理資優學生學習投入之縱貫研究
7. 高中生學習困擾與基本素養關係之多群組樣本分析:以學校環境因素為中介變項
8. 從「文學閱讀者」轉化為「文學帶領者」:專案式學習理念融入大學生探究生命大問題之行動研究
9. 數位說故事專題結合在地實踐對學習成效影響之研究:以音樂通識課程為例
10. 遊戲式學習促進會計課程學習投入之研究
11. 大學生知識認識信念、知識情緒與學習投入的中介效果考驗
12. 大學生基本素養分布狀況與其特性之研究:以臺北某大學為例
13. 大一新生入學選擇、學涯規劃及興趣與能力之縱貫性研究--以北部某私立科技大學為例
14. 國中資優生學業自我概念與學習投入關係:恆毅力之中介效果之探討
15. 國中生數學學習興趣、學習情緒、學習投入與學習成就之關係
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE