:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學生閱讀理解能力與學習顯微鏡相關課程之關係--以一個個案班級為例
書刊名:臺北市立師範學院學報. 人文藝術類社會科學類科學教育類
作者:盧秀琴陳碧霞
作者(外文):Lu, Chow-chinChen, Pi-hsia
出版日期:2005
卷期:36:1
頁次:頁209-238
主題關鍵詞:閱讀理解能力重要概念科學詞彙邏輯推理分析預測Reading comprehensionImportant conceptsScientific glossariesLogical inferences and analytical predictions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:27
     本研究利用RCTC、TIWM和中華國語文能力測驗進行量化研究,發現國小個案學生的閱讀理宗能力和國語文能力、顯微鏡相關概念的獲得都呈現顯著的正相關。學生由閱讀文章而獲得的細胞相概念主要有:能依正確的步驟,製作一個水埋法標本片進行觀察,在複式顯微鏡下觀察到的影像和實物是左右相反、上下顛到的,植物胞和動物細胞的形態及構造有些差異,動物細胞不具細胞壁、葉錄體,無法行光點作用,有些水中的微小生物會攝食更小的微小生物,是消費者。 綜合課室觀、學生訪談和生態概念問卷的詮釋分析,發現高分群學生可以理解文章內容的意涵,雖然一時學習太移科學詞彙,但都能慢慢消化理解;中分群學生有些不理解文章的科學詞彙,蠅無法無行分析預測 依賴背誦記憶在回答問題;低分群學生的語文能力不佳,有些字不認得,無法理解文章內容的意涵,也無法正確的邏輯推理或刀析預測。本研究根據這些發現,建議國小自祭教師盡量使用圖文並茂的課本或文章說明,並多使用學生理解的語言進行討論與解說,幫助學生自關建構重要概念與科學詞彙的理解;並選擇讓學生有經歷探究和論證歷程的文章供學生閱讀,學生才能從閱讀中理解原委而修正自己的看法。
     This study using RCTC, TIWM and the Chinese language ability test conducted the quantifiable research; data analysis showed that significant correlations were found between the case student’s microscope-related reading comprehension and the Chinese language ability, the microscope-related concepts. The students read texts to obtain the microscope-related concepts which included the following: making water mount specimen to be observed by depending on the correct steps, the image of object shown on compound microscope was enlarged directly by the specimen; some differences of structure were found both plant cell and animal’s cell, animal’s cell does not have cell walls and chloroplasts, it unable to photosynthesis; small living beings of water, consumers, will eat little small living beings. The qualitative research method was used by classroom observation, student interview, and ecological concept questionnaire. The result indicated that the high-grade students could understand the meaning of the texts, thought they studies too many scientific glossaries for the moment, but they could understand slowly; the middle-grade students relatively unable to understand scientific glossaries, to do analytical predications, they rely on reciting memory and answering the question; the low-grade students’ Chinese ability was not good, neither they recognized some words, understood the meaning of the texts, nor do the logical inferences and analytical predictions. According to these discoveries, this study suggested that science teachers tried one’s best to use textbook with excellent pictures and texts to prove, and used the language that students understood to discuss and explain, so they could help students to construct understanding the important concepts and scientific glossaries by themselves. Science teaches chose the texts for students to read that let students went through explores and proves the course, so students could understand the whole story and revise one’s own view from reading.
期刊論文
1.Gilbert, S. W.(1989)。An evaluation of the use of analogy, simile, and metaphor in science texts。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,26(4),315-327。  new window
2.Yore, L. D.、Shymansky, J. A.(1991)。Reading in science: Developing and operational conception to guide instruction。Journal of Science Teacher Education,2(2),29-36。  new window
3.Popplewell, S. R.、Doty, D. E.(2001)。Classroom instruction and reading comprehension: A comparison of one basal reader approach and the four-blocks framework。Reading Psychology,22,83-94。  new window
4.盧秀琴(20040900)。中小學「細胞相關課程閱讀理解能力測驗」的發展與效化。國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類,17(2),83-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.趙金祁、洪文東(19930900)。教育的語言--布魯納[J.S.Bruner]對教育的提示。科學教育,162,5-13。  延伸查詢new window
6.許良榮(19940500)。科學課文的特性與學習。科學教育月刊,170,23-36。  延伸查詢new window
7.錡寶香(19991100)。國小學童閱讀理解能力之分析。國教學報,11,100-133。  延伸查詢new window
8.盧秀琴(20030300)。顯微鏡下的世界兩階層診斷式紙筆測驗的發展與效化。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(1),127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.湯清二(19910600)。我國學生自然科概念發展與診斷教學之研究--生物細胞概念發展。彰化師範大學學報,2,489-516。  延伸查詢new window
10.曾千虹、耿正屏(19930400)。國小、國中及高中學生之細胞概念發展。科學教育,4,157-182。  延伸查詢new window
11.盧秀琴(20040300)。不同教學策略影響中小學學生學習顯微鏡相關課程之探究。國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類,17(1),147-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林寶貴、楊慧敏、許秀英(19950600)。中華國語文能力測驗之編製及相關因素之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,12,1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.盧秀琴(20030900)。臺灣北部地區中小學學生的顯微鏡操作技能與相關概念之發展。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(2),161-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.湯清二(19930600)。我國學生生物細胞概念發展研究迷思概念之唔談與概念圖。彰化師範大學學報,4,141-170。  延伸查詢new window
15.盧秀琴(20051200)。探討教科書與中小學學生學習細胞相關概念的關係。科學教育學刊,13(4),367-386。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Yore, L. D.、Pimm, D.(2005)。Trends in reading and writing research Mathematics and Science Education。Science and Mathematics International Conference。National Changhua University of Education。  new window
學位論文
1.陳秋芬(2003)。科學性文章中的時間序列對國小五年級學生閱讀理解的影響(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳碧霞(2004)。探討國小學童語言能力及認知風格對形成另有概念的影響--以顯微鏡相關課程為例(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳郁价(2003)。國小學生學習顯微鏡課程另有概念之成因探究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.林素雯(2003)。指導讀寫策略以提升學生科學寫作能力之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳明彥(2002)。國小學童語言能力、閱讀理解能力與寫作表現關係之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝添裕(2002)。國小學童對不同型式以及不同圖文配置之科學文章其閱讀理解與閱讀觀點之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Campbell, Neil A.、Reece, Jane B.(2003)。Biology。Benjamin Cummings Company press。  new window
2.Lemke, J. L.(1990)。Talking science: Language and values。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
3.熊同鑫(2000)。語言與自然科學教育。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.Brady, S.、Willard, C.(1998)。Microscopic explorations: A Gems Festival Teacher's Guide (Grades 4-8)。CA:University of California-Berkeley, Lawrence Hall of Science。  new window
5.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Hanfmann, E.、Kasanin, J.、李維(1998)。思維與語言。臺北市:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Gagné, Ellen D.、Yekovich, C. W.、Yekovich, F. R.(1985)。The cognitive psychology of school learning。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
7.Ames, L. B.、Ilg, F. L.、Baker, S. M.(1988)。Your ten- to fourteen-year-old。New York:Delacorte。  new window
8.Cook, D. M.(1986)。A guide to curriculum planning in reading。Madison, WI:Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction。  new window
9.Gunning, T. G.(1996)。Creating reading instruction for all children。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
10.Huck, C. S.、Hepler, S.、Hickman, J.(1993)。Children's literature in the elementary school。Orlando, FL:New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers。  new window
11.Gagné, E. D.、Yekovich, C. W.、Yekovich, F. R.(1993)。The cognitive psychology of school learning。New York, NY:Harper Collins College Publishers。  new window
其他
1.盧秀琴(2000)。顯微鏡下的微小世界教學光碟片。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃鴻志(2000)。資訊科技融入自然科的教學設計--「細胞的觀察」,file://C:\windows\temp\教學科目.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Yore, L. D.(1985)。Readability, formulas, and procedures, reading metacognition inventory and interview。Inferences in text processing。Amaterdam:Elsevier Science Publishers。  new window
2.Duit, R.(1991)。Students' conceptual frameworks: consequences for learning science。Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics。New York:Columbia University, Teachers College Press。  new window
3.Sulzby, E.、Teale, W.(1991)。Emergent literacy。Handbook of reading research。Longman。  new window
4.Stepans, J. I.(1991)。Developmental in students' understanding of physics concepts。The psychology of learning science。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE