臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Rasch模式建置國小高年級閱讀理解測驗
書刊名：教育心理學報
作者：林怡君 引用關係／張麗麗 引用關係／陸怡琮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, I-chun／Chang, Lily／Lu, I-chung
出版日期：2013
卷期：45:1
頁次：頁39-61
主題關鍵詞：閱讀理解測驗；Rasch模式；NAEP；Rasch model；Reading comprehension test
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:231
  • 點閱點閱:138
「國小高年級閱讀理解測驗」係根據NAEP閱讀理解評量架構，以Rasch部份給分模式建置適用於高年級一般學童之文本閱讀理解測驗。研究對象係採分層隨機抽樣取得之高屏地區國小五、六年級學童1,052人。測驗共39題，含文學及訊息文本、選擇題及建構反應題，測「尋找和回憶」、「整合和解釋」及「批判和評鑑」三個閱讀理解認知層次。計量分析的結果顯示：Rasch模式建置之測驗符合客觀測量特性（閱讀理解構念為單向度、具性別及年級恆等性）、建構反應題之等級間距適切且呈階層關係、試題難度分配廣且與學童能力相對應、閱讀理解認知層次具階層性、測驗具合理之聚斂與區辨相關且能區辨不同次群體（年級、性別、語文能力）、測驗具理想之分隔信度及評分者信度。本文亦針對測驗應用、Rasch模式應用，以及後續研究提出建議。
The Reading Comprehension Test, based on NAEP reading framework, was developed for 5th and 6th grade students using the Rasch measurement model. The participants of this study were 1,052 5th and 6th graders sampled from Kaohsiung and Pingtung counties using stratified random sampling procedures. The 39-item test, including both multiple-choice and construct-response items, measures three cognitive levels (i.e., locate / recall, integrate / interpret, and critique / evaluate) of literary and informational texts. Results show: a) the underlying trait defined by the reading comprehension test holds the characteristics of an objective measurement (i.e., the construct measured by the test is unidimensional and invariant across genders and grades); b) the rating scales for construct-response items are appropriate in terms of their order and distance; c) items spread reasonably well along the latent continuum and are aligned with various ability levels; d) the three reading cognitive levels show hierarchical structure as expected; e) the test converges and discriminates various measures appropriately; f) the test is able to discriminate group differences by gender, grade, and ability level; and g) the test has satisfactory person separation and rater reliability. Discussions and suggestions regarding test application, the application of the Rasch model, and future research are provided.
期刊論文
1.張麗麗、羅素貞(20110900)。Rasch多向度模式檢核「國小數學問題解決態度量表」(MPSAS)之心理計量特性。教育與心理研究，34(3)，153-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Engelhard, G. Jr.(1993)。What is the attenuation paradox?。Rasch Measurement Transactions，6(4)。  new window
3.Singh, J.(2004)。Tackling measurement problems with item response theory: Principles, characteristics, and assessment, with an illustrative example。Journal of Business Research，57，184-208。  new window
4.Smith, E. V.(2001)。Evidence for the reliability of measurement and the validity of measure interpretation: A Rasch measurement perspective。Journal of Applied Mesurement，3，205-231。  new window
5.Smith, E. V. Jr.(2005)。Effect of item redundancy on Rasch item and person estimates。Journal of Applied Measurement，6(2)，147-163。  new window
6.Wright, B. D.(1996)。Local dependency, correlations and principal components。Rasch Measurement Transactions，10(3)，509-511。  new window
7.Yen, W. M.(1993)。Scaling performance assessments: Strategies for managing local item dependence。Journal of Educational Measurement，30(3)，187-213。  new window
8.Wright, B. D.、Linacre, J. M.、Gustafson, J.-E.、Martin-Löf, P.(1994)。Reasonable mean-square fit values。Rasch Measurement Transactions，8(3)，370-371。  new window
9.王文中(19961200)。幾個有關Rasch測量模式的爭議。教育與心理研究，19，1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林寶貴、錡寶香(20000900)。中文閱讀理解測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，19，79-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.柯華葳(19990700)。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，46(2)，1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林寶貴、楊慧敏、許秀英(19950600)。中華國語文能力測驗之編製及相關因素之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，12，1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Kintsch, Walter(1988)。The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model。Psychological Review，95(2)，163-182。  new window
14.Masters, G. N.(1982)。A Rasch model for partial credit scoring。Psychometrika，47(2)，149-174。  new window
會議論文
1.Andrich, D.、Hagquist, C.(200401)。Detection of differential item functioning using analysis of variance。The Second International Conference on Measurement in Health, Education, Psychology and Marketing: Developments with Rasch Models。Perth：Murdoch University。  new window
研究報告
1.邱上真、洪碧霞(1996)。國語文低成就學生閱讀表現之追蹤硏究（I） (計畫編號：NSC84-2421-H-017-00-F5)。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱上真、洪碧霞(1997)。國語文低成就學生閱讀表現之追蹤硏究（II ） (計畫編號：NSC86-2413-H-017-002-F5)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.胡永崇(1995)。後設認知教學策略對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解成效之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.董宜俐(2003)。國小六年級學童中文閱讀理解測驗編製硏究(碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院，臺中。  延伸查詢new window
3.林建平(1994)。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Andrich, D.、Sheridan, B.、Luo, G.(2007)。RUMM2020。Perth：RUMM Laboratory。  new window
2.Linacre, J. M.(2005)。A user's guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch-model computer programs。Chicago, IL：Winsteps。  new window
3.National Assessment Governing Board(2008)。Reading assessment and item specifications for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress。Washington, DC：American Institutes for Research。  new window
4.Smith, R. M.、Miao, C. Y.(1994)。Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement。Objective measurement: Theory into practice。Norwood, NJ：Ablex Publishing Corporation。  new window
5.van der Linden, W.(1994)。Fundamental measurement and the fundamentals of Rasch measurement。Objective measurement: Theory into practice。Norwood, NJ：Ablex。  new window
6.Andrich, D.(1988)。Rasch Models For Measurement。Sage。  new window
7.Swaby, B. E. R.(1989)。Diagnosis and correction of reading difficulties。Boston, MA：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
8.Rasch, G.(1960)。Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests。Copenhagen：The Danish Institute of Educational Research。  new window
其他
1.柯華葳，詹益綾，張建妤，游婷雅(2008)。台灣四年級學生閱讚素養--PIRLS 2006報告，http://lrn.ncu.edu.tw/pirls/pirls%202006%20report.html， 2009/02/25。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2008)。國民教育社群網--97年課程綱要，http://teach.eje.edu.tw/ 9CC2/9cc_97.php， 2009/04/05。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部國教司(2009)。全方位的國民中小學閱讀推動政策，http://www.edu.tw^DA/news.aspx?news_sn=2798&pages=16&unit_sn =15， 2009/10/08。  延伸查詢new window
4.OECD(2007)。PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world (Executive summary)，http://www.oecd.org， 2009/08/10。  new window
5.OECD(2011)。PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn，http://www.oecd. org， 2011/08/07。  new window
6.高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系(2009)。中文文章適讀性線上分析系統，http://140.127.45.25/readingability/Analyze， 2009/04/05。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Linacre, J. M.(2004)。Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness。Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models and applications。Maple Grove, Minnesota：JAM Press。  new window
2.Holland, P. W.、Thayer, D. T.、Holland, W. P.(1988)。Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure。Test Validity。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
3.胡志偉、顏乃欣(1995)。中文字的心理歷程。語言病理學基礎。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.曾志朗(19910000)。華語文的心理學研究 : 本土化的沈思。中國人．中國心 : 發展與教學篇。臺北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：794（臺灣：794，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67499467
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上