:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:課堂回饋系統融入故事結構教學對國小一年級學生閱讀理解能力之影響
書刊名:教育學誌
作者:杜叔娟歐陽誾 引用關係
作者(外文):Tu, Shu-chuanOuYang, Yin
出版日期:2014
卷期:31
頁次:頁81-132
主題關鍵詞:課堂回饋系統故事結構教學閱讀理解能力Classroom feedback systemClassroom presenterStory grammar instructionReading comprehension ability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:179
  • 點閱點閱:48
閱讀在學生學習的過程中,扮演著重要的角色,教師進行閱讀教學的目的在於培養學生的認字能力與閱讀理解能力。本研究即以鷹架學習概念,試圖將課堂回饋系統融入故事結構教學中,探討在導入科技與逐步引導故事結構策略下,對國小一年級學生閱讀理解能力之影響。本研究以臺南市某公立國小一年級一個班級的27位學生為研究對象,在研究過程中,透過探討相關文獻資料,了解故事結構教學與課堂回饋系統的特性後,進行為期十週的閱讀教學實驗。本研究發現課堂回饋系統融入故事結構教學對國小一年級學生閱讀理解能力具有提昇之成效,且學生對於使用課堂回饋系統融入故事結構教學持正向的看法。
Reading in the students' learning process plays an important role. In teaching reading, teachers aim to develop students' abilities in word recognition and reading comprehension. This study, applying the concept of scaffolding learning, attempts to use classroom feedback system in story grammar instruction to explore the impacts on first grade students' reading comprehension abilities when introducing technology and gradually adopting the story grammar strategy. The subjects of this study were a class of 27 students in the first grade of an elementary school in Tainan. City In this study, relevant literature was reviewed to understand the characteristics of story grammar instruction and classroom feedback system, and then experiments in reading instruction were conducted for ten weeks. The main findings of this study were as follows: (a) Classroom feedback system integrated into story grammar instruction had a positive influence on first grade students' reading comprehension abilities.(b) Students' attitudes toward classroom feedback system integrated into story grammar instruction were positive.
期刊論文
1.Boulineau T.、Forelll, C.、Hagan-Burke, S.、Burke, M. D.(2004)。Use of story-mapping to increase the story-grammar text comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities。Learning Disability Quarterly,27(2),105-121。  new window
2.柯華葳(20091200)。PIRLS2006結果說了甚麼。研習資訊,26(6),3-9。  延伸查詢new window
3.Beauchamp, G.、Kennewell, S.(2010)。Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning。Computers and Education,54(3),759-766。  new window
4.Dufresne, R. J.、Gerace, W. J.、Leonard, W. J.、Mestre, J. P.、Wenk, L.(1996)。Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning。Journal of Computing in Higher Education,7,3-47。  new window
5.Meadowcroft, J.、Reeves, B.(1989)。Influence of story schema development on children’s attention to television。Journal of Communication Research,16,352-374。  new window
6.Naremore, R. C.(1997)。Making it hang together: Children’s use of mental frameworks to structure。Topics in Language Disorders,18(1),16-29。  new window
7.柯華葳(20070906)。促進國際閱讀素養研究(PIRLS)最新發現--臺灣需要更多「閱讀策略」教學。天下雜誌,2007,152-158。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔡銘津(19961200)。增進學童閱讀理解的認知結構模式。資優教育,61,19-24+38。  延伸查詢new window
9.Samuelstuen, Marit S.、Bråten, Ivar(2005)。Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text。Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,46(2),107-117。  new window
10.黃瑞珍(19990600)。故事結構分析法在語言學習障礙兒童教學之應用。國小特殊教育,27,4-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.吳武典、張正芬(19840100)。國語文能力測驗之編製及其相關研究。測驗年刊,31,37-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳海泓(20040600)。無字圖畫書和錄影帶對兒童故事推論的影響。國立編譯館館刊,32(2),51-63。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳姝蓉、王瓊珠(20030900)。故事結構教學對增進國小閱讀障礙學生閱讀理解能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,25,221-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Idol, L.、Croll, V. J.(1987)。Story-mapping Training as a Means of Improving Reading Comprehension。Learning Disability Quarterly,10(3),214-229。  new window
15.吳訓生(20010900)。國小低閱讀理解能力學生閱讀理解策略教學效果之研究。特殊教育學報,15,177-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.林寶貴、錡寶香(20000900)。中文閱讀理解測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊,19,79-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.林寶貴、楊慧敏、許秀英(19950600)。中華國語文能力測驗之編製及相關因素之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,12,1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Staal, L. A.(2000)。The story face: An adaptation of story mapping that incorporates visualization and discovery learning to enhance reading and writing。The Reading Teacher,54(1),26-31。  new window
19.Raphael, Taffy E.(1986)。Teaching question answer relationships, revisited。The Reading Teacher,39(6),516-522。  new window
20.Thorndyke, Perry W.(1977)。Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse。Cognitive Psychology,9(1),77-110。  new window
21.Mayer, R. E.(1996)。Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive procession in knowledge construction。Educational Psychology Review,8(4),357-371。  new window
22.王瓊珠(20021200)。國小一年級疑似閱讀障礙兒童之觀察研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,33,327-344。  延伸查詢new window
23.Pressley, M.、Johnson, C. J.、Symons, S.、McGoldrick, J. A.、Kurita, J. A.(1989)。Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text。The Elementary School Journal,90(1),3-32。  new window
24.Kintsch, Walter(1988)。The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model。Psychological Review,95(2),163-182。  new window
25.Palincsar, A. S.、Brown, A. L.(1984)。Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities。Cognition and Instruction,1(2),117-175。  new window
26.錡寶香(20040300)。國小低閱讀能力學童與一般學童的敘事能力:故事結構之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,26,247-269。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.周台傑、吳金花(20000900)。國民小學閱讀障礙學生閱讀錯誤類型分析。特殊教育研究學刊,19,37-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Roth, F. P.(2000)。Narrative Writing: Development and Teaching with Children with Writing Difficulties。Topics in Language Disorders,20(4),15-28。  new window
29.Kintsch, W.(2005)。An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective。Discourse Processes,39(2/3),125-128。  new window
會議論文
1.杜叔娟、歐陽闇(2010)。課堂回饋系統於國小低年級國語科句型教學應用之研究。TANET2010臺灣網際網路學術研討會,(會議日期: 2010/10/27-10/29)。臺南市:國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫培真、楊清榮、黃志億(2010)。閱讀理解教學系統設計。數位科技與創新管理研討會,(會議日期: 2010/07/02)。新北市:華梵大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Anderson, R.、Davis, K. M.、Linnell, N.、Prince, C.、Razmov, V.(2007)。Supporting active learning and example based instruction with classroom technology。The 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education,69-73。  new window
4.Berque, D.、Bonebright, T.、Whitesell, M.(2004)。Using pen-based computers across the computer science curriculum。The 35th SIGCSE Technology Symposium on Computer Science Education。Norfolk, Virginia。61-65。  new window
5.Berque, D.、Johnson, D.、Jovanovic, L.(2001)。Teaching theory of computation using pen-based computers and an electronic whiteboard169-172。  new window
6.Cue, N.(1998)。A universal learning tool for classrooms?。The First Quality in Teaching and Learning Conference,(會議日期: 1998/12/10-12/12)。Hong Kong。  new window
7.Ratto, M.、Shapiro, R. B.、Truong, T. M.、Griswold, W. G.(2003)。The Active Class project: Experiments in encouraging classroom participation477-486。  new window
8.Simon, B.、Anderson, R.、Hoyer, C.、Su, J.(2004)。Preliminary experiences with a tablet PC based system to support active learning in computer science courses。ITICSE,(會議日期: 2004/06/28-06/30)。Leeds, UK。  new window
學位論文
1.李麗綺(2003)。國小低年級學童詞彙能力和閱讀理解能力之相關研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝淑美(2008)。國小教師協助學生摘寫故事體文章大意之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學,台中。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳佳玲(2011)。以故事結構教學提升國小一年級學生閱讀理解能力之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳書芸(2011)。繪本結合故事結構策略對國小三年級學童閱讀理解能力及摘取大意寫作能力之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳建智(2007)。故事結構教學對新移民華語文閱讀理解與動機影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃千玲(2009)。故事結構教學在國小一年級實施成效之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.趙建偉(2011)。故事結構教學對學習障礙學生閱讀理解與故事重寫學習成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊智雯(2007)。故事結構教學對國小一年級學生閱讀理解能力之影響(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.胡永崇(1995)。後設認知教學策略對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解成效之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳純純、江艾謙、王文秀(2006)。閱讀寫作so easy。臺北市:幼獅文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Borich, G. D.、郝永崴、鄭佳君、何美慧、林宜真、范莎惠、陳秀玲(2011)。有效教學法。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.張世彗、楊坤堂(2005)。閱讀理解測驗指導手冊。臺北市立教育大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝錫金、林偉業、林裕康、羅嘉怡(2006)。兒童閱讀能力進展:香港與國際比較。香港:香港大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.McMillan, J. H.(2004)。Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective instruction。Boston:Pearson。  new window
6.Newby, T. J.、Stepich, D. A.、Lehman, J. D.、Russell, J. D.(2006)。Instructional technology for teaching and learning: Designing instruction, integrating computers, and using media。Merrill。  new window
7.洪碧霞、邱上真、葉千綺、林素微、張漢評、方金雅、王惠川、翁麗雅、黃美秀、葉峰男(1999)。國民中小學國語文成就測驗。臺北市:國立臺南師範學院測驗發展中心:教育部特殊教育工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
8.柯華葳(1999)。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
9.Gagné, Ellen D.、Yekovich, C. W.、Yekovich, F. R.(1985)。The cognitive psychology of school learning。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
10.Chall, J. S.(1996)。Stages of reading development。Harcourt Brace and Company。  new window
11.王瓊珠(2004)。故事結構教學與分享閱讀。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃瑞琴(1993)。幼兒的語文經驗。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.柯華葳、幸曼玲、陸怡琮、辜玉旻(2010)。閱讀理解策略教學手冊。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
14.Gagne, E. D.、Yekovich, C. W.、Yekovich, F. R.、丘修平(1998)。教學心理學:學習的認知基礎。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Rumelhart, D. E.(1980)。Schemata: The Building Block of Cognition。Theoretical issues in reading comprehension。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.Duke, N. K.、Pearson, P. D.(2002)。Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension。What research has to say about reading instruction。International Reading Association。  new window
3.Stein, Nancy L.、Glenn, Christine G.(1979)。An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children。New Directions in Discourse Processing。ABLEX Publishing Corporation。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE