:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:克羅齊美學對藝術教育的啟示
書刊名:國立彰化師範大學文學院學報
作者:林玉山
作者(外文):Lin, Yu-san
出版日期:2004
卷期:3
頁次:頁251-274
主題關鍵詞:克羅齊美學直覺說藝術教育Croce Benedetto (1866-1952)AestheticsIntuition theoryArt education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:158
  • 點閱點閱:50
直覺乃是:不加推理、不加記憶、不加思考,在人類心靈之中,當下直接全般領悟眼前個別事物的特性,是人類與生俱來的天賦,也是克羅齊美學的精髓。自古以來,美學理論派別林立,然而我們探討的目的,乃試圖透過各家學說以及他們對藝術的詮釋,來認識與藝術有關的:藝術家的創作活動、藝術品、藝術的欣賞與批評三大主題,以期對藝術有更深刻的瞭解,並對藝術教育有所裨益。義大利美學家克羅齊,在思想上受到黑格爾的影響,並遠承康德、維柯及文學史家多桑提司的影響,創立了以唯心主義觀點的精神哲學,他提出兩度四階的心靈哲學體系,來解釋人類意識的活動,闡釋「直覺」在人類精神人文建設中所扮演的角色。本文即透過克羅齊「藝術即直覺」的觀點,來探討其美學精義。同時也提出從事藝術創作方面,領導抽象風潮的大師康定斯基對直覺的看法及重視直覺的主張,加以印證與區分,以釐清直覺說對藝術創作所產生的效應。最後透過這兩位哲學家與藝術家,對藝術的詮釋與當前國內藝術教育課程,強調藝術與人文素養核心內涵的藝術學習的理念中,不能忽視的學生心靈層面。如何使青少年在藝術學習的過程,開發其藝術創作與欣賞的內在精神體認,應有相當重要的啟示。全文分為:前言、克羅齊的生平與思想背景、克羅齊美學的精義、克羅齊美學的效應、美學家與藝術家對話、當前藝術教育的趨勢、克羅齊美學對藝術教育的啟示、結論等,來加以敘述,就教於諸位先進:
Definition of intuition: without ratiocination, without memorizing, without thingking; the characteristic of direct comprehension of the individual object before our eyes, an innate ability of humans, and also the essence of Croce's Aesthetics. Factions of aestheticism theories have rivaled ever since times of old, and for our purposes, we will examine each theory and definition of art for a grasp of the creative activity of the artist, the work of art, art appreciation and art criticism. The three major themes will provide further insight into art, and benefit art education in the process. Aestheticist Benedetto Croce (1866-1952) , who was influenced by the thoughts of George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831), Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), Giambattista Vico (1668-1744), and philology historian De Sanctis (1817-1881), created a spiritual philosophy of idealism. He proposed a spiritual philosophy system of two degrees and four levels to explain the conscious human actions, defining the role “intuition” plays in the human spirit and human cultural construction. Through Croce's viewpoint “art is intuition,” we will explore the essence of its aestheticism. For artistic creations, we will take a look at master Wassily Kandinsky (1866-1944), a leading figure of the abstract trend. By confirming and differentiating between his thoughts toward intuition and opinion to value intuition, we will discern the effects the intuition theory has made on artistic creation. Finally, we will examine the definition of art through the eyes of these two philopophers and artists, and what it may inspire for the present. Of the beliefs of the current art education curriculum within the core of cultivating art and cultural content, the student's spiritual condition cannot be overlooked. How to develop teens' inner spiritual values of art creation and appreciation in the process of learning art? That is the question we will look into. The material is divided into: foreword, the life and philosophical background of Croce, the essence of Croce's aesthetics, the effects of Croce's aesthetics, conversation of aestheticists and artists, the trend of present day art education, how Croce's aesthetics has inspired art education, conclusion, etc., to give a vivid description of the whole picture.
期刊論文
1.林玉山(20021100)。藝術與人文領域課程設計理論與實務之探討。彰化師大文學院學報,1,31-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Carmean, E. A.(1981)。Kandinsky’s Codes。Horizon,24(7/8),67。  new window
會議論文
1.林玉山(2001)。近五十年來我國中等學校視覺藝術教育的改革與發展。2001國際藝術教育學會亞洲地區學術研討會。國立彰化師大藝術教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Smtgocki, Stephen V.(1974)。An Ingoing into the Art Pedagogy of Paul Klee and Wassily Kandinsky(博士論文)。The Florida State Univerity。  new window
圖書
1.朱光潛(1974)。克羅齊哲學述評。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Croce, Benedetto、Anslie, Dauglas、正中書局編審委員會(1985)。美學原理。台北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉文潭(1977)。新談藝錄。台北市:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊國賜(1983)。現代教育思潮。臺北:黎明。  延伸查詢new window
5.Richter, Peyton E.(1967)。Perspectives in Aesthetics。New York:The Odyssey Press Inc.。  new window
6.Kandinsky, Wassily(1947)。Concerning the Spiritual in Art。New York, NY:George Wittenborn Inc.。  new window
7.教育部高級中學課程標準編輯審查小組(1996)。高級中學課程標準。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
8.威爾.杜蘭、陳文林(1981)。西洋哲學故事。台北市:志文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳朝平、黃壬來(1995)。國小美勞科教材教法。台北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉文潭(1980)。現代美學。台北市:台灣商務。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Groamann, W.(1958)。Kandinsky Wassily: Life and Work。New York。  new window
12.Kandinsky, Wassily、Kennethc, Lindsay、Vergo, Peter(1982)。Complete Writings on Art。Boston, Mass:G. H. Hall, & CO.。  new window
13.Langer, Susanne K.(1957)。Problem of Art。New York:Charles Scribner’s Sons。  new window
14.Rebay, Hilla(1945)。In Memory of Wassily Kandinsky。The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation。  new window
15.Kandinsky, W.(1979)。Point And Line To Plane。New York:Dover Publications。  new window
16.教育部國民小學課程標準編輯審查小組(1993)。國民小學課程標準。臺北市:台捷國際文化實業股份有限公司:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
17.田培林(1976)。教育與文化。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
18.劉豐榮(1986)。艾斯納藝術教育思想研究。臺北:水牛。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃政傑(1995)。課程設計。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.教育部(1995)。國民中學課程標準(1994公佈)。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
21.劉文潭(1983)。中西美學與藝術評論。台北市:中央文物供應社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.劉文潭(1986)。藝術與直覺(臺灣師範大學美術研究所碩士班上課筆記)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bernett, V. E.(1885)。Kandinsky and science。Christian Derouet, Kandinsky in Paris, 1934-1944。New York:Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum。  new window
2.Croc, Benedetto(1971)。Aesthetics。Philosophy of Art and Aesthetics。台北市:虹橋書店。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE