臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：解構哲學之探討及其對審美教育學之啟示
書刊名：教育科學研究期刊
作者：洪如玉 引用關係／陳惠青
作者(外文)：Hung, Ruyu／Chen, Hui-ching
出版日期：2016
卷期：61:1
頁次：頁115-137
主題關鍵詞：解構；審美素養；審美教育學；藝術鑑賞教育；J. Derrida；Deconstruction；Aesthetic literacy；Aesthetic education；Art appreciation education
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:226
  • 點閱點閱:80
本研究欲詮釋及闡述J. Derrida之解構思想及其所蘊含之審美教育學的意義。由於藝術鑑賞教育為思考與實踐審美教育學的重要途徑，本研究以藝術鑑賞教育之政策論述為例，說明解構取向的審美教育學之啟示。現行藝術鑑賞教育存在的問題反映出傳統審美教育學的限制，包括下述五點：一、藝術鑑賞教育尚過度依賴於西方的美學詮釋體系；二、多數藝術鑑賞教育活動之實施仍以精緻藝術為主；三、藝術鑑賞教育內容缺乏培養學生批判思考的能力；四、忽略不同文化背景學生藝術鑑賞能力之個別差異；五、藝術教育蘊含強烈工具化傾向。透過對Derrida解構思想之探討，揭示出傳統審美教育學預設了內在理路－邏各思（logos），基於前述，本研究提出四點解構概念對於審美教育學之啟示，可作為思考審美教育學及其在藝術鑑賞教育的參照：一、顛覆精緻藝術較為優位之教育主張；二、瓦解精緻藝術和通俗藝術之間的藩籬；三、化解藝術作品中作者主體中心的霸權迷思；四、建構開放的藝術對話空間以展現他者的多元性
This article aims to interpret and expound on Derrida’s notion of deconstruction and reveal the implications for aesthetic education. Art appreciation education plays a crucial role in thinking and practicing aesthetic education. Hence, this paper focuses on art appreciation education and explores the implications of the deconstructive approach for aesthetic education. This paper also discusses the limits of conventional aesthetic education by identifying the problems of the current practice of art appreciation education. Five problems are identified: (1) aesthetic education still relies heavily on the Western aesthetic traditions; (2) most materials for art appreciation activities are based on fine art; (3) the content of aesthetic education instruction does not include critical thinking; (4) the individual differences based on different cultural backgrounds are neglected during teaching; (5) the strong instrumentalism tendency is implied in current art education. Exploring Derrida’s concept of deconstruction is helpful for suggesting improvements to aesthetic education by revealing the logos implied in conventional art appreciation education. This paper concludes with the following four suggestions: (1) the traditional premise that fine art is superior to popular art is questioned; (2) the conventional line between fine art and popular art is blurred; (3) the hegemonic myth of author subject-centric artwork is challenged; (4) the artistic dialogue space should be diverse and available to everyone
期刊論文
1.林文昌(19900800)。美感人格形成的前奏--談高中(職)的美術教育。文訊，19=58，15-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.Beardsley, Monroe C.(1969)。Aesthetic Experience Regained。The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism，28(1)，3-11。  new window
3.Derrida, J.(1984)。Language and Institutions of Philosophy。Semiotic Inquiry/Recherches Semiotiques，4(2)，91-154。  new window
4.Rolfe, G.(2004)。Deconstruction in a nutshell。Nursing Philosophy，5(3)，274-276。  new window
5.Allan, J.(2004)。Deterritorializations: Putting postmodernism to work on teacher education and inclusion。Educational Philosophy and Theory，36(4)，417-432。  new window
6.Biesta, G.(2010)。'This is my truth, tell me yours.' Deconstructive pragmatism as a philosophy for education。Educational Philosophy and Theory，42(7)，710-727。  new window
7.Rolfe, G.(2005)。The deconstructing angel: Nursing, reflection and evidence-€based practice。Nursing Inquiry，12(2)，78-86。  new window
8.劉豐榮(20051200)。人文主義與反人文主義美學：現代到後現代藝術教育理論基礎之變遷。藝術研究期刊，1，83-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Kemp, Gary(1999)。The Aesthetic Attitude。The British Journal of Aesthetics，39(4)，392-399。  new window
10.袁汝儀(19941200)。由戰後臺灣的五種視覺對藝術教育趨勢--探討視覺藝術教師自主性之重要性與培養。美育，54，39-52。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳榮華(20070500)。從語言的中介性論高達美的意義理論--兼論本質主義與反本質主義。臺大文史哲學報，66，153-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳木金(1999)。美感教育的理念與詮釋之研究。「全人教育與美感教育詮釋與對話研討會」學術研討會，國立臺灣藝術學院教育學程中心（主辦） 。國立臺灣藝術學院。36-51。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖敦如(2005)。解構、思考、批判、再建構--從解構主義探討全球化下視覺文化的藝術教學。第一屆台東大學人文與藝術學術研討會。臺東市：國立臺東大學。19-42。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙惠玲(2011)。臺灣中小學藝術鑑賞教育的啟蒙與發展。臺灣首屆國民中小學藝術教育年會。臺北市：教育部。23-29。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉豐榮(2001)。後現代主義對當前藝術批評教學之啟示。2001國際藝術教育學會--亞洲地區學術研討會暨第三屆海峽兩岸美術教育交流研討會--藝術‧人文‧科技，國立彰化師大美術系 。彰化市：國立彰化師範大學藝術教育研究所。177-185。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王岳川(2008)。當代西方最新文論教程。上海：復旦大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉豐榮(1991)。艾斯納藝術教育思想研究。台北：洪葉。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ulmer, G. L.(1985)。Applied grammatology: Post(e)-pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys。Baltimore, MD。  new window
4.Kant, Immanuel、Guyer, Paul、Matthews, Eric(2000)。Critique of the Power of Judgment。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Sturken, M.、Cartwright, L.(2001)。Practice of looking: An introduction to visual culture。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Greene, Maxine(2001)。Variations on a Blue Guitar: The Lincoln Center Institute lectures on aesthetic education。New York, NY：Teachers College press。  new window
7.Derrida, Jacques、Caputo, John D.(1997)。Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques Derrida。New York, NY：Fordham University Press。  new window
8.呂燕卿(1994)。國民小學美勞課程標準修訂與審美領域教學之研究。新竹市：妏晟。  延伸查詢new window
9.Derrida, J.、Mensah, P.(1998)。Monolingualism of the other, or, the prosthesis of origin。Stanford, CA：Stanford University Press。  new window
10.Dewey, J.(1934)。Art as experience。New York, NY：Penguin。  new window
11.Dickie, G.(1983)。Aesthetics: A critical anthology。New York, NY：St Martin's Press。  new window
12.Evans, J. Claude(1991)。Strategies of deconstruction: Derrida and the myth of the voice。Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
13.Kearney, R.(1984)。Dialogues with contemporary continental thinkers: The phenomenological heritage: Paul Ricoeur, Emmanuel Levinas, Herbert Marcuse, Stanislas Breton, Jacques Derrida。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
14.Schiller, F.(2012)。On the aesthetic education of man。Mineola, NY：Courier Dover。  new window
15.Jagodzinski, Jan(1997)。Postmodern dilemmas: Outrageous essays in art & art education。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
16.Shusterman, Richard(1992)。Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
17.Tolstoy, L.、Maude, A.(1960)。What is art?。Indianapolis, IN：Bobbs-Merrill。  new window
18.Beardsley, Monroe C.(1981)。Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism。Hackett Publishing Co., Inc.。  new window
19.楊大春(1995)。德希達。台北：生智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.高宣揚(2003)。當代法國思想五十年。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.Greene, Maxine(1978)。Landscapes of learning。Teachers College Press。  new window
22.王秀雄(1998)。觀賞、認知、解釋與評價：美術鑑賞教育的學理與實務。國立歷史博物館。  延伸查詢new window
23.Eisner, E. W.(2002)。The arts and the creation of mind。Yale University Press。  new window
24.高宣揚(19990000)。後現代論。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部(2003)。92年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要，http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_92.php。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2005)。藝術教育政策白皮書，http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/94_12%E8%97%9D%E8%A1%93%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8.pdf。  new window
3.教育部(2008)。97年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要，http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php?header。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2013)。教育部美感教育中長程計畫，http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20150225102817/%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8%E7%BE%8E%E6%84%9F%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E4%B8%AD%E9%95%B7%E7%A8%8B%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB.pdf， 。  new window
5.教育部(2014)。「美感教育第一期五年計畫：計畫目標、發展策略、具體執行方案、師資精進與培育方案」書面報告，http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lydb/uploadn/103/1030507/12.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
6.Holland, N.(1999)。Deconstruction，http://www.iep.utm.edu/deconst/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Derrida, J.(1995)。The time is out of joint。Deconstruction is/in America: A new sense of the political。New York, NY：New York University Press。  new window
2.Derrida, Jacques(1992)。Force of Law: The 'Mystical Foundation of Authority'。Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice。Routledge。  new window
3.Derrida, J.(1996)。As if I were dead: An interview with Jacques Derrida。Applying: To Derrida。Hampshire：London：MacMillan Press。  new window
4.Derrida, Jacques(1991)。Letter to a Japanese Friend。A Derrida Reader between the Blinds。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
5.Beardsley, M. C.(1991)。Aesthetic experience。Aesthetics and arts education。Urbana, IL：University of Illinois。  new window
6.Biesta, G.(2009)。From critique to deconstruction: Derrida as a critical philosopher。Derrida, deconstruction and the politics of pedagogy。New York, NY：Peter Lang。  new window
7.Biesta, G.(2003)。Jacques Derrida: Deconstruction=Justice。Futures of critical theory: Dreams of difference。Lanham, MD：Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
8.Derrida, J.、Nancy, J. L.(2011)。The deconstruction of dualism: Death and the subject。Mortal subjects。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
9.Hume, D.(1987)。Of the standard of taste。Essays: Moral, political, and literary。Indianapolis, IN：Liberty Fund。  new window
10.Peters, M. A.(2009)。Derrida as a profound humanist。Derrida, deconstruction and the politics of pedagogy。New York, NY：Peter Lang。  new window
11.Peters, M. A.(2009)。Derrida, Nietzsche, and the return to the subject。Derrida, deconstruction and the politics of pedagogy。New York, NY：Peter Lang。  new window
12.Peters, A. M.、Biesta, G.(2009)。[Derrida, deconstruction and the politics of pedagogy] Introduction。Derrida, deconstruction and the politics of pedagogy。New York, NY：Peter Lang。  new window
13.Smith, R. A.(2004)。Aesthetic education: Questions and issues。Handbook of research and policy in art education。London：Routledge。  new window
14.Johnson, Barbara(1981)。Translator’s Introduction。Dissemination。Chicago, IL：U of Chicago P.。  new window
15.王麗雁(2008)。視覺藝術教育篇：臺灣學校視覺藝術教育發展概述。臺灣藝術教育史。國立臺灣藝術教育館。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1275（臺灣：1261，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67461402
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上