:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:魏晉南朝的「溪族」與陶淵明的族屬問題
書刊名:臺灣師大歷史學報
作者:呂春盛 引用關係
作者(外文):Leu, Chuen-sheng
出版日期:2007
卷期:37
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:魏晉南朝溪族陶侃陶淵明族群關係The Wei-chin and southern dynastyThe HsiTao KanTao YuanmingEthnic relation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:68
東晉南朝史籍有零星關於溪族的記載,向來並不被留意。自從周一良、陳寅恪對此族加以考證,並認為東晉名將陶侃、大詩人陶淵明出於漢族之後,學界關於溪族的研究紛紛而出。儘管如此,由於史料殘闕,關於溪族的族群內涵,至今仍模糊不清。 一般認定有關溪族的幾項特色,仔細思索並不能把所謂的溪族描繪清楚。倒是由漢族即所謂五溪蠻的說法加以追蹤,發現魏晉南北朝時期的蠻,本身就是一個非常含糊的概念,其內涵包括許多非漢族的不同族類,蠻只是對當時長江流域各非漢族群的泛稱,五溪蠻則是對五溪地區各非漢族群的泛稱。因此,所謂的漢族,未必是一個概念明確的特定族群,而只能把溪族理解為當時非漢族群“蠻”的一部分。 依據史料,陶侃曾被當時人罵為“溪狗”,陶侃身上應當保有某些異族的色彩,而不被“中華人士”視為同類。但陶侃並非遠離漢族社會聚族而居,而是已漸融入漢族社會。陶侃出身或與溪族有關,但其建功立業多憑個人才華,未見有漢族勢力之奧援。 陶氏家族到陶侃的曾孫陶淵明時代,幾乎已經不見任何異族色彩了。依據血綠,可以說陶淵明出自南方漢族,但當時漢人不以異族視之,陶淵明內必深處雖潛藏著自我族群的意識,但對外並不承認自己是溪族。至此,可以說溪族出身的陶淵明已漢化融入漢族社會了。
In the historical records of the Wei-chin Southern Dynasty, there are fragmentary accounts about the Hsi, yet they have seldom been noticed. Since Zhou Yiliang and Chen Yinque, who further investigated this ethnic group, considered the famous general Tao Kan of the Eastern Chin and the great poet Tao Yuanming to be the descendents of the Hsi, studies regarding the Hsi have multiplied in the academic circle. However, owing to the insufficiency of historical materials, the characteristics of the tribe have still remained vague. Some traits commonly adopted to depict the Hsi in effect could not clearly characterize the so-called Hsi tribe. Yet if we follow the perspective that the Hsi was the so-called Wu Hsi Man, we will find that the concept of the Man itself in the Wei-chin Southern and Northern Dynasties was rather vague, since it was a collective name for the non-Han tribes along the Yangtze River, while Wu Hsi Man a general name for the non-Han tribes in the Wu Hsi area. As a result, the so-called Hsi might not refer to a specific tribe with a clear definition. We could only understand the term, the Hsi, as a part of the non-Han tribe, ”Man.” According to historical materials, Tao Kan was teased as ”Hsi dog” at his time. There must be certain exotic characters in Tao Kan that could not be identified by the ”Chinese people.” Nonetheless, Tao Kan did not isolate himself from the Han society; instead, he attempted to gradually blend himself into the Han. The origin of Tao Kan might be related to the Hsi, yet his achievements mainly came from personal talents rather than from the support of the Hsi. Till Tao Kan's great grandson, Tao Yuanming, there was little trace of exotic characteristics in the Tao clan. According to kinship, we may say that Tao Yuanming came from the southern Hsi, yet he was not treated as a different race by the Han people. On the other hand, although Tao Yuanmong still had a strong consciousness of his own tribe, he did not admit in the public that he was a Hsi. Thus, we may say that Tao Yuanming, the descendents of the Hsi, had integrated himself with the Han society.
期刊論文
1.余嘉錫(1948)。釋傖楚。中央研究院‧歷史語言研究所集刋,20(下),47-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳寅恪(19440900)。魏書司馬叡傳江東民族條釋證及推論。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,11,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉美崧(1992)。陶淵明族屬辨溯。南方文物,1992(2),92-97。  延伸查詢new window
4.祝注先(1996)。陶淵明溪族論說。中南民族學院學報,1996(2),67-82。  延伸查詢new window
5.農學冠(1998)。陶淵明溪族源流考。廣西民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版),1998(4),91-95。  延伸查詢new window
6.張雄(1985)。漢魏以來〞武陵五溪蠻〞的活動地域及民族成分述考。中南民族學院學報,1985(1),25-33。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳永章(1986)。盤瓠考述。思想戰線,1986(2),39-40。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉義慶、楊勇(1976)。世說新語校箋。臺北:正文書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐堅、司義祖、許逸民(2004)。初學記。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.王仲犖(1979)。魏晉南北朝史。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.王隱。晉書。廣雅書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉義慶、余嘉錫、劉孝標(1984)。世說新語箋疏。臺北:仁愛書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳永章(1992)。中南民族關係史。北京:民族出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.何光岳(1988)。南蠻源流史。南昌:江西教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.王國瓔(1999)。古今隱逸詩人之宗:陶淵明論析。臺北:允晨文化公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.聞一多(1975)。神話與詩。藍燈文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.陶淵明、逯欽立(1987)。陶淵明集。香港:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.桑欽、酈道元、楊守敬、熊會貞、段熙仲、陳橋驛(1989)。水經注疏。江蘇古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(北齊)魏收。魏書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(晉)陳壽。三國志,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.(北宋)司馬光。資治通鑑,北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.(唐)李延壽。南史,北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.(唐)姚察。梁書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(唐)魏徵。隋書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.(唐)李延壽。北史,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(梁)沈約。宋書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.周一良(1962)。南朝境內之各種人及政府對待之政策。魏晉南北朝史論集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE