:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:婚姻暴力聲請保護令異常動機個案原因之探索性研究
書刊名:亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊
作者:李靜華蔡宗晃
作者(外文):Lee, Jing-hwaTsai, Tsung-huang
出版日期:2007
卷期:3:2
頁次:頁1-33
主題關鍵詞:婚姻暴力家庭暴力防治法保護令異常動機個案Marital violenceDomestic violenceDomestic violence prevention actProtection orderAbnormally motivated case
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:168
  • 點閱點閱:95
保護令的主要目的在保護被害人免於受到暴力的威脅,但有證據顯示有異常動機者濫用或誤用保護令,使法官未能詳判而核發之。本研究之目的在探索婚姻暴力聲請保護令異常動機個案存在的原因。本研究採取以五位加害人為樣本,並以自編的訪談大綱為研究工具,以半結構式的深度訪談法獲得研究資料進行內容分析。本研究將異常動機個案分二類,即濫用與誤用保護令。研究發現,第一類之原因為妻為財產或妻有外遇而聲請,而第二類之原因為妻有精神異常而夫之暴力制止或強制送醫而聲請。最後並提出因應此類個案之建議。
The main purpose of the protect domestic violence victims from future abuse, but some evidences showed that the abnormally motivated cases did exist and the judges still issued the protection order for these cases. The purpose of this study is to explore the causes of these cases among marital violence. Five abusers among these cases were interviewed based on the in-depth interview method. Two types of abnormally motivated cases were used to differentiate the five cases. Type One abnormal case is that the victim might try to 'abuse' protection order for unjust purpose, and the Type Two abnormal case is the victim might have mental disorder and 'misuse' the protection order. This study found that the causes of Type One cases included that the victims intent to occupy the property belonged to abuser and the victims tried to cover up the extra-marital affair, and the cause of Type Two cases was the victims were mental disorder patients. The suggestions for dealing with these cases were also discussed in the end.
期刊論文
1.林明傑、鄭瑞隆、蔡宗晃、張秀鴛、李文輝(2006)。家庭暴力案件危險分級試辦方案之檢驗。社區發展季刊,115,290-308。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林明傑、鄭瑞隆、蔡宗晃、張秀鴛、李文輝(2005)。家庭暴力案件危險分級試辦方案及其成效之介紹。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,1(1),215-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.侯淑英、黃俊仁(2001)。精神病患居家護理簡介。高醫醫訊月刊,21(1)。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dutton, D.、Corvo, K.(2006)。Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice。Aggression and violent behavior,11(4),457-483。  new window
5.McNeely, R. L.、Robinson-Simpson, G.(1987)。The Truth about Domestic Violence: A Falsely- Framed Issue。Social Work,32,485-490。  new window
6.Sarantakos, S.(2004)。Deconstructing self-defense in wife-to-husband violence。The Journal of Men's Studies,12(3),277-296。  new window
學位論文
1.陳高德(2003)。台灣婚姻暴力之男性加害人(碩士論文)。台北醫學大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.湯琇雅(1993)。婚姻暴力中婦女受虐狀況與其因應過程之初探(碩士論文)。東吳大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
3.王中吟(2006)。親密伴侶暴力中女性施暴者對施暴經驗與自我概念之詮釋(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.王樂民(2003)。警察機關執行保護令對遭受婚姻暴力婦女脫離受暴關係成效之研究--以台南市為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.王淑慧(2002)。台灣女性文學中女性角色與意識覺醒之研究一以女性主義觀點論析。高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉千綺(2000)。從婚姻暴力論我國裁判離婚制度。國防管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許春金(2010)。犯罪學。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Tjaden, P.、Thoennes, N.(2000)。Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence:findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey。Washington:U.S. Department of Justice。  new window
3.陳惠雯(19990000)。大稻埕查某人地圖:大稻埕婦女的活動空間近百年來的變遷。臺北:博揚文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Farrell, Warren、鄭至慧、朱恩伶、顧燕領(1987)。男性解放。台北:婦女新知。  延伸查詢new window
5.Mills, L. G.、黃煜文(2004)。錯的是我們不是我:家暴的動力關係。臺北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
6.周月清(19950000)。婚姻暴力:理論分析與社會工作處置。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭瑞隆(2004)。家庭暴力問題與防治策略。暴力犯罪一原因、類型與對策 \\ 楊士隆(編)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bennett, L. W.、Williams, O. J.(1999)。Men Who Batter。Family violence: Prevention and Treatment \\ Hampton, R. L. (Ed)。CA。  new window
10.Hamel(2005)。Gender inclusive treatment of intimate partner abuse: A comprehensive approach。NY。  new window
11.Pennell & Burford(2002)。Feminist praxis: Making family group conferencing work。Restorative justice and family violence \\ Strang, H. ; Braithwaite, J. (Eds.)。NY。  new window
12.Straus, M. A.(2005)。Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem。Current controversies on family violence \\ Gelles, R .J. ; Loseke, D. R. (Eds.)。Newbury。  new window
13.Straus, M. A.(1999)。The controversy over domestic violence by women –A methodological , theoretical, and sociology of science analysis。Violence in Intimate Relationships \\ Arriaga, B. X. ; Oskamp, S. (Eds.)。CA。  new window
其他
1.郭石城(2001)。家暴「保護令」大破抓姦功。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭勝恩(2005)。她拒行房遭施暴?他說苦肉計。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉孟錦(2002)。家庭暴力防治法實例解析(一)-莫讓「家庭暴力防治法」成爲終結婚姻的致命武器!。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lewis, A.,Sarantakos, S.(2001)。Domestic Violence and the Male Victim。  new window
5.National Family Violence Legislative Resource Center(2006)。Model Programs and Legislation。  new window
圖書論文
1.高淑清(2000)。現象學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。高雄:麗文。  延伸查詢new window
2.林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。麗文。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE