提要歷代以來，關於學術史的撰寫，通常多以文字描述的傳記方式來呈現，正史中的〈儒林傳〉便是一個最好的例子。然而，由於兩漢學術發展重視師法家法的特性，因此在學術史的撰寫上，相當適合使用「圖」或者是「表」來呈現。自宋代以來，以圖解經方式的流行，「授經圖」之類作品的出現，使得學術史撰寫有了全新的方式。此外，隨著授經圖的複雜化，「傳經表」的出現更是將此種方式推展到了極致。本文便是試圖透過兩漢公羊學傳承的兩個爭論為焦點，去探究在圖表中的學術史，是如何去呈現這些爭論，以及有著什麼樣的特性和發展。

For centuries, the history of knowledge was usually represented in biography and verbal composition in Chinese historiography. We may find a scholar's biographies (Rulin(儒林傳) or The Scholars) in every official history. Chinese scholars looked upon the schools of a specific knowledge so heavily just through Rulin, so people could not get a clear picture easily. But if we added some diagrams, we may have a workable solution for the above problem. For this reason, a new history of knowledge emerged in Song dynasty. Scholars began to use diagrams, usually called shoujingtu(授經圖) to study traditional knowledge. As times goes by, this kind of diagrams became more sophisticated and its highest form was chuanjinbiao(傳經表). In this article I am going to discuss there were two main arguments on the systems of Gongyang(公羊) Studies, and how those diagrams represent such arguments and their characters, influences, and developments.