:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論強迫勞動體制之性別正義--一個酷兒法學的初步嘗試
書刊名:國家發展研究
作者:張金權
作者(外文):Hertzberger, Allen Jinquan
出版日期:2011
卷期:10:2
頁次:頁117-156
主題關鍵詞:性別多元酷兒性別操演強迫兵役及其相關制度憲法良心Gender pluralismQueerGender performativityCompulsory military training and conscriptionConstitutional lawConscience
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:189
  • 點閱點閱:85
「酷兒」指涉的是不見容於主流性秩序或性別氣質的族群,例如同性戀者、雙性戀者、娘娘腔、跨性別,而軍隊則是異性戀文化與崇拜陽剛的場域,有抑制陰柔的厭女與恐同傾向。強迫兵役帶來強迫操演異性戀文化、陽剛氣質、厭女與恐同,如此將有壓迫某些主體之人格而不合乎正義之疑義。性別二元分化已經違背性別多元的意識,根據二元分化而來的強迫勞役制度更令不願被二元分化的主體,身處其中倍感痛苦。本文嘗試從性別多元的自由權觀點,提出以「酷兒良心」作爲一種信念拒卻不義的主權者命令;並以解構性別壓迫、性別歧視的平等權觀點,作爲一種制度性的反省超越,使現行性別不平等的強迫兵役制度能找到其應有之出路。
The word "Queer" refers to people who are thought to deviate from the mainstream gender order (e.g. homosexuals, bisexuals, "sissy" males, transgenders, etc.). Military culture celebrates heterosexuality and masculinity and fosters homophobic and misogynistic attitudes and behavior. The gendered military conscription system is based on biological sex, an arbitrary binary gender classification. This system oppresses individuals who do not to conform to essentialist, dualistic gender roles. Compulsory military service exposes such individuals to injustice and suffering. This paper attempts to develop "queer conscience" legal arguments for resisting compulsory military service based on the values of freedom and gender pluralism. This study also exposes the structural gender oppression and gender inequality perpetuated by the current military conscription system. These arguments constitute an attempt at "Queer Jurisprudence."
期刊論文
1.王泰升(20030100)。臺灣憲法的故事:從「舊日本」與「舊中國」蛻變而成「新臺灣」。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,32(1),1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張文貞(20090501)。人權保障與憲法解釋:對司法院大法官釋憲的期許。臺灣法學雜誌,127,94-98。  延伸查詢new window
3.廖元豪(20080600)。平等權:第一講 憲法平等權之意義。月旦法學教室,68,48-58。  延伸查詢new window
4.Nussbaum, Martha C.(2007)。Human Rights and Human Capabilities。Harvard Human Rights Journal,20,21-24。  new window
5.畢恆達(20001100)。從兩性平等到性別平等:記葉永鋕。兩性平等教育季刊,13,125-132。  延伸查詢new window
6.賴孟泉、高淑芬、丘彥南(20090600)。Non-heterosexuality: Contemporary Psychiatric Perspectives。Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry,23(2),104-119。new window  new window
7.黃長玲(20010500)。從婦女保障名額到性別比例原則--兩性共治的理論與實踐。問題與研究,40(3),69-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳昭如(20100900)。大法官解釋中的歷史與傳統--女性主義觀點的批判。中研院法學期刊,7,81-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張宏誠(20001200)。「性傾向」(Sexual Orientation)歧視審查基準之研究--從「性別平等」論同性戀者平等權基礎。東吳法律學報,12(2),47-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳佳樺(2008)。評釋字四九○號解釋女性不用當兵。月旦法學,158,66-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.張金權(2011)。被兵役制度集體霸凌的酷兒--再訪良心自由之法容許性正義。婦研縱橫,94,45-60。  延伸查詢new window
12.詹翔琳(2009)。同性戀與變性議題之探討。長庚醫訊,30(7),222-223。  延伸查詢new window
13.楊通軒(2008)。歐洲聯盟工作平等法制之探討。臺灣勞工,14,8-17。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃長玲(2010)。韓國性別與和平研究的先驅--明知大學權仁淑教授。婦研縱橫,93,38-42。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳佑婷、張金權(2011)。尊重多元性別--第八屆臺灣同志大遊行。臺大社會科學院院訊,12,41-42。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳妙芬(2010)。虛擬舞臺的月球漫步--從麥可傑克森談「酷兒飄浪」。婦研縱橫,91,23-29。  延伸查詢new window
17.Kepros, L. R.(2000)。Queer Theory: Weed or seed in the garden of legal theory?。Sexuality and Law Review,9,279-310。  new window
18.Lin, Chien-Chih(2010)。Unpatriotic Heretics or Conscientious Objectors: Difficulties Which Jehovah Witnesses Face in Taiwan and South Korea。National Taiwan University Law Review,5,201-227。new window  new window
19.Britt, J.(2009)。Unwilling warriors: An examination of the power to conscript in peacetime。Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy,4(2),400-423。  new window
20.Litwack, E. B.(2005)。Conscientious objection in public service ethics: A proposed procedure for Europe。European Journal of Law Reform,7,79-88。  new window
21.Lothstein, L. M.(1982)。Sex reassignment surgery: Historical, bioethical and theoretical issues。American Journal of Psychiatry,139,417-426。  new window
22.Major, M. F.(2001)。Conscientious objection to military service: The European commission on human rights and the human rights committee。California Western International Law Journal,32,1-38。  new window
23.Rudolf, B.(2005)。European Union: Compulsory military service。International Journal of Constitutional Law,3,673-679。  new window
24.Sohn, M.、Bosinski, A. G. H.(2007)。Gender Identity Disorders: Diagnostic and Surgical Aspects。The Journal of Sexual Medicine,4,1193-1208。  new window
25.Valdes, F.(1995)。Queers, sissies, dykes, and tomboys: Deconstructing the conflation of “sex”, “gender” and “sexual orientation” in Euro-American law and society。California Law Review,83,344-378。  new window
會議論文
1.甯應斌(2010)。偽娘來了:性別能力與變性政治。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Enke, A.(2010)。Sister cities or foils of homonormative liberalism? Trinidad, Colorado and Tehran, Iran as the “unlikely sex change capitals of the world。台北。  new window
學位論文
1.裴學儒(2001)。軍隊文化、男性氣概與性傾向壓迫--臺灣男同性戀者的兵役經驗分析(碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.秦光輝(1997)。「當兵」現形記--從臺灣男性兵役經驗看軍隊父權體制再生產的性別邏輯(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張宏誠(1999)。同性戀者權利平等保障之憲法基礎(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林政彥(2001)。從同性戀者入伍服役政策論同性戀者權利主體地位之建構與解構(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.高穎超(2006)。做兵、儀式、男人類:臺灣義務役男服役過程之陽剛氣質研究(2000-2006)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jarass, H. D.(2005)。EU-Grundrechte: Ein Studien- und handbuch。Germany:Beck C. H.。  new window
2.李念祖(200603)。案例憲法III--人權保障的内容(上)。三民。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘆部信喜、李鴻禧(2001)。憲法。沒有紀錄:新世社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Butler, Judith(2004)。Undoing Gender。Routledge。  new window
5.林紀東(1998)。中華民國憲法逐條釋義。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊日然(2005)。法理學。三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.畢恆達(2004)。空間就是性別。臺北:心靈工坊文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Nussbaum, Martha C.(2004)。Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the Law。Princeton University Press。  new window
9.小YG行動聯盟(2010)。小YG成長筆記。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.內政部役政署(2010)。服役須知宣導手冊。台北。  延伸查詢new window
11.洪文龍(2000)。GQ男人在發燒。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳新民(2007)。憲法學導論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.臺灣同志諮詢熱線協會(2011)。認識同志手冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.蔡春美(2010)。擁抱酷兒手冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.羅勒、Steinein, G.(1997)。內在革命:一本關於自尊的書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.Baird, V.(2007)。The no-nonsense guide to sexual diversity。Oxford。  new window
17.Baker, J. M.(2002)。How homophobia hurts children: nurturing diversity at home, at school, and in the community。New York。  new window
18.Dressler, J.(2010)。Criminal procedure: Principles, policies, and perspectives。St. Paul。  new window
19.Wharton, A. S.(2005)。The sociology of gender: An introduction to theory and research。Malden, MA。  new window
20.許宗力(2007)。基本權利的功能與司法審查。憲法與法治國行政。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.卡維波(1997)。什麼是酷兒?--色情國族。酷兒啟示錄 : 台灣當代Queer論述讀本。臺北市:元尊文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.何春蕤(2003)。「性/別壓迫」:跨性別主體在台灣。跨性別。桃園:中央大學性/別研究室。  延伸查詢new window
3.許宗力(2006)。試論民主法治國家的「市民不服從」。法與國家權力。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE