:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學教師作文教學思考之個案研究
書刊名:彰化師大教育學報
作者:董秀珍
作者(外文):Tung, Hsiu-chen
出版日期:2010
卷期:18
頁次:頁123-142
主題關鍵詞:作文教學國小教師教學思考Primary school teacherTeaching thinkingWriting teaching
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:33
  • 點閱點閱:160
本研究主要在探討國民小學教師作文教學之思考與做決定之情形。以訪談、非參與觀察等方法蒐集資料,藉以了解教師在作文教學前、中、後,是如何思考及做決定的。透過觀察老師與班級學生互動之情形以及與研究對象的對話與省思,明瞭資深專家教師在進行作文教學時之做決定歷程與其思考脈絡,期對實際從事作文教學之老師提供明確的作文教學參考。其研究結果如下:一、叮叮老師在作文教學前,以學生的經驗與能力作為決定其教學計畫內容之首要依據。二、叮叮老師在作文教學中(一)其思考主要集中在將教學計畫付諸實行;(二)整個作文教學過程,主要以教師個人心目中理想的作文架構(專業知識)來決定。三、叮叮老師在作文教學後,思考與做決定情形(一)教師反省思考的線索在上課中是以學生上課的反應及教師自己本身當下上課的情況;課後是以學生的文章、學生的回饋單及家長的反應。(二)作文批改決定方面,以教師個人的專業知識與語文能力,對文章進行修正及建議。最後,根據研究結果提出對教師作文教學實務與未來研究之建議。
The purposes of this study were to explore the process of a primary school teacher writing teaching and making decisions. The data were collected by means of interviews and nonparticipant observations to analyze and understand the teachers' teaching and made decisions in writing. By observing the interaction between teacher and students, making reflection and dialog with teacher, the researcher hoped that the findings can be used as references for writing teaching practice. The conclusions of this study were as following: 1. Before class, students' experiences and abilities were the most important basis for Din Din teacher to decide the content of teaching plan. 2. During the class. (1) Din Din teacher's thinking mainly concentrated on the plan implementing. (2) Din Din teacher's made decisions of whole teaching process mainly according to his individual writing structure (professional knowledge). 3. After class. (1) During the class, Din Din teacher's introspection clues were according to the students responses, teacher himself attended class immediately situation. After the class, Din Din teacher's introspection clues were by students' articles, students' feedback lists, and parents' responses. (2) The revisions and the suggestions of the articles were decided by Din Din teacher's individual specialized knowledge and the linguistic ability.
期刊論文
1.陳正治(20080300)。作文教學法介紹與探討。國教新知,55(1),19-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Borko, H.、Livingston, C.(1989)。Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers。American Educational Research Journal,26(4),473-498。  new window
3.孫志麟(19921000)。教師思考研究之探討。教育研究,27,24-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Shavelson, R. J.(1973)。What is the basic teaching skill?。Journal of Teacher Education,24(2),144-151。  new window
5.Shavelson, R. J.、Stern, P.(1981)。Research on teachers, pedagogical thoughts, judgements, decisions and behavior。Review of Educational Research,51(4),455-498。  new window
6.Reynolds, A.(1992)。What is competent beginning teaching? A review of the literature。Review of Educational Research,62(1),1-35。  new window
7.Westerman, Delores A.(1991)。Expert and novice teacher decision making。Journal of Teacher Education,42(4),292-305。  new window
8.簡紅珠(19981000)。教師教學決定:內涵、思考歷程與影響因素--兼談如何改進教學決定技能。課程與教學,1(4),43-56+137。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張景媛(1997)。如何讓新手教師成為專家教師。測驗與輔導,145,3008-3010。  延伸查詢new window
10.王萬清(1995)。寫作教師之寫作教學內容知識偏好與結構研究。台南師院初等教育學報,8,53-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王萬清(1999)。寫作教學師資培育及思考模式研究。台南師院學報,32,91-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林彩鳳(1993)。淺談教師思考。南投文教,5,25-28。  延伸查詢new window
13.孫志麟(1992)。專家教師與生手教師的差異。師友,298,21-23。  延伸查詢new window
14.Smith, T.(2008)。Process Writing。Research Starters Education,1-9。  new window
15.Morine-Dershimer, G.(1978)。Planning and Classroom reality: An In-Depth Look。Educational Research Quarterly,3(4),83-99。  new window
16.Piazza, C. L.(2008)。Development and Validation of a Writing Dispositions Scale for Elementary and Middle School Students。Journal of Educational Research,101(5),275-286。  new window
學位論文
1.劉佳玟(2007)。創造思考作文教學法對國小五年級學童在寫作動機及寫作表現上的影響(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.丁鼎(2003)。材料作文教學研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林進材(1996)。國民小學教師教學思考之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃泰源(2005)。國小體育專家教師與生手教師教學行為及教學反省之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳昭曄(2000)。國民中學實習教師思考之研究--師範大學與教育學程畢業生之比較(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
6.莊佩真(2001)。學前教師教學思考之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.沈桂枝(1995)。國民小學教師體育教學決定影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.顏福南(2005)。國小三年級學童實施限制式作文教學之行動研究。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
9.翁書郁(2006)。小組討論融入作文教學實施模式之研究~以花蓮縣明恥國小三年級為例。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮市。  延伸查詢new window
10.徐靜儀(2006)。童話電子書創作教學研究~以某國小五年某班為例。國立台北教育大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳宇詮(2001)。引導兒童作文教學之探究~自修辭的角度切入。國立台北師範學院,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.連虹雲(2003)。群集策略用於國小學生寫作教學之實施歷程--教師專業成長的質性研究。國立台北師範學院,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
13.林美慧(2007)。一位國小專家教師的國語文寫作教學研究。臺北市立教育大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.李恆惠(2004)。由說話引導寫作之教學研究。國立花蓮師範學院,花縣市。  延伸查詢new window
15.李博文(2002)。國小高年級學生議論文寫作教學之實驗研究。屏東師範學院,屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
16.馮松林(1993)。職前化學教師在微試教學中之想法與決策。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Schon, D. A.(1983)。The reflective practice。New York:Basic Books。  new window
2.Jackson, P. W.(1990)。Life in classroom。New York, NY:Teacher College, Columbia University。  new window
3.林寶山(1990)。教學原理。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.李漢偉(1995)。國小語文科教學探索。高雄市:麗文。  延伸查詢new window
5.Berliner, D. C.(1988)。The development of expertise in pedagogy。American Association of College for Teacher Education。  new window
6.賴慶雄(1993)。動動腦學語文。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃基博(1995)。圖解作文教學法。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.Williams, J.(2003)。Preparing to each writing。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
9.Clark, C. M.、Yinger, R. J.(1979)。Teachers’ thinking。Research on teaching: concepts, findings, and implications。Berkeley, CA。  new window
10.Doyle, W.(1979)。Calssroom tasks and students’ abilities。Research on teaching: concepts, findings, and implications。Berkeley, CA。  new window
11.Borko, H.、Cone, R.、Russo, N. A.、Shavelson, R. J.(1979)。Teachers’ decision making。Research on reaching: Concepts, findings, and implications。Berkeley, CA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Clark, C. M.、Peterson, P. L.(1986)。Teachers' thought process。Handbook of research on teaching。New York:Macmillan Publishing Co.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE