:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高科技產業競爭策略之決策分析--以手機產業為例
書刊名:明道學術論壇
作者:鍾健平 引用關係李靜芳 引用關係陳耀茂劉琇月劉雙意
作者(外文):Chung, Chien-pingLee, Ching-fangChen, Yow-mowLiu, Xiu-yueLiu, Shuang-yi
出版日期:2010
卷期:6:4
頁次:頁87-113
主題關鍵詞:競爭策略成本領導差異化集中階層構造分析法AHPCompetitive strategyCost leadershipDifferentiationFocus
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:565
  • 點閱點閱:84
本研究利用階層構造分析法(AHP)進行高科技產業競爭策略之決策分析,選定手機產業進行實證研究。根據高科技產業的特性與產業環境擬定影響台灣手機廠商競爭策略的相關要素,建立階層構造圖。根據文獻回顧,訂出三項方案,各為「成本領導」策略,「差異化」策略,與「集中」策略。評價項目為「資源」、「能力」及「產業環境」。評價項目下的評估準則項目,在資源項目為「實體資產」、「無形資產」、「財務資產」,在能力項目為「製造能力」、「研發能力」與「行銷能力」,而在產業環境為「競爭者」與「顧客需求」。最後,在考量各評價層次的項目之間具有從屬關係下,利用階層構造分析法的內部從屬法與絕對評價法進行決策分析。以德菲法經專家共識研擬出各要素之相關比較,利用Excel軟體及Super decision軟體進行計算驗證,其結果一致,得到台灣手機廠商最適競爭策略為「差異化」。
We explore this research with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method when high tech industry facing multi-criteria decision making issue in conducting competitive strategy decision. This study applies the multi-criteria decision making to determine the importance weights of evaluation criteria and to the rating of 3 competitive strategies which composed with cost leadership, differentiation, and focus. The criteria made through literature study are resource, capability, and industry environment. Moreover, under those three criteria are sub criteria as physical assets, intangible assets, financial assets, manufacturer capability, R&D capability, marketing capability, competitor, and customer needs. The study model approach is demonstrated with a real mobile phone industry case study from expert opinions. Through double checking computation of excel and super decision software, we got a consistent result which guide to the best competitive strategy as differentiation strategy.
期刊論文
1.Hafeez, K.、Zhang, Y.、Malak, N.(2002)。Determining Key Capabilities of a Firm Using Analytic Hierarchy Process。International Journal of Production Economics,76(1),39-51。  new window
2.Baruch, Yehuda(1997)。High Technology Organization-What It Is, What it isn't。International Journal of Technology Management,13(2),179-195。  new window
3.Porter, Michael E.(1979)。How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy。Harvard Business Review,57(2),137-145。  new window
4.Barney, Jay B.(1986)。Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?。Academy of Management Review,11(3),656-665。  new window
5.鄧振源、曾國雄(19890700)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用。中國統計學報,27(7),13767-13786。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Grant, Robert M.(1991)。The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation。California Management Review,33(3),114-135。  new window
7.Sirikrai, S. B.、Tang J. C. S.(2006)。Industrial competitiveness analysis: Using the analytic hierarchy process。Journal of High Technology Management Research,17,71-83。  new window
8.Rangone,A.(1996)。An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments。International Journal of Operations and Production Management,40(2),104 119。  new window
研究報告
1.黃建智(2008)。2008年第2季台灣手機產銷展望。Digitimes。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.侯斌元(2009)。手機發展趨勢與零組件產品設計之關係探討--以手機連接器為例(碩士論文)。大同大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉靜渡(2004)。台灣高科技廠商營運模式與競爭優勢之研究--以新竹科學工業圜區廠商為例(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Saaty, T. L.(1998)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。New York:McGraw-Hill International Book Co.。  new window
2.張魁峯(2009)。Super Decisions軟體操作手冊-以ANP突破AHP的研究限制。台北:鼎茂出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Porter, Michael E.(1980)。Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors。Free Press。  new window
4.王登城(2009)。2009年手機產業趨勢評析。元大投顧。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳耀茂(1998)。階層構造分析法入門。出版兼發行者:陳耀茂。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳耀茂(2010)。決策分析方法與應用。臺北市:鼎茂圖書。  延伸查詢new window
7.Newell, B.T.、Saxbergy, B.O.(1985)。Managing High Technology: An Interdisciplinary Perspect。N.Y.:Elsevier Science Publishing。  new window
8.Pearce, J. A.、Robinson, R. B.(2011)。Strategic Management-Formulation, Implementation, and Control 12 edtion。New York:McGraw-Hill/Irwin。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE