臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以概念結合理論為基礎的想像力測驗之編製
書刊名：測驗學刊
作者：洪瑞雲 引用關係／王精文 引用關係／拾已寰／李泊諺／王愉敏
作者(外文)：Horng, Ruey-yun／Wang, Ching-wen／Shyr, Yi-hwan／Lee, Po-yen／Wang, Yu-ming
出版日期：2013
卷期：60:4
頁次：頁681-713
主題關鍵詞：創造力；測驗編製；想像力；概念結合；Conceptual combination；Creativity；Imagination；Test construction
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:133
本研究擬依據概念結合理論發展一份「概念結合的想像力測驗」，每一個測驗題目由兩個完全不相關的名詞概念組合而成，其中第一個名詞的性質可能是抽象、自然物或人造物；第二個名詞的性質也可能是抽象、自然物或人造物；此3×3的組合各有兩組，共18題。受試者被要求設法想出兩者之間的關聯，並說明其聯想過程或理由。以602位大學生與研究生在此測驗上的反應，透過項目分析後，本測驗試題具有鑑別度，重測信度為.878，折半信度為.745，評分者間信度為.852；以110位設計系學生的設計專題期末成績為效標，其與想像力測驗分數的相關係數為顯著（r = .265），具有預測效度。此外，想像力測驗的分數與TTCT的獨創性有低的正相關，與TTCT其他的分歧思考能力則無相關，與創造性人格量表間也無相關，顯示此想像力測驗具有區別效度。
The purpose of this study was to develop a test of imagination based on theory of concept combination. The test comprises eighteen items. Each test item is composed of two unrelated nouns. The ontological category of the first noun and the second noun can be either an abstract concept, a natural object, or an artifact. The combination of nouns yielded nine types of noun-noun pairs. There are two items of the same type of nounnoun pairs. For each noun-noun pair, participants were asked to report what emerged in their mind's eye when they saw these two nouns connected together. They were also asked to explain the process or reasons for the emergence of their ideas. Data from six hundred and two college and graduate students indicated that the test-retest reliability of the test was 0.878, and the split-half reliability was 0.745. The test scores from imagination test had low but positive correlation with the originality score of TTCT, but no correlation with fluency, flexibility, or elaboration scores of TTCT. The predictive validity of the test was examined with 110 design students' performance in design projects. It was found that students' performance in design was correlated with their imagination score (r = .265). Imagination score showed low but positive correlation with originality scores of TTCT, but unrelated to other divergent thinking scores in TTCT, or two measures of creative personality. The results indicated that the imagination test developed in this study is valid and imagination ability is a construct different from creativity.
期刊論文
1.Wisniewski, E. J.(1996)。Construal and similarity in conceptual combination。Journal of Memory & Language，35，434-453。  new window
2.鄭昭明(19970203)。什麼是創造力？。臺大校訊。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bock, J. S.、Clifton, C. Jr.(2000)。The role of salience in conceptual combination。Memory and Cognition，28，1378-1386。  new window
4.Gagné, C. L.、Shoben, E. J.(1997)。Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，23(1)，71-87。  new window
5.Gagné, C. L.、Shoben, E. J.(2002)。Priming relations in ambiguous noun-noun combinations。Memory & Cognition，30(4)，637-646。  new window
6.Gentner, D.(2010)。Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical reasoning processes and symbol systems。Cognitive Science，34(5)，752-775。  new window
7.Guilford, J. P.、Christensen, P. R.(1973)。The one way relation between creative potential and IQ。The Journal of Creative Behavior，7(4)，247-252。  new window
8.Khatena, J.(1971)。Something About Myself: A brief screening device for identifying creatively gifted children and adults。Gifted Child Quarterly，15(4)，262-292。  new window
9.Quillian, M. R.(1962)。A revised design for an understanding machine。Mechanical Translation，7，17-29。  new window
10.Reichling, M. J.(1990)。Image of imagination。Journal of Research in Music Education，38(4)，282-293。  new window
11.Rothenberg, A.(1986)。Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus combined composite visual images。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，50(2)，370-381。  new window
12.Simonton, D. K.(1999)。Talents and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model。Psychological Review，106，435-457。  new window
13.Thagard, P.、Steward, T. C.(2011)。The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks。Cognitive Science，35，1-33。  new window
14.Torrance, E. P.、Khatena, J.(1970)。What kind of person are You?。Gifted Child Quarterly，14(2)，71-75。  new window
15.Trotman, D.(2006)。Interpreting imaginative life worlds: Phenomenological approaches in imagination and the evaluation of educational practice。Qualitative Research，6(2)，245-265。  new window
16.Wisniewski, E. J.、Middleton, E. L.(2002)。Of buckets bowls and coffee cup bowls: Spatial alignment in conceptual combination。Journal of Memory & Language，46(1)，1-23。  new window
17.Wisniewski, E. J.、Murphy, G. L.(2005)。Frequency of relation type as a determinant of conceptual combination: A reanalysis。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition，31(1)，169-174。  new window
18.鄭昭明(19971126)。什麼是創造力？。臺大校訊。  延伸查詢new window
19.Fodor, J. A.、Pylyshyn, Z. W.(1988)。Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis。Cognition，28，3-71。  new window
20.Simonton, D. K.(2003)。Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives。Psychological Bulletin，129(4)，475-494。  new window
21.Sobel, R. S.、Rothenberg, A.(1980)。Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus separated visual images。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，39(5)，951-961。  new window
22.Downing, Pamela(1977)。On the creation and use of English compound nouns。Language，53(4)，810-842。  new window
23.Finke, R. A.(1996)。Imagery, Creativity, and Emergent Structure。Consciousness and Cognition，5(3)，381-393。  new window
24.Thomas, N. J. T.(1999)。Are theories of imagery theories of imagination? An active perception approach to conscious mental content。Cognitive Science，23(2)，207-245。  new window
25.Sternberg, R. J.(2001)。Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings。Educational Psychologist，36(4)，227-245。  new window
26.Campbell, Donald T.(1960)。Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes。Psychological Review，67，380-400。  new window
27.Estes, Z.、Ward, T. B.(2002)。The emergence of novel attributes in concept modification。Creativity Research Journal，14(2)，149-156。  new window
28.任純慧、陳學志、練竑初、卓淑玲(20040300)。創造力測量的輔助工具：中文遠距聯想量表的發展。應用心理研究，21，195-217。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Costello, F. J.、Keane, M. T.(2000)。Efficient creativity: Constraint-guided conceptual combination。Cognitive Science，24(2)，299-349。  new window
30.Ward, Thomas B.(1994)。Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation。Cognitive Psychology，27(1)，1-40。  new window
31.West, Michael A.(2002)。Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups。Applied Psychology: An International Review，51(3)，355-387。  new window
32.Collins, A. M.、Loftus, E. F.(1975)。A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing。Psychological Review，82(6)，407-428。  new window
33.Guilford, Joy Paul(1950)。Creativity。American Psychologist，5(9)，444-455。  new window
34.林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(20050900)。想得多是想得好的前提嗎？--探討發散性思考能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊，47(3)，211-227。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Guilford, J. P.(1956)。The structure of intellect。Psychological Bulletin，53(4)，267-293。  new window
36.Mednick, Sarnoff A.(1962)。The Associative Basis of the Creative Process。Psychological Review，69(3)，220-232。  new window
37.林幸台(19941200)。威廉斯創造力測驗修訂報告。特殊教育研究學刊，11，133-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Yu, Bolin、Zhang, Wutian、Jing, Qicheng、Peng, Ruixiang、Zhang, Guojun、Simon, H. A.(1985)。STM Capacity for Chinese and English Language Materials。Memory & Cognition，13，202-207。  new window
會議論文
1.Horng, Ruey-Yun(1986)。A factor-analytic study of Chinese college students' creative self-perception。The 1986 Mid-America Chinese Joint Annual Convention。Schaumburg, IL。  new window
2.Horng, R. Y.、Liu, P. H.、Liao, C. N.、Peng, S. Y.、Huang, Y. Y.(2008)。Creative processes in conceptual combination。28th International Congress of Psychology，(會議日期: 2008/07/20-07/25)。Berlin。  new window
3.Costello, Fintan J.、Keane, Mark T.(1997)。Polysemy in conceptual combination: Testing the constraint theory of combination。The 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
研究報告
1.洪瑞雲、王精文(1989)。創造性思考、創造性人格、與創造性問題解決訓練間的關係：長期交叉分析 (計畫編號：NSC 76-0301-H009-01)。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡志偉(2005)。造成中文字與中文詞之朗讀詞頻效果的原因 (計畫編號：NSC 93-2413-H-002-019)。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳怡榮、陳學志、劉浩敏(2002)。中文遠距聯想量表之修訂：如何避免知識與策略的介入。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃伯聖、陳學志(2003)。新版中文遠距聯想測驗之效度研究及作答認知歷程之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃文毅(2004)。以概念結合所產生之新屬性探討創造的認知歷程(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃翊瑩(2012)。概念結合與概念抽象程度對繪畫創造力的影響(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.李秀瓊(1999)。高低創造力者在詞彙連結型態上有否差異？--檢驗Mednick的「連結層級」假說(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳清麟(2009)。Mednick聯結理論之檢驗暨中文遠距聯想測驗之解題歷程分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Torrance, E. P.(1984)。The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking streamlined (revised) manual Figured A and B。Bensenville, IL：Scholastic Testing Service。  new window
2.Osborn, A. F.(1963)。Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving。New York, NY：Charles Scribner's Son。  new window
3.Perkins, D.(2000)。Archimedes' Bathtub: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking。New York, NY：W. W. Norton。  new window
4.Poincare, H. J.、Halsted, G. B.(1913)。The foundations of science。London, UK：Science Press。  new window
5.Holyoak, K. J.、Thagard, P.(1996)。Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought。Cambridge, MA：The MIT Press。  new window
6.Torrance, E. P.(1995)。Why fly? A philosophy of creativity。Norwood, NJ：Ablex Publishing Corporation。  new window
7.Wallas, G.(1926)。The arts of thought。New York：Harcourt, Brace and World。  new window
8.Osborn, A. F.(1953)。Applied imagination。New York：Scribner。  new window
9.Torrance, E. P.(1966)。Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual。Princeton, NJ：Personnel Press。  new window
10.Arieti, S.(1976)。Creativity: The magic synthesis。New York, NY：Basic Book, Inc. Publishers。  new window
11.張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市：東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.Sternberg, Robert J.、Lubart, Todd I.(1995)。Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity。Free Press。  new window
13.Williams, F. E.、林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗：指導手冊。臺北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
14.Mednick, S. A.、Mednick, M. T.(1967)。Examiner's Manual: Remote Association Test。Boston, MA：Houghton Mifflin。  new window
單篇論文
1.洪瑞雲，王精文(1994)。Torrance 創造思考測驗簡題版。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(2008)。Art Education Partnership，http://www.theimaginenation.net/press/080124_namm.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.Carlson, R.(1964)。Environmental constraints and organizational consequences: The public school and its clients。Behavioral science and educational administration: Sixty-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Simonton, D. K.(1999)。Creativity from a Historiometric Perspective。Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 創造力
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：872（臺灣：867，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67642558
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上