臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：數學後設認知量表之發展與信效度考驗
書刊名：教育心理學報
作者：凃金堂 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tu, Chin-tang
出版日期：2015
卷期：47:1
頁次：頁109-131
主題關鍵詞：探索性因素分析；測量恆等性；數學後設認知；驗證性因素分析；Confirmatory factor analysis；Exploratory factor analysis；Mathematical metacognition；Measurement invariance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:56
  • 點閱點閱:57
本研究旨在發展適用中小學生的數學後設認知量表（Mathematical Metacognition Scale, MMS），本研究分預試與正式施測兩階段，兩階段皆採立意取樣的叢集抽樣方式，各抽取中小學生457人與861人。預試資料進行探索性與驗證性因素分析，驗證性因素分析結果獲得三個因素：後設認知知識、計劃與監控、評估，其內部一致性Cronbach's α係數分別為.87、.87、.72，12題的總量表Cronbach's α係數為.90，顯示本量表具有良好的信度。正式施測資料，進行測量恆等性考驗，考驗結果發現不同性別具測量恆等性，顯示本研究發展的數學後設認知量表，具有良好的建構效度。
The main purpose of this study was to develop the Mathematical Metacognition Scale (MMS) on 5th-8th graders in elementary and junior high schools. The present study included two phases: pretest and test. By adopting purposeful sampling and cluster sampling in both phases, 457 and 861 students were selected for the pretest and the test, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted with the pretest data. The confirmatory factor analysis resulted in three factors including metacognitive knowledge, planning and monitoring, and evaluation. The Cronbach's alphas of the MMS subscales were .87, .87, .72, and .90 for the total score, which indicated good reliability. Measurement invariance was conducted to the test and indicated gender invariance. Therefore, it showed that the MMS has good construct validity.
期刊論文
1.Schraw, G.、Crippen, K. J.、Hartley, K.(2006)。Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning。Research in Science Education，36(1/2)，111-139。  new window
2.于富雲、陳玉欣(20070200)。不同知識表徵建構的學習策略對自然科學習成效之影響。科學教育學刊，15(1)，99-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Gregorich, S. E.(2006)。Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework。Medical Care，44，78-94。  new window
4.Schmitt, N.、Kuljanin, G.(2008)。Measurement invariance: Review of practice and limitations。Human Resource Management Review，18，210-222。  new window
5.Horn, J. L.(1965)。A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis。Psychometrika，30(2)，179-185。  new window
6.涂金堂(19961100)。國小學生後設認知與數學解題表現之相關研究。國教學報，8，133-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Bathgate, M. E.、Sims-Knight, J. E.、Schunn, C. D.(2012)。Thoughts on thinking: Engaging novice music students in metacognition。Applied Cognitive Psychology，26，403-409。  new window
8.Benton, C. W.(2013)。Promoting metacognition in music classes。Music Educators Journal，100，52-59。  new window
9.Carr, M.、Alexander, J.、Folds-Bennett, T.(1994)。Metacognition and mathematics strategy use。Applied Cognitive Psychology，8，583-595。  new window
10.Jacobse, A. E.、Harskamp, E. G.(2012)。Towards efficient measurement of metacognitionin mathematical problem solving。Metacognition and Learning，7，133-149。  new window
11.Kaberman, Z.、Dori, Y. J.(2009)。Metacognition in chemical education: Question posing in the case-basedcomputerized learning environment。Instruction Science，37，403-436。  new window
12.Kapa, E.(2001)。A metacognitive support during the process of problem solving in a computerized environment。Educational Studies in Mathematics，47，317-336。  new window
13.Kramarski, B.(2004)。Making sense of graphs: Does metacognitive instruction make a difference on students' mathematical conceptions and alternative conceptions。Learning and Instruction，14，593-619。  new window
14.Kramarski, B.、Mevarech, Z. R.(2003)。Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training。American Educational Research Journal，40(1)，281-310。  new window
15.Leutwyler, B.(2009)。Metacognitive learning strategies: Differential development patterns in high school。Metacognition and Learning，4，111-123。  new window
16.Mok, Y. F.、Fan, R. M.、Pang, N. S.(2007)。Developmental patterns of school students' motivational and cognitive-metacognitive competencies。Educational Studies，33，81-89。  new window
17.Muis, K. R.、Winne, P. H.、Jamieson-Noel, D.(2007)。Using a multitrait-multi method analysis to examine conceptual similarities of three self-regulated learning inventories。British Journal of Educational Psychology，77，177-195。  new window
18.Nimon, K.、Reio, T. J.(2011)。Measurement invariance: A foundational principle for quantitative theory building。Human Resource Development Review，10，198-214。  new window
19.O'Neil, H. F.、Brown, R. S.(1998)。Differential effects of question formats in math assessment on metacognition and affect。Applied Measurement in Education，11，331-351。  new window
20.Pennequin, V.、Sorel, O.、Nanty, I.、Fontaine, R.(2010)。Metacognition and low achievement in mathematics: The effect of training in the use of metacognitive skills to solve mathematical word problems。Thinking and Reasoning，16(3)，198-220。  new window
21.Poitras, E.、Lajoie, S.、Hong, Y. J.(2012)。The design of technology-rich learning environments as metacognitive tools in history education。Instructional Science，40，1033-1061。  new window
22.Pressley, M.、Gaskins, I. W.(2006)。Metacognitively competent reading comprehension is constructively responsive reading: How can such reading be developed in students。Metacognition and Learning，1，99-113。  new window
23.Rickey, D.、Stacy, A. M.(2000)。The role of metacognition in learning chemistry。Journal of Chemical Education，77(7)，915-919。  new window
24.Rosenzweig, C.、Krawec, J.、Montague, M.(2011)。Metacognitive strategy use of eighth-grade students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving: Think-aloud analysis。Journal of Learning Disabilities，44，508-520。  new window
25.Schwartz, B. L.、Metcalfe, J.(1992)。Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of -knowing judgments。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition，18，1074-1083。  new window
26.Sperling, R. A.、Howard, B. C.、Miller, L. A.、Murphy, C.(2002)。Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition。Contemporary Educational Psychology，27，51-79。  new window
27.Steinmetz, H.、Schmidt, P.、Tina-Booh, A.、Wieczorek, S.、Schwartz, S. H.(2009)。Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement。Quality and Quantity，43，599-616。  new window
28.Veenman, M. V. J.、Spaans, M. A.(2005)。Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences。Learning and Individual Differences，15，159-176。  new window
29.Clark, L. A.、Watson, D.(1995)。Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development。Psychological Assessment，7(3)，309-319。  new window
30.Kelemen, W. L.、Frost, P. J.、Weaver, C. A. I.(2000)。Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability。Memory and Cognition，28，92-107。  new window
31.Veenman, M. V. J.、van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M.、Afflerbach, P.(2006)。Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations。Metacognition and Learning，1(1)，3-14。  new window
32.Schraw, G.、Dennison, R. S.(1994)。Assessing metacognitive awareness。Contemporary Educational Psychology，19(4)，460-475。  new window
33.Garofalo, J.、Lester, F. K. Jr.(1985)。Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education，16(3)，163-176。  new window
34.Sass, D. A.(2011)。Testing Measurement Invariance and Comparing Latent Factor Means within a Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework。Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment，29(4)，347-363。  new window
35.Wang, Margaret C.、Haertel, G. D.、Walberg, H. J.(1990)。What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature。Journal of Educational Research，84(1)，30-43。  new window
36.蘇宜芬、林清山(19920600)。後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀理解能力與後設認知能力之影響。教育心理學報，25，245-267。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.陳李綢(19920600)。國小男女生後設認知能力與數學作業表現的關係研究。教育心理學報，25，97-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Zimmerman, Barry J.、Martinez-Pons, Manuel(1990)。Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use。Journal of Educational Psychology，82(1)，51-59。  new window
39.Mokhtari, Kouider、Reichard, Carla A.(2002)。Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies。Journal of Educational Psychology，94(2)，249-259。  new window
40.Cheung, Gordon W.、Rensvold, Roger B.(2002)。Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，9(2)，233-255。  new window
41.Cross, D. R.、Paris, S. G.(1988)。Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension。Journal of Educational Psychology，80(2)，131-142。  new window
42.Schraw, G.、Moshman, D.(1995)。Metacognitive theories。Educational Psychology Review，7(4)，351-371。  new window
43.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，16(1)，74-94。  new window
44.Noar, S. M.(2003)。The role of structural equation modeling in scale development。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，10(4)，622-647。  new window
45.O'connor, Brian P.(2000)。SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test。Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers，32(3)，396-402。  new window
46.林清山、張景媛(19930700)。國中生後設認知、動機信念與數學解題策略之關係研究。教育心理學報，26，53-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.Jackson, D. L.、Gillaspy, J. A. Jr.、Purc-Stephenson, R.(2009)。Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations。Psychological Methods，14(1)，6-23。  new window
會議論文
1.Panaoura, A.、Philippou, G.(2003)。The construct validity of an inventory for the measurement of young pupils' metacognitive abilities in mathematics。Honolulu, HI。437-444。  new window
圖書
1.Pett, M. A.、Lackey, N. R.、Sullivan, J. J.(2003)。Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research。Sage。  new window
2.Lester, P.、Bishop, L. K.(2000)。Handbook of tests and measurement in education and the social sciences。Lanham, MD：The Scarecrow Press。  new window
3.Larkin, S.(2010)。Metacognition in young children。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
4.Ministry of Education, Singapore(2000)。Curriculum planning and development division, Ministry of Education 2001-Mathematics syllabus (primary)。Singapore, Singapore：Ministry of Education。  new window
5.Kline, R. B.(2011)。Principle and practice of structural equation modeling。New York, NY：Guilford Press。  new window
6.Schumacker, R. E.、Lomax, R. G.(1996)。A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling。Mahwah, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers。  new window
7.Stevens, J. P.(2002)。Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
8.涂金堂(2012)。量表編製與SPSS。五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.Schoenfeld, A. H.(1985)。Mathematical problem solving。Orlando, Florida。  new window
10.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1994)。Psychological theory。MacGraw-Hill。  new window
11.余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
12.Spector, Paul E.(1992)。Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction。SAGE Publications。  new window
13.Hair, J. F.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R.、Black, W. C.、Babin, B. J.(2010)。Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings。Prentice Hall International。  new window
圖書論文
1.Desoete, A.、Veenman, M.(2006)。Metacognition in mathematics: Critical issues in nature, theory, assessment and treatment。Metacognition in mathematics education。New York, NY：Nova Science。  new window
2.Flavell, J. H.(1987)。Speculation about the nature and development of meatcognition。Metacognition, motivation, and understanding。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。  new window
3.Lester, F. K.(1982)。Building bridges between psychological and mathematical education research on problem solving。Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research。Philadelphia, PA：The Franklin Institute。  new window
4.Silver, E. A.(1985)。Research on teaching mathematical problem solving: Some underrepresented themes and needed directions。Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Flavell, J. H.(1976)。Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving。The Nature of Intelligence。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：584（臺灣：577，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2516201 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68310329
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上