《憲法》第16條保障人民的權利救濟請求權，當人民的權利遭受侵犯時，國家就應提供人民相應的救濟途徑，也因此才能呼應「有權利必有救濟」的基本要求。然而長久以來，高級中等以下學校學生與學校之間的關係都被認為是特別權力關係，在此範圍內，行政主體得於無具體法律的依據，限制或剝奪人民的權利，且高級中等以下學校學生原則上亦不得享有救濟的權利。時至今日，自2016年發生的華岡藝校案可以發現，縱使釋字第382號、第684號解釋已盡力破除特別權力關係對學生的限制，目前高級中等以下學校學生的權利救濟請求權仍然受到不合理的限制，特別權力關係在學校中仍持續發生作用，相關爭議並未獲得平息。因此，本文將透過華岡藝校案此一事件，據以提出高級中等以下學校學生權利救濟請求權的問題，接著論述其背後的法基礎、理論等，最後則以《憲法》第16條權利救濟請求權的保障內涵來分析此爭議事件。

Article 16 of Taiwanese Constitution protects the right of instituting legal proceedings. When the people’s fundamental rights are interfered, the state should provide them relief ways to meet the “Where there is a right there is a remedy.” basic requirement. However, in Taiwan the relationships between school students and schools have been considered as special authority relationships for a long time. And it means that in this field subject of administration can restrict or deprive people’s right without positive law basis, and school students do not have the right of instituting legal proceedings in principle. In Hwa Kang Art School case we can find that the right of instituting legal proceedings of school students is still restricted by irrational rules and regulations, even though the J.Y. Interpretation No.382. and No. 684. have done their best to get rid of the restriction which is based on special authority relationships. Therefore, firstly this article will bring up legal arguments about this case; Secondly, this article will analyze the legal basis and theory behind these questions. Finally, this article will review and analyze this case from Article 16 of Taiwanese Constitution.