:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探討高中學生於建模導向科學探究之學習成效
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:蔡哲銘邱美虹曾茂仁謝東霖
作者(外文):Tsai, Che-mingChiu, Mei-hungZeng, Mao-renHsieh, Tung-lin
出版日期:2019
卷期:27:4
頁次:頁207-228
主題關鍵詞:建模探究與實作模型ModelingInquiry and practiceModel
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:52
  • 點閱點閱:3
期刊論文
1.Halloun, I. A.(1996)。Schematic modeling for meaningful learning of physics。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33(9),1019-1041。  new window
2.Justi, Rosária、Gilbert, John K.(2003)。Teachers' views on the nature of models。International Journal of Science Education,25(11),1369-1386。  new window
3.Krajcik, J. S.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Marx, R. W.、Bass, K. M.、Fredricks, J.、Soloway, E.(1998)。Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students。The Journal of the Learning Sciences,7(3/4),313-350。  new window
4.Justi, R. S.、Gilbert, J. K.(2000)。History and philosophy of science through models: Some challenges in the case of 'the atom'。International Journal of Science Education,22(9),993-1009。  new window
5.Van Driel, J. H.、Verloop, N.(2002)。Experienced teachers knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education。International Journal of Science Education,24(12),1255-1272。  new window
6.Sins, P. H. M.、Savelsbergh, E. R.、Van Joolingen, W. R.、Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M.(2009)。The relation between students' epistemological understanding of computer models and their cognitive processing on a modelling task。International Journal of Science Education,31(9),1205-1229。  new window
7.謝州恩、吳心楷(20051000)。探究情境中國小學童科學解釋能力成長之研究。師大學報. 科學教育類,50(2),55-84。  延伸查詢new window
8.鐘建坪(20100500)。引導式建模探究教學架構初探。科學教育,328,2-18。  延伸查詢new window
9.Schwarz, C. V.、White, B. Y.(2005)。Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling。Cognition and Instruction,23(2),165-205。  new window
10.Treagust, D. F.、Chittleborough, G.、Mamiala, T. L.(2002)。Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science。International Journal of Science Education,24(4),357-368。  new window
11.邱美虹(20080300)。模型與建模能力之理論架構。科學教育,306,2-8。  延伸查詢new window
12.Harrison, A. G.、Treagust, D. F.(2000)。Learning about atom, molecules, and chemical bonds: a case study of multiple--model use in grade 11 chemistry。Science Education,84(3),352-381。  new window
13.Justi, R.、Gilbert, J. K.(2002)。Philosophy of chemistry in university chemical education: the case of models and modelling。Foundations of Chemistry,4,213-240。  new window
14.Grosslight, L.、Unger, C.、Jay, E.、Smith, C. L.(1991)。Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,28(9),799-822。  new window
15.邱美虹、劉俊庚(20081100)。從科學學習的觀點探討模型與建模能力。科學教育,314,2-20。  延伸查詢new window
16.Martin-Hansen, L.(2002)。Defining inquiry。The Science Teacher,69(2),34-37。  new window
17.Gobert, J. D.、Buckley, B. C.(2000)。Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education。International Journal of Science Education,22(9),891-894。  new window
18.White, B. Y.、Frederiksen, J. R.(1998)。Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students。Cognition and Instruction,16(1),3-118。  new window
19.Namdar, B.、Shen, J.(2015)。Modeling-oriented assessment in K-12 science education: A synthesis of research from 1980 to 2013 and new directions。International Journal of Science Education,37(7),993-1023。  new window
20.吳百興、張耀云、吳心楷(20100300)。科學探究活動中的科學推理。科學教育研究與發展季刊,56,53-74。  延伸查詢new window
21.Schwarz, C. V.、Reiser, B. J.、Davis, E. A.、Kenyon, L.、Achér, A.、Fortus, D.、Shwartz, Y.、Hug, B.、Krajcik, J.(2009)。Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(6),632-654。  new window
22.張志康、邱美虹(20090800)。建模能力分析指標的發展與應用--以電化學為例。科學教育學刊,17(4),319-342。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Jong, J.-P.、Chiu, M.-H.、Chung, S.-L.(2015)。The use of modeling-based text to improve students' modeling competencies。Science Education,99(5),986-1018。  new window
24.劉湘瑤(2016)。科學探究的教學與評量。科學研習月刊,55(2),5-11。  延伸查詢new window
25.Gibson, H. L.、Chase, C.(2002)。Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science。Science Education,86(5),693-705。  new window
26.Windschitl, M.(2003)。Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?。Science Education,87(1),112-143。  new window
27.邱美虹(2016)。科學模型與建模:科學模型、科學建模與建模能力。臺灣化學教育,11。  延伸查詢new window
28.Cheng, M.-F.、Lin, J.-L.(2015)。Investigating the relationship between students' views of scientific models and their development of models。International Journal of Science Education,37(15),2453-2475。  new window
29.Chiu, M.-H.、Lin, J.-W.(2019)。Modeling competence in science education。Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research,1(1),1-11。  new window
30.洪振方(20031200)。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報,15(3),641-662。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Windschitl, M.、Thompson, J.、Braaten, M.(2008)。Beyond the scientific method: model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations。Science Education,92(5),941-967。  new window
學位論文
1.劉俊庚(2011)。探討模型與建模對於學生原子概念學習之影響(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Halloun, I. A.(2006)。Modeling Theory in Science Education。Springer。  new window
2.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
3.Dewey, J.(1910)。How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process。Boston, MA:D.C. Heath。  new window
4.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
其他
1.Next Generation Science Standards(2013)。Get to know the standards,http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hestenes, D.(1995)。Modeling software for learning and doing physics。Thinking physics for teaching。New York:Plenum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE