臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探
書刊名：高雄師大學報
作者：洪振方 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hung, Jeng-fung
出版日期：2003
卷期：15:3
頁次：頁641-662
主題關鍵詞：創造性探究；探究教學；科學教學；Creative inquiry；Inquiry teaching；Science teaching
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(28) 博士論文(12) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:28
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:261
　　　　　本文的主要目的在整合美國國家研究委員會出版之《探究與國家科學教育標準》（2000）中的科學探究教學模式以及Treffinger、Isaksen和Dorval（1994）所建立的創造性問題解決模式，提出「創造性探究模式」，以回應教育部所公佈之「國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要」和「創造力教育白皮書」二個啟動教育改革工程的重要文件，以及全國第一次科學教育會議對「科學教育目標、現況與前瞻」的檢討。首先，本文將對探究式教學作歷史的回顧；其次討論當時之探究式教學的成效與面臨的困境；接著說明探究式教學再次興起的理由；以及現今之探究式教學的內涵與特性；再轉到探討創造性問題解決模式及其成效，最後，嘗試作整合以提出創造性探究模式。
　　　　　The main purpose of this study was to integrate the "scientific inquiry teaching model" presented in the "Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards" published by National Research Council in 2000, with the "Creative Problem Solving-CPS," which was suggested by Treffinger, Isaksen and Dorval in 1994, to propose a "Creative Inquiry Model, CIM" in response to the two important educational reform activating documents raised by the Ministry of Education: (1)Nine-year integrated curriculum outlines of primary and secondary schools, (2)White Paper on Creative Education, and the reflections of "The objectives, current situations and foresight of science education" proposed in the national first science education meeting in Taiwan. First, this study conducted a historical review of "inquiry teaching." Secondly, the effects of and difficulties faced by those "inquiry teaching" were discussed. Thirdly, the reasons why "inquiry teaching" is flourishing again as well as the implications and characteristics of present inquiry teaching were al explained. Furthermore, Creative problem solving model and its effectiveness were investigated. Finally, an integration of these two models was experimentally conducted to propose a "Creative Inquiry Model, CIM."
期刊論文
1.Shymansky, J.(1984)。BSCS programs: Just how effective were they?。American Biology Teacher，46(1)，54-57。  new window
2.Crawford, Barbara A.(2000)。Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，37(9)，916-937。  new window
3.Keys, Carolyn W.、Bryan, Lynn A.(2001)。Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching，38(6)，631-645。  new window
4.Isaksen, Scott G.、Parnes, Sidney J.(1985)。Curriculum planning for creative thinking and problem solving。The Journal of Creative Behavior，19(1)，1-29。  new window
5.湯偉君、邱美虹(19991000)。創造性問題解決(CPS)模式的沿革與應用。科學教育，223，2-20。  延伸查詢new window
6.Costenson, K.、Lawson, A. E.(1986)。Why Isn't Inquiry Used in More Classroom?。American Biology Teacher，48(3)，150-158。  new window
7.Cox-Petersen, A. M.(2001)。Empowering Science Teachers as Researchers and Inquires。Journal of Science Teacher Education，12(2)，107-122。  new window
8.Firestien, R. L.、Lunken, H. P.(1993)。Assessment of the Long Term Effects of the Master of Science Degree in Creative Studies on Its Graduates。The Journal of Creative Behavior，27(3)，188-199。  new window
9.Gagne, R.(1963)。The Learning Requirements for Enquiry。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，1，144-153。  new window
10.Hogan, K.、Berkowitz, A. R.(2000)。Teachers as Inquiry Learners。Journal of Science Teacher Education，11(1)，1-25。  new window
11.Hurd, P. D.、Bybee, R. W.、Kahle, J. B.、Yager, R. E.(1980)。Biology Education in Secondary Schools of the United States。American Biology Teacher，42(7)，388-410。  new window
12.Lott, G. W.(1983)。The effect of Inquiry Teaching and Advance Organizers upon Student Outcomes in Science Education。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，20(5)。  new window
圖書
1.Lawson, A. E.(1995)。Science teaching and development of thinking。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth。  new window
2.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程總綱。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2002)。全國第一次科學教育會議資料。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Wellington, J.、Henderson, J.、Lally, V.、Scaife, J.、Knutton, S.、Nott, M.(1994)。Secondary Science - Contemporary Issues and Practical Approaches。London ; New York：Routledge。  new window
5.Dewey, J.(1933)。How we think: Restatement of the reflective thinking to the educative process。D. C. Health。  new window
6.Osborn, A. F.(1953)。Applied imagination。New York：Scribner。  new window
7.Wallas, G.(1926)。The art of thought。London：Jonathan Cape。  new window
8.Laudan, Larry(1992)。Progress and its problems: toward a theory of scientific growth。Berkeley。  new window
9.Harms, N. C.、Yager, R. E.(1981)。What research says to the science teacher。Washington, DC：National Science Teachers Association。  new window
10.Trowbridge, Leslie W.、Powell, Janet Carlson、Bybee, Rodger W.(2000)。Teaching Secondary School Science Strategies for Developing Scientific Literacy。NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
11.Joyce, B.、Weil, M.(1996)。Models of Teaching。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
12.Bruner, J. S.(1960)。The process of education。New York, NY：Vintage Books。  new window
13.教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
14.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
15.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
16.Treffinger, D. J.、Isaksen, S. G.、Dorval, K. B.(1992)。Creative Problem Solving--An Introduction。Buffalo：Center for Creative Learning。  new window
17.Bybee, R. W.、DeBoer, G.(1993)。Goals for the Science Curriculum。Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning。Washington, DC：National Science Teachers Association。  new window
18.Educational Policies Commission(1961)。The Central Purpose of American Education。The Central Purpose of American Education。Washington, DC。  new window
19.Halpern, D. F.(1984)。Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking。Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
20.Gopnik, A.、Meltzoff, A. N.、Kuhl, P. K.、黃馨慧(2000)。搖籃裡的科學家－心智、大腦與幼兒學習歷程的新發現。搖籃裡的科學家－心智、大腦與幼兒學習歷程的新發現。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.Howe, R.(1997)。創造性思考教學研討會研習手冊。創造性思考教學研討會研習手冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
22.Karplus, R.、Their, H.(1968)。A New Look at Elementary School Science。A New Look at Elementary School Science。Chicago, IL。  new window
23.Marzano, R. J.、Brandt, R. S.、Hughes, C. S.、Jones, B. F.、Presseisen, B. Z.、Rankin, S. C.、Suhor, C.(1989)。Dimensions of Thinking - A Framework for Curriculum and Instruction。Dimensions of Thinking - A Framework for Curriculum and Instruction。Alexandria, VA。  new window
24.Stake, R. E.、Easley, J. A.(1978)。Case Studies in Science Education。Case Studies in Science Education。Urbana, IL。  new window
25.Torrence, E. P.(1967)。Scientific Views of Creativity and Factors Affecting Its Growth。Creativity and Learning。Boston, MA。  new window
26.Weiss, I. R.(1978)。Report of the 1977 National Survey of Science, Mathematics, and Social Studies Education。Report of the 1977 National Survey of Science, Mathematics, and Social Studies Education。Washington, DC。  new window
其他
1.Torrance, E. P.(1972)。Can We Teach Children to Think Creatively，沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.Treffinger, D. J.、Isaksen, S. G.、Dorval, K. B.(1994)。Creative Problem Solving: An Overview。Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity。Norwood, New Jersey：Ablex Publishing Corporation。  new window
2.Schwab, J. J.(1962)。The Teaching of Science as Enquiry。The teaching of science: The teaching of science as enquiry。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1119（臺灣：1098，外國：21） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67398839
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上