臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：整合性過程導向寫作教學法對國小兒童寫作品質及寫作歷程的影響
書刊名：師大學報
作者：郭生玉／陳鳳如 引用關係
出版日期：1995
卷期：40
頁次：頁1-35
主題關鍵詞：寫作；教學法；國小；兒童；寫作品質；寫作歷程
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:52
  • 點閱點閱:47
　　　　　本研究的主要目的在探討整合性過程導向寫作教學法對國小兒童之寫 作品質、寫作品質之遷移效果及寫作歷程的影響，並分析教學成效是否因先前語 文能力不同而有差異。另外亦進一步探討此寫作教學之教學內容與教學策略漸次 介入的成效，以提供簡化此套寫作教學的參考。本研究對象係自台北縣新莊國小 四年級全體學生中，依其先前語文能力分為低、中、高三個等級。再就先前語文 能力高低及人數比例，分居隨機抽取低語文能力者28名、中語文能力者26名、 高語文能力者26名，並隨機分派各語文能力水準者半數至實驗組，半數至控制 組。實驗組學生接受每週一次，每次80分鐘，共計十二次的整合性過程導向寫 作教學，控制組學生則接受一般寫作教學，而後比較實驗組和控制組學生在記敘 文之寫作品質、說明文之寫作品質及寫作歷程上的差異。研究結果發現:1整合性 過程導向寫作教拳法對國小兒童在記敘文的寫作品質及寫作歷程上，均具有增進 的效果，但對說明文的寫作品質，未具遷移效果;2就記敘文之寫作品質、說明文 之寫作品質及寫作歷程之「計畫階段」、「轉譯階段」與「回顧階段」而言，整 合性過程導向寫作教學法的教學效果，並不因先前語文能力水準的不同而有差異 存在;3實驗組學生在記敘文的寫作品質，隨著寫作教學次數的增加而有漸增的現 象，控制組則無。
　　　　　The purposes of this reasearch are to investigate (l)the main effects of the " ProcessOriented Writing Teaching Program (POWTP)" on the quality and process of writing,(2)the effects of POWTP on the children of different language abilities, and (3)the progressive effects of the teaching contents and teaching strategies of the POWTP. Thefeasibility of the program for elementary students' writing instruction is also explored. This study adopts the two-factor experimental design. The subjects are 80 fourthgrade students, random selected from an elementary school in Taipei County. Then theyare randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group receive twelve weeks POWTP and the control group did not receive thespecial training program. Three instruments are used in this study. They are Writing Scaling, Expository Writing Scaling, and Writing Process Interview Scaling. The obtained data are analyzed by two-way ANOVA to test the writing performanceprogress and tansfer effects of the program, and by two-way mixed design ANOVA totest the gradual effect of the program.The findings are as follows:1. The POWTP has positive and optimistical effect. Through POWPT, two writing variables, the quality and process of writing, have got significant difference, but shows no significant transferring effects on the improvement of expository writing.2. There is no interaction between "group" and "ability" on all dependent variables. In terms of the teaching effect of POWTP on the children of different language abilities, the experimental group is better than control group.3. There is interaction between "group" and "assessment stage" on the quality of writing. In the experimental group, the quality of writing would increase gradually with the exposure of POWTP. The results are discussed and there are some suggestions about the program andsuggestions for the future research.
期刊論文
1.Mayer, R. E.(1989)。Models for understanding。Review of Educational Research，59(1)，43-64。  new window
2.Englert, C. S.、Raphael, T. E.、Fear, K. L.、Anderson, L. M.(1988)。Student's metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts。Learning Disability Quarterly，11，18-46。  new window
3.Faigley, L.、Witte, S.(1981)。Analyzing revision。College Composition and Communication，32，400-415。  new window
4.Matsuhashi, A.(1981)。Pausing and planning: The tempo of written discourse production。Research in the Teaching of English，15(2)，113-134。  new window
5.黃昆輝(1979)。國民小學國語文教學績效之調查研究。師大教育研究所集刊，21，193-250。  延伸查詢new window
6.張新仁(1989)。學習策略訓練之初探。教育文粹，18，86- 94。  延伸查詢new window
7.簡楚瑛、王萬清(1988)。同儕互動對國小學生寫作能力之影響。台南師院初等教育學報，1，143-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bennett, N.、Cass, A.(1988)。The effects of group composition on group interactive processes and pupil understanding。British Educational Research Journa，15(1)，19-32。  new window
9.Bracewell, R.、Scardamalia, M.、Bereiter, C.(1978)。The development of audience awareness in writing。Resources in Education，154-433。  new window
10.Dipardo, A.、Freedman, S. W.(1988)。Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic Foundations and new directions。Review of Educational Research，58(2)，119-149。  new window
11.Englert, C. S.、Raphael, T. E.、Anderson, L. M.、Anthony, H. M.、Stevens, D. D.(1991)。Making Strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classroom。American Educational Research Journal，28，337-372。  new window
12.Graves, Donald H.、Murray, Donald M.(1980)。Revision: In the writer's workshop and in the classroom。Journal of Education，162(2)，38-56。  new window
13.Hayes, J. R.、Flower, L. S.(1986)。Writing research and the writer。American Psychologist，41(10)，1106-1113。  new window
14.Hillocks, G. J.(1984)。What works in teaching composition: a meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies。American Journal of Education，93，33-170。  new window
15.Katstra, J.、Tollefson, N.、Gilbert, E.(1987)。The effects of peer evaluation on attitude toward writing and writing fluency of ninth grade students。Journal of Education Research，80(3)，168-172。  new window
16.Pianko, S.(1979)。Description of the composing process of college freshman writers。Research in the Teaching of English，13，5-22。  new window
17.Sommers, N.(1980)。Revision strategies of student writers and experienced writers。College Composition and Communication，31，378-387。  new window
18.Stallard, C.(1974)。An analysis of the writing behavior of good student writers。Research in the Teaching of English，8，206-218。  new window
19.Voss, J. F.、Vesonder, G. T.、Spilich, G. J.(1980)。Text generation and recall by high- knowledge and low-knowledge individuals。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，19(6)，651-667。  new window
20.王萬清(19910600)。教師引導討論與小組討論對兒童寫作能力之影響研究。臺南師院學報，24，161-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Flower, L. S.、Hayes, J. R.(1977)。Problem-solving strategies and the writing process。College English，39(4)，449-461。  new window
22.Hillocks, George Jr.(1987)。Synthesis of Research on Teaching Writing。Educational Leadership，44(8)，71-82。  new window
23.Bridwell, Lillian S.(1980)。Revising Strategies in Twelfth Grade Students' Transactional Writing。Research in the Teaching of English，14(3)，197-222。  new window
會議論文
1.李麗霞(1987)。看圖作文教學法與創造性主動作文教學法對國小學童早期作文能力發展之影響。七十六年國小課程研究學術研討會。國教研習會。119-129。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳錦釵(1990)。寫作歷程探討與其在教學上的意義。七十八學年度台灣省教育學術論文發表會。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭昭明(1987)。知識的傳遞與理解歷程。行政院國家科學委具會研討會，50-70。  延伸查詢new window
4.Atwell, M. A.(1981)。The evolution of text: The interrelationship of reading and writing in the composing process。Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English，(會議日期: November, 1981)。Boston。  new window
5.Berkenkotter, C.(1982)。A writer and a researcher talk about composing。Conference of College Composition and Communication，(會議日期: March, 1982)。San Francisco。  new window
研究報告
1.張新仁(1992)。「過程導向寫作教學法」對國小學童之訓練成效。  延伸查詢new window
2.Raphael, T. E.、Englert, C. S.、Kirschner, B. W.(1986)。The impact of text sturcture instruction and social context on students' comprehension and production of expository text。East Lansig：Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching。  new window
學位論文
1.王萬清(1992)。寫作教學初學者之教學內容知識結構及其改變歷程研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林建平(1984)。作文和繪畫創造性教學方案對國小四年級學生創造力之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡榮昌(1979)。作文教學探究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡銘津(1991)。寫作過程教學法對國小學童寫作成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.紀惠英(1991)。國小六年級學生應用問題表徵類型輿同構性之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉錫麒(1991)。合作反省思考的數學解題教學模式及其實徵研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Britton, J.、Burgess, T.、Martin, M.、McLeod, A.、Rosen, H.(1975)。The development of writing abilities。London：Macmillan Education。  new window
2.杜淑貞(1986)。國小作文教學探究。台北：學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Applebee, A. N.(1981)。Writing in the secondary school。Urbana, IL：National Council of Teachers of English。  new window
4.Gagné, R. M.(1985)。The Conditions of learning and theory of instruction。New York：Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
5.Mason, E.(1973)。Collaborative learning。New York：Schocken Books。  new window
圖書論文
1.歐陽教(1987)。教學的哲學分析。教學研究專輯。台北：南宏圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Beach, R.、Eaton, S.(1984)。Factors influencing self-assessing and revising by college freshmen。New directions in composition research。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
3.Flower, L. S.、Hayes, J. R.(1980)。The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints。Cognitive processes in writing。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
4.Gould, J. D.(1980)。Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations。Cognitive processes in writing。Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum。  new window
5.Hayes, J. R.、Flower, L. S.(1980)。Identifying the organization of writing processes。Cognitive processes in writing。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
6.Scardamalia, M.、Bereiter, C.、Goelman, H.(1982)。The role of production factors in writing ability。What writers Know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：378（臺灣：378，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1885225 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67680368
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上